Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Refractive index — where it appears

The ratio by which a medium slows light, which fixes how much a ray bends when it crosses into that medium. It varies with wavelength for every real material, and that variation is what separates white light into colours and what limits how sharp a pulse can stay.

Named by 50 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Refraction from n = 1 into n = 1.5. A ray crossing a boundary between media of refractive index 1 and 1.5, bending by the amount Snell's law requires.

The bend at the boundary, and what it is really about

Light changes direction when it changes speed. Snell's law is the geometry of that statement, and it can be derived without knowing anything about light at all.

optics · Refraction The critical angle for n = 1.5 into n = 1. Refracted angle against incident angle. It rises faster than the incident angle and reaches 90° at 41.8°, beyond which no refracted ray exists at all.

The angle past which light cannot leave

Snell's law asks for the sine of an angle greater than one, and no such angle exists. What happens instead is a perfect mirror made out of nothing but a change of speed.

optics · Total internal reflection Rays through a raindrop. Parallel rays entering a spherical drop at different heights, refracting in, reflecting once from the back, and refracting out. The outgoing rays crowd together near one particular direction, and that crowding is the bow.

The angle the rainbow has to be, and why nobody chose it

A rainbow is at forty-two degrees because a function has a minimum there. Nothing about water, light or weather picks the number — it falls out of running Snell's law three times through a sphere.

optics · Dispersion Malus's law. The fraction of polarised light passing a filter, against the angle between the light's own direction of shaking and the filter's axis. It is the cosine squared: half at 45 degrees, nothing at 90.

The direction of the shaking, and the filter that only asks about it

A wave that travels one way can still shake in any direction across that way. Light does, most of it shakes in all of them at once, and a sheet of plastic can ask which.

optics · Polarisation How much each colour is scattered. Scattering strength against wavelength, as the inverse fourth power, normalised to one at 550 nanometres. Light at 450 nanometres is scattered 4.35 times as strongly as light at 650 nanometres — which is the whole reason the sky is the colour it is.

Why the sky is blue and the sunset is not, from one exponent

Scattering goes as the inverse fourth power of wavelength, and that single number produces a blue sky and a red sun without any second explanation. The two facts look opposite and are the same arithmetic.

optics · Scattering Two predictions, a factor of two apart. The deflection of light passing a mass, against impact parameter, on logarithmic axes. The lower line is what a Newtonian photon does — it falls while it crosses, and comes out bent by 2GM/bc². The upper line is what a geodesic does in curved spacetime, which is exactly twice that. At the surface of a body of 1.99·10³⁰ kg the two are 0.88″ and 1.75″. Both are straight lines of slope minus one, so the ratio is two everywhere and the measurement is a choice between two theories rather than a fit.

The bend Newton got half right

A photon treated as a falling body passes a mass and comes out deflected. So does a photon treated as a straight line in curved spacetime — by exactly twice as much. The factor of two is not a refinement; it is the sharpest available statement that gravity is geometry.

astrophysics · Light deflection Snell's law, found by searching. Paths from a point in a medium of index 1 to a point in one of index 1.5, and the optical path length of each against where it crosses the boundary. The curve is that length; the marked point is its minimum, located by golden-section search and not by any use of a law of optics. The angles there are 55.80° and 33.46°, which satisfy n₁sin θ₁ = n₂sin θ₂ to 1.0e-8. Every other drawn path is longer, and the flatness of the curve near the bottom is why light is not fussy: a path a tenth of the way off costs almost nothing.

The path that does not change

Reflection, refraction and the angle of the rainbow are not three laws. They are one condition — that the optical path length is stationary — and the word stationary rather than shortest is the whole of what makes an elliptical mirror and a rainbow the same statement.

optics · Fermat The two reflectances, and the angle one of them loses. Reflectance against angle of incidence for light going from n = 1 into n = 1.5. The upper curve is light polarised with its electric field along the surface, which reflects more and more strongly until at grazing incidence everything reflects. The lower curve is light polarised in the plane of incidence, and it does something the other cannot: it falls to exactly zero at 56.31°, where tan θ = 1.5000, and then rises again. At normal incidence the two are equal at 4.00% because there is no plane of incidence to tell them apart. The dashed curve is the transmittance, computed from the transmission coefficients and the two media's projected impedances rather than as one minus the reflectance; it agrees with one minus the reflectance to 4.4e-16 across the whole range, which is where the energy accounting can be seen to close.

The angle at which reflection picks a side

At one angle of incidence, a water surface reflects no light at all of one polarisation. The Fresnel algebra says so, and says nothing about why. The reason is that the reflected ray would have to leave along the axis of the charges radiating it — and a shaking charge sends nothing along the direction it shakes in.

optics · Polarisation Rays that turn round without meeting anything. Rays leaving an eye 1.5 m above a road, at 0.18°, 0.28°, 0.36°, 0.42°, 0.52° below the horizontal, in air whose refractive index is reduced by 3.0e-5 at the hot surface and recovers over 5 cm. Each is traced by integrating the ray equation, with the conserved quantity n cos θ fixed by where and how the ray set out. The shallow ones come back up without touching anything — the lowest gets to 0.6 cm above the surface and turns — and a ray that returns to eye level from below is seen as sky lying on the road. The steep ones run out of gradient first and hit it. The dividing angle is 0.444°, which is what the whole effect is made of: an unremarkable temperature difference and an angle a fiftieth the width of the Moon. Heights are exaggerated 128× against distances; at true scale every ray here would be indistinguishable from the axis. The conserved n cos θ holds to 4.3e-14 over every trace, which is what says the turns are the physics and not the integrator.

The ray that bends without a surface

Snell's law is about a boundary, and light bends in air where there is no boundary anywhere. Let the index vary continuously and the law of angles becomes a differential equation — one that carries a conserved quantity, forbids the ray from reaching certain heights, and turns a hot road into a mirror a hundred metres long.

optics · Fermat Cancelling a derivative, and what is left over. How far the focus of a 500 mm lens moves with wavelength, for a single crown element and for a cemented pair of crown and flint whose powers satisfy the achromatic condition. The singlet's focus runs over 18.1 mm across the visible — a fifth of a per cent of its focal length, and utterly ruinous at any useful aperture. The doublet's runs over 2.268 mm, some 8× less, and — this is the whole content of the figure — it is not flat. The condition sets the rate of change of power with wavelength to zero, so the curve is stationary rather than constant: it returns to the corrected focus at exactly 2 wavelengths — 486 nm and 656 nm, which are the two Fraunhofer lines the condition was written at — and departs from it everywhere else, most at 400 nm. That residual is the secondary spectrum, it has the same sign at both ends of the visible, and no pair of ordinary glasses removes it, because two conditions cannot be met with one free ratio.

