Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Polarisation — where it appears

The direction in which a wave's oscillation points, transverse to its travel, and the states that direction can be prepared in. Only transverse waves have it, which is why light does and sound in air does not, and why the polarisation of a seismic wave says which kind it is.

Named by 31 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Malus's law. The fraction of polarised light passing a filter, against the angle between the light's own direction of shaking and the filter's axis. It is the cosine squared: half at 45 degrees, nothing at 90.

The direction of the shaking, and the filter that only asks about it

A wave that travels one way can still shake in any direction across that way. Light does, most of it shakes in all of them at once, and a sheet of plastic can ask which.

optics · Polarisation How much each colour is scattered. Scattering strength against wavelength, as the inverse fourth power, normalised to one at 550 nanometres. Light at 450 nanometres is scattered 4.35 times as strongly as light at 650 nanometres — which is the whole reason the sky is the colour it is.

Why the sky is blue and the sunset is not, from one exponent

Scattering goes as the inverse fourth power of wavelength, and that single number produces a blue sky and a red sun without any second explanation. The two facts look opposite and are the same arithmetic.

optics · Scattering A beam through a chain of analysers. An unpolarised beam of intensity 1 entering 3 analysers oriented at 0°, 90°, 0°, selecting the + then + output each time. The intensities are 0.500 and 0.500 out of analyser 1; 0.250 and 0.250 out of analyser 2; 0.125 and 0.125 out of analyser 3. The last analyser is oriented the same way as the first, and it produces a "−" beam of 0.125 — a beam of exactly the kind the first analyser removed entirely. The middle analyser did not filter the beam; it replaced what the beam had an answer to.

The answer that was not there before

Send a beam through an analyser and it splits in two. Send one half through a second analyser turned sideways, then through a third pointing the way the first did, and the property the first analyser removed has come back.

quantum · Measurement What a passing wave does to a ring. A ring of 8 free masses at 4 phases of a passing gravitational wave, in both polarisations. The upper row is the + mode: one diameter lengthens while the perpendicular one shortens, and half a cycle later they swap. The lower row is the × mode, which is the same pattern rotated by forty-five degrees rather than ninety — the signature of a spin-2 field, and the reason a detector is built as two arms at a right angle. The drawn strain is 0.42; a real one is 10⁻²¹, so the deformation is exaggerated 4.2·10²⁰ times. At that true strain a four-kilometre arm changes length by 4·10⁻¹⁸ m.

The wave that stretches one way and squeezes the other

A gravitational wave passing through a ring of free masses lengthens one diameter while shortening the perpendicular one, then swaps. The two conservation laws that forbid anything simpler are why the effect is a part in a thousand million million million.

astrophysics · Gravitational waves The correlation, and the best a shared list of answers can do. The coincidence correlation between two polarisation analysers against the angle between them, over two full turns of the correlation — a polariser turned through 180° is the same polariser, so the picture repeats. The singlet gives −cos 2Δ, drawn through −1.00 at 0°, 1.00 at 90°, −1.00 at 180°, 1.00 at 270°. Beside it is the best correlation any shared list of pre-agreed answers can produce: straight lines between the same four extremes, with corners where the cosine is smooth. The two agree exactly at the multiples of 45° and nowhere else, and they are furthest apart — by 0.2105 — at 19.77° and 70.23°, which is ½ arcsin(2/π) from either end of the quarter turn. The difference is not a matter of degree: it is a curve against a shape with a corner in it, and no list can be bent into the curve.

The correlation no instructions can produce

A pair of gloves in two boxes agrees perfectly and needs no physics, because the answers were settled at packing. What no packing can imitate is the shape that appears as the two analysers are turned relative to each other, and the shape is a number — 2.828 where every list of pre-agreed answers is stuck at 2.

quantum · Entanglement The two reflectances, and the angle one of them loses. Reflectance against angle of incidence for light going from n = 1 into n = 1.5. The upper curve is light polarised with its electric field along the surface, which reflects more and more strongly until at grazing incidence everything reflects. The lower curve is light polarised in the plane of incidence, and it does something the other cannot: it falls to exactly zero at 56.31°, where tan θ = 1.5000, and then rises again. At normal incidence the two are equal at 4.00% because there is no plane of incidence to tell them apart. The dashed curve is the transmittance, computed from the transmission coefficients and the two media's projected impedances rather than as one minus the reflectance; it agrees with one minus the reflectance to 4.4e-16 across the whole range, which is where the energy accounting can be seen to close.

