Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Impedance-matching — where it appears

Arranging for a wave to cross a boundary without reflecting, by inserting something that makes the change of impedance gradual on the scale of a wavelength. A quarter-wave layer does it at one wavelength exactly; a taper does it for every wavelength above a cutoff, which is why a horn is large if it is to reach low notes.

Named by 8 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Reflected upside down. A pulse arriving at a join where the impedance rises by a factor of 3, drawn at three moments. The amplitudes are read off the marched wave: the reflected pulse is -0.500 of the incident one and the transmitted pulse is 0.500, against (1−Z₂/Z₁)/(1+Z₂/Z₁) = -0.500 and 2/(1+Z₂/Z₁) = 0.500 from the two matching conditions. The reflection is inverted, which is the same fact as a pulse on a string flipping when it reaches a wall: a wall is a medium of infinite impedance, and the inversion is what keeps the displacement at the join equal to zero. Note that the transmitted amplitude exceeds one where the second medium is lighter, and that this is not a violation of anything: amplitude is not energy.

What happens where the medium changes

Two conditions at a join — the displacement is continuous, and so is the transverse force — fix the reflected and transmitted amplitudes completely. What decides them is one quantity, the impedance, and not the stiffness or the density separately: two quite different media with the same impedance are, to a wave, the same medium.

waves · Impedance A graded junction against a quarter-wave layer. Reflectance against wavelength for four ways of joining a medium of index 1 to one of 1.52. The bare interface reflects 4.26 per cent at every wavelength. A single quarter-wave layer of index √(n₀n_s) takes that to zero at 550 nm exactly and rises symmetrically either side, which is the shape of every single-layer coating and every single-section transformer. The remaining curves are graded junctions of 150 nm and 400 nm, built as 120 thin layers whose index climbs geometrically and put through the same matrix product. They do not have a design wavelength at all. Below a cutoff they are flat and negligible; above it they climb steeply toward the bare value, and the cutoff is set by the length: 398 nm for the 150 nm taper, 1062 nm for the 400 nm taper. Roughly, a taper works for every wavelength shorter than about twice its own optical length, which is the statement that a reflection needs a partner a quarter of a wavelength further in to cancel against. The engineering versions of this are everywhere: the horn on a loudspeaker, the moth's eye, the flared transition between two waveguides, and the graded layer that lets an ultrasound probe reach tissue across a hundredfold impedance step.

The taper that matches every note

A quarter-wave layer cancels a reflection at one wavelength and only near it. Spread the same change of impedance over a distance instead, and the reflection vanishes for every wavelength shorter than about twice that distance — not by cancelling one echo against another, but by leaving no step anywhere for an echo to come from.

waves · Impedance Minima that are not zeros. The amplitude along a line carrying a wave towards a load and its reflection back, for reflection magnitudes of 0, 0.35, 0.7, 1. With everything reflected the pattern touches zero and is a standing wave in the strict sense. With less than everything it does not: the minima sit at one minus the reflection and the maxima at one plus it, so the pattern is a partial standing wave sitting on a travelling one. The spacing is half a wavelength in every case, and the depth is the only thing that changes — which is why one number, the ratio of the maximum to the minimum, is enough to report the whole pattern.

The node that is not standing still

A wave meeting a perfect reflector makes a standing wave with real nodes. A partial reflection makes something that looks the same and is not: the minima are not zeros, energy flows steadily through them, and the depth of the pattern is a measurement of the load that caused it.

waves · Standing waves Three terms, and one distance. The three terms of an oscillating dipole's electric field against distance, in units of a reciprocal wavenumber, both logarithmic. They fall as 1/u³, 1/u² and 1/u, so they are all equal at u = 1 — a distance of λ/2π, which is a property of the frequency and of nothing about the antenna. The heavy curve is the field the three actually add up to, and it is not their sum: the static and radiation terms are in antiphase and partly cancel, which is why the total dips below every one of them just inside the crossing before settling onto the 1/u the far field is made of.

The distance where a field changes its mind

An oscillating source has three fields around it, falling as the inverse cube, the inverse square and the inverse first power of distance. They are all equal at one radius, and that radius is the wavelength over 2π — a number containing nothing about the source at all. Inside it a source mostly stores energy; outside it, mostly loses it, and the two behaviours are different technologies rather than different strengths.

electromagnetism · Retardation How close a network gets to a load that stores charge. The fraction of a wave's amplitude reflected from a resistance shunted by a capacitance, with RCωc = 2, against frequency in units of the band edge ωc, for the load alone and for networks of inductors and capacitors whose values, with an ideal transformer at the source, were optimised numerically to keep the reflection low across the band. The bare load holds it to 0.707 across the band; the 1-element network holds it to 0.392 across the band; the 2-element network holds it to 0.320 across the band; the 3-element network holds it to 0.289 across the band. The dashed line is Bode and Fano's floor, exp(−π/RCωc) = 0.208, which no network of any size can go beneath over the whole band; each added element brings the design closer to it, and each buys its flatter band with a reflection that climbs to total just beyond the band edge.

