Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Angular momentum — where it appears

The conserved quantity of rotation, being mass times velocity times lever arm, which labels an orbit as a radius does and is changed only by a torque. Its conservation follows from space having no preferred direction, and it is why a skater pulling in spins faster and a planet sweeps equal areas.

Named by 39 essays across 7 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Released together on a 20° slope, 1.1 s later. 3 bodies of different shape, released from the same line on a 20 degree slope and drawn where each has reached after 1.1 seconds. The order is sphere, then disc, then hoop. Each spoke is turned by the distance that body has rolled divided by its radius.

The mass, and where it sits, which is what decides the race

Release a hoop and a marble together on a slope and the marble wins, whatever they weigh and whatever their size. Neither mass nor radius survives the arithmetic; only the arrangement does.

mechanics · Rotation The term that abolishes the inner orbits. The effective potential of the Schwarzschild geometry per unit mass, in units of c², at 4 angular momenta, against radius in Schwarzschild radii. Newton's version has a minimum — a stable circular orbit — at L̃²/GM for every angular momentum there is, however small, and it is the dashed curve at the same L̃, here with its minima at 10.13, 7.61, 6.00, 5.12 rs. General relativity adds one term, −GM L̃²/c²r³, and that minimum stops existing below a definite angular momentum. At L̃ = 4.50 GM/c the barrier and the well are still separate, at 1.83 and 8.29 rs. The two merge at L̃ = √12 GM/c, at 3 rs = 6GM/c² — the innermost stable circular orbit, where the curve drawn here has neither a maximum nor a minimum but a single inflection. Below that momentum — the curve at L̃ = 3.20 GM/c — there is no stationary point anywhere outside the horizon, so no circular orbit exists at all, at any angular momentum whatever. None of that is a property of matter; it is a statement about the geometry, and it fixes the energy of the innermost orbit at √(8/9) = 0.94281 of mc², so 5.719% of the rest mass has been radiated by anything that reached it. Every well drawn here was located on the emitted curve by golden section and checked against the closed form.

The orbit that cannot be made smaller

Newtonian gravity allows a stable circular path at every radius, however tight, and there is no innermost one. General relativity adds a single term to the expression that says so, and below 6GM/c² no stable circular path exists at any angular momentum whatever. Anything arriving there has radiated 5.72% of its rest mass, which is eight times what hydrogen fusion converts.

astrophysics · Orbit stability Every path the body can take, at one angular momentum. The angular momentum vector, drawn in the body's own frame on the sphere its length confines it to, for a body whose principal moments are 3.068e-3, 6.817e-3 and 9.750e-3 kg m². Each closed curve is one motion, traced by integrating Euler's equations rather than by solving for the intersection of the sphere with the energy ellipsoid, so a curve closes only if the physics closes it. The low-energy curves circle the greatest-moment axis and the high-energy ones circle the least; both sets are small loops that stay near their axis, which is what stability looks like. Between them is the one curve that is not a loop at all — four arcs, drawn heavier, meeting at the intermediate axis and leaving it again. A body spun about that axis is balanced on the crossing point of paths that go somewhere else, which is the whole of why it does not stay.

The axis that will not hold

A book spun about its long edge keeps spinning about it. Spun about the axis through its covers, it keeps spinning about that. Spun about the third axis, it flips end over end, again and again, with nothing touching it. Three numbers decide, and what matters is only their order.

mechanics · Rotation The same start, four force laws. Orbits under 4 different central force laws, every one started at the same radius with the same fraction — 0.72 — of the local circular speed, and every one integrated for 6 radial oscillations. The paths are drawn to different scales because the excursions differ; what is comparable between the panels is whether the curve retraces itself. Under the inverse square it does: the orbit is a closed ellipse and the sixth circuit lies exactly on the first. Under the linear force it does too, and the ellipse is centred on the source rather than focused on it. Under anything in between the path is a rosette that never closes, because the angle between successive closest approaches is not a rational fraction of a full turn. Those angles are 180.0° at n = -2, 145.9° at n = -1.5, 126.4° at n = -1, 90.0° at n = 1. The closure is not a matter of degree — a rosette that nearly closes is not nearly a closed orbit, since after enough circuits it fills the annulus.

The orbit that does not come back to itself

A bounded orbit under any central force oscillates between a smallest and a largest radius for ever. That it should also return to the same point is a further demand, and only two force laws in existence meet it — the inverse square, and the linear spring.

astrophysics · Orbit stability Arms in: 4.33× the rate, and 4.33× the energy. A body of 1.2 kg m² carrying two 4 kg masses on arms, spinning freely at 60 revolutions a minute with the arms out at 0.75 m, as the arms are pulled in to 0.12 m. The axis runs right to left, in the direction the arms move. Angular momentum is flat — nothing exerts a torque about the axis, and pulling inward is a force along a radius, which has no moment about the centre. The rate rises as the inverse of the moment of inertia, by a factor of 4.33 here, and the kinetic energy L²/2I rises by exactly the same factor, which is where the usual account stops and where the question starts. The fourth curve is the work done by whoever pulled the arms in, integrated from the force needed to hold each mass on its circle. It lies on the energy curve, to 1.6e-7 joules. Nothing is unaccounted for and nothing is created: the energy is bought, at full price, by pulling against the force that would otherwise fling the arms out.

