Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Dispersion — where it appears

The dependence of a wave's speed on its wavelength, which sorts a disturbance as it travels and parts the speed of the crests from the group's. It is why a pulse spreads, why a prism separates colours, and why the group and phase velocities of a guided wave multiply to c².

Named by 26 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A travelling wave, caught at one instant. A sine wave plotted against position at a fixed moment. The wavelength is the distance between repeats. The ghosted curve is the same wave a moment later.

A wave is a shape that travels, and nothing else does

In a wave on water, no water goes anywhere. What moves is the shape — and separating the two motions is the whole of wave physics.

waves · Wave motion Refraction from n = 1 into n = 1.5. A ray crossing a boundary between media of refractive index 1 and 1.5, bending by the amount Snell's law requires.

The bend at the boundary, and what it is really about

Light changes direction when it changes speed. Snell's law is the geometry of that statement, and it can be derived without knowing anything about light at all.

optics · Refraction Rays through a raindrop. Parallel rays entering a spherical drop at different heights, refracting in, reflecting once from the back, and refracting out. The outgoing rays crowd together near one particular direction, and that crowding is the bow.

The angle the rainbow has to be, and why nobody chose it

A rainbow is at forty-two degrees because a function has a minimum there. Nothing about water, light or weather picks the number — it falls out of running Snell's law three times through a sphere.

optics · Dispersion How much each colour is scattered. Scattering strength against wavelength, as the inverse fourth power, normalised to one at 550 nanometres. Light at 450 nanometres is scattered 4.35 times as strongly as light at 650 nanometres — which is the whole reason the sky is the colour it is.

Why the sky is blue and the sunset is not, from one exponent

Scattering goes as the inverse fourth power of wavelength, and that single number produces a blue sky and a red sun without any second explanation. The two facts look opposite and are the same arithmetic.

optics · Scattering 50 Hz on two strings: 5.66 m and 2.83 m. The same 50 hertz note driven onto 2 strings at the same tension of 80 newtons but different thicknesses. The frequency is identical — it is the source's — while the wavelengths are 5.66 metres and 2.83 metres, because each string carries the wave at its own speed.

The medium decides the speed, and the source only decides the note

A wave's speed is not chosen by whatever made it. It is a property of the material the wave is crossing, fixed before the wave arrives, and the wavelength is whatever is left over after the division.

waves · Wave motion A packet on deep water, ω = √(gk), 1.6 s apart. A wave packet built from a Gaussian spread of wavenumbers about 1.57 per metre, drawn at two times 1.6 seconds apart, with its computed envelope ghosted around it. Between the two frames the envelope's peak moves 2.01 metres and the marked crest moves 3.95 metres, so the packet travels at 1.26 metres per second and the crests at 2.47 — a ratio of 0.51.

The packet that moves at another speed than its own crests

Watch a group of water waves and the individual crests run forward through it, rise in the middle, and vanish off the front. The group travels at half the speed of the crests, and both numbers are real.

waves · Wave packets A grating of 20 slits. Intensity against angle behind a grating of 20 slits spaced 4 wavelengths apart, from I = [sin(Nu)/(N sin u)]² with u = π d sinθ/λ. The principal maxima sit at sinθ = mλ/d — -14.48°, 0.00°, 14.48° for m = -1, 0, 1 — and those angles contain no N at all, so they are exactly where two slits put them. What N changes is the width: the central maximum measures 0.635 degrees between its half-maximum points, measured off the drawn curve, against 0.635 degrees from bisection on the pattern itself. That width goes as 1/N — N times it is 12.692°, 12.691°, 12.691° at N = 64, 256, 1024, and 12.705° here, which is more, because the 1/N law is asymptotic and few slits are the far end of it: two slits give a peak 13 per cent wider than the limit. So a grating's resolving power R = mN is bought with the number of lines illuminated and with nothing else. In first order this grating resolves λ/Δλ = 20; the sodium doublet needs 982. Away from the maxima the pattern stays below 4.8 per cent of one, because there it is bounded by 1/(N sin u)².

