Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Schwarzschild radius — where it appears

The radius 2GM/c² at which a mass would be enclosed by a horizon, and a size rather than a property the mass already has. It is 9 millimetres for the Earth and 3 kilometres for the Sun, so it says nothing about either until they are compressed to it.

Named by 11 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

How small each mass would have to be. The Schwarzschild radius of 4 masses, on a logarithmic scale spanning 35 orders of magnitude. A horizon is not something a mass has; it is a size a mass would have to be squeezed inside. For the Sun it is 2.95 km against a real radius of 696,000 km, a factor of 2.36·10⁵. One row has no real size to set beside the number, which is the one case where the horizon is not hypothetical.

The surface that only lets things in

An eighteenth-century calculation asking where the escape speed reaches the speed of light gives exactly the right radius, by reasoning that is wrong in every step. What is actually there is not a surface in space at all, and nothing local happens when it is crossed.

astrophysics · Horizons The two lengths every mass has. The Compton wavelength and the Schwarzschild radius of the same mass, against mass, on logarithmic axes. One falls and the other rises, so they cross exactly once — here at 1.539·10⁻⁸ kg and 2.286·10⁻³⁵ m, found by bisecting the difference rather than by writing down √(ħG/c³). The conventional Planck values are 2.176·10⁻⁸ kg and 1.616·10⁻³⁵ m; the crossing sits a factor of 1.414 away from them, which is exactly √2 and is the factor of two in the Schwarzschild radius coming through a square root. That is the whole precision this argument has, and it is worth saying, because a number written to four figures invites a reader to believe the definition is doing more work than it is. Nothing in physics is known at that length.

Where every model runs out at once

Every mass carries two lengths — one below which quantum mechanics will not let it be located, one below which gravity will not let anything escape. One falls with mass and the other rises, so they cross exactly once, at a length nothing in physics has ever probed.

astrophysics · Planck scale The term that abolishes the inner orbits. The effective potential of the Schwarzschild geometry per unit mass, in units of c², at 4 angular momenta, against radius in Schwarzschild radii. Newton's version has a minimum — a stable circular orbit — at L̃²/GM for every angular momentum there is, however small, and it is the dashed curve at the same L̃, here with its minima at 10.13, 7.61, 6.00, 5.12 rs. General relativity adds one term, −GM L̃²/c²r³, and that minimum stops existing below a definite angular momentum. At L̃ = 4.50 GM/c the barrier and the well are still separate, at 1.83 and 8.29 rs. The two merge at L̃ = √12 GM/c, at 3 rs = 6GM/c² — the innermost stable circular orbit, where the curve drawn here has neither a maximum nor a minimum but a single inflection. Below that momentum — the curve at L̃ = 3.20 GM/c — there is no stationary point anywhere outside the horizon, so no circular orbit exists at all, at any angular momentum whatever. None of that is a property of matter; it is a statement about the geometry, and it fixes the energy of the innermost orbit at √(8/9) = 0.94281 of mc², so 5.719% of the rest mass has been radiated by anything that reached it. Every well drawn here was located on the emitted curve by golden section and checked against the closed form.

The orbit that cannot be made smaller

Newtonian gravity allows a stable circular path at every radius, however tight, and there is no innermost one. General relativity adds a single term to the expression that says so, and below 6GM/c² no stable circular path exists at any angular momentum whatever. Anything arriving there has radiated 5.72% of its rest mass, which is eight times what hydrogen fusion converts.

astrophysics · Orbit stability Two corrections, opposite in sign and different in size. How fast a clock in a circular orbit runs compared with one on the ground, in microseconds a day, against the height of the orbit — with the two effects drawn apart rather than added. Being high speeds a clock up, by an amount that saturates: the potential term is bounded because there is only so much potential to climb out of. Moving slows it down, and a higher orbit is a slower one, so that term shrinks toward zero. They cancel at 3186 km — a radius of exactly 1.5 Earth radii, which follows from setting the sum to zero and contains neither G, nor the Earth's mass, nor the speed of light. At 20200 km the gravitational term is 45.7 µs a day and the speed term −7.2, leaving 38.5. Left uncorrected, that is 11.5 km of position error a day, growing without limit, from a clock that is working perfectly.