The quantity that survives a change of shape

A skater pulls her arms in and spins four times faster. Angular momentum is conserved, which is the usual explanation, and it accounts for only half of what happened — because the kinetic energy has gone up by the same factor, and something had to pay for it.

mechanics · Rotation A 120 g top at 3000 rpm, precessing once every 1.92 s. A disc of radius 30 mm spinning at 3000 revolutions a minute on a shaft 45 mm long, tilted 30° from the vertical. The weight acts at the centre of mass and the pivot holds the bottom, so the torque about the pivot is horizontal and at right angles to the plane containing the axis and the vertical. Angular momentum points along the axis; a torque at right angles to a vector turns it without changing its length, so the axis sweeps round the dashed circle instead of falling. The precession rate is Mgl divided by I₃ω₃ to leading order, which is 3.269 radians a second here, or one turn every 1.92 seconds — slower the faster it spins.

The push that comes out sideways

Push down on a spinning wheel's axle and it swings horizontally. Nothing about that is mysterious once angular momentum is a vector — but the steady precession every demonstration shows is a solution nobody's initial conditions select, and a top released from rest does something else first.

mechanics · Rotation How fast a spinning electron would have to turn. The equatorial speed of a uniform sphere with the electron's mass and an angular momentum of ħ/2, against the radius it is given, both logarithmically. The expression is 5ħ/4mr and it passes the speed of light at 4.83e-13 m — half a picometre, which is four hundred times larger than a hydrogen nucleus. Giving it a smaller radius only makes the answer worse: at the experimental upper bound, 10⁻¹⁸ m the equator would move at 4.8e+5 times the speed of light; at the classical electron radius the equator would move at 1.7e+2 times the speed of light; at the reduced Compton wavelength the equator would move at 1.3e+0 times the speed of light. No radius the electron is permitted to have gets anywhere near a legal answer, and the experimental bound is off the scale by eight orders of magnitude. So the angular momentum is not the angular momentum of anything going round. It is a property the particle has, in the same way a charge is, and the only thing it shares with a spinning top is the algebra it obeys — which is, admittedly, the whole of what angular momentum means in physics.

The angular momentum that is not a rotation

An electron has angular momentum, and it is not going round anything. A sphere of its mass carrying that much angular momentum would need its equator moving at half a million times the speed of light at any size the electron is allowed to have. What survives of the analogy is the algebra — and the algebra turns out to require that turning the thing all the way round leaves it changed.

quantum · Spin Angular momentum that was in nothing at all. A ring carrying 10⁻⁶ C on a freely pivoted disc, with a solenoid on the axis threading 0.002 Wb through it, switched off over 1 second. Nothing is turning at the start and nothing has been touched. The collapsing flux drives a circumferential electric field round the ring, the ring is torqued, and the disc ends up spinning with 3.183·10⁻¹⁰ kg m²/s of angular momentum. Where was it? The two curves are the field's share, ε₀∫r × (E × B), and the matter's share integrated from the torque — computed by different routes and summing to a constant to 4.2e-15 of the total throughout. So the angular momentum was there before the switch was thrown, in a static electric field crossed with a static magnetic one, in a room where nothing whatever was moving. It is qΦ/2π, it does not depend on the radius of the ring or the shape of the solenoid, and it is the plainest demonstration available that the field is not a bookkeeping device for forces between distant charges.

The angular momentum that is in nothing at all

A charged ring and a solenoid, both at rest, with nothing moving anywhere. Switch the solenoid off and the ring starts to turn. Angular momentum is conserved, so it was there before the switch was thrown — and it was not in the matter, because nothing was moving. It was in the field, and it is qΦ over 2π whatever the geometry.

electromagnetism · Field energy The field a classical partition function cannot see. The momentum plane of one classical charge, in units of the root-mean-square thermal momentum. With no field the Boltzmann weight is a set of circles about the origin; with a field the same circles sit about p = qA, displaced and otherwise unaltered, because the energy depends on p only through p − qA. Integrating over the whole plane therefore cannot notice the displacement, and the numbers beside the drawing are that integral evaluated at 6 displacements: the largest departure from the zero-field value is 3.3e-16, which is the precision of the arithmetic and not a physical effect. The classical free energy has no B in it, so the classical magnetisation is exactly zero at every field and every temperature — no paramagnetism, no diamagnetism, no ferromagnetism. Every magnetic material is therefore evidence of something classical mechanics does not contain.

The magnetism classical physics forbids

Write down the partition function of any collection of classical charges in a magnetic field, and the field cancels out. Not approximately, not to leading order — the integral is over all of momentum space and the field only shifts where the middle of it is. So classical statistical mechanics predicts no paramagnetism, no diamagnetism and no ferromagnetism, and a compass needle is a quantum instrument.

electromagnetism · Magnetisation One level, split by the speed of the electron in it. Hydrogen's n = 2 level on the left at the scale of the whole spectrum, and the same level on the right at a scale ten thousand times finer. The gross structure puts it 3.4014 electronvolts below the ionisation limit; the relativistic and spin–orbit corrections then split it into a lower pair, j = ½, and an upper, j = 3/2, separated by 45.3 microelectronvolts. That gap is 1.331e-5 of the level's own binding energy, which is exactly α²/4 — so the size of the splitting is a measurement of how fast the electron is going, α being its speed in units of c on the innermost orbit. The same physics in sodium is larger by four orders of magnitude: its two D lines at 588.995 and 589.5924 nanometres differ by 2.133 millielectronvolts, which is 1.01e-3 of the transition energy, because the outer electron of sodium penetrates to where the nuclear charge is far from screened and the correction goes as the fourth power of the charge it sees.

