Concept

Resonance — where it appears

The large response a system gives when driven near its own natural frequency, with a height and width set by how lightly it is damped. The peak amplitude is the quality factor times the static response, and the width is the centre frequency divided by that same factor.

Named by 34 essays across 8 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Response against driving frequency. The steady-state amplitude of a driven oscillator against driving frequency, at three damping ratios. Lighter damping gives a taller and narrower peak, and the peak sits slightly below the natural frequency.

The frequency that gets an answer, and the quarter cycle nobody mentions

Push an oscillator at its own frequency and the response grows enormously. The reason is not that the push is in step with the motion — at resonance it is a quarter cycle out, and that is precisely why it works.

waves · Resonance
Where modulating a system sets it going. The regions of the modulation plane in which an oscillator with a damping ratio of 0.02 will not stay still. The horizontal axis is the modulation frequency in units of the oscillator's own; the vertical is how deeply the stiffness is modulated. Inside a shaded wedge the state of rest is unstable and any disturbance grows exponentially; outside it, nothing happens at all. The wedges sit at modulation frequencies of twice, once and two-thirds of the natural frequency, and the first is much the widest — it opens at a depth of 8.0%, against 40.0% for the second. Each boundary is found by integrating one period of the modulation from two independent starts and asking whether the resulting map has a multiplier outside the unit circle, then bisecting on the depth; none of the shape is drawn by hand. Without damping every wedge would come to a point on the axis and there would be no threshold at all — the flat bottom of each is damping, and it is why a swing has to be pumped hard enough before it does anything.

The swing that is pumped, not pushed

Nobody pushes a swing they are sitting on. They stand up at the bottom and sit down at the ends, which changes the pendulum rather than forcing it — and does so twice per period. The equation that describes it has no forcing term at all, so standing still is always a solution, and what the pumping changes is whether standing still is stable.

waves · Resonance
One equation, and the number that decides what it does. The same oscillator released from rest at one unit of displacement, with 4 different amounts of velocity-proportional loss. Every curve is a numerical integration of a single equation with no case analysis in it; what changes between them is one dimensionless number, the damping ratio. Below one, the two exponents are a complex conjugate pair and the motion crosses zero over and over inside a decaying envelope. At one they collide into a real double root and the trace reaches the axis and stops. Above one they are two distinct real numbers, the slower of them dominates, and the return is sluggish — an overdamped system takes longer to come back than a critically damped one, which is the thing the word 'over' is doing in its name. The ratios drawn are 0.15, 0.5, 1, 2, and the first zero crossing happens at 1.75 s for ζ = 0.15, 2.42 s for ζ = 0.5, never for ζ = 1, never for ζ = 2.

The three ways of coming to rest

An oscillator with friction in it can swing and fade, arrive and stop, or crawl back so slowly it looks stuck. One equation and one number decide which. The number is not what most people would guess, and neither is the value that returns fastest.

mechanics · Pendulum
The response of a machine with a 10% absorber bolted to it. The amplitude of the driven mass, in units of the deflection the same force would cause if applied slowly, against drive frequency in units of the machine's own natural frequency. Dashed: the machine alone, with its single resonance. Solid: the same machine with a second mass and spring attached, weighing 10 per cent of it and tuned to the same frequency. At that frequency the driven mass does not move at all — the amplitude is zero rather than small, and the absorber is moving 10.0 static deflections to make it so. What the device costs is the two new resonances it creates, at 0.854 and 1.171 times the original frequency, which are infinite in this undamped calculation and straddle the frequency the machine was protected at.

The mass that makes another stand still

Bolt a small mass on a spring to a machine that is shaking itself apart, tune it to the frequency that is doing the damage, and the machine stops moving. Not moves less — stops, exactly, at that one frequency. The price is two new resonances either side of it, and the whole device is a bet that the drive stays where it was put.

waves · Resonance
The same steady pull, twice. Spring force divided by the normal load, against time, with the far end drawn away at 100 µm/s in both traces and every property of the contact the same. The soft holder at 0.4 k_c produces events every 3.75 s, each of which reaches 0.94 m/s — 9.4e+3 times the speed it is being pulled at. The stiff one at 1.6 k_c settles to a straight line and stays on it.

The chatter a stiffer holder removes

A brake squeals, a bow sounds a string, a fault slips in jerks. The usual explanation is that static friction exceeds kinetic friction — and that explanation, taken seriously, predicts the jerking would happen no matter how the thing were held. It does not, and what decides is a length nobody mentions.

mechanics · Friction
Water's permittivity across six decades of frequency. The real and imaginary parts of water's permittivity against frequency, on logarithmic axes, from 10 to 16 in powers of ten hertz. ε′ begins at 80.1 — the number a textbook prints — falls through the Debye relaxation near twenty gigahertz, is dragged down again by the librational, bending and stretching bands of the molecule, and settles at 1.777 in the visible, whose square root is 1.3330: water's refractive index. The identity n = √ε_r is exact and is an identity between two numbers taken at the same frequency; using the static permittivity in it predicts an index of 8.9 and is the most instructive wrong answer in the subject. The curve is a Debye term and four Lorentz oscillators, with two parameters solved so that the two plateaus are the measured ones rather than fitted by eye.

