Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Near field — where it appears

The region close enough to a source or an aperture that the far-field approximations fail and the pattern still changes with distance. Behind a grating it holds the Talbot self-images; around an antenna it holds energy that is stored rather than radiated.

Named by 8 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The Cornu spiral, and the chords that are amplitudes. Fresnel's two integrals plotted against each other, traced from v = -4.2 to 4.2. Arc length along the curve is v — the distance along the wavefront in units of √(λL/2) — and the amplitude arriving from any stretch of that front is the straight chord between the stretch's two endpoints, not the length of curve between them. The two eyes at ±(½, ½) are where the far parts of an unobstructed front pile up, so the whole open front is the chord between them, of length 1.4142. A straight edge blocks half of it and leaves a chord of 0.7071 — exactly half the amplitude, so a quarter of the intensity, at the geometrical shadow's edge. The chord drawn here runs to v = 1.217, is 1.6556 long, and is the longest chord from the eye that exists: its square over the open chord's square is 1.370, which is why the brightest fringe outside a shadow is brighter than no obstacle at all.

The spiral that says how much light arrives

Huygens' construction says where a wave has got to and refuses to say how bright it is, because an envelope is a locus and a locus has no amplitude. Adding the wavelets with their phases instead of taking their envelope turns the whole subject into one curve, and every near-field pattern there is becomes a chord of it.

waves · Huygens Nine planes behind a grating, with no lens anywhere. The intensity across two periods of a 20 µm grating, at nine planes between it and the Talbot distance z_T = 2d²/λ = 1.26 millimetres, illuminated at 633 nm. The top profile is the grating itself and the bottom is the plane at z_T, and they agree to 2.8e-14: free space has reproduced the object with no imaging element of any kind. The middle profile, at half the Talbot distance, is the object shifted sideways by half a period, to 1.1e-14. At a quarter of the way the grating's own period has vanished entirely — its amplitude there is 1.3e-16 — because the odd orders have all turned by the same right angle and the even ones have not. With this grating open for half of each period there are no even orders either, so the plane is uniform: 9.6e-3 at twice the frequency as well, and a screen there shows no grating at all. None of this is interference between two beams; it is the whole spectrum of the object arriving with the phases exp(−iπλzm²/d²), which are all multiples of 2π when z is z_T.

The grating that photographs itself

Put a grating in a beam of light and hold a screen behind it. At one particular distance the screen shows the grating again — sharp, at full contrast, right way up, with no lens anywhere in the apparatus. Half way there it shows the grating shifted sideways by half a period. A quarter of the way there, a half-open grating shows nothing at all.

optics · Diffraction Three terms, and one distance. The three terms of an oscillating dipole's electric field against distance, in units of a reciprocal wavenumber, both logarithmic. They fall as 1/u³, 1/u² and 1/u, so they are all equal at u = 1 — a distance of λ/2π, which is a property of the frequency and of nothing about the antenna. The heavy curve is the field the three actually add up to, and it is not their sum: the static and radiation terms are in antiphase and partly cancel, which is why the total dips below every one of them just inside the crossing before settling onto the 1/u the far field is made of.

The distance where a field changes its mind

An oscillating source has three fields around it, falling as the inverse cube, the inverse square and the inverse first power of distance. They are all equal at one radius, and that radius is the wavelength over 2π — a number containing nothing about the source at all. Inside it a source mostly stores energy; outside it, mostly loses it, and the two behaviours are different technologies rather than different strengths.

electromagnetism · Retardation Radiated while the push holds, paid for when it stops. The power a charge radiates, the power the radiation reaction force takes from its motion, and the rate of change of the Schott term mτ a·v, through a push that rises over the first 20 per cent of its duration, holds steady, and falls away over the last 20, in units of mτa₀² where a₀ is the steady acceleration. Radiated power is a², the reaction force's take is −ȧv, and the Schott rate is found by differencing a·v along the trajectory; at every instant the first equals the sum of the other two. While the push is steady the reaction force is exactly zero and the charge still radiates at the full rate, all of it drawn from the Schott term. When the push stops, ȧ is large and negative while the charge is moving fast, and the reaction force takes 0.775 units, more than the 0.750 radiated over the whole push. The difference is what it handed back while the push was starting: then the charge is still slow, the reaction force points along the rising acceleration, and it does 0.025 units of work on the charge instead of taking any. The totals agree to a part in a hundred thousand.

The bill that arrives when the pushing stops

A charge accelerating steadily radiates at the full Larmor rate while the radiation reaction force on it is exactly zero, so for as long as the push holds, nothing about the charge's motion pays a single watt. The energy is lent by the field that travels with the charge, the loan is called the Schott term, and it is repaid the moment the acceleration changes.

astrophysics · Radiating charge A sheet of light a tenth of a micrometre thick. The intensity of the evanescent field in water beyond a glass coverslip (index 1.518 against 1.33), against distance from the glass, for 488 nm light totally reflected at 62°, 65°, 70°, 75°, s-polarised, relative to the light arriving in the glass. The critical angle is 61.2°. At 62° the field at the surface is 3.79 times the incident intensity and falls by e in 234 nm; at 65° the field at the surface is 3.07 times the incident intensity and falls by e in 110 nm; at 70° the field at the surface is 2.01 times the incident intensity and falls by e in 75 nm; at 75° the field at the surface is 1.15 times the incident intensity and falls by e in 63 nm. Ordinary illumination (dashed) lights the whole depth of a cell equally; totally reflected light lights only the layer against the glass, which is where a cell's membrane and the proteins in it are.

