Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Recently added

What's new

Essays arrive in groups rather than one at a time. The most recent group is below in full, and every earlier one after it, newest first.

Essays arrive in groups rather than one at a time, and a group usually opens up a subject not covered before. Between one group and the next nothing changes, so a reader who has seen the most recent group has seen everything.

16 September 2026

40 essays on waves, fluids, astrophysics, electromagnetism, mechanics, optics, quantum, thermodynamics and relativity

The ripple that sits on top of an absorption edge. The Cu K absorption of copper foil, 293 K through its edge and for seven hundred electronvolts above it, with the smooth atomic background it would have if the absorbing atom were alone drawn beneath it. The difference between the two is the fine structure: a modulation reaching 11 per cent, dying away as the photon energy rises, and entirely absent from a free atom. It is there because the ejected electron is a wave that the neighbouring atoms scatter back onto the atom that emitted it, so the absorption depends on whether the returning wave arrives in step with the outgoing one — which depends on the distance to the neighbour and on nothing else about the sample. Waves

The ripple that counts the neighbours

An absorption edge is drawn as a step and it is a step with a ripple on it — a modulation of eleven per cent in copper, five in a zinc site buried in a protein. The ripple is the ejected electron's own wave, scattered back onto the atom that emitted it, so its period is a distance. It is the only way of measuring where an atom's neighbours are that does not need a crystal.

7 figures The edge that is a straight line, not a step. The absorption of gallium arsenide near its own band gap of 1.424 electronvolts, on a logarithmic axis, at 4 temperatures. Below the gap the absorption does not stop; it falls exponentially, along a straight line whose slope is an energy, and the straightness holds over several decades. Raising the temperature makes the line shallower — the tail reaches further below the gap — and the slope runs from 5.6 millielectronvolts at 10 kelvin to 7.5 at 300, a factor of 1.33. The lines pivot about a point just above the gap rather than rotating about nothing, which is what makes the slope a single number worth quoting. The band gap's own shift with temperature has been removed here, so that the fan is the tail's doing and not the gap's. Waves

Below the gap, where there is nothing to absorb

A semiconductor is supposed to be transparent below its band gap, and it is not. The absorption falls exponentially instead, over seven decades, along a straight line whose slope is an energy of a few millielectronvolts — and the description that produces that line has no states in the gap at all. What the slope measures is how much the gap itself is moving about.

6 figures The four vortices a standing wave leaves behind. Streamlines of the steady flow that a standing sound wave sets up in a channel, over half an acoustic wavelength, with the horizontal axis in units of the wave's own phase and the vertical axis scaled to the channel. The sound itself is a back-and-forth motion that averages to nothing; this is what does not average to nothing. Four closed cells fill each wavelength, two above the centreline and two below, turning in opposite senses, with the fluid moving along the walls toward the velocity nodes and back along the centre. The boundary layer that generates all of it is 69 micrometres thick, which is 0.7 per cent of the channel and is thinner than the width of a line in this drawing. The cells are not in the layer; they fill the channel. Fluids

The drift a sound leaves behind

A sound wave moves fluid back and forth and puts it back where it started. Over many cycles it does not: a steady circulation appears, four cells to a wavelength, driven entirely from inside a boundary layer seventy micrometres thick. Its speed contains the sound speed and the amplitude, and it contains no viscosity at all — so making the fluid thinner does not make the drift weaker.

5 figures The pressure at which an oil becomes a glass. Viscosity against pressure for 4 liquids on a logarithmic axis, from Barus's rule with the pressure coefficient each one actually has. The rule is an exponential, so a gigapascal multiplies an ordinary oil's viscosity by a hundred million or more, and the curves cross the line conventionally taken to mark a glass — a million million pascal-seconds — at 1.37 GPa for a mineral oil, 0.98 GPa for a traction fluid. The vertical line is the peak pressure inside the loaded contact this figure is about, 1.32 gigapascals, computed from the Hertz solution for that geometry and load. Water is drawn for contrast: its pressure coefficient is thirty times smaller, it never approaches a glass over this range, and that is why it is useless as a lubricant in a rolling contact however clean it is. Each curve is drawn solid up to the glass line and dashed above it, because past that point the material is not a liquid and its viscosity is not what decides how it shears — the exponential continues, and the substance it was written for does not. Fluids

The oil that is a glass for a quarter of a millisecond

Every other account of viscosity here varies the temperature. Pressure does something larger and in the same direction for every liquid: viscosity rises exponentially, by a factor of ten to the eight or more at the gigapascal inside a loaded gear tooth. That is not a curiosity — it is the only reason there is a film there at all. Remove the pressure dependence from the calculation and the predicted film is five nanometres, under the roughness, and the surfaces touch.

6 figures 14 decades of fluid, and a floor none of them reaches. The ratio of viscosity to entropy density for 8 substances, in units of the proposed lower bound, on a logarithmic axis. The quantity is a viscosity divided by how much entropy a cubic metre of the substance holds, and it has the dimensions of Planck's constant over Boltzmann's — so a bound on it is a statement with no material properties in it at all. The span here is a factor of 1.6e+14, from pitch at 20 °C at the top to the quark–gluon plasma at the bottom, which sits a factor of 1.6 above the floor. The values marked as computed are worked out from a viscosity and a tabulated entropy; the rest are quoted from the compilations, because a minimum along an isobar is an inference from many measurements rather than a single one. Fluids

Whether a fluid can be made arbitrarily thin

Viscosity has no units anybody would call fundamental, and nothing obviously stops it being as small as you like. Divide it by the entropy in a cubic metre and the units become Planck's constant over Boltzmann's — and a conjecture from 2005 says that ratio has a floor. Across fourteen decades of ordinary fluid nothing has been measured below it, the closest thing to it is the hottest matter ever made, and a kinetic-theory argument reaches the same number from the opposite direction.