Two glasses that cancel a derivative

A single lens focuses blue light closer than red, and the difference ruins the image. Cementing a second lens of another glass behind it fixes the fault at two wavelengths and at no others, because the condition sets a slope to zero rather than a value.

optics · Dispersion A peak that leaves before it should have arrived. Two pulses at the far face of a cell, both normalised to the peak the vacuum one reaches. One has crossed empty space; the other has crossed a medium with two gain lines either side of its carrier, whose group index there is -3.85 — negative, so the envelope's peak should emerge early, and it does. Measured off the two curves the advance is 616 in units where the carrier period is 2π, against 582 predicted from the group index alone; the difference is the higher-order dispersion the group index leaves out. The advance is 0.21 of the pulse's own duration, and the peak leaves the far face before the input peak has entered the near one. Nothing has outrun anything. The emergent pulse is a reshaped version of the input's leading edge, which arrived in plenty of time and already contained — for a smooth pulse — everything needed to reconstruct the rest; the medium amplifies it by 1.14× and delivers it early. Give the pulse a genuine front, a moment before which it is exactly zero, and that front travels at the speed of light in every medium there is.

The speed that carries no signal

In the right medium a pulse's peak emerges from the far side before it entered the near one. The measurement is real, it has been made, and nothing has outrun light — because the peak of a smooth pulse was never carrying any information in the first place.

waves · Wave packets The index that depends on which way the light is going. The two refractive indices of 3 uniaxial crystals, against the angle between the wave normal and the crystal's optic axis. The flat lines are the ordinary index, which is the same in every direction because the ordinary wave's field is always perpendicular to the axis. The curves are the extraordinary index, which runs from the ordinary value along the axis — where the two waves are identical and the crystal behaves like glass — to its extreme value at right angles to it. calcite (CaCO₃) has n_o = 1.6584 and n_e = 1.4864, so n_e − n_o = -0.1720; quartz (SiO₂) has n_o = 1.5443 and n_e = 1.5534, so n_e − n_o = 0.0091; lithium niobate has n_o = 2.3005 and n_e = 2.2075, so n_e − n_o = -0.0930. The sign of that difference is what makes a crystal positive or negative, and it decides which of the two images in a double-refracting crystal is the one that moves.

The crystal that answers twice

Lay a piece of calcite on a printed page and the print appears twice. One image sits still when the crystal is turned and the other goes round it. Nothing has been done to the light except pass it through a material whose response to a field is not a number.

optics · Polarisation The reflected beam does not leave from where it arrived. The lateral displacement of a totally reflected beam along the surface, for the two polarisations, at 550 nm from n = 1.5 into n = 1. Geometrical optics puts the outgoing ray at the point where the incoming one struck. It is not there: it is displaced forward along the surface by a distance comparable with a wavelength, which was measured by Goos and Hänchen in 1947 by reflecting a beam many times and looking at the accumulated offset. The displacement is different for the two polarisations — at 42°, 1361 nm for s and 2991 nm for p, at 45°, 350 nm for s and 560 nm for p, at 50°, 237 nm for s and 261 nm for p, at 60°, 183 nm for s and 127 nm for p, at 75°, 161 nm for s and 79 nm for p — which is why an unpolarised beam comes back slightly split. A displacement is only possible if the light spent time on the far side of a boundary it never crossed, and it is the most direct evidence there is that the evanescent field is a real field rather than a bookkeeping term.

The reflection that happens where the glass is not

Total internal reflection sends back every photon, which is why it is called total. It does not send them back from where they arrived — the beam re-emerges displaced along the surface, by a fraction of a wavelength, and a displacement is only possible if the light spent time on the far side of a boundary it never crossed.

optics · Total internal reflection A radar echo past the Sun, delayed by 233 microseconds. The extra time a round-trip radar signal takes when its path passes close to the Sun, against how close, for a reflector 0.723 AU away. Grazing the Sun's limb the delay is 233 microseconds — about 70 kilometres of light travel, on a path of hundreds of millions — and it falls only as the logarithm of the impact parameter, so the effect is still tens of microseconds ten solar radii out. That slow falloff is what makes the measurement possible: the delay can be watched building and fading as the geometry changes, rather than having to be caught at one instant. The dashed curves are the delay the solar corona's plasma adds at three radio frequencies. It is the competing effect, it is larger than the gravitational one close in, and it falls as the square of the frequency while the gravitational delay does not depend on frequency at all — which is how the two are separated, and why the sharpest measurement of this was made with a spacecraft carrying three radio links instead of one.

The delay that is not a bend

The same metric that bends a ray also slows it, and the two are different tests. A radar echo from Venus arrives 233 microseconds late when its path grazes the Sun — and half of that delay is accumulated more than twenty solar radii away, in a field thousands of times weaker.

astrophysics · Light deflection A lens with two flat faces. Rays entering a rod whose refractive index falls parabolically from the axis outward, parallel to the axis and at -2.4, -1.2, 0, 1.2, 2.4 mm from it. The ray equation in such a medium is the harmonic oscillator's, so each path is a cosine of the same period whatever height it started at — which is exactly the condition for a focus, and the reason all of them cross the axis together at 12 mm. Nothing is curved anywhere: the faces are flat and the bending is done by the inside of the glass. Cut the rod at a quarter of the period and it images; cut it at half and it relays the beam parallel again, inverted. The period is a property of the profile alone, which is why a rod like this is specified by a length rather than by a curvature.

The channel with no walls

A pipe will not carry a note below its cutoff, and no length of pipe helps. Replace the walls with nothing but a region where the wave travels slightly slower, and the cutoff disappears — however weak the contrast and however thin the channel, at least one mode is bound. The difference is not a matter of degree; it is the difference between a boundary condition and a potential well.

waves · Guided waves What the return journey does to each of them. The rotation of the plane after a beam has gone through a rotator, been reflected, and come back, against the length of the rotator — divided by the one-way rotation, so the two answers are 0 and 2 and nothing else can happen. A naturally active medium is handed with respect to the beam: reverse the beam and the sense of the rotation reverses with it, and the second pass undoes the first exactly, at every length and every wavelength. A Faraday rotator is handed with respect to the field, which does not care which way the light is going, so the second pass adds to the first and the round trip is twice the single one: 1 mm of it gives 21.7° out and 43.4° back; 2 mm of it gives 43.4° out and 86.8° back; 4 mm of it gives 86.8° out and 173.6° back; 8 mm of it gives 173.6° out and 347.2° back. That is a violation of reciprocity, and it is only available because a magnetic field is odd under time reversal. Everything a passive optical component can do — a lens, a mirror, a waveplate, a piece of quartz — looks the same run backwards, and none of them can be made into a one-way street. This can.