The constant that depends on how fast it is asked

Water's relative permittivity is 80.1. Its refractive index is 1.333, and the square of 1.333 is 1.777. The identity n = √ε_r is exact, the two numbers differ by a factor of forty-five, and nothing is wrong with either — because a permittivity is a function of frequency and the two measurements were made eight orders of magnitude apart.

electromagnetism · Dielectrics
The one frequency a broken repeat lets through. Transmission through a quarter-wave stack whose repeat is broken once, on a logarithmic scale, against frequency in units of the quarter-wave design frequency. The perfect stack forbids this whole band; adding a single half-wave layer at the centre opens one line inside it, at exactly the middle of the gap, through which the stack transmits everything. With 4 pairs either side the line is 2.50e-3 wide, a quality factor of 400, on a background of 4.5e-4; With 6 pairs either side the line is 1.56e-4 wide, a quality factor of 6410, on a background of 6.3e-6; With 8 pairs either side the line is 1.00e-5 wide, a quality factor of 100000, on a background of 9.2e-8. The line narrows geometrically as the mirrors are made thicker, because the field inside the defect leaks out through a barrier whose transmission falls exponentially with its thickness — so the useful quantity of a band gap turns out to be not what it excludes but how well it can trap what a single flaw is allowed to hold.

The mode that lives in the mistake

A perfect stack of alternating layers refuses a whole band of frequencies — not weakly, not with loss, but not at all. Break the repeat once, by inserting a single layer of the wrong thickness, and exactly one frequency inside that band passes through the whole stack with a transmittance of one. The useful thing about a forbidden band turns out to be not what it excludes but what a single flaw is thereby allowed to hold.

waves · Periodic media
Flat, then exponential, then a power law. Survival probability against time in lifetimes, both logarithmic, for a resonance 20 linewidths above the bottom of its band and 400 below the top. The straight dashed line is exp(−Γt), and the computed curve sits on it through the middle — a fitted rate of 0.9998 per lifetime between one and eight — and leaves it at both ends. Below 1.57e-2 lifetimes the curve is flat, falling as (t/τ_z)² with τ_z = 0.1253 lifetimes; beyond 22.6 lifetimes it is an inverse square, which any exponential eventually loses to. Both departures are forced: the head by the state being normalisable and the tail by the band having a bottom.

The exponential that is only true in the middle

A decay law is not an assumption about nuclei; it is the Fourier transform of an energy distribution. Do that transform honestly and the exponential fails at both ends — flat at the start, because the state is normalisable, and an inverse square at the end, because no system has states of arbitrarily negative energy. Neither departure is a correction that could be made small.

quantum · Decay
The same number read off a decay and off a linewidth. A lightly damped oscillator released and left alone, above, and the power spectrum of exactly those samples, below. The decay falls to 1/e of its starting amplitude after 8.0 cycles, which makes the quality factor π times that, or 25.0. The spectrum peaks at 1.0000 radians per second and falls to half its power 0.04001 radians per second wide, which makes the quality factor the peak divided by the width, or 25.0. The two disagree by 0.02 per cent, which is the resolution of the frequency grid rather than a difference in the physics. They cannot disagree by more, because they are the same statement: a resonance is narrow because its ringing is long, and the transform that turns one into the other is not an approximation but an identity. A measurement of either is a measurement of both — which is why a bell can be characterised by hitting it and listening, or by driving it and sweeping, and why the two instruments never argue.

The width that is a lifetime

Hit a bell and time how long it rings; drive it and measure how narrow its response is. The two numbers are the same number, and they cannot disagree — not because the physics conspires but because a decay and a linewidth are one function seen in two coordinate systems.

waves · Resonance
Two barriers, and the energies at which they stop being barriers. Transmission against energy on a logarithmic scale, for one barrier of width 0.9 and height 20, and for two of them separated by a well of width 2. Below the top of the barrier the single one transmits an exponentially small amount and does so smoothly. The pair does not: at particular energies the transmission climbs by orders of magnitude and reaches 1.000000 — one, to every digit the arithmetic has — even though each barrier on its own passes 3.9e-2 of what arrives. Multiplying the two single-barrier transmissions would give 1.5e-3, which is wrong by 6e+2: amplitudes are what compose, not probabilities, and the region between the barriers is a box whose quasi-bound levels are where the amplitudes reinforce. The resonances sit at 6.438, 13.915 and the levels of an infinite well of the same width are at 2.467, 9.870 — near, and not equal, because a well with leaky walls has states that are not quite bound.