The mirror that lights a tenth of a micrometre

Total internal reflection sends back every photon, and it leaves behind a field in the medium beyond that dies away within a fraction of a wavelength. Put a living cell on a coverslip and reflect a laser inside the glass, and that field lights only the hundred nanometres of the cell pressed against the glass: the membrane, and the proteins moving in it. Nothing else glows. The same field works in reverse. A molecule close to the glass sends part of its own light into angles no ray from the water could reach, and how much it sends there says how close it is.

optics · Total internal reflection London's attraction, and the distance where it gives out. The dispersion energy between two identical atoms times the sixth power of their separation, relative to London's constant, against the separation in units of c/ω₀ — the reduced wavelength of each atom's strongest transition — on logarithmic axes, from the Casimir–Polder integral with a one-resonance polarisability. Close in, the product is one: London's inverse sixth power. It has fallen to a half by 3.82 c/ω₀, and far out it falls as one over the distance, so the energy goes as the inverse seventh power, reaching 23.2 per cent of London's value at ten reduced wavelengths and 2.44 per cent at a hundred. For two helium atoms, whose strongest line is at 58 nm, c/ω₀ is about 9 nm; for two sodium atoms, 94 nm.

The attraction that weakens when light is too slow

Two neutral atoms attract because each one's fluctuating electrons polarise the other, and the two fluctuations fall into step. London's calculation of the force, as the inverse sixth power of the distance, assumes the field from one atom reaches the other instantly. It does not. Beyond a distance set by the wavelength of the atoms' own strongest transition — nine nanometres for helium, about a hundred for sodium — the field returns too late to find the fluctuation that made it. The attraction then falls one power faster. Casimir and Polder worked this out in 1948, and it was the starting point for the Casimir force between plates.

electromagnetism · Retardation The heat two surfaces exchange when they almost touch. The radiative heat-transfer coefficient between two parallel half-spaces at 300 K, in W/m²K on a logarithmic axis, against the width of the vacuum gap between them, also logarithmic, from fluctuational electrodynamics: silicon carbide (solid) and gold (dashed), with two perfect black bodies, 4σT³ = 6.12 W/m²K, for comparison (dotted). Far apart, silicon carbide exchanges 3.3 W/m²K — less than black — and gold, a good mirror, only 0.024. Closer than the thermal wavelength, about 17 µm, waves that cannot leave either surface begin to tunnel across the gap. At 100 nm silicon carbide exchanges 137 W/m²K, at 10 nm 9338, at 1 nm 9.3·10⁵ — rising as the inverse square of the gap, 1.5·10⁵ times the black-body value at 1 nm. Gold exceeds black only below a few hundred nanometres and then grows much more slowly: 1284 at 10 nm, 2561 at 1 nm.

The heat that crosses a gap too narrow for light

Stefan and Boltzmann's law is usually read as a ceiling: no surface can radiate more heat than a perfect black body at the same temperature, 6.1 watts per square metre for every degree of difference at room temperature. It is a ceiling only for surfaces that are far apart. Bring two of them closer than the wavelength of their thermal glow and they begin to exchange waves that never leave either surface — waves that cling to it and die away within a wavelength — and those waves tunnel across the gap. Two plates of silicon carbide ten nanometres apart exchange fifteen hundred times what two black bodies can, almost all of it in a single colour, and the colour is the one in which silicon carbide is too shiny to glow at all.

quantum · Blackbody One number decides the efficiency. The best efficiency a link of two resonant circuits can reach, with its load chosen to maximise it, against the figure of merit U = k√(Q₁Q₂) on a logarithmic scale: the coupling coefficient times the geometric mean of the two coils' quality factors. The curve is η = U²/(1 + √(1 + U²))², and nothing else about the coils, the frequency or the distance enters: 0.25 per cent at U = 0.1, 17 per cent at U = 1, 52 per cent at U = 3, 82 per cent at U = 10, 94 per cent at U = 30. A weak coupling is rescued by a high Q: k = 0.003 with Q = 1,000 on each side gives U = 3 and 54 per cent, where the same coils used without tuning capacitors, as a plain transformer, deliver under one per cent, with the source driving mostly reactive current that does nothing.

The coupling a resonance rescues

Two coils a hand's breadth apart share a few thousandths of their magnetic flux, and as a transformer they deliver almost nothing. Tune each with a capacitor to the same frequency and the same pair can carry most of the power across. Resonance does not strengthen the coupling, which is fixed by the geometry and falls as the cube of the distance. It changes how many times the energy goes round before it is lost. The efficiency then depends on one number, the coupling times the quality factor, and that one number explains a toothbrush on its stand, a phone on its pad, a car parked over a plate in the road and a light bulb lit two metres away.

electromagnetism · Induction

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DiffractionEvanescent waveImpedance-matchingInterferencePhaseRetardationWavefrontAmplitudeBlackbodyCasimir polderCoherenceCoupling coefficient

All concepts