Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Transmission — where it appears

The fraction of an incident wave's amplitude or power that emerges beyond an obstacle. It composes by multiplying amplitudes rather than probabilities, which is why two barriers in series can transmit everything at energies where each alone transmits almost nothing.

Named by 5 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The one frequency a broken repeat lets through. Transmission through a quarter-wave stack whose repeat is broken once, on a logarithmic scale, against frequency in units of the quarter-wave design frequency. The perfect stack forbids this whole band; adding a single half-wave layer at the centre opens one line inside it, at exactly the middle of the gap, through which the stack transmits everything. With 4 pairs either side the line is 2.50e-3 wide, a quality factor of 400, on a background of 4.5e-4; With 6 pairs either side the line is 1.56e-4 wide, a quality factor of 6410, on a background of 6.3e-6; With 8 pairs either side the line is 1.00e-5 wide, a quality factor of 100000, on a background of 9.2e-8. The line narrows geometrically as the mirrors are made thicker, because the field inside the defect leaks out through a barrier whose transmission falls exponentially with its thickness — so the useful quantity of a band gap turns out to be not what it excludes but how well it can trap what a single flaw is allowed to hold.

The mode that lives in the mistake

A perfect stack of alternating layers refuses a whole band of frequencies — not weakly, not with loss, but not at all. Break the repeat once, by inserting a single layer of the wrong thickness, and exactly one frequency inside that band passes through the whole stack with a transmittance of one. The useful thing about a forbidden band turns out to be not what it excludes but what a single flaw is thereby allowed to hold.

waves · Periodic media Nine slabs, no symmetry, and one transmission. A stack of 9 slabs of random wavenumber and random thickness, with no symmetry anywhere in it. Send a wave in from the left and the amplitude that emerges on the right is 0.6694240937; turn the stack round and send it in from the right and the amplitude is 0.6694240937. The two agree to every digit the arithmetic has. This is not a property of the stack — it survives any arrangement, any number of layers, any amount of internal reflection — but of the equation, which is unchanged when the sign of time is reversed, and the phase is protected as well as the modulus, which is the stronger statement and the one an interferometer would notice. The reflections are a different matter. Their moduli are equal too, at 0.742880, but only because nothing here absorbs; their phases differ by 1.621 radians, because the wave meets a different first surface from each side. What the theorem protects is the pair of ends, and not what the wave does on its way between them.

Swap the ends and nothing changes

Put a source at one end of the most complicated arrangement of materials anybody can build and a detector at the other, then exchange them. The reading is identical — not approximately, not on average, but to every digit the arithmetic has. Two things in physics break it, and neither of them is a shape.

waves · Wave motion Two barriers, and the energies at which they stop being barriers. Transmission against energy on a logarithmic scale, for one barrier of width 0.9 and height 20, and for two of them separated by a well of width 2. Below the top of the barrier the single one transmits an exponentially small amount and does so smoothly. The pair does not: at particular energies the transmission climbs by orders of magnitude and reaches 1.000000 — one, to every digit the arithmetic has — even though each barrier on its own passes 3.9e-2 of what arrives. Multiplying the two single-barrier transmissions would give 1.5e-3, which is wrong by 6e+2: amplitudes are what compose, not probabilities, and the region between the barriers is a box whose quasi-bound levels are where the amplitudes reinforce. The resonances sit at 6.438, 13.915 and the levels of an infinite well of the same width are at 2.467, 9.870 — near, and not equal, because a well with leaky walls has states that are not quite bound.

Two walls that let more through than one

Put a second barrier behind the first and the transmission does not fall — at particular energies it rises to exactly one, through a pair of walls each of which stops all but a few per cent. Probabilities cannot do that. Amplitudes can, and the region between the barriers is a box whose levels say where.

quantum · Tunnelling A resonance that goes to zero before it peaks. Fano profiles for asymmetry parameters of 5, 1.5, 0.5, 0, each normalised to its own peak, against detuning in half-widths. A large parameter gives an almost symmetric peak — the resonant path dominates and the shape is nearly Lorentzian. A parameter of zero gives a symmetric dip, a window in which the system transmits nothing on resonance. In between the profile is lopsided, with a zero on one side of the resonance and the maximum on the other, at positions whose product is exactly minus one. The asymmetry is not a defect of the measurement: it is the interference of two ways through the system, and its sign says which side of the resonance the two paths cancel on.

The resonance with a zero in it

Where a resonance is the only way through a system, the response is a symmetric peak. Where there is also a smooth path that does not care about the frequency, the two add before anything is squared — and the result is lopsided, with a frequency at which nothing gets through at all.

waves · Resonance The delay that stops caring how thick the wall is. The Wigner phase time — how late the transmitted packet's peak arrives, compared with a free particle covering the same distance — for an electron under a 3 eV barrier, at 0.2 nm, 0.5 nm, 1 nm thick. 0.2 nm: 0.3728 fs at half the barrier height; 0.5 nm: 0.4372 fs at half the barrier height; 1 nm: 0.4388 fs at half the barrier height. The widths span a factor of 5.0 and the times span 1.18. A thicker barrier is exponentially harder to cross and the delay in crossing it barely moves — which is either a remarkable fact about tunnelling or a sign that the phase time is not a traversal time, and the rest of the essay is about which.

How long the crossing takes

Tunnelling has a probability, and asking how long it takes turns out to be a different kind of question. The delay a transmitted packet shows stops growing once the barrier is opaque, so a thicker wall is crossed in the same time — and several defensible clocks give several different answers.

quantum · Tunnelling

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ResonanceTransfer matrixEvanescent waveInterferenceLinewidthQuality factorTunnellingAmplitudeAntennaBand gapBloch waveCausality

All concepts