5 figures A few cycles, and everything about them is two numbers. The strain radiated by a remnant of 62 solar masses spinning at 0.68 of its maximum, as it settles down, with the decaying envelope of its fundamental mode drawn over it. The fundamental rings at 274 hertz and decays in 3.7 milliseconds, which is 1.0 cycles — this is not a bell and it does not sustain. Every frequency and every decay time in the sum is fixed by the mass and the spin alone; nothing about what made the remnant survives into them. What does depend on the collision is how loudly each mode is excited, and the relative amplitudes here are the rough values a merger of two comparable masses produces rather than a prediction. Astrophysics

A few cycles that are only mass and spin

After the orbit is gone there is one object left, distorted, and it settles down by radiating at frequencies that belong to it rather than to the collision. For a black hole those frequencies are fixed by the mass and the spin and by nothing else — so the first mode measured is a measurement and every mode after it is a test, and the test is that four curves in one plane pass through one point.

5 figures The ring does not come back. A ring of freely floating masses at four phases of a passing gravitational wave and once after it has gone. The first four are the familiar picture: stretched one way, then the other, with the area unchanged. The fifth is the one the standard picture does not draw — the ring is permanently deformed, by 25 per cent of the largest deformation the wave itself produced, and nothing brings it back. The masses are not oscillating about a new centre; they are at rest, at new separations. Both the oscillation and the offset are exaggerated enormously: the real strain at 440 megaparsecs is 9.9e-22 and the real permanent offset is 2.5e-22, so the drawing magnifies both by about 2e+20. What is honest in the picture is the ratio between them. Astrophysics

The ring that does not come back

Every picture of a passing gravitational wave shows a ring of free masses stretched, squeezed and let go. The last frame is wrong. The ring ends a different shape — permanently, with the masses at rest at new separations — by about a fifth of the largest distortion the wave itself produced. What sources the offset is the energy the wave carried away, so the wave is remembering itself, and nobody has measured it.

5 figures Two fields of the same magnet, and inside they point opposite ways. A uniformly magnetised sphere, with the field lines of B on the left and of H on the right, both computed from the exact solution — uniform inside, a dipole outside. Outside the sphere the two pictures are identical up to a constant, because there B is μ₀ times H and nothing else. Inside they are opposite: B is 0.67 tesla pointing along the magnetisation and H is 267 kiloamps a metre pointing against it. The B lines close on themselves and never end; the H lines begin on the top face and end on the bottom, which is what a field with sources looks like. Nothing about the magnet changed between the two panels — only which currents the circulation is allowed to count. Electromagnetism

The field that points against the magnet it is in

There are two magnetic fields in use and the difference between them is which currents a loop is allowed to count. The consequence nobody expects on being told the definitions: inside a permanent magnet H points the other way from B. It has to — a loop inside the magnet threads no wire, so its H circulation is zero, and the only arrangement left has H running backwards.

6 figures A potential that is lower every time round. The magnetic scalar potential along a path circling a wire carrying 10 amps, against the angle turned through, for 2 complete circuits. Away from the wire the magnetic field has no circulation round any small loop, so it is the gradient of something — and it is, except that the something does not come back to its own value. Each circuit lowers it by exactly the current, 10 amps, and a second circuit lowers it by 10 again. The potential is perfectly good locally and has no single value globally, and the amount by which it fails to close is the current threaded. So nothing has been lost in going from a circulation to a potential: Ampère's law has been rewritten as a statement about the shape of the region the potential lives in. Electromagnetism

A potential that does not come back to itself

Where no current flows, the magnetic field has no circulation round any small loop, so it is the gradient of something and a magnetic problem becomes an electrostatic one. The catch is not that the potential fails to exist. It is that walking once round a wire lowers it by the current, and walking round again lowers it by the current again — so Ampère's law survives the translation as a statement about what the path encircles rather than about where it went.

5 figures The floor does no work and the jumper leaves the ground. A 70-kilogram person pushing off the floor: the floor's force in units of body weight against time, with the centre of mass's height and speed drawn on the same axis, each scaled. The force reaches 2.6 body weights, the contact lasts 260 milliseconds, and the take-off speed that comes out of integrating it is 1.67 metres a second — a jump of 14 centimetres. Integrating the floor's force over the centre of mass's rise gives 247 joules. The work the floor does is zero, because the patch of floor under the foot never moves and work is a force times the displacement of its own point of application. Both numbers are correct and they are answers to different questions: the first is what Newton's second law integrated over the centre of mass gives, and the second is what crosses the boundary between the floor and the person, which is nothing. Mechanics

The floor that does no work

A jumper leaves the ground with three hundred joules of kinetic energy, supplied by a floor that does exactly zero work — because work is a force times the displacement of its own point of application, and the patch of floor under the foot never moves. Newton's second law integrated over the centre of mass gives the right kinetic energy and is not the work-energy theorem, and telling the two apart is what the first law of thermodynamics is for.

6 figures A wall pulled away fast leaves the energy behind. The energy of a ball bouncing in a box whose wall is moved, against the length of the box, for 3 wall speeds — each a fraction of the ball's own starting speed — with the adiabatic prediction drawn dashed. Every collision is solved for exactly rather than stepped, so nothing here assumes the wall is slow. Moved slowly, the wall takes energy from the ball at the adiabatic rate, and the energy falls as the inverse square of the length. Moved as fast as the ball is moving, it takes almost nothing: the ball cannot catch a wall retreating faster than it travels, so the collisions stop and the energy stops falling. That is the difference between a gas pushing a piston and a gas expanding into a vacuum, and it is drawn here for one particle. At the end of the range the slowest wall leaves the energy at 0.058 of its starting value and the fastest at 1.000, against an adiabatic 0.065. Mechanics

The wall that moves while the ball is in flight

Energy is conserved because the rules do not depend on the time. Move the walls of a box and the rules do depend on the time, so what is inside gains or loses without limit — and how much depends entirely on how fast. Moved slowly, a wall takes energy at exactly the rate the adiabatic law says; moved faster than the ball travels, it takes none at all, and the same box is a piston or a vacuum according to a speed.