Two walls that let more through than one

Put a second barrier behind the first and the transmission does not fall — at particular energies it rises to exactly one, through a pair of walls each of which stops all but a few per cent. Probabilities cannot do that. Amplitudes can, and the region between the barriers is a box whose levels say where.

quantum · Tunnelling
A drive at one frequency, and what comes back at three times it. The Fourier components of the steady motion of an oscillator driven at a single frequency ω = 1.35, for drive strengths of 0.02, 0.05, 0.1. The equation is a harmonic oscillator with a cubic term added, and the components are projected out of the integrated motion rather than assumed. A linear oscillator answers only in the first column. This one answers in the third as well, because x³ of a cosine contains a cosine of three times the angle. The third harmonic grows as the drive to the power 3.00 where the fundamental grows as the power 1.00, so it is negligible at small drive and not at large — which is why nonlinearity in an instrument is a specification rather than a yes or no.

The oscillator that answers at three times the question

Push a spring hard enough that the parabola stops being the whole story, and three things happen that a linear oscillator cannot do: it emits frequencies nobody supplied, its resonance leans over, and its amplitude at one drive frequency depends on where the drive has been.

mechanics · Harmonic approximation
A resonance that goes to zero before it peaks. Fano profiles for asymmetry parameters of 5, 1.5, 0.5, 0, each normalised to its own peak, against detuning in half-widths. A large parameter gives an almost symmetric peak — the resonant path dominates and the shape is nearly Lorentzian. A parameter of zero gives a symmetric dip, a window in which the system transmits nothing on resonance. In between the profile is lopsided, with a zero on one side of the resonance and the maximum on the other, at positions whose product is exactly minus one. The asymmetry is not a defect of the measurement: it is the interference of two ways through the system, and its sign says which side of the resonance the two paths cancel on.

The resonance with a zero in it

Where a resonance is the only way through a system, the response is a symmetric peak. Where there is also a smooth path that does not care about the frequency, the two add before anything is squared — and the result is lopsided, with a frequency at which nothing gets through at all.

waves · Resonance
The month a binding energy would bend. The Moon's orbit seen with the Sun held off to the right, drawn as it would be if the Earth's binding energy fell towards the Sun more weakly than the rest of it. The Earth is bound by 4.5 × 10⁻¹⁰ of its mass-energy and the Moon by 1.9 × 10⁻¹¹, so with the Sun pulling at 5.93 mm/s² the Moon is pushed sunward relative to the Earth by 2.6 × 10⁻¹² m/s² for every unit of η. That push turns once a synodic month relative to the orbit, 29.53 days, and Hill's equations about a circular orbit — integrated from the forced solution and held on it to 4 × 10⁻¹¹ over twelve months — give a radial displacement of 8.0 m times η times the cosine of the lunar phase: outward at new moon, inward at full. The complete lunar theory, with the Sun's tide on the orbit included, gives 13.1 m. The displacement is drawn about 7 × 10⁶ times larger than it would be at η = 1.

The binding energy that has to fall too

Every laboratory test of the equivalence principle compares bodies whose own gravity is a part in 10²⁵ of their mass, so none of them can ask whether gravitational binding energy falls like everything else. The Earth is bound by five parts in ten billion and the Moon by twenty times less, and if that difference fell differently the Moon's orbit would lean towards the Sun once a month — by a distance lasers have been measuring since 1969.

astrophysics · Equivalence principle
Resonances drawn as bands. 60,000 decays of a D⁰ decaying to K⁻π⁺π⁰, accepted from 1,287,365 flat ones in proportion to the square of an amplitude built from 3 short-lived intermediate states, each decaying to two of the three products. A ρ⁺(770) in m²(π⁺π⁰), 67.0 per cent of the rate on its own; a K⁻(892) in m²(K⁻π⁰), 25.5 per cent of the rate on its own; a K⁰(892) in m²(K⁻π⁺), 33.2 per cent of the rate on its own. Each appears as a band at its own mass squared — vertical, horizontal or diagonal according to which pair it decays to — holding 51 per cent, 19 per cent, 23 per cent of the decays within one width of its mass, where phase space alone would put 34, 10, 9. The separate fractions add to 126 per cent, not 100, because the amplitudes interfere where the bands overlap. The magnitudes and phases are a model chosen to make all three visible, not a fit to data.

The plane in which three bodies are flat

A particle breaking into two gives each product a fixed energy; one breaking into three gives none of them one. What it gives instead is a plane of two invariant masses in which a decay with no forces spreads perfectly evenly inside a curved boundary — so every band, dark stripe and bright crossing a real decay draws there is a force, its spin, or a phase between two routes to the same three particles.

relativity · Relativistic dynamics
One width that falls to nothing. The decay rates of the two modes of a pair of resonances that leak into one shared channel at rates 0.1 and 0.05 and are coupled to each other with strength 0.2, against the detuning of the first from the second. The two rates always add to 0.15, the trace of the leak matrix, to 10⁻¹². Where the resonances are far apart each mode keeps roughly its own resonance's leak. Near them the leaks interfere, and at a detuning of 0.1414 — κ(γ₁ − γ₂)/√(γ₁γ₂) — the slower mode's decay rate is zero to within 10⁻¹², and the faster carries all 0.15. That mode sits at a frequency where the channel is open and does not leak into it: the two routes by which it could escape cancel.

