Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Central force — where it appears

A force that always points at one fixed centre, which makes the torque about that centre zero and the angular momentum constant. The constant angular momentum confines the motion to a plane and turns a three-dimensional problem into a one-dimensional one in the radius.

Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The same start, four force laws. Orbits under 4 different central force laws, every one started at the same radius with the same fraction — 0.72 — of the local circular speed, and every one integrated for 6 radial oscillations. The paths are drawn to different scales because the excursions differ; what is comparable between the panels is whether the curve retraces itself. Under the inverse square it does: the orbit is a closed ellipse and the sixth circuit lies exactly on the first. Under the linear force it does too, and the ellipse is centred on the source rather than focused on it. Under anything in between the path is a rosette that never closes, because the angle between successive closest approaches is not a rational fraction of a full turn. Those angles are 180.0° at n = -2, 145.9° at n = -1.5, 126.4° at n = -1, 90.0° at n = 1. The closure is not a matter of degree — a rosette that nearly closes is not nearly a closed orbit, since after enough circuits it fills the annulus.

The orbit that does not come back to itself

A bounded orbit under any central force oscillates between a smallest and a largest radius for ever. That it should also return to the same point is a further demand, and only two force laws in existence meet it — the inverse square, and the linear spring.

astrophysics · Orbit stability Arms in: 4.33× the rate, and 4.33× the energy. A body of 1.2 kg m² carrying two 4 kg masses on arms, spinning freely at 60 revolutions a minute with the arms out at 0.75 m, as the arms are pulled in to 0.12 m. The axis runs right to left, in the direction the arms move. Angular momentum is flat — nothing exerts a torque about the axis, and pulling inward is a force along a radius, which has no moment about the centre. The rate rises as the inverse of the moment of inertia, by a factor of 4.33 here, and the kinetic energy L²/2I rises by exactly the same factor, which is where the usual account stops and where the question starts. The fourth curve is the work done by whoever pulled the arms in, integrated from the force needed to hold each mass on its circle. It lies on the energy curve, to 1.6e-7 joules. Nothing is unaccounted for and nothing is created: the energy is bought, at full price, by pulling against the force that would otherwise fling the arms out.

The quantity that survives a change of shape

A skater pulls her arms in and spins four times faster. Angular momentum is conserved, which is the usual explanation, and it accounts for only half of what happened — because the kinetic energy has gone up by the same factor, and something had to pay for it.

mechanics · Rotation The arrow the orbit cannot turn. A Kepler orbit of eccentricity 0.6, integrated for two revolutions, with the Laplace–Runge– Lenz vector constructed from the position and velocity at five points along it. Every one of the five is the same arrow: its length varies by 3.7e-11 over the whole run and its direction by 2.1e-10 radians. It points at the perihelion and its length is 0.600000, which is the orbit's eccentricity measured independently from the closest and furthest radii as 0.600000. Energy and angular momentum fix the size and shape of an orbit and say nothing about which way it points; this vector is the missing statement, and only an inverse square has one.

The arrow that says which way the orbit points

Energy and angular momentum fix the size and shape of an orbit and say nothing about its orientation. The inverse-square force has a third conserved quantity that supplies it — a vector pointing at the perihelion whose length is the eccentricity — and no other force law does.

astrophysics · Orbit stability A rosette: the orbit of a body whose inertia is its energy. An orbit of eccentricity 0.45 under inertia from energy, Newton's pull, integrated for 7 revolutions from the closest approach of a body with k/Lc = 0.35. The dashed curve is the Newtonian ellipse from the same starting position and momentum, which closes on itself. The integrated orbit does not: its closest approach moves forward by 24.3° each revolution, against the exact 24.3° of 2π(1/Γ − 1) with Γ = √(1 − k²/L²c²). The dots are the successive closest approaches.

The orbit special relativity cannot close

An inverse-square orbit closes on itself because of a conserved vector that nothing else has. Give the orbiting body an inertia that grows with its speed, as special relativity requires, and the vector turns — the orbit becomes a rosette, advancing by a sixth of Mercury's famous 43 arcseconds a century. A different theory that respects special relativity just as well turns the rosette backwards by the same amount. The 43 is not special relativity plus a correction; it is a measurement of what gravity pulls on.

astrophysics · Orbit stability

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Angular momentumPrecessionConservation lawsConserved quantityDegeneracyEffective potentialGeneral relativityOrbitPerturbationApsidal angleBertrand theoremCentripetal force

All concepts