6 figures The rings belong to the edge, not to the size. The far-field intensity of 3 apertures of the same width, against angle in units of the diffraction limit, on a logarithmic intensity axis spanning ten decades. They differ only in how the transmission falls off toward the rim. With a hard edge the first sidelobe is 13.3 decibels down and the core is 0.89 wide. With a Hann taper the first sidelobe is 31.5 decibels down and the core is 1.44 wide. With a Blackman taper the first sidelobe is 58.1 decibels down and the core is 1.64 wide. The hard edge's rings are not a defect of the optics and are not reduced by making it larger — they are the transform of a discontinuity, and the only way to remove them is to remove the discontinuity. What it costs is the width of the core, which is the resolution. Optics

The rings that belong to the edge

Every account of diffraction so far asks what the size of an aperture does. The rings around a star are not about its size: they are the transform of a discontinuity, they do not shrink relative to the core when the telescope grows, and the only way to remove them is to stop the transmission falling to zero abruptly. Softening the edge buys forty-five decibels of contrast and costs eighty per cent of the resolution.

5 figures The peak that is lost to a fraction of a wave. The height of the central peak, relative to a perfect pupil of the same size, against the root-mean-square error of the wavefront in waves, for four kinds of error — each computed from the transform and each normalised to the same rms. The dashed curve is the usual approximation, the exponential of minus the square of two pi times the error. What the figure shows is that to a good approximation it does not matter WHAT the error is, only how large it is in the mean square: four quite different shapes of wavefront give nearly the same peak. A fourteenth of a wave leaves 80 per cent of the peak, which is the conventional definition of diffraction-limited, and it corresponds to a quarter of a wave peak-to-valley for a simple defocus — which is where Rayleigh's quarter-wave rule comes from and why it is a convention laid over a computed number rather than a threshold in the physics. Optics

How accurate a mirror has to be

The pupil's amplitude decides the rings; its phase decides the peak. A wavefront error of a fourteenth of a wave root-mean-square leaves eighty per cent of the peak intensity, which is the whole of what 'diffraction-limited' means — a convention laid over a computed number. And the number barely depends on what the error is, only on how large: four quite different aberrations of the same magnitude give nearly the same answer.

5 figures The count that works for everything with a mass. How many beams a Stern-Gerlach analyser splits a particle into, for four spins, with the photon on the bottom row. For anything with a mass the answer is 2j+1 — go to the particle's rest frame, where its spin can point in any direction, and count the projections along whichever axis the magnet defines. A spin-one particle gives three: up, down, and a middle beam that is not deflected at all. The photon has spin one and gives two. The middle state does not exist, and it is not that it is hard to produce or weakly coupled — there is no such state of the electromagnetic field. A light wave has two polarisations and the third one, in which the field would oscillate along the direction of travel, is not a solution of Maxwell's equations at all. Quantum

Two states where the counting says three

A particle of spin one has three states, and the photon has two. The missing one is not rare or weakly coupled — there is no such state of the electromagnetic field. What removes it is that a massless particle has no rest frame, so the rotations that would turn one projection into another are not available; and the state comes back the moment the particle acquires a mass, which is what a photon does in a plasma.

5 figures No beam is narrow enough and wide enough at once. Three lengths at the far end of a Stern-Gerlach magnet 10 centimetres long with a gradient of 1000 tesla a metre, against the width of the beam entering it, for an electron at 100 electronvolts. The spin splitting is a horizontal line at 2.9e-6 metres: it does not depend on the beam's width. The Lorentz blurring rises in proportion to the width, because the field a particle sees depends on where in the beam it is, and the divergence-free condition ties a gradient in one component to a gradient in another. It overtakes the splitting at 1.0e-9 metres. Narrower than that and diffraction has already spread the beam by 3.9e-3 metres, which is larger still. There is no width at which the splitting is the largest of the three, and the magnet's length and gradient cancel out of the comparison entirely — so no magnet helps. Quantum

The experiment that defines spin and cannot be done on it

A Stern–Gerlach magnet separates magnetic moments and is how spin was discovered. It cannot be made to work on a free electron, and the obstruction is not the apparatus: the field gradient that splits the beam also deflects the charge by an amount that varies across it, and the ratio of the splitting to that blurring comes out as the de Broglie wavelength over the beam width — with the magnet's length and gradient cancelling exactly.

5 figures A fridge with no work going into it, and its ceiling. How much heat a three-reservoir machine can lift out of a cold space per unit of heat supplied to drive it, against the temperature of the driving heat, for 3 cold temperatures and an ambient of 300 kelvin. No work enters or leaves: the machine takes heat in at the top, takes heat in at the bottom, and rejects the sum at ambient. That it can do anything at all is the surprise — the second law allows heat to be moved up a gradient provided a larger flow is moved down one, and the accounting is a single inequality in the three entropy flows. The ceiling is the product of two familiar expressions, and at 450 kelvin driving a 253-kelvin space it is 1.79. The marks are what real machines achieve, which is a fifth to a third of it — absorption refrigeration is not efficient and is chosen when the heat is free and the silence and the absence of moving parts are worth something. Thermodynamics

A fridge with no work going into it

Every engine here so far turns heat into work or work into a heat flow. A machine exchanging heat with three reservoirs and doing no work at all can still move heat from cold to hot, and the ceiling on how much is the product of two Carnot expressions — an engine's efficiency times a fridge's coefficient of performance. A gas flame makes ice, and the accounting is one inequality in three entropy flows.

