Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Ferromagnetism — where it appears

The ordering of atomic moments into parallel alignment with no applied field, held by an exchange interaction that is electrostatic rather than magnetic. Iron orders at 1,043 K where the magnetic interaction between neighbouring moments is worth a fifth of a kelvin, which is why the alignment cannot be magnetic in origin.

Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The hole that holds exactly one particle. How likely a second particle is to be found a distance away from a first, relative to a gas with no correlation at all, for three cases that differ in nothing but the symmetry of the state under swapping the two labels. There is no interaction anywhere in this calculation: no Coulomb term, no potential, no force. Distinguishable particles give a flat line, which is what no interaction ought to give. Identical fermions dig a hole that reaches exactly zero at zero separation and fills back in over about a wavelength. Identical bosons do the opposite and pile up to twice the density. Integrating the fermion hole gives 0.9992 particles missing from around each one — exactly one, and the sum rule holds at any density, because raising the density narrows the hole in exact proportion. That is what makes the effect worth a name of its own. It is often called an exchange force and it is not a force: nothing carries momentum between the particles, and no term in the energy is proportional to a distance. It is a statement about which states exist. What follows from it is most of chemistry — the reason two atoms with filled shells repel, the reason a metal's electrons cost so much less Coulomb energy than a random arrangement would, and the reason matter takes up room.

The force with no force in it

Two identical fermions keep apart and two identical bosons crowd together, and neither is being pushed. The Hamiltonian contains no interaction at all: what produces the hole and the pile is which many-particle states exist, and the hole it digs around each electron holds exactly one particle at any density whatever.

quantum · Exclusion The interaction that orders a magnet is not the magnetic one. For six ordered magnets, two temperatures on a logarithmic scale: the energy of the magnetic interaction between two neighbouring moments, expressed as a temperature, and the temperature at which the material actually orders. iron orders at 1043 K against a dipolar scale of 0.201 K, a factor of 5182; cobalt orders at 1394 K against a dipolar scale of 0.117 K, a factor of 11961; nickel orders at 627 K against a dipolar scale of 0.015 K, a factor of 42312; gadolinium orders at 293 K against a dipolar scale of 0.790 K, a factor of 371; europium oxide orders at 69 K against a dipolar scale of 0.615 K, a factor of 112; lithium holmium fluoride orders at 1.53 K against a dipolar scale of 1.230 K, a factor of 1.24. The five ferromagnets order between a hundred and forty thousand times above the only interaction their moments have with each other, so whatever aligns them is not magnetism. The sixth is the control: lithium holmium fluoride is a magnet whose ordering really is dipolar, and its two temperatures agree.

What holds a magnet together is not magnetism

Two neighbouring moments in iron interact magnetically with an energy worth a fifth of a kelvin, and iron keeps its order to 1,043 kelvin. Whatever aligns them is five thousand times stronger than the only force they exert on one another — and it is electrostatic, with the exclusion principle deciding which of two spatial arrangements two electrons may use.

electromagnetism · Magnetisation Reversing the magnetism in step with the swing. The rod hung from a fibre as a torsion pendulum with a period of 10 s and a quality factor of 200, its magnetisation reversed 40 times, once every half swing, in step with its motion, then left alone; the angle it turns through, integrated, in degrees. Each reversal adds the same small kick of angular momentum and the kicks add up, as pushes on a swing do: the swing grows to 15.46° if the magnetism is spin, 30.92° if it were orbital currents. A single reversal would turn the rod by about 0.45° — measurable in principle, buried in practice by the much larger twist that the coil's own field puts on any slight misalignment, which is why Einstein and de Haas drove the rod at its resonance and why their first result, g′ = 1, came out wrong.

The rod that turns when its magnetism flips

Hang an iron rod on a thin fibre inside a coil, reverse the current, and the rod turns a little. Nothing has pushed it sideways: reversing the magnetisation reversed the angular momentum the electrons inside it carry, and since nothing outside can twist the rod about its axis, the iron lattice has to take up the difference. Einstein and de Haas did it in 1915 to prove that magnetism is electric charge going round. They got the right effect and the wrong number, and the right number — twice what they expected — was evidence, years before anyone proposed it, that the electron's magnetism comes from something that is not a rotation at all.

quantum · Spin

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Exchange interactionMagnetisationPauli exclusionAngular momentumAntisymmetryBosonConservation lawsCovalent bondCurie temperatureDipole dipole interactionExchange holeFermion

All concepts