The rotation a return trip doubles

Quartz turns the plane of polarisation and so does glass in a magnetic field. The two look identical on the way through and are opposites on the way back — the crystal undoes its own rotation exactly, and the magnet adds to it. That difference is the whole of why a one-way street for light can be built at all, and why nothing passive will ever be one.

optics · Polarisation Water's permittivity across six decades of frequency. The real and imaginary parts of water's permittivity against frequency, on logarithmic axes, from 10 to 16 in powers of ten hertz. ε′ begins at 80.1 — the number a textbook prints — falls through the Debye relaxation near twenty gigahertz, is dragged down again by the librational, bending and stretching bands of the molecule, and settles at 1.777 in the visible, whose square root is 1.3330: water's refractive index. The identity n = √ε_r is exact and is an identity between two numbers taken at the same frequency; using the static permittivity in it predicts an index of 8.9 and is the most instructive wrong answer in the subject. The curve is a Debye term and four Lorentz oscillators, with two parameters solved so that the two plateaus are the measured ones rather than fitted by eye.

The constant that depends on how fast it is asked

Water's relative permittivity is 80.1. Its refractive index is 1.333, and the square of 1.333 is 1.777. The identity n = √ε_r is exact, the two numbers differ by a factor of forty-five, and nothing is wrong with either — because a permittivity is a function of frequency and the two measurements were made eight orders of magnitude apart.

electromagnetism · Dielectrics What arrives in the back focal plane. A grating of pitch 1.2 µm illuminated at 550 nm, and the spectrum that appears in the objective's back focal plane. Each spatial frequency in the object leaves at its own angle, sinθ = mλ/d, and the bar heights are the Fourier coefficients of the object's transmittance. The aperture admits everything inside sinθ = 0.65, which here is orders -1, 0, 1 — 2 of them carrying information about the pitch. Orders outside it are drawn faint and are simply lost: they never reach the image plane, and no amount of magnification afterwards recovers them. This is where a microscope's resolution is decided — not at the image, not by the eyepiece, but by which of these bars the front of the objective is wide enough to catch.

The image that is a diffraction pattern twice

A lens does not project an object onto a screen. It takes the object's spatial frequencies apart, spreading them across its own back focal plane at an angle each, and then puts them back together — so an image is the object's spectrum, filtered by whatever the aperture admits, transformed back. With only the zeroth order through, the image is a uniform grey with no information in it at all.

optics · Imaging N when the phases are random, N² when they are not. Scattered intensity against the number of scatterers, both logarithmic, for two ways of adding the same amplitudes. The lower curve averages 400 draws of N unit amplitudes with independent random phases and grows as N^1.000; the upper one adds them in phase and grows as N². At 3000 scatterers the two differ by a factor of 2921. Nothing about the scatterers is different between the two — same number, same strength, same wavelength. Only the arrangement is, and it is worth three decades here.

Why a litre of water is not blue for the reason the sky is

The same molecules that make the sky blue also make the refractive index of air, and the two numbers agree because the sideways sum has random phases and the forward one does not. Condense those molecules into a liquid and the sideways sum collapses by a factor of sixteen — and what is left is thirty-four times smaller than the absorption that actually colours the water.

optics · Scattering One line, 21 decades of density, and every mirror on it. Plasma frequency against electron density, both logarithmic, with the horizontal rules at frequencies a reader already has a feel for. A wave is reflected by everything to the right of where its own rule meets the line and passes through everything to the left. a fluorescent tube at 1.0e+17 m⁻³ cuts off at 2.84 GHz; ionosphere, D layer at night at 1.0e+8 m⁻³ cuts off at 90 kHz; ionosphere, E layer at 1.0e+11 m⁻³ cuts off at 2.84 MHz; ionosphere, F2 layer at 1.0e+12 m⁻³ cuts off at 8.98 MHz; aluminium's conduction electrons at 1.8e+29 m⁻³ cuts off at 3819.9 THz. So the F2 layer turns back a 1 MHz broadcast and lets a 100 MHz one straight out, which is why one of them is heard across an ocean at night and the other stops at the horizon; and aluminium's cutoff sits in the far ultraviolet, which is why it is a mirror for everything visible and a window above 78 nm. The dependence is a square root, so the line has slope one half: a hundredfold denser plasma reflects only ten times the frequency. Arriving at an angle helps by a factor of sec θ — 1.00 at 0°, 1.15 at 30°, 2.00 at 60° — because only the component of the motion along the density gradient has to be turned round.

The frequency below which nothing gets in

Free charges give a medium a permittivity that is negative, and a negative permittivity is not an absorbing medium — it is one in which no wave exists at all. Below that frequency the reflection is total, exactly rather than nearly, because there is no transmitted wave and nothing to absorb. The same expression puts the number at 9 MHz for the ionosphere and 3.8 PHz for aluminium.

astrophysics · Plasma oscillation Absorption and refraction, drawn as one function. The real and imaginary parts of a Lorentz oscillator's susceptibility against frequency, in units of the resonance. The imaginary part is the absorption: a symmetric line centred on the resonance, with a full width at half maximum equal to the damping — 0.05, 0.12, 0.30 here. The real part is the refraction, and it is what the same medium does to the speed of light. The two curves are not two facts about the medium: either one determines the other completely, by an integral over all frequencies, and that is a consequence of the medium responding after it is asked rather than before. Between x = 0.97 and x = 1.02 the refraction runs the wrong way — the index falls as the frequency rises, which is anomalous dispersion — and that region is exactly the width of the absorption line. Away from the line the index rises with frequency, which is ordinary dispersion and is why a prism separates colours in the order it does: every transparent material is on the low-frequency tail of an ultraviolet absorption it is not otherwise showing. A narrower line is a taller one, because the area under the absorption is fixed by how many electrons there are and by nothing else.