The angle at which reflection picks a side

At one angle of incidence, a water surface reflects no light at all of one polarisation. The Fresnel algebra says so, and says nothing about why. The reason is that the reflected ray would have to leave along the axis of the charges radiating it — and a shaking charge sends nothing along the direction it shakes in.

optics · Polarisation Where the sky's blue goes. How many times more strongly a sphere scatters 450 nm light than 650 nm light, against its radius, with the radius on a logarithmic axis running from a couple of nanometres to twenty micrometres. On the left the ratio sits at 4.35, which is the fourth power of the wavelength ratio and the whole reason the daytime sky is blue. It does not stay there. By a radius of 245 nm the preference has halved, and by a micrometre it has essentially gone: a particle comparable with the wavelength scatters every visible colour within a few per cent of equally, which is why a cloud is white, why fog is white, why milk is white and why the exhaust of a cold diesel is white while the smoke of a cigarette — whose particles are ten times smaller — is blue. Nothing about the material changed between one end of this axis and the other; only the size did.

When the particle is the size of the wave

The sky is blue because small things scatter short wavelengths far more strongly. A cloud is made of the same water and scatters every colour alike. Nothing about the material changed — only the size, and one dimensionless number crossing one.

optics · Scattering The index that depends on which way the light is going. The two refractive indices of 3 uniaxial crystals, against the angle between the wave normal and the crystal's optic axis. The flat lines are the ordinary index, which is the same in every direction because the ordinary wave's field is always perpendicular to the axis. The curves are the extraordinary index, which runs from the ordinary value along the axis — where the two waves are identical and the crystal behaves like glass — to its extreme value at right angles to it. calcite (CaCO₃) has n_o = 1.6584 and n_e = 1.4864, so n_e − n_o = -0.1720; quartz (SiO₂) has n_o = 1.5443 and n_e = 1.5534, so n_e − n_o = 0.0091; lithium niobate has n_o = 2.3005 and n_e = 2.2075, so n_e − n_o = -0.0930. The sign of that difference is what makes a crystal positive or negative, and it decides which of the two images in a double-refracting crystal is the one that moves.

The crystal that answers twice

Lay a piece of calcite on a printed page and the print appears twice. One image sits still when the crystal is turned and the other goes round it. Nothing has been done to the light except pass it through a material whose response to a field is not a number.

optics · Polarisation The field a polarised sphere makes inside itself. A uniformly polarised sphere, its bound surface charge drawn at the size the cosine gives it, the uniform field that charge makes inside, and the exact dipole field it makes outside. The internal field is the same everywhere and points against the polarisation — that is what makes it a depolarising field — and its size is P/3ε₀, the third being the sphere's share of the one unit the three axes divide between them.

The field the matter takes away

Put a piece of glass in an electric field and the field inside it is smaller. How much smaller is not a property of glass. A needle of it keeps almost the whole field, a sphere keeps three-quarters, a slab across the field keeps a seventh — same material, same applied field, three answers, and the difference is arithmetic about shape.

electromagnetism · Dielectrics What the return journey does to each of them. The rotation of the plane after a beam has gone through a rotator, been reflected, and come back, against the length of the rotator — divided by the one-way rotation, so the two answers are 0 and 2 and nothing else can happen. A naturally active medium is handed with respect to the beam: reverse the beam and the sense of the rotation reverses with it, and the second pass undoes the first exactly, at every length and every wavelength. A Faraday rotator is handed with respect to the field, which does not care which way the light is going, so the second pass adds to the first and the round trip is twice the single one: 1 mm of it gives 21.7° out and 43.4° back; 2 mm of it gives 43.4° out and 86.8° back; 4 mm of it gives 86.8° out and 173.6° back; 8 mm of it gives 173.6° out and 347.2° back. That is a violation of reciprocity, and it is only available because a magnetic field is odd under time reversal. Everything a passive optical component can do — a lens, a mirror, a waveplate, a piece of quartz — looks the same run backwards, and none of them can be made into a one-way street. This can.