6 figures One dimensionless group between an engine and Carnot. The efficiency of a thermoelectric couple against the temperature of its hot side, with the cold side at 300 kelvin, for 4 values of the figure of merit, and the Carnot ceiling drawn above them. The expression has exactly one material quantity in it — the dimensionless group formed from the Seebeck coefficient squared, the electrical conductivity, the temperature and the thermal conductivity — and everything else is the two temperatures. At 600 kelvin, a figure of merit of one gives 10.8 per cent against a Carnot ceiling of 50.0, and a figure of merit of four gives 22.6. The approach to the ceiling is slow: every doubling of the group buys less than the last, so the difference between a good material and a perfect one is smaller than the difference between a poor material and a good one. Thermodynamics

An engine with one number in it

A thermoelectric couple has no moving part and no working fluid, and its efficiency is the Carnot value multiplied by a factor containing exactly one dimensionless group of material properties. Sixty years of effort have moved that group from about one to about two, and the reason it is hard is that its three ingredients are not independent: raising the conductivity ruins the coefficient it is squared against, and the only lever that is really free is the heat the lattice carries.

5 figures A blackbody in every direction, at a different temperature in each. The spectrum of a blackbody at 100 kelvin in its own frame, seen by an observer it is moving past at 0.5 of the speed of light, in 5 directions. Each curve is a Planck spectrum exactly — the Planck form survives a Doppler shift, with the temperature multiplied by the shift — and the temperatures run from 57.74 kelvin looking one way to 173.21 looking the other. So the body is a perfect blackbody in each direction and has no single temperature. A thermometer placed in the radiation reads something between, and what it reads depends on where it is put and on how much of the sky it sees — which is the reason a transformation law for temperature was argued about for sixty years without being found. Relativity

The body that has no temperature when it moves

Energy, momentum, length, duration and field strength all change when the observer moves. Temperature was argued about for sixty years, with three transformation laws proposed and each defended by people making no mistake. The resolution is that a moving blackbody is a perfect blackbody in every direction at a different temperature in each — so a thermometer's reading depends on where it is put, and the quantity the law was for is not there.

5 figures What a boost leaves alone, and what it does not. How each quantity of a box of blackbody radiation changes when the observer moves at 0.8 of the speed of light, a Lorentz factor of 1.667, on a logarithmic axis with one at the centre. The top four do not change at all, and the reason is the same in each case: they are counts, or logarithms of counts, or invariants built from four-vectors. A number of photons is a number, and every observer arrives at the same number. The rest change, by powers of the Lorentz factor that follow from the first four. And the entry that matters is the last two together: the energy density rises as the square of the factor while the entropy density rises as the factor itself, so the ratio between them that would define a temperature does not stay fixed — which is why the boosted radiation cannot be a blackbody at any temperature at all. Relativity

The count that no observer can disagree about

A moving body, it turns out, has no temperature. What it does have is an entropy, and every observer agrees about it — because entropy is the logarithm of a count of arrangements, and a count is a number. That one invariant, with energy and momentum being parts of one object, is enough to compute everything a temperature could not: what happens to the energy density, the entropy density, and the relation between them that having a temperature consists of.

5 figures The bath does push back, by an unmeasurable amount. The retarding force on a perfectly absorbing body moving through isotropic radiation at 2.725 kelvin, against its speed, for three areas. Moving through a bath of radiation is not free: the radiation arriving from ahead is blue-shifted and more intense and the radiation from behind is red-shifted and weaker, so the body absorbs more momentum from the front than from the back and decelerates. A square metre at half the speed of light feels 3.7e-14 newtons. That is the reason a preferred frame exists without relativity being violated: the laws are the same in every frame and the radiation is not — it is a physical system with a state, and its state picks out the frame in which it is isotropic, exactly as a body of water does. Relativity

The bath that pushes back

Moving through a bath of radiation is not free. The light arriving from ahead is blue-shifted and more intense and the light from behind is weaker, so a body absorbs more momentum from the front than from the back and slows down. That drag picks out the frame in which the radiation is isotropic — without violating relativity, because the laws are the same in every frame and the radiation is not.

5 figures The action at one instant, drawn as a map. Trajectories leaving one point at the same moment, at launch speeds 0.6, 1 and sixteen directions each, in a uniform field pulling downward, drawn up to time 1. Behind them, dashed, are the level curves of the action at that instant, regarded as a function of where a trajectory ends. They are circles, and their common centre is neither the launch point nor anywhere the particles have reached: it is 0.500 above the launch point, while the whole swarm has fallen by the same 0.500. Every arriving velocity points straight out from that centre, so every trajectory crosses the level curves at right angles, and the arriving momentum equals the gradient of the action to one part in ten thousand. The action integrated along each path agrees with the map's value at its end. Mechanics

The action that knows where every path ends

The action is usually a number attached to one path. Treat it instead as a function of where the true path ends, and a single function of position and time holds every trajectory at once — its slope is the momentum, its rate of change is the energy, and its level curves are wavefronts, drawn about a point that sits above the source while everything falls.

5 figures The launches that go in, and one thrower's scatter over them. Every free throw as a point: launch angle across, launch speed up. The dark curve is the launches that put the ball's centre through the centre of the hoop, lowest at the least-speed launch, 51.4° and 7.17 m/s. The shaded band is every launch that passes cleanly through, found at each angle by moving the speed until the ball touches the rim. It does not exist below 46.9°, is a hair thick near the bottom of the curve, and thickens as the launches steepen. The two ellipses are one thrower who scatters ±0.05 m/s in speed and ±1° in angle, drawn at two standard deviations and centred on two aims: the least-speed launch, and 58.5°, the aim that makes a clean pass most likely for that thrower. At the first, the ellipse lies across a band far thinner than itself; at the second, more of it lies inside, although the band there slopes more steeply. Mechanics

The throw most likely to go in

A free throw can be launched at 51.4° with less speed than at any other angle, and there a small error of angle hardly moves the ball at all. It is still not the best aim. Once the question is which throw most often goes in rather than which is cheapest, the thrower's scatter has to be laid over the launches that succeed — and for a hoop the answer moves steeper, while for a board the same scatter moves it flatter.