The mismatch no network can remove

A quarter-wave layer or a taper can match a resistance to a resistance as well as anyone likes. Put a capacitance across the load and that stops being true for every network that could ever be built from lossless parts: Bode and Fano proved that the total amount of match available is fixed by the load's resistance and capacitance, so a network can only move it about — and a flat match across a band can never be better than e to the minus π over the load's time constant times the band.

waves · Impedance The thickness fixes the area, and the design only moves it. How much a metal-backed resistive sheet 7.5 mm from the metal absorbs, measured as ln(1/|Γ|), against wavelength, for sheets of 150, 250, 377, 800 Ω per square. Rozanov's bound says the area under any such curve, over all wavelengths, can be at most 2π² times the thickness: 147.9 mm here. The areas computed are 147.9 mm for 150 Ω, 147.9 mm for 250 Ω, 147.9 mm for 377 Ω, 69.7 mm for 800 Ω. Every sheet up to the impedance of free space meets the bound exactly and only moves its area between wavelengths; the more resistive sheet wastes part of it.

The absorber whose bandwidth is its thickness

A metal plate reflects everything, and a surface that must swallow a radar wave instead has to be a match between free space and a short circuit. A resistive sheet a quarter-wave in front of the metal does it perfectly at one frequency. Widening the band takes more sheets and more depth, and a theorem says why that is not a failure of design: for any absorber backed by metal, the total absorption over all wavelengths is fixed by its thickness, and by nothing else except its permeability.

waves · Impedance A lever that makes air and water meet. The fraction of sound power crossing from air into water through an ideal lossless transformer that multiplies pressure by a factor n, against n on a logarithmic axis. With no transformer, n = 1, it is 0.11 per cent. It rises as the transformer makes the water look less stiff and air look stiffer, reaching everything at n = 60, and falls again beyond, where the water is made to look softer than air. The middle ear's 22 gives 43 per cent in this picture — a gain of 26 dB over no transformer at all. The curve is flat near its top: a lever within a factor of two of the ideal still passes about two-thirds of the power, which is why a mechanism need not be precise to be effective.

The lever that lets air speak to water

Sound in air striking a surface of water is almost entirely reflected: 99.9 per cent bounces off, which is why a swimmer underwater hears the world above as a muffled murmur. The inner ear is filled with fluid, and the eardrum faces air, so every land animal has the problem of getting sound across that boundary. The answer is three tiny bones and a difference in area, which together multiply the pressure about twenty-fold and turn a thousandth of the power into nearly half. The middle ear is an impedance transformer, the mechanical twin of the one in every radio, and it works best over just the band where speech carries its meaning.

waves · Impedance One number decides the efficiency. The best efficiency a link of two resonant circuits can reach, with its load chosen to maximise it, against the figure of merit U = k√(Q₁Q₂) on a logarithmic scale: the coupling coefficient times the geometric mean of the two coils' quality factors. The curve is η = U²/(1 + √(1 + U²))², and nothing else about the coils, the frequency or the distance enters: 0.25 per cent at U = 0.1, 17 per cent at U = 1, 52 per cent at U = 3, 82 per cent at U = 10, 94 per cent at U = 30. A weak coupling is rescued by a high Q: k = 0.003 with Q = 1,000 on each side gives U = 3 and 54 per cent, where the same coils used without tuning capacitors, as a plain transformer, deliver under one per cent, with the source driving mostly reactive current that does nothing.

The coupling a resonance rescues

Two coils a hand's breadth apart share a few thousandths of their magnetic flux, and as a transformer they deliver almost nothing. Tune each with a capacitor to the same frequency and the same pair can carry most of the power across. Resonance does not strengthen the coupling, which is fixed by the geometry and falls as the cube of the distance. It changes how many times the energy goes round before it is lost. The efficiency then depends on one number, the coupling times the quality factor, and that one number explains a toothbrush on its stand, a phone on its pad, a car parked over a plate in the road and a light bulb lit two metres away.

electromagnetism · Induction

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ImpedanceBandwidthReflection coefficientStanding waveAnalyticityBoundary conditionsNear fieldQuality factorReflectionResonanceTransmission coefficientAcoustic impedance

All concepts