The clock that is wrong in two directions

A satellite clock loses 7.2 microseconds a day to its speed and gains 45.9 to its height. The two effects have opposite signs, different sizes and different dependence on the orbit, so there is exactly one altitude where they cancel — and 38.6 microseconds a day, left alone, is eleven and a half kilometres of position error.

relativity · Time dilation How large a box may be before gravity shows in it. The largest freely falling laboratory in which nothing can be detected, against how long the experiment runs, for an instrument resolving 10⁻⁹ m. Free fall removes the field and leaves the gradient: two masses released a distance apart converge across the fall and separate along it, by (GM/r³)Lt²/2, so the box that stays undetectably flat shrinks as the square of the time. At one second the limits are 1.30 mm at the Earth's surface, 5.07 mm at the Sun's surface, 8.61 nm at a white dwarf, 1.86·10⁻¹⁷ m at a neutron star, 3.88·10⁻¹⁷ m at a stellar black hole, 388 mm at a giant black hole. Two things are worth reading off it. The equivalence principle is local in time as much as in space, on the same footing and with a worse exponent — patience is more expensive than room. And the tidal parameter GM/r³ falls with mass at a horizon, so a large enough black hole is one an experimenter could fall through with a metre-sized laboratory and a very good interferometer and detect nothing at all: the curve for the giant lies above the Earth's, not below it.

The term free fall cannot remove

Fall freely and gravity disappears. It disappears only to the extent that the falling laboratory is small — what survives is the gradient, which pulls two released masses together across the fall and apart along it. Given an instrument, the size of the box in which nothing is detectable is computable, and that number is the whole content of the word "locally".

astrophysics · Equivalence principle The bigger the hole, the gentler the horizon. The difference in gravitational pull between the two ends of a 1.8 metre body, at the moment it crosses the horizon, against the mass of the hole. Both axes are logarithmic and the line is straight, of slope -2.00: the tidal acceleration at a horizon falls as the square of the mass, because the tide goes as the mass over the cube of the radius and the radius itself is proportional to the mass. At the low end — a hole of a few solar masses — the stretch is 1.9e+7 times Earth's gravity across a person, which pulls them apart long before they arrive. At the high end it is 1.9e-11, which is nothing at all: crossing the horizon of a large enough hole is locally unremarkable, and an observer would notice no boundary being passed. The two meet at 1.0e+4 solar masses, above which the horizon can be crossed intact. That is the sharpest available statement of what a horizon is and is not. It is not a surface, nothing is there, and nothing local marks it — it is the place from which no future path leads out, which is a statement about the whole of the future rather than about anything present.

The horizon that nothing marks

A falling body is torn apart by the difference in gravity between its ends. At the horizon of a black hole that difference goes as the inverse square of the mass, so a large enough hole can be entered intact — and nothing local happens at the crossing to say it has occurred.

astrophysics · Horizons A lens with no focal length. Where a ray crosses the axis, against how far off the axis it passed the deflecting body, for 1 solar mass of radius 1 solar radius. A glass lens deflects a ray by an angle proportional to its distance off axis, which is precisely the condition for every ray to arrive at one point — the flat dashed line. Gravity deflects by 4GM/c²b, which grows smaller further out, so the crossing distance goes as b² and each ray has its own focus. The grazing ray crosses at 548 astronomical units and a ray passing at 12 radii crosses at 78857; the square law is verified on the drawn curve to 1.5e-16. So there is no image plane at all, only a half-line of foci beginning at the first of those and running outward for ever. Anything placed on that line sees not an image but a ring, and moving along it does not refocus anything — it selects which rays are being seen.

The lens with no focal length

A glass lens bends a ray by an angle proportional to how far off the axis it passes, which is precisely the condition for every ray to arrive at one point. Gravity bends by an angle that falls with distance off the axis, so every ray has its own focus and there is no image plane anywhere — only a half-line of foci, beginning 548 astronomical units from the Sun and running outward for ever.

astrophysics · Light deflection A target that grows as the traveller slows. The capture cross-section of a non-rotating black hole for particles arriving with speed v, in units of the horizon's own cross-sectional area π(2GM/c²)², against v/c, both on logarithmic axes (solid). For light it is 27/4 = 6.75 times the horizon's area. It grows as the particle slows, following 4c²/v² (dashed) — 404 at a tenth of light speed and 7.43·10⁶ at the 220 km/s of the Galaxy's dark matter. The dotted curve is a Newtonian ball of radius 8GM/c² — four horizon radii — capturing by ordinary gravitational focusing, and for slow particles the hole and the ball cannot be told apart.