The answer that cannot come first

A medium absorbs at some frequencies and bends light at all of them, and those look like two separate facts to be measured separately. They are one fact. The requirement that a material respond after it is asked rather than before ties the absorption at every frequency to the refraction at every other, by an integral — and a material given the two halves independently answers before the question arrives.

waves · Attenuation Past the critical angle, all that is left of a reflection is its phase. The phase each polarisation acquires on total internal reflection at an index ratio of 1.518, against angle of incidence, together with the difference between them. Below the critical angle of 41.19° there is a transmitted beam and the reflection coefficients are real; above it the transmitted wavenumber is imaginary, the coefficients have modulus exactly one — every photon comes back — and the only thing that distinguishes one angle from another is the phase. The two polarisations acquire different phases, and their difference peaks at 46.533° at an incidence of 51.05°, which the closed form puts at the same place. That difference is a retardation: a wave plate made out of an angle, with no birefringent material anywhere in it, and — because the expression contains only the index ratio — one that barely changes with colour.

The retarder with no crystal in it

A wave plate turns linear polarisation into circular by making one component travel a little further than the other, which requires a birefringent crystal cut to a thickness and works properly at one wavelength. Total internal reflection does the same job with a phase that comes from the geometry instead — and because a refractive index barely changes across the visible where a wavelength changes by a factor of two, the same block of ordinary glass is a quarter-wave plate for every colour at once.

optics · Polarisation Two principles, two classes of path, two things left free. On the left, five curves from the same launch point to the same target: the true trajectory of a particle of energy 0.7 in a uniform field, and four deformations of it that share both ends. On the right, four quantities computed along that family and plotted as departures from their values on the true path. Maupertuis' abbreviated action ∫p·ds, computed at fixed energy, is stationary — flat at the centre. Hamilton's action ∫L dt, computed at fixed duration, is stationary too. The other two are not: the time a fixed-energy path takes changes at first order in the deformation, and so does the energy a fixed-duration path carries. That is the whole difference between the two principles. Each holds one of those quantities fixed and lets the other vary, and neither can hold both.

The principle that fixes the energy instead of the clock

There are two principles of least action, they compare different sets of paths, and they are not the same statement. One holds the duration fixed and lets the energy vary; the other holds the energy fixed and lets the duration vary — and written that way, mechanics turns into optics with a refractive index.

mechanics · Least action A cone of 14.3°, from two indices and nothing else. On the left, the acceptance cone of a step-index fibre with a core index of 1.4677 and a cladding of 1.4624. A ray entering steeper than the cone reaches the wall inside the critical angle and is refracted out at the first bounce; one inside it is trapped. The sine of the half-angle is √(n₁² − n₂²) = 0.125, which is 7.2° in air. On the right, that number against the fractional index difference between core and cladding. Nothing about the core's diameter appears: a fibre a hundred times thicker accepts exactly the same cone, and takes a hundred times the area's worth of light through it.

The cone a fibre will accept

A fibre takes light from a cone whose half-angle depends on two refractive indices and nothing else — not on how thick it is, not on how long, not on what is shining into it. That single number, squared and multiplied by the core's area, is all the light it will ever carry.

optics · Etendue Why only a sideways scattered wave takes anything away. The transmitted amplitude behind a thin scatterer, drawn as a phasor: the incident wave of unit length along the axis, plus a forward-scattered wave of length 0.12 at 0°, 60°, 90°, 150°. What a detector reads is the square of the total length. A scattered wave along the incident one lengthens or shortens the sum in proportion to itself; one at right angles changes the length only in second order, because a small perpendicular addition to a long vector barely alters its length. So a scatterer that removes energy from the beam at first order must scatter forward with a component perpendicular to the incident wave, and the size of that component is the whole extinction — which is the optical theorem.

Everything a scatterer removes, from one direction

How much light a particle takes out of a beam — by scattering it anywhere at all, and by absorbing it — is fixed entirely by what it does in the forward direction, where its scattered wave cannot be told apart from the incident one. The mechanism is interference, and it also gives the refractive index.

optics · Scattering The bowl a lens actually focuses onto. Where a lens of 50 mm focal length brings each part of a flat scene to a focus, against distance from the centre of the field, out to 21.6 mm — the corner of a 35 mm frame. The surface of best focus is a sphere of radius 76 mm curving towards the lens, and the corner of the frame sits 3.13 mm in front of the plane the centre is focused on. The shaded band is the depth of focus at f/8, which is 0.070 mm — 45 times smaller than the sag it has to cover. The curvature is not an error in the lens. It is what Σ1/nf comes to for this stack, and it depends on the powers and the glasses and on nothing else: bending the surfaces, moving the stop or stopping down changes every other aberration and leaves this one exactly where it was.

The flat scene that comes back curved

A lens does not image a plane onto a plane. It images it onto a bowl, and the curvature of that bowl is fixed by the powers and the glasses alone — not by the shapes of the surfaces, not by where the stop is, and not by stopping down. Everything a designer usually plays with leaves it exactly where it was.

optics · Imaging The fringes a flow of water moves. The interference fringe shift against the speed of the water, for two tubes 1.5 m long, an index of 1.333, and light of 526 nm — Fizeau's apparatus. The beam is split, each half goes with the flow in one tube and against it in the other, and the two are recombined; the shift is the difference in transit time counted in wavelengths. Three predictions are drawn and they are not close together. If the water did not affect the light at all the shift would be zero, flat along the bottom. If the water carried the light with it completely the shift would be the steepest line. Fresnel's partial drag is the middle one, and at 7 m/s it gives 0.207 of a fringe — which is what was measured, to the accuracy of an eye reading a fringe pattern in 1851. The experiment therefore did not merely detect an effect; it chose between three quantitative possibilities that differ by factors of two, which is why a fraction of a fringe settled something.

The drag that was only an addition

Light in moving water is carried along by it, but only partly — by a fraction of the water's speed that depends on the refractive index in a way nobody could account for. Fresnel invented the coefficient to save a theory, Fizeau measured it in 1851, and it sat unexplained for half a century. It is the first term of the relativistic velocity addition and nothing else.

relativity · Velocity-addition A wave with two directions in it. Light at 60° entering silver, 550 nm, whose index is 0.055 + 3.32i. Phase matching along the boundary fixes the transmitted wave's tangential wavenumber and leaves the normal one to the medium, which supplies a complex answer. The real part decides where the phase goes and the imaginary part where the amplitude does, and they are not the same direction: the surfaces of constant amplitude are parallel to the interface, because the decay is entirely into the metal, while the surfaces of constant phase are tilted by 86.5° from the normal. There is therefore no single refracted angle to quote. The familiar picture, in which one set of parallel planes carries both, requires the absorption to be exactly zero.