The line that is really two

Sodium's yellow line is two lines six-tenths of a nanometre apart, and the gap is not a property of the light. It is a splitting of the atom's own level, caused by the electron's magnetic moment sitting in the field it sees because it is moving — and its size, relative to the level it splits, is exactly α²/4.

quantum · Atomic spectra Circulation against how fast the bucket turns. The circulation round the rim of a bucket of radius 1 mm, against the angular velocity it is spun at. An ordinary liquid ends up rotating with the bucket, and its circulation is 2Ω times the area — the straight dashed line, continuous in Ω and with no special value anywhere on it. A superfluid's velocity is the gradient of a phase, so it can carry circulation only in whole units of h/m = 9.969e-8 m²/s. Below 0.256 radians per second it carries none at all: the bucket turns and the liquid does not, which is what Hess and Fairbank measured. Above it the circulation is a staircase of 13 steps, each exactly one quantum high and each 1.59e-2 radians per second wide. The staircase runs below the classical line by the ln(R/a) quanta the threshold costs, a fixed lag: at 102 radians per second the two agree to 0.24 per cent, which is why a rotating superfluid looks like a rotating liquid at any speed a bucket is normally spun at.

The whirlpool that comes in one size

Spin a bucket of ordinary liquid and it ends up turning with the bucket. Spin a bucket of superfluid helium slowly and it does not turn at all. Spin it faster and it does not turn either — until a threshold, at which a single line of circulation appears, carrying not some amount but exactly h/m. There is nothing in between, because the velocity is the gradient of a phase and a phase has to come back to itself.

fluids · Superfluidity Three quantities that do not move while everything else does. On the left, an orbit in an inverse-square attraction, integrated from its equation of motion over 2.4 revolutions at an eccentricity of 0.55. On the right, three quantities computed from that same trajectory at every step and plotted against time: the energy, the angular momentum, and the length of the eccentricity vector that points at periapsis. Every one is flat to better than 1.2e-11 in units where the circular speed at r = 1 is 1, and none of them was constrained to be — the integrator was given the force and nothing else. Each is a symmetry seen sideways. The energy is constant because the force law does not mention the time; the angular momentum is constant because it does not mention the direction; and the eccentricity vector is constant because of a symmetry that is not a motion of space at all, which is why the inverse square closes its orbits and its neighbours do not. What the picture cannot show is the direction of the argument: it demonstrates that these three are constant here, and the theorem says something much stronger, that a constant exists for every continuous symmetry whatever the system.

The conservation law a symmetry hands over

Energy, momentum and angular momentum are usually presented as three separate empirical facts that happen to hold. They are one fact three times: every continuous symmetry of a system's action supplies a quantity that does not change, the correspondence is exact, and it runs both ways.

mechanics · Least action The same top, let go four ways. The path traced by the top of the axis, seen from directly above, over 1.2 precession periods. The dashed circle is the tilt the top was released at and the outer circle is 46.8° from the vertical. Released from rest the axis falls, and the fall is what generates the sideways motion: the path comes to a cusp each time it returns to the starting tilt, because at that instant the precession rate is momentarily zero. Launched at exactly the steady rate the path is a circle and the nutation is absent. Launched slower it waves; launched faster it loops: at 0× the steady rate the path comes to cusps, at 0.45× the steady rate the path waves, at 1× the steady rate the path stays a circle, at 1.9× the steady rate the path waves. Every one of these is the same equation with the same top and the same spin.

The top that nods before it settles

A spinning top let go from rest does not begin to precess. It falls, catches itself, and comes back up, over and over, at a frequency that has nothing to do with gravity — and the steady precession every textbook draws is what is left after friction has removed the nod.

mechanics · Rotation The point that does not notice the collision. Two bodies of rest mass 1 and 2, approaching at 0.8c and -0.3c, colliding elastically and leaving at -0.6168c and 0.5969c — speeds obtained by reversing the motion in the zero-momentum frame, with the total energy and momentum checked to a part in a million million. The third line is the energy-weighted centre. It runs straight through the collision at 0.1872c, which is the total momentum divided by the total energy, and it has no kink — verified at two hundred instants. Nothing here is the centre of mass: the rest masses are unchanged by the collision but the energies are redistributed, and it is the energies that do the weighting.

The centre that is not a place

The centre of mass is replaced in relativity by the centre of energy, which moves uniformly and does everything the old point did — except be the same point for everybody. Boost a spinning body and its centre moves, so a spinning object has no centre at all.

relativity · Relativistic dynamics The arrow the orbit cannot turn. A Kepler orbit of eccentricity 0.6, integrated for two revolutions, with the Laplace–Runge– Lenz vector constructed from the position and velocity at five points along it. Every one of the five is the same arrow: its length varies by 3.7e-11 over the whole run and its direction by 2.1e-10 radians. It points at the perihelion and its length is 0.600000, which is the orbit's eccentricity measured independently from the closest and furthest radii as 0.600000. Energy and angular momentum fix the size and shape of an orbit and say nothing about which way it points; this vector is the missing statement, and only an inverse square has one.

The arrow that says which way the orbit points

Energy and angular momentum fix the size and shape of an orbit and say nothing about its orientation. The inverse-square force has a third conserved quantity that supplies it — a vector pointing at the perihelion whose length is the eccentricity — and no other force law does.

astrophysics · Orbit stability The energy a spin is allowed, and the only direction it can go. A body with principal moments 1.000, 3.000, 4.000 spinning with a fixed angular momentum. Every possible motion has an energy somewhere in the band drawn here, and the three marks are the three principal-axis spins: energy L²/2I, so the largest moment of inertia gives the smallest energy. The band runs from 0.1250 to 0.5000 in units where the momentum is one — a ratio of 4.0. Anything inside the body that flexes and warms takes energy out and leaves the momentum untouched, so the state can only move leftwards along this band, and there is exactly one place for it to stop. A spin about the axis of least inertia is at the far right: it is a perfectly good solution of the equations of motion, stable against small disturbances in a perfectly rigid body, and it sits at the top of a hill the smallest leak will roll it off.