The rotation a return trip doubles

Quartz turns the plane of polarisation and so does glass in a magnetic field. The two look identical on the way through and are opposites on the way back — the crystal undoes its own rotation exactly, and the magnet adds to it. That difference is the whole of why a one-way street for light can be built at all, and why nothing passive will ever be one.

optics · Polarisation Water's permittivity across six decades of frequency. The real and imaginary parts of water's permittivity against frequency, on logarithmic axes, from 10 to 16 in powers of ten hertz. ε′ begins at 80.1 — the number a textbook prints — falls through the Debye relaxation near twenty gigahertz, is dragged down again by the librational, bending and stretching bands of the molecule, and settles at 1.777 in the visible, whose square root is 1.3330: water's refractive index. The identity n = √ε_r is exact and is an identity between two numbers taken at the same frequency; using the static permittivity in it predicts an index of 8.9 and is the most instructive wrong answer in the subject. The curve is a Debye term and four Lorentz oscillators, with two parameters solved so that the two plateaus are the measured ones rather than fitted by eye.

The constant that depends on how fast it is asked

Water's relative permittivity is 80.1. Its refractive index is 1.333, and the square of 1.333 is 1.777. The identity n = √ε_r is exact, the two numbers differ by a factor of forty-five, and nothing is wrong with either — because a permittivity is a function of frequency and the two measurements were made eight orders of magnitude apart.

electromagnetism · Dielectrics A circuit on the sphere of polarisations. The Poincaré sphere, on which every polarisation state is a point: linear states around the equator, circular at the poles, and orthogonal states at opposite ends of a diameter. The triangle is a closed circuit — linear at 0°, then linear at 23°, then left circular, and back — taken along geodesics, which is what a sequence of ideal polarisers does. Bringing a state round it returns it to exactly the state it started in, and multiplied by a phase: 0.3927 radians here, against minus half the enclosed solid angle of -0.7854 steradians. The two agree exactly, and neither calculation knows about the other — the phase is the argument of a product of three overlaps between Jones vectors, and the solid angle is spherical geometry. Nothing about the elements used, their thickness, or the wavelength enters. A phase that depends only on the shape of a path is the signature of a geometric phase, and this is the oldest known example of one.

The phase that is only a shape

Take a beam of polarised light through a sequence of elements that returns it to the polarisation it started with, and it comes back with a phase it did not have before. That phase is not an optical path length — it does not depend on the thickness of anything, or on the wavelength, or on how slowly the sequence was carried out. It is minus half the area the path enclosed on the sphere of polarisation states, and nothing else.

optics · Polarisation A refraction with no wave in it. Field lines crossing the boundary between two dielectrics whose permittivities differ by a factor of 4, at incidences of 12°, 26°, 40°, 54°, 68°. Nothing is oscillating and nothing is travelling: these are static fields, and the only inputs are that the component of E along the surface is the same on both sides and that the component of D across it is. Dividing one condition by the other gives the ratio of the tangents of the two angles, and it comes out equal to the ratio of the permittivities — measured off the constructed directions as 4.000, 4.000, 4.000, 4.000, 4.000, against 4. The lines bend towards the surface on the side with the larger permittivity, which is the opposite sense from a light ray entering glass, and the chart on the right shows the whole relation: it is a version of Snell's law with the sines replaced by tangents, and there is no speed anywhere in it. Two things follow that are worth carrying. A field line meeting a surface at grazing incidence stays nearly parallel to it whatever the materials, so the ratio matters least where the field is largest along the surface. And in the limit of a very large ratio every line comes out very nearly perpendicular on the low side, which is the electrostatic ancestor of a conductor's boundary condition — a conductor is the ratio taken to infinity.