What a thousand slits buy that two cannot

The bright directions behind a grating are fixed by its ruling pitch and the wavelength alone, and no count of lines appears in them. What the count changes is the width of each maximum, which falls as 1/N — so resolving power is mN, and 1,200 illuminated lines separate the sodium D lines with a dip of 53.4 per cent where 300 show one line and no dip at all.

optics · Diffraction Reflected upside down. A pulse arriving at a join where the impedance rises by a factor of 3, drawn at three moments. The amplitudes are read off the marched wave: the reflected pulse is -0.500 of the incident one and the transmitted pulse is 0.500, against (1−Z₂/Z₁)/(1+Z₂/Z₁) = -0.500 and 2/(1+Z₂/Z₁) = 0.500 from the two matching conditions. The reflection is inverted, which is the same fact as a pulse on a string flipping when it reaches a wall: a wall is a medium of infinite impedance, and the inversion is what keeps the displacement at the join equal to zero. Note that the transmitted amplitude exceeds one where the second medium is lighter, and that this is not a violation of anything: amplitude is not energy.

The equation that lets a shape travel

Newton's second law applied to a piece of string a millimetre long gives T·y″ = µ·ÿ, and the derivation never once asks what the string is made of. Two things fall out immediately: the speed is √(T/µ) and belongs to the medium, and the general solution holds two arbitrary functions rather than one. The second of them is the reflection, which is why a boundary condition can be met at all.

waves · Wave motion Cancelling a derivative, and what is left over. How far the focus of a 500 mm lens moves with wavelength, for a single crown element and for a cemented pair of crown and flint whose powers satisfy the achromatic condition. The singlet's focus runs over 18.1 mm across the visible — a fifth of a per cent of its focal length, and utterly ruinous at any useful aperture. The doublet's runs over 2.268 mm, some 8× less, and — this is the whole content of the figure — it is not flat. The condition sets the rate of change of power with wavelength to zero, so the curve is stationary rather than constant: it returns to the corrected focus at exactly 2 wavelengths — 486 nm and 656 nm, which are the two Fraunhofer lines the condition was written at — and departs from it everywhere else, most at 400 nm. That residual is the secondary spectrum, it has the same sign at both ends of the visible, and no pair of ordinary glasses removes it, because two conditions cannot be met with one free ratio.

Two glasses that cancel a derivative

A single lens focuses blue light closer than red, and the difference ruins the image. Cementing a second lens of another glass behind it fixes the fault at two wavelengths and at no others, because the condition sets a slope to zero rather than a value.

optics · Dispersion A peak that leaves before it should have arrived. Two pulses at the far face of a cell, both normalised to the peak the vacuum one reaches. One has crossed empty space; the other has crossed a medium with two gain lines either side of its carrier, whose group index there is -3.85 — negative, so the envelope's peak should emerge early, and it does. Measured off the two curves the advance is 616 in units where the carrier period is 2π, against 582 predicted from the group index alone; the difference is the higher-order dispersion the group index leaves out. The advance is 0.21 of the pulse's own duration, and the peak leaves the far face before the input peak has entered the near one. Nothing has outrun anything. The emergent pulse is a reshaped version of the input's leading edge, which arrived in plenty of time and already contained — for a smooth pulse — everything needed to reconstruct the rest; the medium amplifies it by 1.14× and delivers it early. Give the pulse a genuine front, a moment before which it is exactly zero, and that front travels at the speed of light in every medium there is.

The speed that carries no signal

In the right medium a pulse's peak emerges from the far side before it entered the near one. The measurement is real, it has been made, and nothing has outrun light — because the peak of a smooth pulse was never carrying any information in the first place.

waves · Wave packets The lowest note a pipe will carry. The dispersion relation of a guided wave for three cutoffs, in units where the free wave speed is one. Each curve leaves the vertical axis at its own cutoff and bends toward the diagonal, which is the free wave. Above the cutoff the phase velocity is the slope of the line from the origin and always exceeds one, while the group velocity is the slope of the curve and never does: at k = 2 their product is 1.0000, 1.0000, 1.0000, which is one to four decimal places in every case and is an identity rather than a coincidence. Below the cutoff there is no curve, because there is no travelling wave to draw.

The pipe that will not carry a low note

A wave squeezed sideways acquires a lowest frequency. Below it nothing travels — the field is there, it is large, and it goes nowhere. Above it the guide is dispersive whether or not anything in it is, and the pattern inside runs faster than light while the signal does not.

waves · Guided waves A lens with two flat faces. Rays entering a rod whose refractive index falls parabolically from the axis outward, parallel to the axis and at -2.4, -1.2, 0, 1.2, 2.4 mm from it. The ray equation in such a medium is the harmonic oscillator's, so each path is a cosine of the same period whatever height it started at — which is exactly the condition for a focus, and the reason all of them cross the axis together at 12 mm. Nothing is curved anywhere: the faces are flat and the bending is done by the inside of the glass. Cut the rod at a quarter of the period and it images; cut it at half and it relays the beam parallel again, inverted. The period is a property of the profile alone, which is why a rod like this is specified by a length rather than by a curvature.