5 figures The paths in space: orbits of one period, and a throw straight up. The same free falls drawn in space around the Earth, which is the filled disc. All start at the marked point 2 Earth radii from the centre. The circle is the circular orbit. The ellipses, of eccentricity 0.2 and 0.4, have the same period, so they come back to the start at the same moment. The straight line is the thrown clock's path: straight up to 4.46 Earth radii and back down the same line, arriving as the orbits complete one revolution. The Earth's rotation is ignored and it is treated as a point mass for the paths that pass close to it. Relativity

The orbit that ages less than a throw

A clock in orbit and a clock thrown straight up leave the same point at the same moment and meet there again one period later. Both fall freely the whole way, so both follow paths of stationary proper time — and the thrown clock comes back 4.1 microseconds older. Even a clock held still by a rocket, which is not falling at all, beats the orbit. Free fall picks out a path that is stationary, not one that is longest.

5 figures Equilibrium is where the entropy peaks, and there the temperatures differ. Two cavities of radiation, one high in a gravitational field and one low, free to exchange energy, with the clock at the bottom running at 0.8 of the rate of the one at the top. What is conserved is the energy either would deliver to a distant observer, so energy held at the bottom counts for 0.8 of its local value. Across: the share of that conserved energy held at the top. Above: the total entropy of the two gases. Below: the temperature a thermometer in the top cavity reads, as a fraction of one in the bottom cavity. The entropy peaks at a share of 0.339, found by search, and there the top cavity is at 0.800 of the bottom's temperature — the clock-rate ratio exactly. Where the two local temperatures are equal, at a share of 0.556, the entropy is 1.82 per cent below its peak and energy still flows downward, into the deeper cavity. Relativity

The column that is hotter at the bottom

Two bodies in equilibrium have the same temperature — that is what equilibrium was supposed to mean. In a gravitational field it is false. A column left alone until nothing in it changes is warmer at the bottom by exactly the factor by which clocks there run slow, a part in ten million billion per metre on the Earth and more than a per cent across the outer kilometre of a neutron star, and near a black hole's horizon the equilibrium temperature grows without limit.

5 figures Every reaction's free energy has its lowest point inside. An ideal reaction A ⇌ B at 298 K. Across: how far it has gone, from pure A towards pure B. Up: the Gibbs energy of the mixture per mole, relative to pure A. Left, for standard reaction Gibbs energies ΔG° of −4, 0, +4 kJ/mol: the dashed straight lines are what the energy would be if A and B did not mix, and the solid curves add the entropy of mixing them. For ΔG° = −4 kJ/mol the lowest point is at 83.4 per cent B; for ΔG° = 0 kJ/mol the lowest point is at 50.0 per cent B; for ΔG° = +4 kJ/mol the lowest point is at 16.6 per cent B. Right, magnified near pure A, a reaction with ΔG° = +10 kJ/mol, whose straight line climbs from the start and which looks as if it should not proceed at all: its curve first falls, to a minimum of −43 J/mol at 1.74 per cent B, because the mixing term falls infinitely steeply away from a pure end. Each minimum was found by search and sits where the ratio of B to A equals exp(−ΔG°/RT). Thermodynamics

The reaction that cannot go all the way

Chemistry speaks of reactions that go to completion and reactions that do not happen, and at equilibrium there are neither. The reason is a logarithm. The free energy of a half-finished reaction contains the entropy of mixing, whose slope is infinite at both pure ends, so every reaction's lowest point lies strictly inside — and the slope of that free energy, the chemical potential, is to particles what temperature is to heat.

5 figures The light of a diode at room temperature is as bright as a surface thousands of kelvin hot. How many photons occupy each mode of the light, on a logarithmic scale, against photon energy. The lowest curve is the thermal glow of a 1.42 eV semiconductor at 300 K with no voltage across it. The solid curve above it is the same device with 1.3 V across it, emitting only above its gap. The dashed curve is a blackbody at 2571 K, the temperature whose light has the same occupation as the diode's at 1.472 eV, just above the gap. They cross there and nowhere else: the diode's occupation falls a factor e every 25.9 meV, as its lattice's temperature requires, and the blackbody's every 222 meV. No single temperature describes the diode's light. At each photon energy it has a brightness temperature, and that temperature is 300 K multiplied by ε/(ε − qV). Thermodynamics

The glow that carries a voltage

Thermal radiation has no chemical potential, because walls make and destroy photons freely. A light-emitting diode is a body that glows at room temperature with a voltage written into its light — Planck's law with the voltage as the photons' chemical potential — which is why its light can be as bright as a surface thousands of kelvin hot, why at low voltage it can put out more light than the power it draws and cool itself doing so, and why a reverse voltage makes a surface look colder than it is.

5 figures Three identical photons in a three-way splitter: some outcomes are forbidden. One photon enters each input of a symmetric three-way splitter, which sends each photon to each output with equal probability. Across: the ten ways three photons can leave, written as how many leave by each output. Bars, for each outcome: photons that can be told apart, identical photons, and identical fermions. Distinguishable photons spread over all ten, as independent coins would. Identical photons never produce 210, 201, 120, 102, 021, 012 — the 6 outcomes whose output labels do not add to a multiple of three — and pile into the rest: 300 with 0.222, 111 with 0.333, 030 with 0.222, 003 with 0.222. Identical fermions leave one per output every time (probability 1.000). Each probability is a sum of amplitudes over the distinct ways to reach the outcome, and each set sums to one. Quantum

The outcomes identical photons refuse

Two identical photons meeting at a beam splitter always leave together, and that one fact carries three more. No classical light can empty the coincidence dip more than halfway, so the depth is a test of what light is; the depth measures how identical two photons are, however they differ; and with three photons in a three-way splitter whole classes of outcome become impossible — the first case of a sum over paths that no known algorithm can evaluate quickly as the photons multiply.