The angle that is two angles

Snell's law survives a complex index by giving a complex answer, and a complex angle is not an angle. What the phase-matching argument actually fixes is the tangential wavenumber, and when the medium absorbs, the surfaces of constant phase and the surfaces of constant amplitude stop being parallel. In silver at 550 nanometres the phase fronts run within four degrees of the surface while the amplitude decays straight into it.

optics · Refraction Two intersections, and the rule that picks one. The phase-matching construction for light arriving at 40° from a medium of index 1 into one of index -1. The circles are each medium's own relation between wavevector and frequency; the vertical line is the tangential wavenumber, which the boundary conserves. The line crosses the second circle twice, and the construction alone does not say which point is the answer — the rule that does is that energy must travel away from the interface. For a positive index the energy runs along the wavevector and the upper point is taken. For a negative one the energy runs against it, so the lower point is taken, the wavevector points back toward the boundary, and the ray leaves at -40.0° — on the same side of the normal as it arrived. Nothing in the drawing has changed except which intersection is circled.

The ray on the wrong side of the normal

The phase-matching construction draws a circle and a line, and the line crosses the circle twice. Every earlier construction silently took the upper intersection. Which one is physical is decided by where the energy goes rather than by where the wavevector points, and in a medium whose group velocity opposes its phase velocity the answer is the other one — so the refracted ray leaves on the same side of the normal it arrived on, a flat slab focuses, and a lens can beat the diffraction limit until loss stops it.

optics · Refraction A hemisphere outside is a cone of 16.6° inside. Rays leaving a flat face from a material of index 3.5 into air. Every direction in the hemisphere above the face is reached by a ray from inside a cone of half-angle 16.6°, arcsin(1/n), because refraction at the face fans the cone out; rays steeper than that are reflected back, drawn in the warning colour. The squeeze is exact in the way the invariant requires. The projected solid angle of the inside cone is π sin²θc, which is π/12.25, and multiplied by n² it equals π, the projected solid angle of the whole hemisphere outside — checked on the drawn geometry. So the light that does get out has not gained anything: the radiance inside is n² times higher and the directions available are n² times fewer, and the étendue passing the face is the same on both sides.

The cone light has to find to get out

Inside a dense material the whole hemisphere of directions outside a flat face shrinks to a narrow cone, and light made inside can leave only if it happens to be travelling within it. For gallium arsenide that is two per cent of the light. Turned round, the same cone keeps light in: a slab of silicon with a rough surface holds the light it admits for fifty-one passes. Both numbers are the n² the optical invariant carries, and neither one breaks it.

optics · Etendue Snell's law with space and time exchanged. Two constructions on the same diagram of frequency against wavenumber, with the light lines of a medium of index 1 and of index 1.5. On the left, a boundary in space: the wave crosses a still surface, the frequency is conserved, and the horizontal line at the incident frequency meets the new medium's line at a wavenumber 1.5 times larger — the familiar shortening of the wavelength. On the right, a boundary in time: the whole medium changes at once, the wavenumber is conserved, and the vertical line at the incident wavenumber meets the new medium's line at a frequency 0.667 times the old one. The vertical line also meets the new line's negative-frequency branch, which is a wave running backwards: a reflection in time. A spatial boundary reflects into the same frequency and a temporal one into the same wavelength.

The reflection that needs no surface

Change the refractive index of a whole medium at one instant and a wave already travelling through it splits in two, one part running on and one running back, though there is no surface anywhere for it to reflect from. A boundary in time is Snell's law with space and time exchanged: the wavelength is kept and the frequency changes, momentum is conserved and energy is not.

optics · Refraction Four rays that arrive together. Meridional rays through a fibre whose index falls as the square of the distance from the axis, launched at four angles, drawn against distance along the fibre in millimetres and radius in units of the core radius. Each path is integrated from the ray equation. A steep ray swings out to where the index is lower and travels faster; a shallow one stays near the axis where the index is highest and travels slowest, and in a parabolic profile the two effects cancel: the four rays cross the axis within 0.36 per cent of a pitch of each other, measured off the traced paths rather than assumed. The pitch is 1.11 millimetres and it contains no launch angle, which is the whole of the result. Nothing about what the fibre accepts has changed — the acceptance cone is what the invariant fixed and it is untouched — and everything about when the light arrives has.

The same cone, and a different arrival

The invariant fixes what a guide accepts and says nothing about when it arrives, and the two turn out to be nearly independent. Shaping the index so that the rays which travel furthest also travel fastest cuts the spread in arrival times by a factor of five hundred, at the cost of exactly half the light — and the acceptance cone the invariant governs is untouched throughout.

optics · Etendue Two guides, and the two solutions they have. The transverse field of the two modes a pair of identical slab guides supports, against position across them, for guides half a micrometre wide separated by a gap of 300 nanometres at a wavelength of 1550 nanometres. A single guide has one fundamental mode; two guides side by side have two, and neither of them lives in one guide. The symmetric one is a single hump spanning both, the antisymmetric one has a node exactly between them — checked here to be exactly zero rather than nearly so — and they have slightly different propagation constants because the symmetric one has more of its field in the high-index gap region. That difference, computed from the slab's own dispersion condition, is 4.60e-2 per micrometre. Everything else about a coupler follows from it: a wave launched into one guide alone is the sum of the two supermodes in equal parts, they run at different speeds, and the interference between them moves the power from one guide to the other and back. There is no leakage in the account anywhere — only two solutions beating.

Two tails that swap everything

Bring two guides close enough for their evanescent tails to overlap and they do not leak a little power into each other. They exchange all of it, and then exchange it back, over a length fixed by the splitting between two modes that belong to neither guide — so a coupler is cut to a length rather than tuned to a ratio, and the length depends exponentially on a gap of a few hundred nanometres.

waves · Guided waves Every ray from one point, meeting again at another. Rays from a point half a radius from the centre of Maxwell's fish-eye, n = n₀/(1 + r²/R²), traced in 11 directions round the full circle. Every one is an arc of a circle, and every one passes through the point on the other side of the centre at distance R²/r from it — 2.00 radii — which is the image. The worst miss is 8.8e-4 radii, the size of the integration's own error. Rays leaving in opposite directions, rays leaving at right angles, rays that go the long way round: all arrive. The faint circles are contours of the index, which falls from n₀ at the centre to n₀/2 at one radius and n₀/5 at two.

