Separatrix — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The pendulum, and the small lie that makes it simple
A pendulum's period does not depend on how far it swings. This is one of the most useful false statements in physics, and it is worth knowing exactly how false.
The period that depends on the swing, computed exactly
A pendulum's period is not independent of amplitude. The exact answer is an elliptic integral, it has no elementary form, and plotting it shows precisely where the famous approximation earns its keep and where it collapses.
The axis that will not hold
A book spun about its long edge keeps spinning about it. Spun about the axis through its covers, it keeps spinning about that. Spun about the third axis, it flips end over end, again and again, with nothing touching it. Three numbers decide, and what matters is only their order.
The error that doubles on a schedule
Two double pendulums released a hundred-millionth of a degree apart follow one curve for ten seconds and then have nothing to do with each other. The separation grows exponentially the whole time, including while the picture shows a single trace — which turns unpredictability into a rate, and makes the length of a forecast the logarithm of the precision rather than anything proportional to it.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Phase portraitExponential sensitivitySimple harmonic motionThe small-angle approximationAmplitude dependenceAngular momentumThe arithmetic–geometric meanChaosConservation lawsDeterminismThe elliptic integralInstability