A refraction with no wave in it

A field line crossing from one dielectric into another bends, by a law that looks exactly like Snell's with the sines replaced by tangents. Nothing is oscillating, nothing is travelling, and no speed appears anywhere in the derivation — only the two conditions that say what a boundary may and may not do to a field.

electromagnetism · Dielectrics Past the critical angle, all that is left of a reflection is its phase. The phase each polarisation acquires on total internal reflection at an index ratio of 1.518, against angle of incidence, together with the difference between them. Below the critical angle of 41.19° there is a transmitted beam and the reflection coefficients are real; above it the transmitted wavenumber is imaginary, the coefficients have modulus exactly one — every photon comes back — and the only thing that distinguishes one angle from another is the phase. The two polarisations acquire different phases, and their difference peaks at 46.533° at an incidence of 51.05°, which the closed form puts at the same place. That difference is a retardation: a wave plate made out of an angle, with no birefringent material anywhere in it, and — because the expression contains only the index ratio — one that barely changes with colour.

The retarder with no crystal in it

A wave plate turns linear polarisation into circular by making one component travel a little further than the other, which requires a birefringent crystal cut to a thickness and works properly at one wavelength. Total internal reflection does the same job with a phase that comes from the geometry instead — and because a refractive index barely changes across the visible where a wavelength changes by a factor of two, the same block of ordinary glass is a quarter-wave plate for every colour at once.

optics · Polarisation The only part of the field that can pull. A dielectric slab part-way into a parallel-plate capacitor. Everywhere except at the slab's edge the field is perpendicular to the plates and therefore perpendicular to the direction the slab can move, so it exerts no force along that direction at all: inside the parallel-plate model, which is uniform between the plates and zero outside them, nothing pulls the slab anywhere. The force lives in the bowed lines drawn at the edge, where the field leaks past the end of the dielectric and acquires a component along the plates. Those lines are what the model throws away as a small correction near the boundary, and they are the entire mechanism. The energy method sidesteps the drawing altogether: differentiate the total energy with respect to the insertion and the answer is 1.328e-3 newtons, inward, without ever asking where on the slab the force is applied.

The force that lives where the model is not

A slab of glass held at the mouth of a charged capacitor is pulled in. Inside the parallel-plate model there is no force at all — the field is perpendicular to the slab's motion everywhere — and the same model's energy nevertheless gives the pull exactly right. The mechanism is entirely in the part of the field the model throws away.

electromagnetism · Dielectrics One measurement that separates unpolarised from polarised. What a rotating linear polariser passes, against its angle, for beams of the same total intensity and degrees of polarisation 0, 0.35, 0.7, 1. Every curve has the same average — a polariser passes half of any beam over a whole turn, whatever its state — and they differ only in how deeply they modulate. The depth of the modulation is the degree of polarisation, exactly: a fully polarised beam goes to zero at one angle and a beam with no preferred direction gives a flat line at a half. That is the whole measurement, and it is why "unpolarised" is a statement about a modulation depth rather than about what a wave is doing.

The light with no direction of shaking

Unpolarised light is not a state of a wave; it is the absence of one, and no description of a single wave can represent it. What can is a set of four numbers, all of them powers a detector reads — and they describe every beam there is, including the ones that are neither polarised nor not.

optics · Polarisation Where the instrument can hear. The response of an L-shaped interferometer to the plus polarisation, over the whole sky: azimuth across, cosine of the polar angle up, so that equal areas of the picture are equal areas of the sky. The plus pattern is largest directly overhead and underfoot and along the arms, and vanishes on four lines where a wave stretches both arms equally and the interferometer has nothing to compare. The average of the square over the whole sky is 0.2333, summed over a hundred and sixty thousand directions, and the two polarisations' averages add to 0.4000 — two fifths exactly, whatever the polarisation angle. Averaged over that angle as well, each polarisation contributes a fifth, and that fifth is what turns a strain sensitivity into a range: it is why a detector's quoted reach is substantially less than what it would manage for a source overhead. There is no direction in which the instrument is deaf to both polarisations at once, and none in which it is fully sensitive either.