5 figures Four states of light, each with the same area of noise. The field of a single mode of light drawn as a point in a plane whose two axes are its two quadratures — the parts of the wave in step with a reference and a quarter-cycle out of step. The distance from the centre is the amplitude and the angle is the phase. Each state is a cloud of 400 sampled measurements with its two-standard-deviation outline, in units where the vacuum's noise is one in every direction. The vacuum is a round cloud at the centre. Steady laser light is the same round cloud moved away from the centre. Light squeezed by 4 dB is an ellipse of the same area: narrower than the vacuum by a factor of 0.63 in one direction and wider by 1.58 in the other. Pointed along the direction from the centre it is quiet in amplitude; pointed across it, quiet in phase. The sampled spreads were checked against each state's widths. Quantum

The noise pushed below the floor

A perfectly steady laser beam still flickers, by an amount set by the vacuum itself, and for most of the twentieth century that flicker was treated as the floor of any optical measurement. It is a floor only for one shape of noise. Light can be made quieter than the vacuum in one property by being made louder in another — and the price, the fragility and the use of that trade are all visible in how the noise is shaped, which is why the world's gravitational-wave detectors now run on it.

5 figures Two paths through a neutron interferometer at two heights. A neutron interferometer cut from one silicon crystal, tilted by 30 degrees about its incoming beam so that one path runs higher than the other. Left: the two paths, split at the first slab, turned at the second and recombined at the third, enclosing 10.1 square centimetres; the heights are drawn exaggerated. Taken as a rectangle of the same area, the upper path runs 15.8 mm higher for 3.2 cm. There a neutron of wavelength 1.445 Å, moving at 2738 m/s, is slower by 56.5 micrometres per second, so its wavelength is longer by 20.6 parts per thousand million. Over 3.2 cm that accumulates 28.7 radians less phase than the lower leg — 4.6 whole fringes — computed by integrating the local wavenumber along both legs and checked against 2πm²gλA sin α / h². Quantum

The fall that leaves the mass in the phase

Every body falls the same way whatever its mass, and a neutron is no exception. But a neutron is also a wave, and the phase that wave accumulates while falling depends on the mass — as its square, at a fixed wavelength. Tilt a neutron interferometer so that one path runs a centimetre higher than the other and the neutrons swing between its two detectors, which in 1975 was the first measurement in which gravity and quantum mechanics both had to be right at once.

5 figures Three bodies of one mass, one field outside, three fields inside. The gravitational field against distance from the centre, both in units of the body's surface values, for 3 spherical bodies of the same mass and radius: a uniform ball; a dense core under a light mantle; a hollow shell. Outside the surface the three curves are one curve — checked at 1.7 radii by adding up the pull of every mass element in each body, which agrees with the pull of a point of the same mass to better than a part in five hundred. Inside they part: the uniform ball's field falls in a straight line, the layered body's rises to 1.24 times the surface value at the top of its core, and the hollow shell's is zero throughout its cavity. Their moment-of-inertia factors are 0.400 (uniform ball), 0.330 (dense core under a light mantle), 0.551 (hollow shell) — a number that no measurement of the field outside can supply. Electromagnetism

The field outside that cannot find the core

Gauss's law gives the field outside a body from what it encloses, and read backwards it is a limit. A uniform ball, a planet with an iron core and a hollow shell of the same mass have identical gravity everywhere outside. The field fixes a list of numbers — the mass, the flattening, higher moments — and leaves free everything else, including the moment of inertia; the Earth's core was weighed by its wobble, not by its pull.

5 figures A hump that is not a soliton comes apart into solitons. A single smooth hump of height 6, shaped as the square of a hyperbolic secant, released into the Korteweg–de Vries equation and followed by a pseudo-spectral integration, drawn at times 0.00, 0.15, 0.35, 0.60, each snapshot raised above the last. The hump is too tall for its width to be a soliton, and it separates: by the last time there are 2 crests, of heights 8.00 and 2.00, running apart at different speeds, with a small ripple left behind. Read as a potential well, the same hump holds 2 bound states, at κ = 2.000 and 1.000, and a soliton of height 2κ² belongs to each: 8.00 and 2.00. The integration conserved the hump's area to 3.1·10⁻¹⁵. Waves

The solitons a hump already contains

A soliton is one height for one width. Release a hump of any other shape and it does not keep that shape or simply spread — it comes apart into a fixed number of solitons of fixed heights, running off in order of size, with a ripple left behind. The number and the heights can be read off before anything moves, by treating the hump upside down as a well and counting the levels it holds.

5 figures The light follows one supermode through the crossing. Inside a tapered coupler 800 µm long at 1550 nm. Above: the fraction of the light in the first guide along the coupler, from integrating the coupled-mode equations, and dashed, the share of the first guide in the local supermode the light was launched into. They agree to within 8.3 percentage points along the whole length: the light does not beat between the guides but follows the supermode as that supermode changes from being in the first guide to being in the second. Below: the two supermodes' propagation constants relative to their average, which approach each other and repel across a gap of twice the coupling, 0.084 per micrometre, at the point where the guides are equally wide; dashed, the two single guides' constants, which cross. Waves

The coupler that does not care about the colour

Two identical guides side by side swap their light back and forth, and a coupler cut to the length of one swap works perfectly at one wavelength and badly at every other. Make the guides unequal, and sweep the inequality from one sign to the other along their length, and the light no longer swaps — it follows a single mode of the pair as that mode moves from one guide to the other. The transfer is then nearly complete across hundreds of nanometres of wavelength and immune to the widths being made wrong, and it costs length.