The medium that images every point

A single refracting surface can be shaped to image one point perfectly and no other. A medium whose index falls smoothly away from a centre can do better: in Maxwell's fish-eye every ray from any point, leaving in any direction, arrives at one image point, and every such path takes exactly the same time. It is a perfect instrument for all of space at once — and the image it forms is sharp everywhere and a faithful copy nowhere.

optics · Fermat A parallel beam brought to a point on the far side. Parallel rays sent into Luneburg's sphere, whose index falls from the square root of two at the centre to one at the rim, from the left. Each beam is brought to a single point on the rim diametrically opposite the direction it came from; the worst of the 11 rays misses by 2.0e-3 radii. The sphere has no axis — every direction is the same to it — so a beam from any direction is focused as well as any other, and there is no such thing as an off-axis aberration.

The lens with no axis

Every ordinary lens has an axis, and every one of its hardest aberrations is a penalty for looking away from it. A sphere has no axis, so a sphere cannot have off-axis aberrations — but a glass ball has spherical aberration instead, because one index and one curvature are too few to focus every ray. Luneburg's sphere, whose index falls from √2 at the centre to 1 at the rim, keeps the symmetry and removes the aberration: it brings parallel light from every direction to a perfect point on its own surface.

optics · Fermat The block has to move, and which way decides the momentum. A pulse of light crosses a free block of glass of index 1.5 and length L, with time in units of L/c. The pulse falls behind where it would have been in vacuum by 0.50 L while it is inside. The block's displacement, in units of EL/Mc², is obtained from momentum conservation alone: if the light inside carries Abraham's E/nc the block takes up the rest of E/c, moves forward, and ends 0.500 units along — Balazs's (n − 1). The sum of the pulse's lag and the block's shift, which is the centre of energy's departure from uniform motion, is then zero to within 0.0004 units at every moment. If instead the light carried Minkowski's nE/c, the block would have to recoil backwards and the centre of energy would end 1.25 units behind a straight line, which no isolated system can do. For a one-joule pulse through a kilogram of glass ten centimetres long the real shift is 5.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ m.

The momentum light carries into glass

A pulse of light in glass has two momenta, nE/c and E/nc, and for a century the argument was about which one is right. Both are measured. A free block that the light crosses must move forward, which only Abraham's value explains; a Cherenkov cone exists at all, which only Minkowski's allows. They answer different questions, and the difference between them is momentum carried by the glass.

electromagnetism · Field energy Three conditions and the window they leave. For a ray entering a diamond's table straight down, the angle from the normal at which it meets the first pavilion face, the second pavilion face and the top again, against the pavilion angle; diamond's critical angle, 24.4°, is the dashed line. The first two must lie above it, so that the ray is totally reflected; the third must lie below it, so that the ray gets out. The first holds for every pavilion angle drawn. The second fails above 51.9°, where the ray would leak out of the far side of the pavilion. The third fails outside 38.9° to 51.1°, and it is the one that decides. Together they leave a window from 38.9° to 51.1°, and Tolkowsky's 40.75° sits inside it, towards the lower edge.

The window a diamond is cut inside

A well-cut diamond sends back out of its top most of the light that falls on it, and it does so without a single silvered surface. Light entering the top is totally reflected at one sloping face of the pavilion below, again at the opposite face, and then has to leave through the top — where it must not be totally reflected. Each of those three is a condition on one angle, and together they leave a window a dozen degrees wide inside which a stone looks bright and outside which it looks glassy. The window is wide for diamond and nearly closed for glass, which is why a cutter's skill cannot make glass sparkle.

optics · Total internal reflection A mirror for X-rays that works only at a glance. The fraction of 8 keV X-rays reflected by a smooth surface of gold and of silicon, against the grazing angle between the ray and the surface, in milliradians, with absorption included (solid) and without it (dashed). Below the critical angle √(2δ) — 10.02 mrad (0.57°) for gold, 3.88 mrad (0.22°) for silicon — the X-rays are totally reflected from outside the material, because its index is below the vacuum's; above it almost nothing is. Absorption rounds the edge and keeps the plateau a little below one. A mirror for X-rays is therefore a surface met at less than a degree, and it reflects well only while it is met that way.

The index that falls below one

Glass bends light because light is slower in it. X-rays are not slower in glass, or in anything: every material's refractive index for them is slightly less than one, by a few parts in a million. Everything about X-ray optics follows from that small number with the wrong sign. A lens that focuses them must be thinner in the middle than at the edges, and so weak that dozens are stacked in a row. A mirror reflects them only if they arrive at a glancing angle of less than a degree — totally, from the outside, the reverse of the way a diamond traps light — which is why the mirrors of an X-ray telescope are long, nested barrels rather than dishes.

optics · Refraction How much darker a surface looks under a film of water. The diffuse reflectance of a surface covered by a thin film of clear water (solid), against its reflectance dry, with the dry value for comparison (dashed): (1 − Rₑₓₜ) a (1 − Rᵢₙₜ)/(1 − a Rᵢₙₜ), where the film traps and returns light that falls outside its escape cone. A bright surface of reflectance 0.9 falls to 0.77; a mid-grey one of 0.5 to 0.32, 64 per cent of its dry value; a dark one of 0.2 to 0.11, 54 per cent. Dark surfaces darken proportionally most, because each return trip costs them most; and a coloured surface grows more saturated, because the colours it absorbs are absorbed again on every return while the colour it reflects survives.

The sand that darkens when it is wet

Wet sand is darker than dry sand, a wet stone darker than a dry one, a splashed pavement darker in patches, and a wet white shirt turns grey and then see-through. Water is clear and absorbs almost nothing, so it cannot be adding darkness. What it does is change where the light goes. A film of water on a surface traps light that has been scattered back up, returning most of it for another chance to be absorbed. Water in the pores between grains replaces air with something closer to the grains' own refractive index, so each grain turns light aside less, and light wanders deeper before it gets out. Both lengthen the path, and on a longer path more light is absorbed by the material that was there all along.

optics · Scattering The cone a charge leaves behind in water. A charged particle crossing water at 0.99 of the speed of light in vacuum, which is 1.317 times the speed of light in water, drawn at one instant. From each point it passed, its field set off a spherical wavelet travelling at c/n; the wavelets from earlier points have grown larger. Because the particle outruns them, they all touch one cone with its tip at the particle, at an angle θ = arccos(1/nβ) = 40.6° to the path — the light of Cherenkov radiation, which travels out perpendicular to the cone. No point on the path is special and the particle never accelerates: the radiation is a property of the field moving faster than the medium can carry it, the electromagnetic counterpart of a sonic boom or a boat's wake.

