Magnetisation — where it appears
Named by 14 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The magnet that has to fight its own field
A bar magnet's own poles put it in a reverse field, so the same material cut short and fat is weak and cut long and thin is strong. And a magnetised material does not have a magnetisation — it has a magnetisation and a history, which is why the word for what it does is the Greek for coming late.
The magnetism classical physics forbids
Write down the partition function of any collection of classical charges in a magnetic field, and the field cancels out. Not approximately, not to leading order — the integral is over all of momentum space and the field only shifts where the middle of it is. So classical statistical mechanics predicts no paramagnetism, no diamagnetism and no ferromagnetism, and a compass needle is a quantum instrument.
The staircase that never reaches the floor
Absolute zero is unreachable, and the reason is not that the apparatus is not good enough. Every stage of cooling removes a fixed fraction of what is left rather than a fixed amount, so the steps shrink in proportion to the distance remaining — and the fixed fraction cannot be made one, because the entropy curves at two field strengths are required to meet where the axis is.
The curve that is really a staircase
A magnetisation curve is drawn as a smooth line and is nothing of the sort. Measured finely enough it is a sequence of jumps of every size, audible as a crackle in a coil, with no typical jump and no smooth motion underneath.
A law about spectra, not about heat
The third law is usually met as a statement about cooling. Its statistical form is a statement about a spectrum: the entropy of a system in its ground state is k ln g, and it vanishes only when the ground state is unique. Every apparent exception is a degeneracy or a system that never reached its ground state — and copper nuclei carry eleven joules per kelvin per mole down to a hundred nanokelvin without violating anything.
What holds a magnet together is not magnetism
Two neighbouring moments in iron interact magnetically with an energy worth a fifth of a kelvin, and iron keeps its order to 1,043 kelvin. Whatever aligns them is five thousand times stronger than the only force they exert on one another — and it is electrostatic, with the exclusion principle deciding which of two spatial arrangements two electrons may use.
The first length that belongs to the substance
Every length in magnetism so far has been a length of the sample — a demagnetising factor is a shape, an avalanche cutoff is a sample's own restoring field. A domain wall's width is not. It is √(A/K), made of two material constants and nothing else, and across seven ordinary magnets it runs from two and a half nanometres to nine hundred.
Nothing keeps a magnetisation for ever
A magnetised particle sits in a well with a barrier between it and the other direction, and a barrier of finite height is crossed eventually. So remanence has a lifetime, coercivity is a different number depending on how fast it is measured, and a grain below about twenty nanometres of iron forgets within a second at room temperature.
The field that points against the magnet it is in
There are two magnetic fields in use and the difference between them is which currents a loop is allowed to count. The consequence nobody expects on being told the definitions: inside a permanent magnet H points the other way from B. It has to — a loop inside the magnet threads no wire, so its H circulation is zero, and the only arrangement left has H running backwards.
The current no particle carries
A magnetised plasma holds its own pressure against the field only if a current flows across the pressure gradient, and the fluid equations say exactly how much. Follow the particles in a uniform field and none of them is going anywhere; every guiding centre is still. The current is real all the same. It is made of circles that are more crowded on one side of a line than the other, and when the field is not uniform, the drifts that do move the guiding centres flow the wrong way.
The field a superconductor keeps after all
A superconductor is famous for throwing magnetic field out, and the experiment that showed it is the one that made superconductivity a state of matter. Most superconductors that are actually used do something closer to the opposite: they let the field in as threads, grip the threads where they are, and keep them when the field is taken away. The result is a slope of field inside the material that is as steep as the grip allows and no steeper, which is all that is needed to explain why such a superconductor has a hysteresis loop, heats up in an alternating field, can hang a magnet underneath itself, and can be made into a magnet stronger than any of iron.
The magnets that put their whole field on one side
Lay bar magnets in a row, each turned a quarter turn from the last, and the row's field appears almost entirely on one side, with almost nothing on the other — although every magnet in it, alone, is perfectly symmetric. Turn the magnetisation smoothly instead of in steps and the weak side has no field at all, exactly. Nothing is shielding it. The two halves of the pattern each make a symmetric field, and their fields line up on one side and cancel on the other, because a magnetisation that turns as it goes can only make the field that decays in one direction.
The voltage a moving magnet adds to an insulator
Spin a hollow cylinder of insulator in a magnetic field along its axis and a voltage appears between its inner and outer surfaces, because every piece of it is moving through the field. How large that voltage is turns out to depend on whether the insulator is magnetic, and the dependence was predicted by one theory and missed by the other. Maxwell's equations hold in a moving material only if the material's response is written in its own frame and carried into the laboratory by relativity — and then a moving magnet is also an electric dipole.
The rod that turns when its magnetism flips
Hang an iron rod on a thin fibre inside a coil, reverse the current, and the rod turns a little. Nothing has pushed it sideways: reversing the magnetisation reversed the angular momentum the electrons inside it carry, and since nothing outside can twist the rod about its axis, the iron lattice has to take up the difference. Einstein and de Haas did it in 1915 to prove that magnetism is electric charge going round. They got the right effect and the wrong number, and the right number — twice what they expected — was evidence, years before anyone proposed it, that the electron's magnetism comes from something that is not a rotation at all.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
HysteresisCoercivityDemagnetising fieldAngular momentumConstitutive lawDegeneracyDiamagnetismDomain wallEntropyEquilibriumExchange interactionFerromagnetism