The channel with no walls

A pipe will not carry a note below its cutoff, and no length of pipe helps. Replace the walls with nothing but a region where the wave travels slightly slower, and the cutoff disappears — however weak the contrast and however thin the channel, at least one mode is bound. The difference is not a matter of degree; it is the difference between a boundary condition and a potential well.

waves · Guided waves Water's permittivity across six decades of frequency. The real and imaginary parts of water's permittivity against frequency, on logarithmic axes, from 10 to 16 in powers of ten hertz. ε′ begins at 80.1 — the number a textbook prints — falls through the Debye relaxation near twenty gigahertz, is dragged down again by the librational, bending and stretching bands of the molecule, and settles at 1.777 in the visible, whose square root is 1.3330: water's refractive index. The identity n = √ε_r is exact and is an identity between two numbers taken at the same frequency; using the static permittivity in it predicts an index of 8.9 and is the most instructive wrong answer in the subject. The curve is a Debye term and four Lorentz oscillators, with two parameters solved so that the two plateaus are the measured ones rather than fitted by eye.

The constant that depends on how fast it is asked

Water's relative permittivity is 80.1. Its refractive index is 1.333, and the square of 1.333 is 1.777. The identity n = √ε_r is exact, the two numbers differ by a factor of forty-five, and nothing is wrong with either — because a permittivity is a function of frequency and the two measurements were made eight orders of magnitude apart.

electromagnetism · Dielectrics The wavelength at which a fibre stops smearing a pulse. Group-delay dispersion against wavelength for fused silica, computed by differencing Malitson's Sellmeier fit twice rather than read off a table, in picoseconds of spread per nanometre of source width per kilometre of fibre. The material curve crosses zero at 1273 nm — a property of the glass, fixed by where the ultraviolet and infrared absorptions balance, and not adjustable. Below it a fibre is normally dispersive and above it anomalously so, and at 1550 nm, where silica is most transparent, it is 21.9. The second curve adds a waveguide term, which is negative because a mode confined by a core spreads into the cladding differently at different wavelengths, and which depends on the fibre's geometry rather than on the glass; it is drawn here as a constant offset chosen to put the total zero at 1310 nm, which is what standard single-mode fibre is built to do. The consequence in a system is the thing worth carrying away: a source one nanometre wide sent 100 km through fibre at 1550 nm arrives 1833 picoseconds broader than it left, against 0.0 at the zero. That is the whole reason a network runs at one wavelength rather than another, and the reason the two quantities an engineer wants — lowest loss and zero dispersion — sit at different wavelengths and have to be reconciled by design rather than chosen.

The wavelength a fibre does not smear

Fused silica's index has a second derivative that passes through zero at 1,273 nanometres, and that is not a design choice — it is where the ultraviolet and infrared absorptions balance. A pulse sent at that wavelength arrives the shape it left. A pulse at the wavelength of least loss arrives 1,800 picoseconds wider after a hundred kilometres.

optics · Dispersion A click that arrives sorted by pitch. Arrival time against frequency for a broadband pulse travelling 40 megametres along a magnetic field line through a plasma of 1e+8 electrons per cubic metre in a field of 300 nanotesla — the magnetosphere, roughly. The gyrofrequency is 8.4 kilohertz and the plasma frequency 90 kilohertz, so this is the regime where a right-hand circularly polarised wave travels happily below both of them. It does not travel at one speed. The group velocity is 2c√ω(ω_c − ω)^(3/2)/(ω_p ω_c), which is zero at zero frequency and zero again at the gyrofrequency and peaks in between — at 2.10 kilohertz here, which is a quarter of the gyrofrequency, found by searching the drawn function rather than quoted. Everything either side of that peak is slower, so the curve has a nose: 3.21 s at 500 Hz, 2.20 s at 2000 Hz, 3.59 s at 5000 Hz. The branch below the nose is the classic whistler — a lightning stroke in one hemisphere reaching a receiver in the other as a note gliding downward over about a second, which is what gave the phenomenon its name — and the branch above it arrives as a rising tone at the same time. Both are observed, and a recording that shows the two joined at the nose is how the gyrofrequency along the path is read off directly. Read the other way it is an instrument: the product of the delay and the square root of the frequency is 79 s·Hz^½ here, nearly constant across the low end of the band, and it measures the electron content of a path through the magnetosphere that nothing else could reach.