The axis a leak of energy chooses

A body spinning with nothing pushing on it keeps its angular momentum exactly, and keeps its kinetic energy only while nothing inside it flexes. At fixed momentum the energy is least for a spin about the axis of greatest inertia — so any leak, however small, has a destination. The first American satellite found this out in orbit.

mechanics · Rotation The quantity that went down, and the one that went up. The books for GW150914: two black holes of 36 and 29 solar masses merging into one of 62, with a final spin of 0.67. 3.0 solar masses left as gravitational waves, so the mass fell by 4.6 per cent. The total horizon area rose, from 107417 to 168330 in units of the Sun's gravitational radius squared — an increase of 57 per cent. The two progenitors are taken as non-spinning, which is the assumption that makes the test hardest to pass: a spinning hole of the same mass has a smaller horizon, so any spin they actually had would only widen the gap. Mass is the quantity that behaves the way energy usually does and it is not the one with a direction. Area is, and it is the reason the area has been read as an entropy ever since.

The area that is not allowed to shrink

Two black holes merge and the result weighs less than the sum, because three solar masses left as gravitational waves. The horizon area went up by more than half. Mass is the quantity that behaves like energy and it is not the one with a direction; area is, and the theorem saying so has been tested against a real merger.

astrophysics · Horizons The levels that refuse to cross. The six energies of sodium 3p against an applied field from zero to 4 crossover fields, 147 T, from diagonalising spin–orbit coupling and the field together. At zero field there are two levels, 515.5 GHz apart. The two states with the largest |mⱼ| are straight lines at every field, because nothing else shares their mⱼ. The other four bend. The two states with mⱼ = −½ approach within 486.0 GHz near 12.3 T and then separate again — √2 ζ exactly, since the coupling between them sets how close they may come — while the mⱼ = −3/2 state falls straight through the lower mⱼ = +½ state at 16.6 T as if it were not there. States that the field cannot mix cross freely; states it can mix exchange character instead, and that exchange is the passage from one pattern to the other.

The field an atom calls strong

A magnetic field splits sodium's two yellow lines into ten, at spacings set by Landé's factors — until the field grows past the one the electron already feels from its own motion, when the ten reorganise into the three a theory without spin predicts. Nothing about the magnet decides which pattern appears. The atom does: the same 45 tesla is a strong field for hydrogen, a middling one for sodium and a weak one for caesium.

quantum · Atomic spectra Where to strike so the pivot feels nothing. The impulse the pivot has to supply, as a fraction of the blow, against where along the body the blow lands, measured from the pivot, for a uniform rod pivoted at one end and for a 0.84 m wooden bat held 15 cm from its knob, with the blow's position as a fraction of the length beyond the grip. For the rod the reaction is 1 − 3q/2L, positive for blows nearer the pivot, negative beyond, and zero at 0.6667 of the length. For the bat it is zero 51.9 cm from the grip, 17.1 cm from the end of the barrel. A blow there sets the body turning about the pivot as though the pivot were not needed.

The point that takes the blow without a jolt

Hit a stick held at one end and the hand feels a jolt — forwards if the blow lands near the hand, backwards if it lands near the tip, and nothing at all if it lands two-thirds of the way along. That point is the centre of percussion, and it is exactly where a simple pendulum with the same period would end: two different questions about a swinging body with one answer.

mechanics · Pendulum Each unit of angular momentum costs a factor of tens of thousands. Weisskopf's estimates of the half-life of a gamma-ray transition in a nucleus of mass number 100, against the photon's energy, for electric multipoles of order 1 to 5 — the photon carrying away 1 to 5 units of angular momentum. At 1 MeV the estimates are 10⁻¹⁵ s for E1, 10⁻¹¹ s for E2, 2.0 µs for E3, 292.5 ms for E4, 17.3 h for E5. Each extra unit multiplies the half-life at 1 MeV by between 60,000 and 210,000: about a thousand of that is (λ/2πR)², the square of the photon's reduced wavelength over the nucleus's radius, which grows as the energy falls, and the rest is a numerical factor that grows with the order. A transition that must carry away five units at 100 keV has an estimated half-life longer than the age of the universe; the same energy carried off with one unit takes less than a nanosecond.

The spin a photon has to carry away

An excited nucleus sheds its energy as a gamma ray in a millionth of a millionth of a nanosecond — or in minutes, or centuries, or never within the age of the universe. The energy available hardly matters. What matters is how much angular momentum the photon must carry off, because a source much smaller than its wavelength is very bad at launching a wave that twists, and each extra unit of twist costs a factor of tens of thousands in time. Selection rules are usually stated as what cannot happen; they are really a price list, and it spans forty decades.

quantum · Decay The wobble slows as the body yields. The period of the Earth's free wobble against how far the body yields to its own rotation, measured as the Love number k over its value for a fluid Earth, kₛ = 0.941, computed from the Earth's flattening. A rigid Earth, at zero, wobbles in 303.6 days, Euler's period. The observed 433 days requires k/kₛ = 0.299, an effective k of 0.281: the Earth yields about 30 per cent as much as a fluid would. The period grows without limit as the body approaches a fluid, because a fluid body's bulge re-forms round any new spin axis and leaves nothing to push the axis back.