The resonance that refuses to leak

A resonance that sits at a frequency where waves can escape has a width, because it leaks. Put two such resonances into the same channel and let them talk to each other, and at one precise detuning one of their combinations stops leaking altogether — a mode with no width, surrounded by a continuum it could escape into and does not. It cannot be seen from outside, it traps whatever energy lands in it, and if a symmetry is what forbids the leak, it survives any change that keeps the symmetry.

waves · Resonance
The condition three modes never quite satisfy. By how much three modes of a thirty-two mass chain fail to be in resonance — the sum of two mode frequencies minus the frequency of their sum, on a logarithmic scale, against the second of the two modes for four choices of the first. The leading nonlinear term couples modes in threes and the exchange accumulates only where this quantity is zero. It never is: the chain's dispersion is a sine, a sine is concave, and the sum of two of its values always exceeds the value at their sum. The smallest mismatch anywhere on the chain is at the two lowest modes and equals 2.156e-4 — which the scan finds and which is the cube of pi over four times the cube of one more than the mode count, checked here on chains from eight masses to two hundred and fifty-six. That closed form is the whole of why this is a finite-chain problem: the mismatch falls as the cube of the length, so a long enough chain is arbitrarily close to resonant and the continuum limit is exactly resonant, which is where the solitary waves come from.

The condition three modes never meet

Whether two modes of a chain can hand energy to a third is arithmetic on the dispersion relation, and for a chain of masses the answer is never: a sine is concave, so the sum of two frequencies always exceeds the frequency of their sum. The smallest shortfall anywhere on a chain of N masses is π³/4(N+1)³ — never zero, and never far from it — and a shortfall turns a transfer into a beat.

thermodynamics · Equipartition
A few cycles, and everything about them is two numbers. The strain radiated by a remnant of 62 solar masses spinning at 0.68 of its maximum, as it settles down, with the decaying envelope of its fundamental mode drawn over it. The fundamental rings at 274 hertz and decays in 3.7 milliseconds, which is 1.0 cycles — this is not a bell and it does not sustain. Every frequency and every decay time in the sum is fixed by the mass and the spin alone; nothing about what made the remnant survives into them. What does depend on the collision is how loudly each mode is excited, and the relative amplitudes here are the rough values a merger of two comparable masses produces rather than a prediction.

A few cycles that are only mass and spin

After the orbit is gone there is one object left, distorted, and it settles down by radiating at frequencies that belong to it rather than to the collision. For a black hole those frequencies are fixed by the mass and the spin and by nothing else — so the first mode measured is a measurement and every mode after it is a test, and the test is that four curves in one plane pass through one point.

astrophysics · Gravitational waves
Every colour a bound electron can meet. The light-scattering cross-section of one electron bound with a resonance at 2.105 eV (589 nm) and damped only by its own radiation, in units of the Thomson cross-section, against the frequency of the light in units of the resonance, on logarithmic axes spanning nine decades of frequency and twenty-five of cross-section. Far below the resonance it rises with slope 4.001, Rayleigh's fourth power: at a hundredth of the resonance it is 1.0 × 10⁻⁸ times the Thomson value. At the resonance it spikes to 2.5 × 10¹⁵ times the Thomson value, which is 3λ²/2π = 1.66 × 10⁻¹³ m² exactly, over a width of 2.0 × 10⁻⁸ of the resonant frequency. Above it the cross-section settles to the Thomson value, 6.652 × 10⁻²⁹ m² — 1.0002 times it at a hundred times the resonance — and stays within 10 per cent of it from 4.6 times the resonant frequency, 9.8 eV, to 29 keV, 3.5 decades, until the photon energy approaches the electron's rest energy, where the Klein–Nishina factor for a free electron takes it down to 0.431 of the Thomson value at 511 keV and 0.077 at 10 MeV.

The cross-section that forgets the colour

An electron on a spring, shaken by light, scatters it — weakly and very blue below its resonance, enormously at it, and above it by exactly the same amount whatever the colour. That flat stretch is the Thomson cross-section, 6.65 × 10⁻²⁹ m², and it is why an X-ray picture of a crystal is a map of electrons and why the corona is white.

astrophysics · Radiating charge
The angle at which a total reflection stops being total. Reflectance of light at 633 nm inside a BK7 prism whose face carries a 50 nm gold film with water beyond it, against the angle of incidence, for the two polarisations, from the three-layer Fresnel sum in complex arithmetic. Past the critical angle for glass and water, 61.62°, s-polarised light is reflected almost completely, as total internal reflection requires, apart from what the thin gold absorbs. p-polarised light is reflected too — except near one angle, where the reflectance falls to 0.014 at 71.52°. The dispersion relation of a surface plasmon on gold against water puts its resonance at 71.67°; the difference is the film's finite thickness and the prism on its other side pulling the resonance slightly.