The whistle that arrives sorted

A lightning stroke in one hemisphere reaches a receiver in the other as a note gliding downward over about a second. Nothing dispersed the sound; there was no sound. A radio pulse travelled forty megametres along a magnetic field line through a plasma whose group velocity depends on frequency, and arrived with its frequencies separated by up to three seconds.

astrophysics · Plasma oscillation Absorption and refraction, drawn as one function. The real and imaginary parts of a Lorentz oscillator's susceptibility against frequency, in units of the resonance. The imaginary part is the absorption: a symmetric line centred on the resonance, with a full width at half maximum equal to the damping — 0.05, 0.12, 0.30 here. The real part is the refraction, and it is what the same medium does to the speed of light. The two curves are not two facts about the medium: either one determines the other completely, by an integral over all frequencies, and that is a consequence of the medium responding after it is asked rather than before. Between x = 0.97 and x = 1.02 the refraction runs the wrong way — the index falls as the frequency rises, which is anomalous dispersion — and that region is exactly the width of the absorption line. Away from the line the index rises with frequency, which is ordinary dispersion and is why a prism separates colours in the order it does: every transparent material is on the low-frequency tail of an ultraviolet absorption it is not otherwise showing. A narrower line is a taller one, because the area under the absorption is fixed by how many electrons there are and by nothing else.

The answer that cannot come first

A medium absorbs at some frequencies and bends light at all of them, and those look like two separate facts to be measured separately. They are one fact. The requirement that a material respond after it is asked rather than before ties the absorption at every frequency to the refraction at every other, by an integral — and a material given the two halves independently answers before the question arrives.

waves · Attenuation One sharp kick, heard 6 pulse-lengths away. The signal arriving at a fixed distance from a point source that emits a single short pulse, in one, two and three dimensions, each normalised to its own peak. In three dimensions the arriving signal is the emitted pulse, unchanged in shape: it arrives, and then there is silence. In two dimensions the same kick arrives at the same moment and then keeps arriving — a tail falling as one over the time, which is still at a tenth of its peak 12.1 pulse-lengths after the front has passed. In one dimension it never comes back down at all; the medium is left displaced. The wave equation is the same equation in all three, and the source is the same source; what differs is only how many dimensions the disturbance has to spread into. Sharp arrival is the exception rather than the rule — it happens in three dimensions, and in five, and in seven, and in no even number of them — and every argument that treats a wavefront as the whole of the signal is an argument that has quietly used the fact that we live in three.

The arrival that keeps arriving

A clap heard across a field arrives and stops. The same clap in two dimensions arrives at the same instant and then goes on arriving for ever, fading as one over the time — and the difference is not absorption, or echo, or scattering. It is the number of dimensions, and sharp arrival happens in three of them and in no even number at all.

waves · Wave motion Two ways of destroying a pulse, and their cancellation. The same starting pulse, carried forward three times by three equations that differ only in which terms are present, all shown at t = 0.097. Dotted: where it began. With the dispersive term alone the pulse spreads and sheds an oscillating tail, because its Fourier components travel at different speeds and drift out of step — the profile departs from what it was by 27 per cent of its own height. With the nonlinear term alone the tall part overtakes the shallow part and the front leans forward: the steepest gradient is 9.3 times what it started as and is on its way to vertical. With both, neither happens — the profile has moved to the right and is otherwise identical to what it was, to 2.7e-12 of its own height. The balanced run is a pseudo-spectral integration and the other two are exact, and the integration conserves the two quantities the equation conserves — mass to 2.2e-16 and the squared integral to 4.7e-15 — which is the check that the answer belongs to the equation rather than to the integrator. What the picture cannot show is why the cancellation is stable: a pulse of the wrong height for its width does not persist in the wrong shape, it sheds the excess as a dispersive tail and settles on the shape that works, which is why these objects turn up in canals and optical fibres rather than only in equations.