What the instrument actually hears

A gravitational-wave detector is not a ruler laid against a stretching space. It is a clock comparison, its response falls to nothing at frequencies where the wave turns over while the light is still in the arm, and there are directions in the sky where it is deaf.

astrophysics · Gravitational waves The pattern the whole sky is written in. The sky as a disc — zenith at the centre, horizon at the rim, equal angles at equal distances — with the sun 30° above the horizon. Each short line is the direction the electric field vibrates in at that point, and its length and darkness are how polarised the light there is. The directions are perpendicular to the plane containing the sun, the observer and the point, which puts them tangent to circles centred on the sun. The heavy arc is the locus 90° from the sun, where the polarisation is strongest — 74 per cent here — and it is a great circle rather than a patch: a band across the sky, not a region near the horizon. This is what a polarising filter on a camera acts on, and it is why turning one darkens a band of sky and leaves the rest almost untouched, and why the effect is strongest when the sun is off to one side and absent when it is behind the photographer.

The pattern the sky is written in

Scattered sunlight is polarised, so the whole sky carries a direction of vibration at every point — arranged in circles about the sun, strongest on the great circle ninety degrees away from it, and vanishing at points that were found by looking before anyone could explain them. Bees navigate by it and a camera filter reads one band of it.

optics · Polarisation A hill that is always ahead of the atom. The light-shift potentials of the two ground sublevels of a spin-½ atom in two counter-propagating beams with crossed linear polarisations, over one and a half wavelengths, in units of the well depth. The polarisation of the light turns from σ+ to linear to σ− every quarter wavelength, and the two sublevels see sinusoidal potentials a quarter wavelength out of step. Optical pumping transfers the atom from one sublevel to the other fastest exactly where its own potential is highest — the fastest pumping and the hilltop coincide, which the figure checks — and that is the bottom of the other potential. The heavy line is an atom that starts with 3.3 well depths of kinetic energy: each time it reaches a hilltop it is pumped down by exactly one well depth, climbs the next hill, and is pumped down again, 3 times, until it no longer has the energy to reach a hilltop and is left oscillating in one well. The energy is carried off by the pumping photon, which leaves bluer than the light that drove it by the depth of the well.

The limit that belonged to a simpler atom

The theory of laser cooling predicted a floor, and the first careful measurement came in six times below it. Nothing was wrong with the measurement or the arithmetic. The floor belonged to an atom with one ground state, and real atoms have several — which lets the light build a hill in front of every atom, move it to the bottom before it can roll back, and repeat the trick until the atom is a few microkelvin from rest.

astrophysics · Radiation pressure A gap that every angle from air falls into. The stop bands of a stack of quarter-wave layers of index 4.6 and 1.6 — tellurium and polystyrene, the pair of the first such mirror — against frequency, in units of the design frequency, and the parallel index β = n₀ sin θ₀ the light brings along the layers; TE polarisation on the right, TM on the left. Shaded regions are gaps. Light from air can only have β between −1 and 1, the vertical lines; within those lines the gaps for both polarisations overlap between f = 0.848 and 1.321, the band marked across the figure, so every angle of incidence and both polarisations are reflected: a relative width of 43.6%. The TM gap narrows as β grows and closes at the internal Brewster index, 1.51, which light from air cannot reach.

The mirror that works from every direction

A stack of alternating transparent layers reflects nearly all the light of one colour arriving straight on, and less as the light tilts, because tilting moves the forbidden band. A structure that repeats in only one direction ought therefore to be a mirror for only a range of directions. It is not, if the layers differ enough: light arriving from air cannot bring enough sideways momentum to escape the forbidden band at any angle, for either polarisation, and a flat stack of plastic and tellurium reflects every angle over a band of frequencies almost half as wide as its centre.

waves · Periodic media How far the vacuum is from being a nonlinear medium. The size of the vacuum's departure from linearity, as a fraction, against the electric field it is subjected to — thirteen decades of field and twenty-eight of correction, both logarithmic. The scale is the Schwinger field, computed here from the electron's mass and the fundamental constants as 1.32e+18 volts per metre: the field at which a pair gains its own rest energy over a Compton wavelength, and therefore the field at which the vacuum stops being a passive backdrop. The marks are the strongest fields that exist. a laboratory magnet, 10 T is 2.3e-9 of it; a hydrogen atom's own field is 3.9e-7 of it; a 10²² W/cm² laser focus is 2.1e-4 of it; the Schwinger field is 1.0e+0 of it; a magnetar, 10¹¹ T is 2.3e+1 of it. So a laboratory is twenty-eight decades from making the effect large, and a magnetar's field is above the critical one — which is why the only places the vacuum's nonlinearity has been seen are the two where the fields are not human: the ultraperipheral collision of two heavy nuclei, and the surface of a neutron star.