The angle at which total reflection stops being total

Coat the back face of a glass prism with fifty nanometres of gold and total internal reflection still returns almost all the light — except at one angle, where the reflection of one polarisation falls nearly to zero. The light has gone into an electron wave bound to the far surface of the gold, and because that wave's angle depends on whatever touches the gold, the missing reflection has become one of the most sensitive balances in biochemistry.

optics · Total internal reflection
The same thermal motion, spread three ways. How the thermal jiggling of a spring-mounted mass is distributed over frequency, for quality factors 3, 30, 300, with frequency in units of the resonance and the spectrum in units that make the area under each curve its mean-square displacement. All three curves enclose exactly the same area, kT/k — 1.000, 1.000, 1.000 of it in the units drawn — because equipartition fixes the energy in the spring and not how fast it changes. What the damping chooses is where that motion goes: a high Q concentrates it in a peak 100 times taller than the low-Q one, and leaves the rest of the spectrum 100 times quieter at 10 times the resonance frequency.

The noise a high Q moves out of the way

Anything held by a spring at a temperature jiggles, and equipartition says exactly how much: the mean square of its displacement is kT divided by the spring's stiffness, whatever the spring is made of and however it is damped. That looks like a floor no measurement can go below. It is a floor on the total, and the total can be moved. An oscillator with little damping puts almost all of its thermal motion into a narrow peak at its own frequency and leaves every other frequency quiet — which is why the mirrors of gravitational-wave detectors hang from fibres of glass that ring for minutes.

thermodynamics · Equipartition
A clock that takes the drive's frequency over a whole range. The frequency a self-sustained oscillator actually runs at, relative to the frequency of a weak drive, against how far its own natural frequency is from the drive's, both in units of the locking strength K. Without the drive it would lie on the dashed diagonal, keeping its own frequency. With it, every natural frequency within ±K of the drive's is pulled all the way in: the oscillator runs at exactly the drive's frequency, a flat plateau where it has abandoned its own. Outside the plateau it runs free again but not at its own frequency; it is pulled towards the drive, its offset shrinking from the detuning to the square root of (detuning squared minus K squared) — 0.66 K instead of 1.2 K just outside, 2.83 K instead of 3 K further out.

The clock that is pulled into step

In 1665, ill in bed, Christiaan Huygens noticed that two of his pendulum clocks hanging from the same beam were swinging in exact opposition, and that however he disturbed them they returned to it within half an hour. A clock is not a passive resonator waiting to be pushed; it keeps its own time, by its own mechanism. What a weak push can do to it is not change how strongly it swings but pull its phase — and within a range of frequencies set by the push's strength, pull it all the way into step. The same arithmetic locks lasers, pacemaker cells, power stations and the body's daily clock.

waves · Resonance
A lever that makes air and water meet. The fraction of sound power crossing from air into water through an ideal lossless transformer that multiplies pressure by a factor n, against n on a logarithmic axis. With no transformer, n = 1, it is 0.11 per cent. It rises as the transformer makes the water look less stiff and air look stiffer, reaching everything at n = 60, and falls again beyond, where the water is made to look softer than air. The middle ear's 22 gives 43 per cent in this picture — a gain of 26 dB over no transformer at all. The curve is flat near its top: a lever within a factor of two of the ideal still passes about two-thirds of the power, which is why a mechanism need not be precise to be effective.

The lever that lets air speak to water

Sound in air striking a surface of water is almost entirely reflected: 99.9 per cent bounces off, which is why a swimmer underwater hears the world above as a muffled murmur. The inner ear is filled with fluid, and the eardrum faces air, so every land animal has the problem of getting sound across that boundary. The answer is three tiny bones and a difference in area, which together multiply the pressure about twenty-fold and turn a thousandth of the power into nearly half. The middle ear is an impedance transformer, the mechanical twin of the one in every radio, and it works best over just the band where speech carries its meaning.

waves · Impedance
A bottle as a mass on a spring. A 750 ml bottle with a neck 8 cm long and 19 mm across, and its equivalent: the plug of air in the neck, 32 milligrams, moving in and out as a piston on the air in the body, which acts as a spring of stiffness 15 N/m because squeezing it raises its pressure. The plug's mass and the spring's stiffness give a frequency of 109 Hz, the note heard when air is blown across the mouth. The effective neck length includes about one and a half radii of air beyond its two ends that moves with the plug. Nothing in the body's air moves much — it is compressed and released almost uniformly, because the wavelength, three metres, is far larger than the bottle. That is what makes the resonator lumped: one mass, one spring, one note.