The pulse two failures keep alive

Dispersion spreads a pulse until it is nothing. Nonlinearity steepens it until it breaks. Each on its own destroys a disturbance, and there is exactly one height for each width at which the two cancel completely — leaving a shape that travels for ever and survives being run into by another one.

waves · Wave packets The deviation that has a bottom. The angle by which a 60° and a 90° ice prism bends a ray, against the angle at which the ray arrives, for an index of 1.31. Each curve is traced ray by ray through both faces and stops where it stops: outside the plotted range the ray meets the second face beyond the critical angle and never leaves. Both curves have a minimum, and the minimum is the point of the figure twice over. Its value — 21.84° for the 60° prism and 45.73° for the 90° prism — is where the sky puts a halo. And its flatness is why there is a halo at all: near a minimum the deviation changes only in second order, so a wide band of orientations all deliver light to nearly the same angle, and a cloud of randomly tumbling crystals piles up a bright ring there while sending the rest of the light nowhere in particular. The passage at the minimum comes out symmetric — in at 40.92°, out at 40.92° — which was found by searching the traced curve rather than assumed. The window of incidence that gets through at all is 76.5° wide for the 60° prism against 32.2° for the 90° one, a factor of 2.4, and that is why one of the two halos is common and the other is rare.

The ring at twenty-two degrees

A halo round the sun is a caustic in orientation rather than in space. Most of the ice crystals in a cirrus cloud send light nowhere in particular; the ones near minimum deviation all send it to nearly the same angle, because a minimum is flat — and the angle they pick has a red inner edge, which is the reverse of a rainbow.

optics · Dispersion How far into the ground a surface wave goes. The horizontal and vertical displacements of a Rayleigh wave against depth, in wavelengths, at Poisson's ratio 0.25, each divided by the largest displacement anywhere. Both fall off exponentially, and at one wavelength down the vertical component is 19.3 per cent of its surface value — so the wave is confined to a skin about a wavelength thick, and the thickness is set by the wavelength rather than by anything about the material. The horizontal component changes sign at 0.193 wavelengths, which is not a node of a standing wave but a reversal: above that depth the ground moves one way round its elliptical orbit and below it the other. A long-period wave therefore samples deep rock and a short-period one samples only the surface, which is what makes a seismogram's dispersion a measurement of the structure underneath.

The wave a surface is enough to hold

A pipe guides with walls and a fibre guides with a slower core. A solid needs neither: one free surface binds a wave that is not a bulk wave bouncing but a separate solution, travelling slower than any wave in the material, dying away exponentially into it, and carrying its energy round a circle instead of over a sphere — which is why it is the part of an earthquake that knocks buildings down.

waves · Guided waves The delay that stops caring how thick the wall is. The Wigner phase time — how late the transmitted packet's peak arrives, compared with a free particle covering the same distance — for an electron under a 3 eV barrier, at 0.2 nm, 0.5 nm, 1 nm thick. 0.2 nm: 0.3728 fs at half the barrier height; 0.5 nm: 0.4372 fs at half the barrier height; 1 nm: 0.4388 fs at half the barrier height. The widths span a factor of 5.0 and the times span 1.18. A thicker barrier is exponentially harder to cross and the delay in crossing it barely moves — which is either a remarkable fact about tunnelling or a sign that the phase time is not a traversal time, and the rest of the essay is about which.

How long the crossing takes

Tunnelling has a probability, and asking how long it takes turns out to be a different kind of question. The delay a transmitted packet shows stops growing once the barrier is opaque, so a thicker wall is crossed in the same time — and several defensible clocks give several different answers.

quantum · Tunnelling The fringes a flow of water moves. The interference fringe shift against the speed of the water, for two tubes 1.5 m long, an index of 1.333, and light of 526 nm — Fizeau's apparatus. The beam is split, each half goes with the flow in one tube and against it in the other, and the two are recombined; the shift is the difference in transit time counted in wavelengths. Three predictions are drawn and they are not close together. If the water did not affect the light at all the shift would be zero, flat along the bottom. If the water carried the light with it completely the shift would be the steepest line. Fresnel's partial drag is the middle one, and at 7 m/s it gives 0.207 of a fringe — which is what was measured, to the accuracy of an eye reading a fringe pattern in 1851. The experiment therefore did not merely detect an effect; it chose between three quantitative possibilities that differ by factors of two, which is why a fraction of a fringe settled something.