The one medium that was supposed to add exactly

Superposition holds because an equation is linear, and every material stops being linear at some amplitude. Empty space was the exception: Maxwell's equations are linear exactly, and two beams cross with no interaction of any kind. Quantum electrodynamics says otherwise — light scatters light, and a strong field makes the vacuum birefringent — at a field of 1.3 × 10¹⁸ volts per metre, which no laboratory has come within four decades of.

waves · Superposition The count that works for everything with a mass. How many beams a Stern-Gerlach analyser splits a particle into, for four spins, with the photon on the bottom row. For anything with a mass the answer is 2j+1 — go to the particle's rest frame, where its spin can point in any direction, and count the projections along whichever axis the magnet defines. A spin-one particle gives three: up, down, and a middle beam that is not deflected at all. The photon has spin one and gives two. The middle state does not exist, and it is not that it is hard to produce or weakly coupled — there is no such state of the electromagnetic field. A light wave has two polarisations and the third one, in which the field would oscillate along the direction of travel, is not a solution of Maxwell's equations at all.

Two states where the counting says three

A particle of spin one has three states, and the photon has two. The missing one is not rare or weakly coupled — there is no such state of the electromagnetic field. What removes it is that a massless particle has no rest frame, so the rotations that would turn one projection into another are not available; and the state comes back the moment the particle acquires a mass, which is what a photon does in a plasma.

quantum · Spin Six ways into a corner, each leaving from the opposite side. A corner cube seen along its axis: its hexagonal face, divided into six sectors by the three edges where its mirror faces meet and by their extensions. A ray entering along the axis meets the three faces in an order fixed by the sector it enters: y → x → z, y → z → x, z → y → x, z → x → y, x → z → y, x → y → z. Traced reflection by reflection, every ray leaves travelling exactly back along its arrival direction, to rounding error, and it leaves from the point diametrically opposite where it entered — in the sector whose order is the reverse of its own.

The corner that sends light home

Three mirrors at right angles send light straight back the way it came, from any direction they can see, because each one reverses one component of its direction. Made from solid glass, a corner reflects by total internal reflection and needs no silver — which is why the reflectors left on the Moon are bare glass — but each of its six sectors then returns a different polarisation, and the returned spot loses three-quarters of its peak.

optics · Total internal reflection A field strings a suspension into chains. 48 identical polarisable spheres, two radii apart at least, scattered at random through a periodic cell twenty radii square — 38 per cent of its area — and the same spheres after the field (vertical) has been on long enough for the viscous liquid to let them move. Each moves in proportion to the dipolar force from all the others and is stopped only by contact. At the start no two are touching; at the end 45 are bonded end to end along the field and 48 of the 48 spheres belong to chains, lying along the field lines and kept apart sideways because side-by-side dipoles repel. Chains that reach from one electrode to the other are what make the liquid resist shear, and they form in the milliseconds it takes a sphere to travel its own diameter.

The liquid a field turns solid

Stir fine starch or glass beads into silicone oil and the result pours like cream. Put a few kilovolts across it and within milliseconds it holds its shape and will not flow until it is pushed hard. Nothing in it is charged. Each particle becomes a dipole in the field, dipoles pull on each other end to end and push apart side by side, and so the particles string themselves into chains from one electrode to the other — a solid made of forces that exist only while the voltage is on.

electromagnetism · Dielectrics The brightness N lasers can be made into. The greatest radiance — power per unit area per unit solid angle — that N identical single-mode lasers can be combined into by lossless optics, as a multiple of one laser's, against N, for four arrangements. Laid side by side and passed through any lenses and mirrors, they fill N modes and are never brighter than one: the étendue of the combination is at least N times one beam's. Two can share a mode if their polarisations are crossed, so polarisation doubles it once. Beams of N different wavelengths can be overlapped into one spatial mode by a grating, and beams with their phases locked together can be made into one mode outright; either way the radiance grows as N, because the beams are no longer N copies of the same mode.