The note a bottle sings whatever its shape

Blow across the mouth of an empty wine bottle and it sounds a low note, about 109 hertz for a 750-millilitre bottle. Its wavelength is three metres, ten times the bottle's height, so it is not a standing wave in the bottle the way a flute's note is a standing wave in the flute. It is a mass bouncing on a spring: the plug of air in the neck, thirty milligrams of it, riding on the springiness of the air in the body. The note depends on the body's volume and the neck's size and on nothing about the body's shape, which is why a sphere, a cube and a tall cylinder of the same volume all sing the same note — and why a car driven with one window open throbs at eighteen hertz.

waves · Resonance
One number decides the efficiency. The best efficiency a link of two resonant circuits can reach, with its load chosen to maximise it, against the figure of merit U = k√(Q₁Q₂) on a logarithmic scale: the coupling coefficient times the geometric mean of the two coils' quality factors. The curve is η = U²/(1 + √(1 + U²))², and nothing else about the coils, the frequency or the distance enters: 0.25 per cent at U = 0.1, 17 per cent at U = 1, 52 per cent at U = 3, 82 per cent at U = 10, 94 per cent at U = 30. A weak coupling is rescued by a high Q: k = 0.003 with Q = 1,000 on each side gives U = 3 and 54 per cent, where the same coils used without tuning capacitors, as a plain transformer, deliver under one per cent, with the source driving mostly reactive current that does nothing.

The coupling a resonance rescues

Two coils a hand's breadth apart share a few thousandths of their magnetic flux, and as a transformer they deliver almost nothing. Tune each with a capacitor to the same frequency and the same pair can carry most of the power across. Resonance does not strengthen the coupling, which is fixed by the geometry and falls as the cube of the distance. It changes how many times the energy goes round before it is lost. The efficiency then depends on one number, the coupling times the quality factor, and that one number explains a toothbrush on its stand, a phone on its pad, a car parked over a plate in the road and a light bulb lit two metres away.

electromagnetism · Induction
Where a speck lands decides how much it weighs. The fractional drop in frequency of a cantilever's first and second bending modes when a small mass lands on it, per unit of that mass as a fraction of the beam's, against where along the beam it lands, from the clamp to the free tip. The response is the square of the mode's displacement at the landing point divided by twice the mode's effective mass: a quarter of the beam for both modes (0.250 and 0.250), since each is measured against its own tip. At the tip both modes respond fully — the first by 2.0 times the landed fraction, the second by 2.0. Near the clamp neither responds, so a speck landing there is invisible. Halfway along, the first mode drops by 0.23 and the second by 1.02; at 0.783 of the length the second mode has a node and does not notice the speck at all. A single frequency cannot tell a light speck at the tip from a heavier one further in.

The weight a frequency can find

A spring's frequency is the square root of its stiffness over the mass it carries, so adding a little mass lowers the note by half the fraction added. Nothing in that rule cares about gravity, and nothing in it cares about size. It weighs astronauts in orbit by the swing of a chair, films a fraction of an atom thick on a quartz plate, and single molecules on a beam a few micrometres long — and it improves without limit as the thing that vibrates gets lighter. What it cannot do on its own is say where the added mass sat, and that turns out to matter as much as how much there was.

mechanics · Harmonic approximation
What a station hears from one thunderstorm region. The power spectrum of the vertical field from a single region of thunderstorms, received 20° and 90° of arc away, from a sum of the first seven resonant patterns, each with the measured peak frequency and a quality factor of 4 to 6, both taken as inputs. Measured spectra fall off with frequency rather more than this one, because real strokes and the real ionosphere are not as simple. The resonances are so broad that neighbouring peaks run into each other; a quality factor of five means a peak about a fifth as wide as its frequency, and the ringing dies in a few cycles. At 20° every tone is present, the higher ones merging. At 90° the first, third and fifth have vanished, because those patterns have a node a quarter of the world away, and the spectrum is made of the even tones alone. Real stations receive the sum of the world's storms, which move with the time of day, and the heights of the peaks drift with them.

The tone the whole Earth rings at

The ground conducts and so does the ionosphere, eighty kilometres up, and between them lies a waveguide the size of the planet. Two walls, unlike a pipe, carry waves of any length, so the guide takes radio waves forty thousand kilometres long — longer than the world is round — and, closed on itself, it rings. Lightning strikes fifty times a second and keeps it ringing at about 7.8, 14.3 and 20.8 hertz. Perfect walls would put the tones at 10.6, 18.4 and 25.9; the difference is the ionosphere, a ceiling that leaks.

waves · Guided waves
The standing shapes of a lake and of a harbour. The water surface at its greatest tilt in the slowest standing waves of a basin of length L, exaggerated vertically. In a closed lake the water must be still at both ends' walls, which are antinodes of the surface: the first mode tilts the whole lake about a node in the middle, the second has two nodes. In a harbour open to the sea at one end, the sea holds the mouth's level fixed, so the mouth is a node: the first mode has a quarter of a wave in the harbour, the second three quarters. Their periods are 2L/(n√(gh)) for the lake, Merian's formula, and 4L/((2n + 1)√(gh)) for the harbour — a harbour of a given length rings at twice the period of a lake of the same length and depth.

