Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Permittivity — where it appears

The constant relating an electric field to the charge producing it, which together with the permeability fixes the speed of light. In matter it is larger, because the material polarises and its bound charge partly cancels the free charge — by a factor that depends on the material and on the shape of the sample.

Named by 9 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The same loop, spanned two ways. A 100 cm² capacitor with a 2 mm gap, charged at 1.0 million volts per second. A loop drawn round the wire can be spanned by a flat surface, which the current of 44.271 µA passes through, or by a bag-shaped surface that passes between the plates, which no charge crosses at all. Ampère's law as it stood gave two different answers for one circulation. The rate of change of electric flux between the plates, multiplied by ε₀, is 44.271 µA — the same number to every figure, because C = ε₀A/d is the same ε₀A/d either way. That is the term, and it is not an approximation or a correction: it is what makes the law consistent at all.

The term that made light

Ampère's law contradicts itself the moment a current stops being steady, and the contradiction is visible in one picture: two surfaces on the same loop, with a current through one of them and nothing through the other. The term that repairs it turns four equations into a wave, whose speed is two constants measured in a room with the lamps off.

electromagnetism · Maxwell equations Equipotentials, with the field lines that cross them. Contours of constant potential, traced by marching squares, with field lines traced along the gradient of the same potential. The two families meet at right angles everywhere, which is a consequence of the field being the gradient rather than a property of the drawing.

The attraction that needs no charge

Gauss's law says nothing comes out of a neutral molecule, and yet water's field one nanometre away reaches 1.1 × 10⁸ V/m. What survives when the monopole vanishes is a separation, and every step down the tower of falloffs below it is paid for with one more order of cancellation.

electromagnetism · The field concept The field a polarised sphere makes inside itself. A uniformly polarised sphere, its bound surface charge drawn at the size the cosine gives it, the uniform field that charge makes inside, and the exact dipole field it makes outside. The internal field is the same everywhere and points against the polarisation — that is what makes it a depolarising field — and its size is P/3ε₀, the third being the sphere's share of the one unit the three axes divide between them.

The field the matter takes away

Put a piece of glass in an electric field and the field inside it is smaller. How much smaller is not a property of glass. A needle of it keeps almost the whole field, a sphere keeps three-quarters, a slab across the field keeps a seventh — same material, same applied field, three answers, and the difference is arithmetic about shape.

electromagnetism · Dielectrics Water's permittivity across six decades of frequency. The real and imaginary parts of water's permittivity against frequency, on logarithmic axes, from 10 to 16 in powers of ten hertz. ε′ begins at 80.1 — the number a textbook prints — falls through the Debye relaxation near twenty gigahertz, is dragged down again by the librational, bending and stretching bands of the molecule, and settles at 1.777 in the visible, whose square root is 1.3330: water's refractive index. The identity n = √ε_r is exact and is an identity between two numbers taken at the same frequency; using the static permittivity in it predicts an index of 8.9 and is the most instructive wrong answer in the subject. The curve is a Debye term and four Lorentz oscillators, with two parameters solved so that the two plateaus are the measured ones rather than fitted by eye.

The constant that depends on how fast it is asked

Water's relative permittivity is 80.1. Its refractive index is 1.333, and the square of 1.333 is 1.777. The identity n = √ε_r is exact, the two numbers differ by a factor of forty-five, and nothing is wrong with either — because a permittivity is a function of frequency and the two measurements were made eight orders of magnitude apart.

electromagnetism · Dielectrics One line, 21 decades of density, and every mirror on it. Plasma frequency against electron density, both logarithmic, with the horizontal rules at frequencies a reader already has a feel for. A wave is reflected by everything to the right of where its own rule meets the line and passes through everything to the left. a fluorescent tube at 1.0e+17 m⁻³ cuts off at 2.84 GHz; ionosphere, D layer at night at 1.0e+8 m⁻³ cuts off at 90 kHz; ionosphere, E layer at 1.0e+11 m⁻³ cuts off at 2.84 MHz; ionosphere, F2 layer at 1.0e+12 m⁻³ cuts off at 8.98 MHz; aluminium's conduction electrons at 1.8e+29 m⁻³ cuts off at 3819.9 THz. So the F2 layer turns back a 1 MHz broadcast and lets a 100 MHz one straight out, which is why one of them is heard across an ocean at night and the other stops at the horizon; and aluminium's cutoff sits in the far ultraviolet, which is why it is a mirror for everything visible and a window above 78 nm. The dependence is a square root, so the line has slope one half: a hundredfold denser plasma reflects only ten times the frequency. Arriving at an angle helps by a factor of sec θ — 1.00 at 0°, 1.15 at 30°, 2.00 at 60° — because only the component of the motion along the density gradient has to be turned round.