Why the glow of a fast charge is blue

A charge moving in a straight line at constant speed does not radiate — in a vacuum. In water, if it moves faster than light does in water, it glows, and the glow is blue. The cone of the light is the familiar half of the story. The other half is a count: Frank and Tamm's formula says each centimetre of water yields about two hundred visible photons, in numbers that rise as the inverse square of the wavelength, which is why a reactor pool shines blue and why the light keeps getting stronger into the ultraviolet until water stops being transparent. The charge never accelerates. What radiates is the water.

astrophysics · Radiating charge Rays at a frequency the ionosphere cannot stop head-on. Ray paths at 14 MHz launched at angles from 10° to 75° from the vertical into a Chapman layer peaking at 300 km with a critical frequency of 8 MHz, over a flat Earth. A wave sent straight up at 14 MHz passes through: it is above the layer's plasma frequency everywhere. A ray at φ₀ from the vertical turns back where the plasma frequency equals f cos φ₀ — the secant law — so only rays more oblique than arccos(8/14) = 55.2° return. Those that do land beyond about 1133 km; nothing comes down closer than that: the skip zone, a ring of silence round a transmitter that is audible much further away. Vertical scale exaggerated about six times.

The frequency the sky returns only at a slant

The ionosphere turns back any radio wave below its plasma frequency, about eight megahertz on a summer afternoon, and lets anything above it out into space — if the wave is sent straight up. Send a fourteen-megahertz wave up at a slant and it comes back down, a thousand kilometres away. Only the part of the wave's motion across the layer has to be stopped, and that part is the frequency times the cosine of the angle. The rule turns one frequency into a range of them, sets the highest frequency that can reach any given distance, and leaves a ring of silence round every short-wave transmitter, inside which it cannot be heard at all.

astrophysics · Plasma oscillation Light from a charge that crosses into glass at a steady speed. The transition radiation emitted as an ultrarelativistic charge crosses from vacuum into a dense medium, per unit solid angle, against the angle to the path in units of 1/γ, for photons at three frequencies: one tenth, three tenths and one times γωₚ, where ωₚ is the medium's plasma frequency. The scale is αħγ²/π² per unit frequency. Nothing is emitted straight ahead; the light comes out in a narrow hollow cone with its brightest ring at γθ = 0.98, 0.88, 0.68 for the three. At a tenth of γωₚ the peak is about ten times higher than at γωₚ. The charge never accelerates: it is the field's sudden change of shape at the surface, from the flattened disc it carries in vacuum to the one the medium's electrons allow, that is radiated.

The light a charge makes by changing medium

A charge moving at constant speed in a straight line radiates nothing in a vacuum, and nothing in glass either if it is slower than light there. Let it cross from one into the other and it radiates at the boundary, though it neither turns nor slows. The field it carries has one shape in each medium and has to be rebuilt as it crosses, and what is shed in the rebuilding is light. The energy shed grows in proportion to the particle's Lorentz factor, the one property of a fast particle that almost nothing else measures at high energy, and this is why detectors stack hundreds of plastic foils in a particle's path to collect one or two X-rays.

astrophysics · Radiating charge Three cylinders that focus electrons. An einzel lens: three coaxial tubes of radius R, the outer two at the potential the electrons arrived with and the centre one, 2R long, at 4 times it. Electrons enter from the left parallel to the axis at five heights, from 0.1R to 0.7R, and are traced through the field without approximation. In each gap the equipotentials bulge between the tubes, and an electron crossing them is refracted as at a curved glass surface: pushed towards the axis where the potential is low and away from it where the potential is high. It is slower where it is pushed inward, so it spends longer there, and each gap converges on balance; the electron leaves with the speed it came in with. The rays cross the axis at 4.00R, 3.92R, 3.78R, 3.56R, 3.25R beyond the lens centre: the outer ones are bent too much and cross first, which is spherical aberration.

The voltage that bends an electron like glass

An electron that has fallen through a potential difference V moves at a speed proportional to √V. Crossing a surface of constant potential, it keeps the part of its momentum that runs along the surface and changes the part across it, and the two rules together are Snell's law with √V in place of the refractive index. Every arrangement of charged electrodes is therefore a piece of glass for electrons. Three metal tubes make a lens that focuses whichever way its middle tube is charged — and, by a theorem proved in 1936, no lens built from round electrodes can be free of spherical aberration. That theorem kept electron microscopes some fifty times coarser than their wavelength for sixty years.

electromagnetism · Potential A filter made of glass powder and oil. The fraction of light transmitted straight through a 5 mm layer of N-BK7 grains packed to half its volume in the matching liquid, against wavelength, for grains of radius 5, 10 and 20 μm, from van de Hulst's extinction for large, weakly refracting particles. At the crossing the grains vanish and the layer is clear. A few tens of nanometres away each grain shifts the light passing through it in phase by enough to scatter a little of it out of the beam, and a thousand grains in a row scatter all of it: the passband is 51.7 nm wide at half height for 5 μm grains, 36.3 nm for 10 μm, 25.5 nm for 20 μm. Larger grains make a narrower filter, because the phase a grain imposes grows with its size; the same mismatch of index that a fine powder lets through, a coarse one scatters.

The colour at which glass disappears

Lower a glass rod into an oil of the same refractive index and it vanishes, except for a faint coloured outline. The outline is the clue. Glass and oil disperse light differently, so their indices can agree at only one wavelength; at every other the glass is still there, bending and scattering a little. Grind the glass to powder and pack it in the oil, and the mixture is clear at that one wavelength and opaque at the rest — a colour filter made of nothing but two transparent materials, whose colour moves by a whole hue for a few degrees of warming.

optics · Dispersion Light inside an accelerating rocket travels on circles. Rays of light leaving one point inside a rocket with constant acceleration, drawn in the rocket's own coordinates: height above the horizon up the page, in units of c²/a (one light-year for one gravity), and distance across. Each ray is a straight line in an inertial frame, transformed event by event. Launched across the rocket (0°) or at +30°, +60°, −30°, −60°, every ray is an exact semicircle centred on the horizon, with radius 1.000, 1.155, 2.000, 1.155, 2.000: the rays bend down towards the horizon and meet it at right angles. A ray sent straight up stays straight. These are the straight lines of the hyperbolic plane, although the spacetime inside the rocket is flat.