The tide a lake makes by itself

On Lake Geneva the water at Geneva rises and falls by a few centimetres every seventy-three minutes, and the water at the far end does the opposite, as though the whole lake were a bath slopping back and forth. It is a standing wave, set ringing by wind and air pressure, and its period follows from the lake's length and depth alone. A harbour rings the same way with its mouth as a node, and it does something odder: narrowing its entrance, the obvious way to keep waves out, makes its resonance stronger.

waves · Standing waves
The mass law: how much sound a limp wall stops. The transmission loss of a wall that only has mass — no stiffness — for sound arriving square-on, against frequency on a logarithmic axis, for surface masses of 10 kg/m², 20 kg/m², 40 kg/m². It is 10 log(1 + (ωm/2ρc)²) decibels. At 500 Hz, 10 kg/m² stops 31.6 dB, 20 kg/m² stops 37.6 dB, 40 kg/m² stops 43.6 dB. Doubling the mass or the frequency adds six decibels, and nothing else about the wall matters: it is the wall's inertia, set against air's characteristic impedance ρc = 413 rayl, that turns the sound back.

The wall that stops sound by its weight

A wall between two rooms keeps out sound not by absorbing it but by being hard to shake. The sound's pressure pushes the wall back and forth, the moving wall becomes a loudspeaker on the far side, and how much gets through depends almost entirely on the wall's mass per square metre against the frequency: six decibels more for every doubling of either. Read as impedance, a wall is a mass placed in series with the air, and the same reading explains the frequency at which a stiff pane of glass nearly vanishes and why two thin walls with a gap beat one thick one.

waves · Impedance
A bounce that turns into a swing and back. The share of a swinging spring's oscillation energy that is in its sideways swing rather than its up-and-down bounce, against time in units of the swing's period over 2π, for a spring started bouncing with a stretch of 0.08 of its length and almost no tilt (0.02 rad). When the bounce frequency is exactly twice the swing frequency (red), the energy drains out of the bounce into the swing until 100 per cent of it is swinging, then drains back, over and over. At a ratio of 2.4 (blue) the swing never takes more than 1.5 per cent. The bounce pumps the swing parametrically, twice per swing, which works only when the two keep step.

The spring that swings when it was only bounced

Hang a weight on a spring and pull it straight down: it bounces straight up and down. Unless its bounce happens to be twice as fast as its swing would be as a pendulum. Then the bounce dies away and the weight starts to swing, wider and wider, until the bounce has gone completely — and then the swing dies and the bounce comes back. Two motions that look independent are trading their energy through a resonance, regularly and for ever at small amplitude. Give the spring more energy and the trading becomes chaotic: the same simple rule, with nothing random in it, produces motion that never repeats and that a hundred-millionth of a radian can redirect.

mechanics · Chaos
The swing's plane, turning a step at a time. The direction in which a swinging spring swings, seen from above, against time, for a spring whose bounce is twice as fast as its swing, started bouncing almost vertically with a trace of sideways motion. Points are coloured by how much of the energy is in the swing (darker: more). While the swing holds the energy the direction is fixed; while the bounce holds it, the direction changes, and the swing returns in a new direction each time — 9 steps in 1500 units of time, each 43.6° on average (43.6, 43.6, 43.6, 43.6…), always in the same sense. In a plane the swing could only come back along its old line. In space it comes back turned, and the turn is the same every time.

The swing that turns a step at a time

A weight on a spring whose bounce is twice as fast as its swing trades its energy back and forth: the bounce becomes a swing, and the swing a bounce again. Let it move in space rather than a plane, with the slightest sideways twist, and each swing comes back in a new direction, turned by the same angle every time. The turn happens all at once, while the weight is only bouncing and the swing is too small to see, and its size is set by a single ratio, of the twist to the energy carrying it. The steps are a geometric phase made mechanical, and they blur into chaos when the spring is bounced too hard.

mechanics · Chaos
How a sphere of gas rings. The acoustic pressure against distance from the centre of a spherical cavity, for its three lowest radial modes, in which the gas breathes in and out in spherical shells: sin(zr/a)/(zr/a), with z = 4.4934, 7.7253, 10.9041 the roots of tan z = z that make the gas's motion vanish at the wall. Filled with argon at the triple point of water, 273.16 K, a sphere 62 mm in radius rings in these modes at 3551, 6104, 8616 Hz. Radial modes are the ones precision work uses: they have no motion along the wall, so the wall's roughness and the gas's viscosity there barely touch them, and their frequencies are set by the volume rather than the shape — a slightly imperfect sphere shifts them only at second order.