The beams that add only if they differ

Take two identical lasers and try to merge their beams into one beam twice as bright. No arrangement of lenses, mirrors and prisms will do it: the brightness of light cannot be increased by passive optics, and two copies of the same beam can only ever be put side by side. The escape is to make the beams not copies. Give them crossed polarisations and two will merge. Give each a different colour and a grating will stack dozens into a single beam. Lock their phases so that they stop being separate beams at all, and they add — but only as well as the gaps between them allow and only while their phases are held to a twentieth of a wavelength.

optics · Etendue A squeezed disc between crossed polarisers. The dark fringes seen in a 50 mm disc of polycarbonate, 6 mm thick, squeezed across a vertical diameter by 500 N and viewed between crossed circular polarisers in light of 550 nm: each dark line is a contour on which the principal stresses differ by a whole number of fringe values, from the stress-optic law with a coefficient of 78 Brewsters. At the centre the fringe order is 3.61; it climbs steeply towards the two loading points, where the fringes crowd together and the stress grows without limit, and falls to zero at the free edges level with the centre. The pattern is the exact stress field of an elastic disc under diametral load; every fringe can be counted from a dark point, and the count times the fringe value is the difference of the principal stresses at that place.

The stress that polarised light can see

Squeeze a disc of clear plastic and look at it between two crossed polarising filters, and it fills with dark lines and coloured bands that crowd towards the points where it is pressed. Each line is a contour of stress. Glass, plastic and most transparent solids become doubly refracting when they are loaded, in proportion to the difference between their largest and smallest stresses, and polarised light turns that difference into a pattern that can be counted. David Brewster found it in 1816, the same Brewster whose angle polarises reflected light, and for a century the way to learn the stresses in a bridge or a dam was to cut its shape from plastic, load it and photograph the fringes.

optics · Polarisation Six ways a wave of gravity could move a ring of free masses. Sixteen free masses on a ring (dashed) and where a passing gravitational wave of each of the six possible polarisations moves them at its crest, drawn at a strain of 0.32, some 10²⁰ times larger than a real wave's. Top row: plus and cross, the two general relativity allows, which stretch one direction across the wave while squeezing the other and change no area; and breathing, which swells the ring evenly. Bottom row, drawn in planes containing the direction of travel (arrow): longitudinal, which stretches along the travel; and the two vector modes, which shear those planes. Any metric theory of gravity permits these six and no others; which of them a theory keeps is decided by the field that carries gravity.

The four shapes a wave of gravity leaves out

A passing gravitational wave squeezes a ring of free masses in one of two patterns, and that is usually presented as the whole menu. It is general relativity's choice from a longer one. The tide a wave carries is a symmetric table of six numbers, so any theory in which gravity is geometry allows six shapes; a theory keeps two only if its graviton has no mass and nothing else rides along with it. Give the graviton the smallest mass imaginable and it gains three more states, and one of them changes how much the Sun bends light — by a quarter, however small the mass.

astrophysics · Gravitational waves A point of light split by an uncoated roof. The image of a distant point across the direction of the roof edge, behind an Amici roof in glass of index 1.517, for unpolarised light, as a fraction of the peak an undivided pupil would give, against position in units of the diffraction width λ/D: with a phase-coated roof, and with bare glass. The coated roof gives the ordinary diffraction pattern of the full aperture. Bare glass leaves the two halves of the pupil only partly able to interfere, and the image's peak falls to 0.70 of its proper height, its central lobe widening across the edge into a shoulder on each side — a slight doubling of every point, which an observer sees as a loss of crispness and contrast.