The wobble that is slow because the Earth gives

Euler worked out in 1765 that a spinning, flattened Earth whose axis is knocked slightly off its figure should wobble, the pole wandering in a small circle once every ten months. Astronomers looked for a ten-month period for a century and found nothing. In 1891 Seth Chandler found a wobble of fourteen months instead. The four extra months are not an error in Euler's arithmetic. They are the Earth yielding: its bulge partly re-forms round the displaced axis, weakening the torque that drives the wobble, and the lengthening measures how soft the planet is.

mechanics · Rotation A sharp angle costs a spread of turning. Left: the probability of finding a rotor at each angle, for three states. Right: the probability of each value of its angular momentum, in units of ħ, for the same states. A state bunched to a circular spread of 0.025 has an angular-momentum spread of 2.21ħ; a state bunched to a circular spread of 0.302 has an angular-momentum spread of 0.59ħ; a state with no preferred angle has an angular-momentum spread of 0.00ħ. The angular momentum can only take whole-number values, so its probabilities are bars; the angle is continuous. The state with no preferred angle has exactly one value of angular momentum, and its angle is spread evenly round the circle — where the naive rule would say that its angle's spread times ħ/2 should be infinite, it is π/√3.

The angle the uncertainty principle cannot be written for

Position and momentum trade exactly: squeeze one and the other spreads, with a product never below ħ/2. Angle and angular momentum look like the same pair and are not. A rotor in a state of definite angular momentum has zero spread in angular momentum and a finite spread in angle, π/√3, and their product is zero. Nothing is wrong with the rotor. The relation was written with a commutator that does not hold, because an angle lives on a circle and a line has no ends to wrap round. The relation that does hold measures the angle's spread by how far its average position on the circle falls short of the rim.

quantum · Uncertainty A gyroscope swinging into the meridian. The direction of a gyrocompass's axis, in degrees east of true north, against time in hours, released 20° east of north at latitude 50°. The Earth's rotation tilts the horizon under the spinning axis, a pendulous weight turns the tilt into a torque, and the torque precesses the axis towards the meridian. Undamped (dashed) it swings through north and back with a period of 84.4 minutes, the compass having been built to that period. With damping it settles: after 8 hours it points within 0.03° of north. Nothing in the instrument knows where north is. It finds the direction about which the Earth turns, because only when its axis lies in the meridian does the turning horizon stop tilting it.

The compass that finds the axis the Earth turns about

A spinning wheel held so that its axis stays level will, on a turning Earth, swing its axis round to point at true north and stay there — not magnetic north, the geographic pole. Nothing in the instrument knows where north is; it finds the one direction about which the Earth's turning stops tilting it. Built to be used at sea, such a compass has to ignore the ship's lurches, and that forces its swing to have one particular period: 84.4 minutes, the period of a pendulum as long as the Earth's radius, of a satellite skimming the ground, and of a stone dropped through a tunnel to the far side of the planet.

mechanics · Rotation A target that grows as the traveller slows. The capture cross-section of a non-rotating black hole for particles arriving with speed v, in units of the horizon's own cross-sectional area π(2GM/c²)², against v/c, both on logarithmic axes (solid). For light it is 27/4 = 6.75 times the horizon's area. It grows as the particle slows, following 4c²/v² (dashed) — 404 at a tenth of light speed and 7.43·10⁶ at the 220 km/s of the Galaxy's dark matter. The dotted curve is a Newtonian ball of radius 8GM/c² — four horizon radii — capturing by ordinary gravitational focusing, and for slow particles the hole and the ball cannot be told apart.

The target that grows as the traveller slows

Light aimed at a black hole is swallowed if it passes within about five of the hole's gravitational radii, a disc six and three-quarter times the horizon's own. A particle arriving slowly is swallowed from much further out, and the disc grows as the inverse square of its speed: dark matter drifting at 220 kilometres a second sees a target seven million times the horizon. The reason is that slow matter carries almost no angular momentum for a given aim, and angular momentum is the only thing that keeps anything out. For slow traffic the hole behaves exactly like an ordinary ball four times its own size.

astrophysics · Horizons The band in which radiation feeds a mode instead of draining it. The speed of a mode's pattern as seen from far away, in units of the star's own spin rate, against the spin rate as a fraction of the fastest a star can turn. The shaded band, between zero and one, holds patterns that run forward across the sky and backward through the star; gravitational radiation drives any mode inside it and damps any mode outside. The r-modes with ℓ = m = 2, 3 and 4 sit at 0.667, 0.833 and 0.900 at every spin, inside the band however slowly the star turns. The dashed curves are schematic modes whose crests run backward on the star at a fixed 0.2, 0.5 and 0.9 of the Kepler rate: each is dragged into the band only once the star turns faster than its crest runs, which is why an ordinary oscillation needs a star near break-up and an r-mode does not.

The wobble that radiating makes larger

Radiation normally drains a vibration: a struck bell goes quiet because it sends its energy away as sound, and a ringing black hole settles in milliseconds because it sends its energy away as gravitational waves. A spinning star can have the opposite. A pattern that runs backward through the star's material, while the star carries it forward across the sky, has less angular momentum than the star would have without it, and every wave it radiates takes away angular momentum it did not have to give. The pattern grows. One family of such patterns, the r-modes, runs backward on every rotating star, so every spinning neutron star is unstable unless friction wins — and that may be why none has been found spinning faster than 716 turns a second.

astrophysics · Gravitational waves The drift is the area under the height. Height against time for the two balls: the throw (dashed curve) rising to 100 m in 4.52 s and falling back in as long again, and the drop (solid) falling from 100 m. For vertical motion the east–west velocity is always −2Ω cos λ times the height above the starting point, so the east–west drift is −2Ω cos λ times the area between the path and the starting height. The throw's area (lower shading) is (4/3)·h·t = 602 m s, above its start, so it drifts west; the drop's (upper shading) is h·t/3 = 151 m s, below its start, so it drifts east. The ratio of the two areas is four.