The drag that was only an addition

Light in moving water is carried along by it, but only partly — by a fraction of the water's speed that depends on the refractive index in a way nobody could account for. Fresnel invented the coefficient to save a theory, Fizeau measured it in 1851, and it sat unexplained for half a century. It is the first term of the relativistic velocity addition and nothing else.

relativity · Velocity addition A wave with two directions in it. Light at 60° entering silver, 550 nm, whose index is 0.055 + 3.32i. Phase matching along the boundary fixes the transmitted wave's tangential wavenumber and leaves the normal one to the medium, which supplies a complex answer. The real part decides where the phase goes and the imaginary part where the amplitude does, and they are not the same direction: the surfaces of constant amplitude are parallel to the interface, because the decay is entirely into the metal, while the surfaces of constant phase are tilted by 86.5° from the normal. There is therefore no single refracted angle to quote. The familiar picture, in which one set of parallel planes carries both, requires the absorption to be exactly zero.

The angle that is two angles

Snell's law survives a complex index by giving a complex answer, and a complex angle is not an angle. What the phase-matching argument actually fixes is the tangential wavenumber, and when the medium absorbs, the surfaces of constant phase and the surfaces of constant amplitude stop being parallel. In silver at 550 nanometres the phase fronts run within four degrees of the surface while the amplitude decays straight into it.

optics · Refraction Two intersections, and the rule that picks one. The phase-matching construction for light arriving at 40° from a medium of index 1 into one of index -1. The circles are each medium's own relation between wavevector and frequency; the vertical line is the tangential wavenumber, which the boundary conserves. The line crosses the second circle twice, and the construction alone does not say which point is the answer — the rule that does is that energy must travel away from the interface. For a positive index the energy runs along the wavevector and the upper point is taken. For a negative one the energy runs against it, so the lower point is taken, the wavevector points back toward the boundary, and the ray leaves at -40.0° — on the same side of the normal as it arrived. Nothing in the drawing has changed except which intersection is circled.

The ray on the wrong side of the normal

The phase-matching construction draws a circle and a line, and the line crosses the circle twice. Every earlier construction silently took the upper intersection. Which one is physical is decided by where the energy goes rather than by where the wavevector points, and in a medium whose group velocity opposes its phase velocity the answer is the other one — so the refracted ray leaves on the same side of the normal it arrived on, a flat slab focuses, and a lens can beat the diffraction limit until loss stops it.

optics · Refraction A delay that grows as the square root of the length. The differential group delay between the fastest and slowest polarisation states of a fibre built from sections 100 m long, each a slightly birefringent waveplate with its axis at a random angle, against length up to 400 km. Three individual fibres are drawn faint, and the root-mean-square delay over 300 of them heavy. The ensemble grows as a power 0.50 of the length — the square root, because each section rotates the polarisation it receives before adding its own delay, so the delays add like the steps of a random walk in three dimensions rather than like lengths laid end to end. At 100 km the mean delay is 5.18 ps against 5.00 ps for a coefficient of 0.5 ps/√km. Had the axes all been aligned, the same sections would have added to 172 ps at that length, growing in proportion, and the drawn dashed line leaves the frame within a few kilometres. The randomness is what keeps the delay small, and it is also what makes it impossible to compensate with a fixed device.

The delay that is a random variable

A fibre's core is very slightly elliptical, so its two polarisations travel at very slightly different speeds — and the ellipse turns, at random, every hundred metres or so. The delays of the pieces do not add. They random-walk, so the total grows as the square root of the length, follows the same distribution as the speeds of gas molecules, differs from one wavelength to the next, and on any particular day may be three times its average.

optics · Dispersion A hump that is not a soliton comes apart into solitons. A single smooth hump of height 6, shaped as the square of a hyperbolic secant, released into the Korteweg–de Vries equation and followed by a pseudo-spectral integration, drawn at times 0.00, 0.15, 0.35, 0.60, each snapshot raised above the last. The hump is too tall for its width to be a soliton, and it separates: by the last time there are 2 crests, of heights 8.00 and 2.00, running apart at different speeds, with a small ripple left behind. Read as a potential well, the same hump holds 2 bound states, at κ = 2.000 and 1.000, and a soliton of height 2κ² belongs to each: 8.00 and 2.00. The integration conserved the hump's area to 3.1·10⁻¹⁵.

The solitons a hump already contains

A soliton is one height for one width. Release a hump of any other shape and it does not keep that shape or simply spread — it comes apart into a fixed number of solitons of fixed heights, running off in order of size, with a ripple left behind. The number and the heights can be read off before anything moves, by treating the hump upside down as a well and counting the levels it holds.

waves · Wave packets

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Refractive indexGroup velocityPhase velocityEvanescent waveWavelengthCausalitySuperpositionWave speedAbsorptionBoundary conditionBoundary conditionsGuided waves

All concepts