5 figures A repeat in space gaps the frequencies; a repeat in time gaps the wavenumbers. Two media with the same modulation depth, 0.2, computed the same way. Left: permittivity repeating in space, a stack of layers. For each frequency the wave equation is integrated across one spatial period, and the Bloch wavenumber drawn against frequency; between frequencies 0.478 and 0.526 (in units of c over the period) there is no real wavenumber, so light of those frequencies cannot travel and is reflected. Right: permittivity repeating in time. For each wavenumber the equation is integrated across one period, and the frequency drawn against wavenumber; between wavenumbers 0.474 and 0.518 there is no real frequency. The axes of the two panels are swapped, and so is everything else: the spatial gap is a band of frequencies that decays in space, the temporal gap is a band of wavenumbers that grows in time. Optics

The crystal made of moments

A stack of layers that repeats in space refuses a band of frequencies and reflects them. A medium that repeats in time — its refractive index swung up and down everywhere at once — refuses a band of wavenumbers instead, and a wave with a wavenumber in that band does not reflect. It grows, exponentially, drawing on whatever is swinging the index. The construction is exact, the gap is computable from one period of the modulation, and the obstacle to building one for light is how fast a material would have to change.

5 figures With interference kept, transmission falls exponentially; without it, only as one over the thickness. Light through stacks of randomly thick transparent layers, alternating indices 1 and 2.6, with thicknesses scattered by ±50 per cent about a quarter wave, on a logarithmic scale against the number of layers. The falling line is the transmission with the waves' interference kept, computed exactly by multiplying transfer matrices and averaged as the logarithm over 40 random stacks and five wavelengths. It falls in a straight line: the transmission drops by a factor of e every 17 layers, however thick the stack, which is exponential decay — localisation. The upper curve is the same stacks with every surface's reflection and transmission added as intensities, so that no interference survives. It falls only as one over the thickness, checked to grow in exact proportion, which is the diffusion of light through a cloud: at 400 layers it still transmits 1.0 per cent where the coherent stack typically transmits 4.5·10⁻¹¹. Optics

The walk that interference can stop

Light scattered many times walks through a cloud, and a walk always gets through eventually — a slab twice as thick lets through half as much. Keep the waves' interference instead of adding intensities, and in one dimension the same disorder does something a walk cannot: it stops the light exponentially, traps it in modes with nothing special about where they sit, and turns transmission from a number into a spread over powers of ten. Whether the same can happen to light in three dimensions has been claimed, retracted and argued for thirty years.

5 figures A thrust that cannot push past the hump. The resistance a hull meets against its speed in knots, in two layers whose fastest interfacial wave travels at 1.02 knots: ordinary friction rising as the square of the speed, plus the drag of the interfacial waves, whose hump sits just below the wave speed. The horizontal lines are 2 steady engine thrusts. A ship settles where its thrust meets the resistance curve. Thrust 0.6 meets it at 0.81 knots; Thrust 1.3 meets it at 0.94, 1.00, 1.82 knots. A ship accelerating from rest reaches the first crossing and stops gaining speed there, below the hump, even when a faster crossing exists beyond it — which is the dead water sailors reported, a ship held to a fraction of its usual speed by a wave it cannot see. Fluids

The wave that holds a ship back

In 1893 the polar ship Fram, which could make four or five knots, was held to about one in a calm Arctic sea with nothing visible in the water. The sea was layered — a metre or two of fresh meltwater over salt — and the ship was making a wave on the boundary between the layers, a wave that travels at about a knot and carries away almost all of a slow ship's power. Below that speed the drag is a hump no steady thrust can climb; above it the wave cannot keep up and the drag falls away.

5 figures The field a pinch gives up relaxing into. The axial and azimuthal field across a cylinder of conducting plasma in the minimum-energy state at fixed helicity, Bz = J₀(λr) and Bθ = J₁(λr), drawn for λa = 1.5 and λa = 3. Solid lines are the axial field and dashed lines the azimuthal field. Both satisfy ∇×B = λB, checked by finite differences at three radii, so the current runs along the field everywhere and the field exerts no force on the plasma. At λa = 3 the axial field passes through zero at r = 0.802a and is reversed outside it. The reversal needs λa above 2.405, the first zero of J₀, and nothing was imposed at the edge to produce it. λa = 1.5: pinch parameter Θ = 0.75, reversal parameter F = 0.688. λa = 3: pinch parameter Θ = 1.50, reversal parameter F = -1.150. Astrophysics

The twist that outlives the turbulence

A plasma pinch driven hard enough goes violently unstable, and then settles into the same quiet state however it was started — with the field at its edge pointing backwards. The explanation is that turbulence destroys almost every constraint a perfect conductor obeys and spares one. The magnetic helicity, a measure of how twisted and linked the field is, decays far more slowly than the energy, and a field that has shed all the energy it can at fixed helicity has only one shape available to it.

6 figures Both clocks move, and their ratio does not. Two years of a clock's fractional frequency against a distant clock (upper panel), and of the ratio of two unlike clocks kept side by side (lower panel). Above, both clocks slow as the Earth nears the Sun, with an amplitude of 1.65·10⁻¹⁰, and if the redshift is universal the two curves are one curve. Below, the ratio: the flat line is what universality predicts, and the sinusoid is what a clock responding to the potential 10⁻⁶ more strongly than the other would produce — an annual term of 1.65·10⁻¹⁶, a million times smaller than the shift both clocks share and within reach of clocks that compare to parts in 10¹⁷. Astrophysics

The clocks that must all slow together

Every clock on the Earth runs slower in January than in July, by three parts in ten thousand million, because the orbit carries the planet deeper into the Sun's potential at perihelion. No clock on the Earth can see this, and that invisibility is the claim worth testing. If the redshift is a property of time rather than of clocks, two clocks built on different physics must slow by exactly the same fraction, and their ratio must not move with the seasons. A ratio that did move would mean the constants of nature depend on where they are measured.