The ball thrown up that lands to the west

Drop a ball from a tower a hundred metres high and, because the Earth turns, it lands a centimetre and a half east of the point directly below. Throw a ball straight up so that it just reaches the same height, and it lands six centimetres west of where it was thrown — four times as far, the other way. The asymmetry has a one-line explanation that turns a problem in rotating frames into a problem about areas: for anything moving straight up or down, the sideways drift is proportional to the area under its graph of height against time. A dropped ball spends its flight below where it started, a thrown one above, and the thrown one's area is four times as large.

mechanics · Projectile Light whose crests wind round its axis. Cross-sections of three beams carrying orbital angular momentum, with phase exp(iℓφ) round the axis, for ℓ = 1, 2 and 3, at one instant: solid lines where the field is at a crest, dashed where it is at a trough. Along the beam the crests form ℓ interleaved helices, and at a fixed plane the pattern turns about the axis once every ℓ optical periods. Looked at from a frame turning about the axis at a rate Ω, every crest arrives ℓΩ/2π times a second more or less often: the field's frequency is shifted by ℓΩ. That is a Doppler shift with no approach and no recession — the angular counterpart of k·v, with the winding number ℓ standing in for the wavenumber and the rotation rate for the speed. Each photon of such a beam carries ℓħ of orbital angular momentum about the axis.

The Doppler shift with nothing coming closer

Every Doppler shift so far has needed something to approach or recede. Light can be shifted in frequency by something that does neither: a surface spinning in place, or a polarising plate turning in a beam that passes straight through it. A beam whose wavefronts wind round its axis, ℓ times per wavelength, comes back from a surface spinning at Ω shifted by exactly ℓΩ, at every distance from the axis. A circularly polarised beam through a spinning half-wave plate comes out shifted by exactly 2Ω, because the plate takes two units of angular momentum from each photon and does work on it. The shift is tiny and perfectly measurable, and satellite navigation has to correct for it.

waves · Doppler Every steady flow of gas onto a point mass. The Mach number of steady, spherical, isothermal flow round a point mass against distance from it, both on logarithmic axes, distance in units of the sonic radius, where the inflow reaches the speed of sound. Every curve is a contour of Bondi's conserved integral, which ties the Mach number to the distance. The faint curves are flows that never pass the speed of sound, or that exist only close in or only far out. Two curves cross at the saddle (1, 1): the solid one is accretion, starting from rest far away, reaching the speed of sound exactly at the sonic radius and falling supersonically within it; the dashed one is its time-reverse, a wind. Only the crossing flow joins a gas at rest to a hole that swallows it, and it fixes the rate: λ = exp(3/2)/4 = 1.120 in Ṁ = 4πλ(GM)²ρ∞/c³.

The gas a hole catches from far away

A particle drifting past a black hole is captured only if its aim is almost perfect; miss by a little and it swings round and leaves. Gas is different. Streams passing on opposite sides collide, lose their sideways motion as heat, and fall in, so a hole in warm gas draws from the whole sphere inside which its gravity beats the gas's thermal motion. Bondi worked out the flow in 1952: one steady solution passes smoothly from rest to free fall, it crosses the speed of sound at a single radius, and the rate it fixes grows as the square of the hole's mass — fast enough, left alone, to run away in a finite time.

astrophysics · Horizons The pattern in which a spinning Earth turns gyroscopes. The direction in which the Earth's rotation turns a gyroscope near it, in a plane through the Earth's axis (spin upward): the lines are those of the precession rate Ω = (G/c²r³)[3(J·r̂)r̂ − J], which has exactly the shape of the magnetic field of a spinning charged ball. On the circle of a polar orbit 650 km up, arrows show the direction and relative size of the turning at twelve points. Over the poles a gyroscope is turned the same way the Earth spins, twice as fast as anywhere else at that distance; over the equator it is turned the opposite way. Averaged round a polar orbit, what is left is half the size of the over-the-equator rate and opposite to it — in the sense of the Earth's spin.

The gyroscope a spinning Earth turns

A moving charge makes a magnetic field, and a spinning charged ball makes a dipole field around it. Gravity has the same structure one level down: a spinning mass drags the local standards of rotation around with it, and a perfect gyroscope near the Earth turns, very slightly, in the pattern of a dipole field — with the Earth's spin over the poles and against it over the equator. Averaged round a polar orbit the turning is 41 milliarcseconds a year. It took forty-four years and a satellite carrying the roundest objects ever made to measure it.

relativity · Field transformation An orbit, and the circle its velocities make. Left: an orbit of eccentricity 0.6 round a central mass (dot), integrated step by step, with the velocity drawn as an arrow at twelve points equally spaced in time. Right: the same twelve velocities drawn from a single point, the origin of velocity. Their tips lie on a circle — the hodograph — of radius GM/h, whose centre is displaced from the origin by e times that radius, here 0.6: the integrated velocities stay on it to within one part in ten thousand. The fastest velocity, at the closest approach, is 1.60 times GM/h and the slowest, at the furthest point, 0.40 times. The tips are bunched near the slow end, because the body spends most of its time far away.

