Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Magnification — where it appears

The ratio of an image's size to its object's, or of a lensed source's brightness to its unlensed brightness. The two meanings are worth keeping apart: a gravitational lens changes the second by large factors and offers no improvement at all in resolving the first.

Named by 8 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A converging lens making a real image. An object 2.44 focal lengths from a thin converging lens. The image sits where the construction rays cross, at 1.69 focal lengths, magnified -0.69×.

What a lens is doing, and why three rays are enough

A lens bends every ray that reaches it. The construction uses three, because three are all that can be drawn without calculation — and any three that meet prove all the rest do.

optics · Imaging A lens with no focal length. Where a ray crosses the axis, against how far off the axis it passed the deflecting body, for 1 solar mass of radius 1 solar radius. A glass lens deflects a ray by an angle proportional to its distance off axis, which is precisely the condition for every ray to arrive at one point — the flat dashed line. Gravity deflects by 4GM/c²b, which grows smaller further out, so the crossing distance goes as b² and each ray has its own focus. The grazing ray crosses at 548 astronomical units and a ray passing at 12 radii crosses at 78857; the square law is verified on the drawn curve to 1.5e-16. So there is no image plane at all, only a half-line of foci beginning at the first of those and running outward for ever. Anything placed on that line sees not an image but a ring, and moving along it does not refocus anything — it selects which rays are being seen.

The lens with no focal length

A glass lens bends a ray by an angle proportional to how far off the axis it passes, which is precisely the condition for every ray to arrive at one point. Gravity bends by an angle that falls with distance off the axis, so every ray has its own focus and there is no image plane anywhere — only a half-line of foci, beginning 548 astronomical units from the Sun and running outward for ever.

astrophysics · Light deflection Image distance against object distance. Image distance in focal lengths against object distance in focal lengths. At exactly one focal length the image runs off to infinity; inside it the image distance goes negative, which means virtual.

The focus that is a slab, not a plane

A lens images one plane and no other, which would make every photograph and every micrograph almost entirely out of focus. What rescues them is a tolerance — and there are two of them, one from rays and one from waves, which give different answers and stop being interchangeable exactly where microscopes work.

optics · Imaging Every ray from one point, meeting again at another. Rays from a point half a radius from the centre of Maxwell's fish-eye, n = n₀/(1 + r²/R²), traced in 11 directions round the full circle. Every one is an arc of a circle, and every one passes through the point on the other side of the centre at distance R²/r from it — 2.00 radii — which is the image. The worst miss is 8.8e-4 radii, the size of the integration's own error. Rays leaving in opposite directions, rays leaving at right angles, rays that go the long way round: all arrive. The faint circles are contours of the index, which falls from n₀ at the centre to n₀/2 at one radius and n₀/5 at two.

The medium that images every point

A single refracting surface can be shaped to image one point perfectly and no other. A medium whose index falls smoothly away from a centre can do better: in Maxwell's fish-eye every ray from any point, leaving in any direction, arrives at one image point, and every such path takes exactly the same time. It is a perfect instrument for all of space at once — and the image it forms is sharp everywhere and a faithful copy nowhere.

optics · Fermat Five images of one source, and the curves where they are made. The sky around a lens with a core of 0.10 and an external shear of 0.15, in Einstein radii, with its two critical curves: an outer one near the Einstein ring and a small inner one round the core. A source at (0.06, 0.04) in the source plane — inset, with the caustics the critical curves map to — lies inside the diamond-shaped caustic and has 5 images. Their magnifications are +4.99, −3.76, +3.42, −2.63, +0.01 — a minus sign for an image turned over — and the parities sum to +1. Four sit near the outer curve and carry nearly all of the 14.8-fold total; the fifth, at the centre, is magnified by only 0.013. A source further out, at (0.55, 0.1), has 3.