6 figures Mean field always pushes; correlations pull. The pressure between two planes of equal charge with only their own counterions between them, against their separation, in units of the Gouy–Chapman length μ for the separation and 2πℓ_Bσ²kT for the pressure. The upper curve is the Poisson–Boltzmann result, solved from k·tan(kd/2) = 1: it is the density of counterions at the midplane and is positive at every separation, falling from the ideal-gas 2/d at contact to π²/d² far apart — 1.71 at 1μ, 0.290 at 4μ. The lower curve is the strong-coupling limit, 2/d − 1, which the same ions reach when their valence and the surface charge are high. It crosses zero at d = 2μ and is negative beyond, tending to −1: the two like-charged planes attract, and the separation 2μ is where they come to rest. Fluids

The like charges that pull together

Two surfaces carrying the same charge, with nothing between them but the ions that neutralise them, ought to repel, and the standard mean-field theory proves that they always do. With calcium or spermine as the counterions they attract, and come to rest a fraction of a nanometre apart. The mean field misses it because it averages the ions into a smooth cloud, and multivalent ions are too strongly repelled by each other to form one. Each keeps a patch of surface to itself, and the pressure between the plates becomes a single ion's business.

5 figures Circles that go nowhere, and a current across the line. Gyrating ions in a uniform magnetic field pointing out of the page, with 60 guiding centres drawn from a density that falls by a factor of e every 3 gyroradii to the right, and Maxwellian speeds. Every ion goes round clockwise and none of the circles moves. Of the circles that cross the dashed vertical line, those centred to its left cross it moving down and those centred to its right cross it moving up; in this sample 11 cross moving down and 7 moving up, a count a sample this small could turn either way. Because there are more circles on the left, the ions at the line move downwards on average over every speed and phase, at exactly the thermal speed squared over the gyrofrequency times L, 0.33 thermal speeds, computed by averaging over speeds and phases and checked against that value. It is a current, carried by circles whose centres are still. Electromagnetism

The current no particle carries

A magnetised plasma holds its own pressure against the field only if a current flows across the pressure gradient, and the fluid equations say exactly how much. Follow the particles in a uniform field and none of them is going anywhere; every guiding centre is still. The current is real all the same. It is made of circles that are more crowded on one side of a line than the other, and when the field is not uniform, the drifts that do move the guiding centres flow the wrong way.

5 figures A pendulum with unequal steps. The potential −EJ cos φ of the junction against its phase, at EJ/EC = 50, with the lowest 4 levels of the circuit drawn across the well between their classical turning points, in units of the charging energy. The transitions are 18.94, 17.79, 16.50, each smaller than the one below it; a harmonic well of the same curvature would space them all at the square root of 8·EJ·EC, 20.00. The spacing shrinks because the cosine is flatter than a parabola away from its bottom, and the shrinking is what lets a microwave pulse tuned to the lowest transition leave the next one alone. Electromagnetism

The circuit that forgets its charge

A tiny superconducting island joined to its surroundings through a Josephson junction has discrete energy levels, and two of them make a quantum bit. The first such circuits were ruined by stray charges on nearby surfaces, which moved their levels and scrambled any superposition within a nanosecond. The cure was to make the junction's energy fifty times the charging energy. That makes the levels exponentially insensitive to charge while costing only a power-law loss in the unequal spacing that lets one transition be driven alone.

5 figures

Before that

Everything published earlier, newest first. Titles only — the cards are on the full listing.

14 September 2026

20 essays on electromagnetism, mechanics, optics, thermodynamics, astrophysics, quantum, waves, fluids and relativity

13 September 2026

19 essays on astrophysics, electromagnetism, fluids, mechanics, optics, relativity, quantum, thermodynamics and waves

11 September 2026

20 essays on astrophysics, mechanics, fluids, optics, electromagnetism, quantum, relativity, thermodynamics and waves

9 September 2026

20 essays on astrophysics, electromagnetism, fluids, mechanics, optics, quantum, relativity, thermodynamics and waves

8 September 2026

20 essays on quantum, waves, electromagnetism, mechanics, optics, thermodynamics, astrophysics, relativity and fluids

5 September 2026

50 essays on mechanics, electromagnetism, optics, waves, thermodynamics, quantum, relativity, fluids and astrophysics

3 September 2026

20 essays on mechanics, waves, optics, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, quantum, relativity, fluids and astrophysics

1 September 2026

20 essays on mechanics, waves, fluids, astrophysics, optics, quantum, electromagnetism, thermodynamics and relativity

30 August 2026

20 essays on mechanics, waves, fluids, astrophysics, optics, quantum, electromagnetism, thermodynamics and relativity

29 August 2026

20 essays on waves, mechanics, fluids, astrophysics, optics, thermodynamics, relativity, electromagnetism and quantum

28 August 2026

20 essays on mechanics, waves, thermodynamics, fluids, optics, electromagnetism, relativity, astrophysics and quantum

26 August 2026

15 essays on quantum, electromagnetism, optics, thermodynamics, astrophysics, waves, mechanics, fluids and relativity

25 August 2026

15 essays on electromagnetism, quantum, thermodynamics, fluids, relativity, astrophysics, optics, mechanics and waves

24 August 2026

15 essays on fluids, mechanics, waves, optics, quantum, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, relativity and astrophysics

22 August 2026

15 essays on mechanics, waves, optics, quantum, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, relativity, fluids and astrophysics

21 August 2026

15 essays on mechanics, waves, optics, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, quantum, relativity, fluids and astrophysics

20 August 2026

15 essays on mechanics, electromagnetism, optics, waves, thermodynamics, quantum, relativity, fluids and astrophysics

19 August 2026

15 essays on mechanics, electromagnetism, optics, waves, relativity, thermodynamics, fluids and astrophysics

17 August 2026

15 essays on mechanics, electromagnetism, optics, waves, relativity, thermodynamics, fluids, astrophysics and quantum

15 August 2026

15 essays on mechanics, electromagnetism, optics, waves, thermodynamics and relativity

14 August 2026

15 essays on astrophysics, relativity and thermodynamics

13 August 2026

15 essays on fluids, thermodynamics and quantum

11 August 2026

15 essays on quantum

10 August 2026

12 essays on mechanics, electromagnetism, optics, waves, thermodynamics and relativity

3–7 August 2026

34 essays on mechanics, waves, optics, electromagnetism, thermodynamics and relativity

Every essay, by subject · by subject · by thread · search