The velocity that always lies on a circle

A planet on an elliptical orbit speeds up and slows down, its velocity swinging round as it goes. Draw all its velocities from a single point and their tips fall exactly on a circle — not an ellipse, a circle — offset from the point by the orbit's eccentricity. Hamilton noticed this in 1846; it holds for every orbit under an inverse-square force and for no other force; and it turns the ellipse into something that can be proved with a ruler and compass, as Feynman did in a lecture that was lost for thirty years.

astrophysics · Orbit stability Two ways to spin, against angular momentum. The spin Ω²/πGρ of the Maclaurin spheroids (blue) and the Jacobi ellipsoids (red) against their angular momentum, in units of √(GM³R) with R the radius of a sphere of the same volume. The two families meet at the bifurcation, angular momentum 0.304. Below it only spheroids exist. Above it a body of given angular momentum could be either, and the two differ: the ellipsoid spins more slowly, its spin falling as its angular momentum grows, because it gets longer and its moment of inertia climbs faster than its angular momentum. Every Maclaurin spheroid past the bifurcation is a shape a slightly viscous body will leave.

The spinning fluid that becomes a cigar

A ball of fluid held together by its own gravity flattens when it spins, as the Earth bulges at the equator. Spin it faster and it flattens further, into a lens — but only up to a point, and long before that point something unexpected happens. In 1834 Jacobi found that a fast-spinning fluid can also take a shape that is not symmetric about its axis at all: an ellipsoid with three different axes, stretched along its equator, tumbling end over end. Past a definite spin the stretched shape has less energy than the flattened one, and a body that can shed energy will choose it.

astrophysics · Self-gravity One lever, two frames, two different torques. A right-angled lever pivoted at its corner, with arms of length L, held still by a force F at the end of each arm, perpendicular to it. Left, in the lever's own frame: torque FL anticlockwise from the horizontal arm's force, FL clockwise from the vertical arm's, and they cancel. Right, the same lever seen moving to the right at 0.8 of the speed of light: the horizontal arm, along the motion, is contracted to L/γ = 0.60L, and the force on it, which is across the motion, is reduced to F/γ = 0.60F; the vertical arm and its force, along the motion, are unchanged. The torques are now 0.36FL and FL, and the lever is twisted clockwise by 0.64FL — the square of its speed as a fraction of light's. It does not turn.

The lever that is twisted and does not turn

A right-angled lever held still by two equal forces has no net torque on it. Watch the same lever go by at high speed and one arm is shorter, one force is weaker, and the torques no longer cancel — yet the lever goes by without turning. Nothing is wrong with either frame's arithmetic. The forces are doing work on the moving lever, the energy they put in is flowing through its arms, and a flow of energy carries momentum that points across the lever's motion: a body that moves straight with a momentum that does not.

relativity · Mass-energy Electrons that reach the anode, and electrons that turn back. Paths of electrons leaving a cathode 4 mm across at rest, in a cylindrical diode with an anode 8 mm across held at 4000 V, with no space charge, for axial magnetic fields of 0.80, 0.98, 1.02 and 1.30 times Hull's cut-off field of 142.2 millitesla; computed by integrating the Lorentz force. Below the cut-off the field only bends the path, and the electron still reaches the anode — at 0.98 of the cut-off it arrives almost tangentially. Just above it the electron turns back just short of the anode and returns to the cathode, then repeats the arc further round; at 1.30 times the cut-off it turns back well inside. Nothing reaches the anode, and the current stops completely within a few per cent of the field.

The field at which no electron reaches the anode

Put a hot wire inside a metal tube, make the tube positive, and electrons stream across from wire to tube. Add a magnetic field along the axis and they curve on the way, and still arrive — until, at one definite field, every one of them turns back a hair's breadth short of the tube and the current stops dead. The field at which it happens can be found without knowing anything about how the voltage is distributed between the wire and the tube, because one quantity the electron carries is fixed by the magnetic field alone. The microwave oven runs just inside that line.

electromagnetism · Magnetism The swing's plane, turning a step at a time. The direction in which a swinging spring swings, seen from above, against time, for a spring whose bounce is twice as fast as its swing, started bouncing almost vertically with a trace of sideways motion. Points are coloured by how much of the energy is in the swing (darker: more). While the swing holds the energy the direction is fixed; while the bounce holds it, the direction changes, and the swing returns in a new direction each time — 9 steps in 1500 units of time, each 43.6° on average (43.6, 43.6, 43.6, 43.6…), always in the same sense. In a plane the swing could only come back along its old line. In space it comes back turned, and the turn is the same every time.

The swing that turns a step at a time

A weight on a spring whose bounce is twice as fast as its swing trades its energy back and forth: the bounce becomes a swing, and the swing a bounce again. Let it move in space rather than a plane, with the slightest sideways twist, and each swing comes back in a new direction, turned by the same angle every time. The turn happens all at once, while the weight is only bouncing and the swing is too small to see, and its size is set by a single ratio, of the twist to the energy carrying it. The steps are a geometric phase made mechanical, and they blur into chaos when the spring is bounced too hard.

mechanics · Chaos Stopped for half a second, a raw egg starts again by itself. Two eggs spinning at 3 revolutions a second, each touched with a finger at t = 4 s so that its shell is held still for 0.5 s and then released. The cooked egg (solid) stops and stays stopped. The raw egg's shell (dashed) stops too, but its contents (dotted) are still turning — slowed to 2.15 revolutions a second during the hold, by viscosity working against the held shell — and once the finger lifts they drag the shell back into rotation, reaching 1.81 revolutions a second, 60 per cent of its speed before the touch. The table's friction is left out here, so that nothing else slows either egg. It is the oldest kitchen test of whether an egg is cooked, and the whole of the physics is a liquid's reluctance to stop turning.