The frequency below which nothing gets in

Free charges give a medium a permittivity that is negative, and a negative permittivity is not an absorbing medium — it is one in which no wave exists at all. Below that frequency the reflection is total, exactly rather than nearly, because there is no transmitted wave and nothing to absorb. The same expression puts the number at 9 MHz for the ionosphere and 3.8 PHz for aluminium.

astrophysics · Plasma oscillation A refraction with no wave in it. Field lines crossing the boundary between two dielectrics whose permittivities differ by a factor of 4, at incidences of 12°, 26°, 40°, 54°, 68°. Nothing is oscillating and nothing is travelling: these are static fields, and the only inputs are that the component of E along the surface is the same on both sides and that the component of D across it is. Dividing one condition by the other gives the ratio of the tangents of the two angles, and it comes out equal to the ratio of the permittivities — measured off the constructed directions as 4.000, 4.000, 4.000, 4.000, 4.000, against 4. The lines bend towards the surface on the side with the larger permittivity, which is the opposite sense from a light ray entering glass, and the chart on the right shows the whole relation: it is a version of Snell's law with the sines replaced by tangents, and there is no speed anywhere in it. Two things follow that are worth carrying. A field line meeting a surface at grazing incidence stays nearly parallel to it whatever the materials, so the ratio matters least where the field is largest along the surface. And in the limit of a very large ratio every line comes out very nearly perpendicular on the low side, which is the electrostatic ancestor of a conductor's boundary condition — a conductor is the ratio taken to infinity.

A refraction with no wave in it

A field line crossing from one dielectric into another bends, by a law that looks exactly like Snell's with the sines replaced by tangents. Nothing is oscillating, nothing is travelling, and no speed appears anywhere in the derivation — only the two conditions that say what a boundary may and may not do to a field.

electromagnetism · Dielectrics Two intersections, and the rule that picks one. The phase-matching construction for light arriving at 40° from a medium of index 1 into one of index -1. The circles are each medium's own relation between wavevector and frequency; the vertical line is the tangential wavenumber, which the boundary conserves. The line crosses the second circle twice, and the construction alone does not say which point is the answer — the rule that does is that energy must travel away from the interface. For a positive index the energy runs along the wavevector and the upper point is taken. For a negative one the energy runs against it, so the lower point is taken, the wavevector points back toward the boundary, and the ray leaves at -40.0° — on the same side of the normal as it arrived. Nothing in the drawing has changed except which intersection is circled.

The ray on the wrong side of the normal

The phase-matching construction draws a circle and a line, and the line crosses the circle twice. Every earlier construction silently took the upper intersection. Which one is physical is decided by where the energy goes rather than by where the wavevector points, and in a medium whose group velocity opposes its phase velocity the answer is the other one — so the refracted ray leaves on the same side of the normal it arrived on, a flat slab focuses, and a lens can beat the diffraction limit until loss stops it.

optics · Refraction Snell's law with space and time exchanged. Two constructions on the same diagram of frequency against wavenumber, with the light lines of a medium of index 1 and of index 1.5. On the left, a boundary in space: the wave crosses a still surface, the frequency is conserved, and the horizontal line at the incident frequency meets the new medium's line at a wavenumber 1.5 times larger — the familiar shortening of the wavelength. On the right, a boundary in time: the whole medium changes at once, the wavenumber is conserved, and the vertical line at the incident wavenumber meets the new medium's line at a frequency 0.667 times the old one. The vertical line also meets the new line's negative-frequency branch, which is a wave running backwards: a reflection in time. A spatial boundary reflects into the same frequency and a temporal one into the same wavelength.

The reflection that needs no surface

Change the refractive index of a whole medium at one instant and a wave already travelling through it splits in two, one part running on and one running back, though there is no surface anywhere for it to reflect from. A boundary in time is Snell's law with space and time exchanged: the wavelength is kept and the frequency changes, momentum is conserved and energy is not.

optics · Refraction A repeat in space gaps the frequencies; a repeat in time gaps the wavenumbers. Two media with the same modulation depth, 0.2, computed the same way. Left: permittivity repeating in space, a stack of layers. For each frequency the wave equation is integrated across one spatial period, and the Bloch wavenumber drawn against frequency; between frequencies 0.478 and 0.526 (in units of c over the period) there is no real wavenumber, so light of those frequencies cannot travel and is reflected. Right: permittivity repeating in time. For each wavenumber the equation is integrated across one period, and the frequency drawn against wavenumber; between wavenumbers 0.474 and 0.518 there is no real frequency. The axes of the two panels are swapped, and so is everything else: the spatial gap is a band of frequencies that decays in space, the temporal gap is a band of wavenumbers that grows in time.

The crystal made of moments

A stack of layers that repeats in space refuses a band of frequencies and reflects them. A medium that repeats in time — its refractive index swung up and down everywhere at once — refuses a band of wavenumbers instead, and a wave with a wavenumber in that band does not reflect. It grows, exponentially, drawing on whatever is swinging the index. The construction is exact, the gap is computable from one period of the modulation, and the obstacle to building one for light is how fast a material would have to change.

optics · Refraction

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Refractive indexBoundary conditionDielectricGroup velocityPhase velocityPolarisationRefractionBound chargeConductorDispersionDispersion relationElectromagnetic wave

All concepts