The note that fixed the kelvin

A sphere of argon, struck, rings at a pitch set by the speed of sound in it, and the speed of sound in argon contains only one quantity nobody could compute: the constant that converts a temperature into an energy. Argon's atoms can hold energy in exactly three ways, so its heat capacity is a count rather than a measurement, and its speed of sound is (5/3)kT/m with nothing left over. Ring the sphere at the temperature of melting ice, measure its size with radio waves in the same cavity, and Boltzmann's constant comes out to a part in a million. In 2019 that number stopped being measured and became the definition.

thermodynamics · Equipartition
A light panel that blocks one band as a heavy one would. Sound transmission loss at normal incidence against frequency, on a logarithmic frequency axis. Dashed: a limp panel of 2 kg/m², following the mass law, 13.4 dB at 300 Hz. Dotted: the same panel made 3 kg/m² by adding 1 kg/m² of plain mass, 16.8 dB. Solid: the 2 kg/m² panel with the same added mass hung on springs tuned to 300 Hz (damping 0.02). It blocks 35 dB at 300 Hz — the loss the mass law would give a wall 26 kg/m² heavy — and just above, at 367 Hz, falls to 5.2 dB, far below even the bare panel's 15.1: there the panel lets sound through more easily than if the resonators were not there.

The wall made heavy only at one note

A wall stops sound by being hard to shake, and how hard a plain wall is to shake is its weight: that is the mass law, and it makes quiet walls heavy. Hang small masses on springs inside a light panel, tuned to one frequency, and near that frequency the panel becomes many times harder to shake than it weighs, because the hidden masses swing against it. A two-kilogram panel then blocks a tone as a wall thirteen times heavier would. The price comes just above the tuning, where the panel's dynamic mass passes through zero and it lets sound through more easily than if the masses were not there.

waves · Impedance
How much of a wave of gravity a bar can catch. A resonant bar's cross-section for gravitational waves, integrated over its resonance, (8/π)(GM/c)(v/c)², against its mass, on logarithmic axes, for sound speeds of 3.0 km/s, 5.4 km/s, 10.0 km/s (aluminium is about 5.4). It is proportional to the mass, which is why the bars weighed tonnes, and to the square of the speed of sound over the speed of light — the bar answers a strain only by being stretched against its own stiffness, and (v/c)² is about 3 × 10⁻¹⁰. Weber's first bar caught 2.3·10⁻²⁵ m² Hz: to absorb a single joule, a burst must carry 4.4·10²⁴ J per square metre per hertz at the bar's frequency. Dots: Weber's bar, and the two cryogenic aluminium bars that ran longest, ALLEGRO in Louisiana and NAUTILUS near Rome.

The bar a wave of gravity barely touches

The first gravitational-wave detectors were tonnes of aluminium, hung in a vacuum and listened to for ringing. A passing wave stretches and squeezes the bar, and the bar can answer only by vibrating against its own stiffness, so the fraction of the wave it catches is set by the speed of sound over the speed of light, squared: about three parts in ten billion. That one ratio explains why the bars had to be enormous and cold, why Joseph Weber's reported detections of 1969 would have required the Galaxy to be converting dozens of suns a day into gravitational waves, and why the waves were finally found by light instead.

astrophysics · Gravitational waves
The parabola every quartz watch follows. The frequency error of a watch's quartz fork, in parts per million, against its temperature: a downward parabola, −0.034 ppm per degree squared, about a turnover at 25 °C, where the fork runs exactly at its nominal rate; with the right-hand scale in seconds a day, since one part per million is 0.086 s a day. On a wrist, at about 31 °C, the watch runs 1.2 ppm slow, 0.11 s a day; in a drawer at 10 °C, 7.7 ppm, 0.66 s a day; at 0 °C 1.8 s a day; at 60 °C 3.6. Every departure from the turnover, hotter or colder, makes it lose. The turnover is set by the angle at which the fork is cut from the crystal, and is chosen near the temperature of the place watches are worn — the parabola is a fact about quartz, and its vertex is a fact about people.

The fork inside a watch

Every quartz watch keeps time with a tuning fork three millimetres long, cut from a crystal of quartz and ringing thirty-two thousand seven hundred and sixty-eight times a second. Each number in that sentence is a decision. The frequency is two to the fifteenth, so that fifteen halvings make one tick a second, and it sits just above the range of human hearing. The shape is a fork because two tines swinging against each other leave their base still and lose almost no energy into it. And the fork's rate drifts with temperature along a parabola whose vertex is set near twenty-five degrees, which is why a watch worn on a wrist keeps better time than one left in a cold drawer.

waves · Resonance

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Quality factorDampingNormal modesAcoustic impedanceInterferenceMeasurementSimple harmonic motionAmplitudeDecayEquipartitionFourier transformLinewidth

All concepts