The rocket in which light travels on circles

Inside a rocket that accelerates for ever at a constant rate, a beam of light sent across the cabin sags towards the floor, as Einstein argued it must if acceleration and gravity are indistinguishable. Followed further than any cabin, the sag turns out to be exact geometry: every ray inside the rocket is a perfect semicircle centred on the horizon below, and the rays obey the rules of a non-Euclidean plane in which the angles of a triangle add to less than two right angles. The spacetime in the rocket is flat; the curvature belongs to the clocks.

relativity · Accelerated frames The width a self-focusing beam is forced to. The root-mean-square width of a collimated Gaussian beam in a Kerr medium, relative to its starting width, against distance in Rayleigh ranges, at powers of 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 3 times the Gaussian threshold, the wavelength squared over 2π n0 n2. This curve is exact, not a model: the mean square width of any beam obeyed by the two-dimensional cubic wave equation is a parabola in distance, its coefficient set by one minus the power over the threshold, whatever happens to its shape. At low power the beam spreads by diffraction. At exactly the threshold its width never changes. Above it the parabola reaches zero at a finite distance — 1.41 Rayleigh ranges at 1.5 times, 0.71 at three times — which a width cannot do, so the beam must have collapsed to a point at or before it. The equation stops being true there; the glass usually breaks first.

The beam that focuses itself

In glass the refractive index rises very slightly with the intensity of the light, so a beam that is brightest in the middle writes a converging lens into the glass it is crossing. Diffraction spreads it at the same time. Both effects grow in the same proportion as the beam is narrowed, so neither can win by a change of size — only by a change of power. Above a critical power, 4.3 megawatts in fused silica, the beam is forced to collapse within a finite distance, and every high-power laser is built around not letting that happen where it is not wanted.

optics · Fermat Fringes that bend into hooks beside a line. The interference fringes seen in a spectrograph behind an interferometer with 10 cm of sodium vapour at 10¹⁴ atoms per cubic centimetre in one arm and a glass plate in the other, against wavelength across the D₂ line (horizontal) and position along the slit (vertical, in fringe spacings). Far from the line the plate tilts every fringe evenly. Near the line the vapour's dispersion sweeps each fringe up on one side and down on the other, and every fringe turns back on itself in a hook: the turning points sit −100 and 100 picometres from the line centre, the same for every fringe. The line itself, a few picometres wide, is a dark gap between them; the hooks lie far outside it, in vapour that is transparent.

The hooks that weigh an absorption line

A strong absorption line is black at its centre, and how black it is says almost nothing about how many atoms made it — double them and the line hardly darkens. The atoms are still there, and they still bend light: on either side of the line, where the vapour is transparent, its refractive index rises and falls by an amount proportional to their number. In 1912 Dmitry Rozhdestvensky found a way to read that index straight off a photograph. Interference fringes passed through a spectrograph curl into hooks beside the line, and the distance between the hooks, squared, counts the atoms — whatever the line's shape and however saturated its core.

optics · Dispersion Three shapes of one cell, delaying light by the same total. The phase delay of 633 nm light across the middle of a model cell holding 300 pg of dry matter, in three shapes — rounded up, spreading and flattened — each with the same contents dissolved in volumes of 942, 965, 982 μm³. The rounded cell delays the light by 3.41 rad at its centre, the flat one by only 0.55. But the delay summed over the whole image is the same for all three, 536 rad·μm², and it gives back 300.0 pg through the refractive increment α = 0.18 mL/g: a cell is weighed by the light it delays, whatever shape it takes.

The cell weighed by the light it delays

A living cell is nearly transparent, and the light that passes through it comes out almost as bright as it went in. What changes is its timing: the cell's proteins and nucleic acids raise its refractive index a little above the water around it, and the light is delayed by a fraction of a wave. Measure that delay at every point of the image and add it up, and the sum is the cell's dry mass — the weight of everything in it except water — whatever shape the cell takes and however much water it holds. The water drops out because the medium is water too; the shape drops out because the delay is an integral of concentration along the path. Light becomes a balance that weighs a living cell to a part in a thousand without touching it.

optics · Imaging The angle at which water lets the light out. The fraction of light reflected inside a windscreen of index 1.52 at its outer surface, unpolarised, against the angle of incidence, when the outer surface is dry (glass to air) and when it is wet (glass to water). Beyond 41.2° all the light is reflected from a dry surface; under water total reflection does not begin until 61.3°. Between the two angles, shaded, the surface is a perfect mirror where it is dry and a window where it is wet. A sensor working at 45° sits in that band: at a wet spot only 1.2% of its light is reflected and the rest leaves the glass into the water. The difference between a mirror and a window is the refractive index of what is touching the glass — a property of contact, not of what can be seen through it.

The windscreen that feels the rain

Behind the rear-view mirror of most modern cars a small box decides when the wipers should run, and it does so without looking at the rain. It shines infrared light into the windscreen at forty-five degrees, steep enough to be trapped inside the glass by total internal reflection, and counts how much comes back out of the far end of the glass a few centimetres away. A raindrop on the outside changes the medium the glass is touching from air to water, and water's critical angle against glass is sixty-one degrees, not forty-one: at forty-five the light is no longer trapped, and nearly all of it leaves into the drop. The sensor measures the area the rain is touching, and the rain rate from how fast that area grows.

optics · Total internal reflection The focus that moves out of the eye. Parallel rays from a distant object entering a simplified eye 24 mm long, in millimetres along its axis: in air the eye's 61 dioptres bring them to a focus 21.9 mm behind its principal plane, on the retina; under water its 18 dioptres would bring them to a focus 73 mm behind, about three times the length of the eye. On the retina itself the underwater rays have converged only a third of the way, and every point of the scene is spread into a disc the size of the pupil's shadow. The eye is not out of focus by a little, as a short-sighted eye is; it is missing most of a lens.

The eye that loses its lens in water

Eyes opened under water see only a blur, and the reason is not water in the eye or salt or murk. The human eye does two-thirds of its focusing not with its lens but with the curved front of its cornea, whose power comes from the jump in refractive index between air and tissue. Water is almost as dense optically as the cornea, and the jump all but disappears: about forty-three of the eye's sixty dioptres vanish, and the focus moves to three times the eye's own length behind the retina. A mask gives the cornea back its air; a small pupil and a hard squint buy back a little; animals that hunt in both worlds have flattened their corneas and given the work to the lens.

optics · Imaging

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DispersionSnell's lawTotal internal reflectionFermat's principleCritical angleEvanescent waveAbsorptionPolarisationGroup velocityPhase velocityOptical path lengthStationary point

All concepts