The small-angle approximation — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The pendulum, and the small lie that makes it simple
A pendulum's period does not depend on how far it swings. This is one of the most useful false statements in physics, and it is worth knowing exactly how false.
The period that depends on the swing, computed exactly
A pendulum's period is not independent of amplitude. The exact answer is an elliptic integral, it has no elementary form, and plotting it shows precisely where the famous approximation earns its keep and where it collapses.
The equation that lets a shape travel
Newton's second law applied to a piece of string a millimetre long gives T·y″ = µ·ÿ, and the derivation never once asks what the string is made of. Two things fall out immediately: the speed is √(T/µ) and belongs to the medium, and the general solution holds two arbitrary functions rather than one. The second of them is the reflection, which is why a boundary condition can be met at all.
The length nobody has to measure
A pendulum's period depends on its length, so a pendulum will measure gravity — except that a real swinging bar has no single length, and finding where its mass effectively sits is far harder than timing it. Kater's answer was to build the instrument so that the awkward quantity cancels, leaving a distance between two knife edges that a rule can read to five figures.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Restoring forceSeparatrixSimple harmonic motionAmplitude dependenceThe arithmetic–geometric meanBoundary conditionsCentre of massCurvatureDispersionDispersion relationThe elliptic integralEquivalent length