The fifth image a galaxy hides

A single star bends light into two images of whatever lies behind it. A galaxy, whose mass is spread out, has to make an odd number — one, three or five — because the map from the sky to the source is smooth and has nowhere to put an even count. The famous cross of four quasar images is therefore five images, with the fifth thousands of times too faint to see, sitting at the centre of the galaxy that made it. Images are born and destroyed only in pairs, and only on the curves where the map folds.

astrophysics · Light deflection How bright a nebula looks through a 200 mm telescope. The surface brightness of the image of an extended object — a nebula, a galaxy, the Moon — through a lossless 200 mm telescope, as a fraction of its brightness to the naked eye, against magnification on a logarithmic axis, for eye pupils of 7 and 5 mm. It is never above one. For a 7 mm pupil it is one up to a magnification of 28.6, where the exit pupil equals the eye's; below that magnification the exit pupil is wider than the eye's and part of the collected light falls on the iris; above it the image dims as the square of the exit pupil: 0.327 at 50×, 0.082 at 100×, 0.020 at 200×. The telescope makes the nebula larger, not brighter; at the magnification where its exit pupil matches the eye's it makes it as large as it can while keeping it as bright as it is.

The nebula no telescope can brighten

A telescope eight metres across gathers a million times more light than the eye, and a star seen through it is a million times brighter. The Orion nebula seen through it is not brighter at all. It is bigger, and spread over a bigger patch of the retina, and the two exactly cancel: no instrument made of lenses and mirrors can show an extended object brighter than the naked eye sees it. What a telescope does is decided by the small disc of light behind its eyepiece, the exit pupil, and by whether that disc is larger or smaller than the pupil of the eye looking through it.

optics · Etendue Three planes that meet in one line. A thin lens of focal length 50, drawn as a vertical line, and an object plane tilted at 45° to the axis, crossing it 150 units in front of the lens. Four points on the object plane are traced to their images through the lens's centre and along the axis-parallel ray. The images lie on a straight line too — a thin lens maps planes to planes — but one tilted far less steeply, and when the object plane, the lens plane and the image plane are extended they meet in a single line, here 150 units below the axis. That is the Scheimpflug rule. A sensor laid along the tilted image plane records the whole tilted object plane sharp, which no sensor square to the axis can do.

The plane of focus a tilted lens tilts

An ordinary camera focuses on a plane square to its axis, so a road receding from it, a table top or a field of flowers can be sharp only over the depth an aperture allows. Tilt the lens, or the sensor, and the plane of sharp focus tilts too, by a rule a surveying officer patented in 1904: the plane of the subject, the plane of the lens and the plane of the image always meet in a single line. Turn the focus and the plane of focus does not slide back and forth; it swings about a fixed hinge. The same geometry lets an eye camera see the whole front of the eye in one exposure and a lidar keep a laser beam kilometres long in focus.

optics · Imaging A lens that cannot focus a wave longer than itself. How much a point mass brightens a wave passing behind it — the factor on the wave's power, on a logarithmic scale — against the dimensionless frequency w = 8πGMf/c³, for a source exactly behind the lens and 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 Einstein radii off it, from the exact diffraction integral. Geometric optics puts the magnification at 10.0, 3.4 and 1.34 for the three offsets and at infinity on the axis, whatever the frequency. The wave disagrees: at w = 0.01 every curve is within 1.6 per cent of 1 — a wave a hundred times longer than the lens passes as if it were not there — and on the axis the power factor is πw/(1 − e^(−πw)): 3.28 at w = 1, 31.4 at w = 10, finite at every frequency. The off-axis curves rise to their geometric values only above w ≈ 1 and then oscillate about them, as the two images begin to interfere.

The lens a long wave walks round

Geometric optics says that a star passing exactly in front of a source magnifies it infinitely. No real wave agrees, because a wave cannot be focused to a point, and for the gravitational waves the detectors hear the disagreement is the whole story. A star, or a black hole of a few tens of suns, is smaller than one of those waves in the only measure that matters — the delay between paths round it — and the wave flows past it almost untouched. What decides whether a mass lenses a wave is not the mass's size, which is millions of kilometres, but its Schwarzschild radius set against the wavelength.

astrophysics · Light deflection

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Einstein radiusFocal lengthGravitational lensImagingAberrationCausticFermat's principleThe paraxial approximationReal and virtual imagesSchwarzschild radiusApertureCritical curve

All concepts