The egg that keeps turning after it is stopped

Spin an egg on a table, touch it for a moment to stop it, and let go. A cooked egg stays still. A raw one starts turning again by itself, as if something inside had kept going — which it has. A raw egg is two bodies, a thin shell and a liquid that the shell can turn only through the slow grip of viscosity, and the kitchen test that tells them apart is a measurement of how long that grip takes. The same two-body arithmetic says that a raw egg wastes most of the energy of a flick, starts out spinning six times faster than a cooked one given the same twist, and keeps a record of its past rotation in its interior for a second or two after its shell has forgotten.

mechanics · Rotation Reversing the magnetism in step with the swing. The rod hung from a fibre as a torsion pendulum with a period of 10 s and a quality factor of 200, its magnetisation reversed 40 times, once every half swing, in step with its motion, then left alone; the angle it turns through, integrated, in degrees. Each reversal adds the same small kick of angular momentum and the kicks add up, as pushes on a swing do: the swing grows to 15.46° if the magnetism is spin, 30.92° if it were orbital currents. A single reversal would turn the rod by about 0.45° — measurable in principle, buried in practice by the much larger twist that the coil's own field puts on any slight misalignment, which is why Einstein and de Haas drove the rod at its resonance and why their first result, g′ = 1, came out wrong.

The rod that turns when its magnetism flips

Hang an iron rod on a thin fibre inside a coil, reverse the current, and the rod turns a little. Nothing has pushed it sideways: reversing the magnetisation reversed the angular momentum the electrons inside it carry, and since nothing outside can twist the rod about its axis, the iron lattice has to take up the difference. Einstein and de Haas did it in 1915 to prove that magnetism is electric charge going round. They got the right effect and the wrong number, and the right number — twice what they expected — was evidence, years before anyone proposed it, that the electron's magnetism comes from something that is not a rotation at all.

quantum · Spin Two measures of how uncertain a split state is. For the two-peaked state, against half the separation of the peaks in units of their width: Heisenberg's product σₓσₚ divided by its minimum ħ/2 (solid), and the entropic sum Hₓ + Hₚ minus its minimum ln(πeħ) (dashed), both computed from the state's distributions. As the peaks separate the product grows without limit, 8.1 times the minimum at the right of the figure, because the variance counts the empty space between the peaks as uncertainty. The entropic excess levels off at 2 ln 2 − 1 = 0.386 (0.386 at the right): the position's entropy gains ln 2, one bit, for not knowing which peak, and the momentum's gives back 1 − ln 2 because its fringes pack it into narrow bands. The entropic relation says what is true of the state: it is a fraction of a coin toss away from a minimum-uncertainty packet, however far apart the two places are.

The sharpness a variance cannot see

Heisenberg's inequality is a statement about standard deviations, and a standard deviation is a poor measure of how sharply something is known. A particle that is certainly in one of two narrow places a metre apart has a position spread of half a metre, and satisfies the inequality with room to spare while being sharply localised. Measure uncertainty by information instead — by the Shannon entropy of each distribution — and the relation tightens: the sum of the two entropies has a floor that the split state cannot get under either, and the floor survives in places where the variance form says nothing at all.

quantum · Uncertainty Every toss already decided. The outcome of a coin toss as a map of how it was launched: the upward speed in metres per second across, the spin in radians per second up, with the region where the coin shows the face it started with shaded and the region where it shows the other face left clear. A coin spinning about a diameter and caught at the height it left is in the air for 2v/g and turns 2vω/g radians, so the boundaries are the hyperbolae vω = nπg/2, one for every half-turn. Near the origin the bands are wide: a slow toss with little spin is easy to control, and a conjuror's "honest" toss lives there. Nothing in the map is random. Every point is a definite outcome, and the bands are smooth curves — there is no fractal boundary, no region where a tiny change has an unpredictable effect. What makes a toss a fair bet is only how narrow the bands become further out.

The toss that is random without chaos

A coin toss is the textbook random event and the textbook deterministic one at the same time. Its flight is a few lines of Newtonian mechanics with no chaos anywhere: two tosses that start almost alike stay almost alike, drifting apart only in proportion to time. Its outcome is fixed the moment it leaves the thumb, by a map of launch speed and spin carved into bands of heads and tails. It is a fair bet because the bands, at a real toss, are only a few per cent wide and no hand repeats itself that well — and it is not quite fair, because a coin wobbles as it flips, and the wobble keeps its starting face up a little more than half the time: 50.8 per cent, predicted in 2007 and counted in 2023 over 350,757 tosses.

mechanics · Chaos A spin set by the length of a cord. The body's spin against the cord let out, from conservation of energy and of angular momentum alone, for three values of c, one plus the body's moment of inertia over the weights' mR². Every curve passes through zero at a cord length of exactly √c radii, and a direct integration of the equations of motion, which assumes neither conservation law, lands on the same curve to a part in a thousand. Past that length the spin reverses. The starting spin does not appear in the zero's position: only the shape of the machine does. A weight on a cord cut to length therefore removes all the spin whether it was spinning at 20 or 100 revolutions a minute, provided the cord is released at that length.

The weights that stop a spinning satellite

A rocket stage is often spun up to keep it pointing straight during its burn, and the spin then has to be removed. A small cord and a weight wrapped round its rim do the whole job, with no fuel, no sensors and no moving parts besides the cord. The cord's length has no dependence on how fast the stage is spinning, so the same two weights stop it at any speed. And the cord unwinds at exactly the rate the stage was first spinning, while its spin falls away to nothing.

mechanics · Energy

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Moment of inertiaTorquePrecessionSpinConservation lawsDegeneracyMagnetic momentRigid bodyRotating frameSymmetryBlack holeCentral force

All concepts