The roof that splits a binocular's image

A slim, straight binocular turns its image upright with a roof — two glass faces meeting at a right angle, which reflect every ray twice by total internal reflection and lose no light at all. They lose sharpness instead. Total reflection shifts the phases of the two polarisations of light by different amounts, and the half of the beam on one side of the roof's edge meets the two faces in the opposite order from the other half. The halves leave in different polarisations, interfere only partly at the focus, and every star becomes a slightly doubled smudge — unless a coating a fraction of a micrometre thick makes the glass behave like a mirror.

optics · Total internal reflection Light that turns with the molecules it passes. Through a layer of liquid crystal whose molecules turn steadily through 90° from the entrance face to the exit (dashed line), the direction of the light's polarisation against depth, for linearly polarised light entering along the molecules, in a thick cell and a thin one; u = 2dΔn/λ measures the layer's birefringence against the wavelength. In the thick cell the polarisation turns with the molecules, never more than a few degrees behind, and leaves rotated by 90°: 100.0 per cent of the light passes an analyser set along the exit molecules. In the thin cell the light barely notices the twist; its polarisation lags further and further behind and leaves turned only part of the way, with 31 per cent passing. Mauguin saw the first case in 1911: a birefringent medium that twists slowly enough drags the light's polarisation round with it.

The twist that carries light round a corner

Between two crossed polarisers, a sandwich of liquid crystal a few micrometres thick turns black to white. Its long molecules lie flat, but turned a quarter-turn from one face of the layer to the other, and polarised light entering along the molecules at one face comes out along them at the other — rotated by ninety degrees and able to pass the second polariser. Charles Mauguin found in 1911 that a slowly twisting birefringent layer drags light's polarisation round with it. Sixty years later the effect became the liquid-crystal display. The layers in those displays, though, are too thin to drag anything: the light inside them wanders off and comes back, at exactly the right thickness.

optics · Polarisation Where the two theories part: the magnetic permeability. The voltage across the spinning wall as a fraction of a metal's, against the material's relative permeability μ, for a permittivity ε = 6. Lorentz's electron theory (flat) polarises the material only through the force on its charges, so μ does not enter: (ε − 1)/ε = 0.833 at every μ. Relativity gives (εμ − 1)/εμ, which agrees exactly at μ = 1 — so no ordinary insulator, such as the ebonite H. A. Wilson spun in 1904, can tell them apart — and climbs towards a metal's value as μ grows. At μ = 3 (dot) the relativistic voltage is 13.3 per cent larger. That is why Wilson and Wilson needed an insulator that was also magnetic, and made one from steel spheres set in wax.

The voltage a moving magnet adds to an insulator

Spin a hollow cylinder of insulator in a magnetic field along its axis and a voltage appears between its inner and outer surfaces, because every piece of it is moving through the field. How large that voltage is turns out to depend on whether the insulator is magnetic, and the dependence was predicted by one theory and missed by the other. Maxwell's equations hold in a moving material only if the material's response is written in its own frame and carried into the laboratory by relativity — and then a moving magnet is also an electric dipole.

electromagnetism · Maxwell equations How fine a grid has to be to polarise. The fraction of the power transmitted by a grid of thin parallel wires, against the ratio of the wire spacing d to the wavelength, on logarithmic axes — for the field along the wires with three wire radii (solid), and for the field across the wires with the thickest (dashed), from the quasi-static theory of strip gratings, valid while the spacing is under about half a wavelength. Across the wires nearly everything passes at every spacing. Along them the leak is about four times the square of (d/λ)·ln(d/2πa): 0.1% of the power at a spacing of a hundredth of a wavelength, 10% at a tenth, 64% at four-tenths, for wires of radius 3% of their spacing. Thicker wires block better because the inductance of the grid falls. The diamond marks Hertz's grid of 1888, 4% leaking along the wires; a visible-light polariser needs the same ratio at a wavelength of half a micrometre, which means wires about 140 nanometres apart.

The grid that stops the light along its wires

A row of parallel wires looks like a fence, and a fence ought to let through a wave that shakes along its slats. A grid of wires does the opposite. A field along the wires drives electrons up and down them, the currents re-radiate, and the wave is reflected; a field across the wires can move charge only through a wire's width, and passes. Heinrich Hertz used such a grid in 1888 to show that his new waves were polarised. The same grid, shrunk two hundred thousand times to wires 140 nanometres apart, polarises visible light in projectors — and every sheet of polarising plastic is the same idea made from chains of iodine.

optics · Polarisation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Refractive indexMalus's lawSuperpositionBirefringenceSnell's lawDielectricDipole radiationMeasurementPermittivityWave plateBound chargeBrewster's angle

All concepts