The target that grows as the traveller slows

Light aimed at a black hole is swallowed if it passes within about five of the hole's gravitational radii, a disc six and three-quarter times the horizon's own. A particle arriving slowly is swallowed from much further out, and the disc grows as the inverse square of its speed: dark matter drifting at 220 kilometres a second sees a target seven million times the horizon. The reason is that slow matter carries almost no angular momentum for a given aim, and angular momentum is the only thing that keeps anything out. For slow traffic the hole behaves exactly like an ordinary ball four times its own size.

astrophysics · Horizons How well a distance can be known, by how long it is. The smallest uncertainty in a distance l, on logarithmic axes, by three rules. Solid: the clock argument, 1.89 (ℓₚ² l)^(1/3), which grows as the cube root of the distance. Dotted: the Planck length, the floor usually quoted, which does not grow at all. Dashed: the guess that Planck-scale jitters add like a random walk, √(ℓₚ l). a metre: 1.2·10⁻²³ m by the clock argument, 4·10⁻¹⁸ m as a random walk; the Earth to the Sun: 6.4·10⁻²⁰ m by the clock argument, 1.6·10⁻¹² m as a random walk; the observable universe: 9.2·10⁻¹⁵ m by the clock argument, 8.4·10⁻⁵ m as a random walk. By the clock argument the size of the observable universe is uncertain by about the size of an atomic nucleus; as a random walk, by about a tenth of a millimetre. All three rules meet at the Planck length.

The clock that cannot be both light and good

The Planck length is usually quoted as the smallest distance that means anything, as though every longer distance could be known to that precision. Time a distance with light against a clock and the floor turns out to rise with the distance. A light clock wanders while the light is away; a heavy clock wanders less but is closer to being a black hole; and the best compromise leaves a metre uncertain by 750 thousand million Planck lengths and the size of the observable universe by the size of an atomic nucleus. The same compromise, counted up, says a region can hold only as many distinguishable places as its surface has Planck areas.

astrophysics · Planck scale Rays that leave the far side of a compact star. Light rays leaving the surface of a star of radius 2.9 Schwarzschild radii — a neutron star of 1.4 solar masses and about 12 km — and travelling to an observer far off to the right, traced along the exact paths of Schwarzschild's geometry, shown above and below the line of sight. The last ray to escape leaves the surface tangentially from a point 121° round from the point facing the observer, so the bright arc — everything the observer sees — covers 76 per cent of the surface rather than the half that straight rays would show. The dashed circle is the horizon a star of the same mass would have if it were compressed inside it.

The star whose far side can be seen

Look at a ball and half of it faces you; the other half is hidden behind it. That half is a fact about straight lines, and near a neutron star the lines are not straight. Light leaving the surface is bent round the star on its way out, so a distant observer sees three-quarters of a typical neutron star at once — and a star squeezed to 1.76 times its own Schwarzschild radius would show every point of its surface, the point directly behind it included.

astrophysics · Light deflection A lens that cannot focus a wave longer than itself. How much a point mass brightens a wave passing behind it — the factor on the wave's power, on a logarithmic scale — against the dimensionless frequency w = 8πGMf/c³, for a source exactly behind the lens and 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 Einstein radii off it, from the exact diffraction integral. Geometric optics puts the magnification at 10.0, 3.4 and 1.34 for the three offsets and at infinity on the axis, whatever the frequency. The wave disagrees: at w = 0.01 every curve is within 1.6 per cent of 1 — a wave a hundred times longer than the lens passes as if it were not there — and on the axis the power factor is πw/(1 − e^(−πw)): 3.28 at w = 1, 31.4 at w = 10, finite at every frequency. The off-axis curves rise to their geometric values only above w ≈ 1 and then oscillate about them, as the two images begin to interfere.

The lens a long wave walks round

Geometric optics says that a star passing exactly in front of a source magnifies it infinitely. No real wave agrees, because a wave cannot be focused to a point, and for the gravitational waves the detectors hear the disagreement is the whole story. A star, or a black hole of a few tens of suns, is smaller than one of those waves in the only measure that matters — the delay between paths round it — and the wave flows past it almost untouched. What decides whether a mass lenses a wave is not the mass's size, which is millions of kilometres, but its Schwarzschild radius set against the wavelength.

astrophysics · Light deflection

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Event horizonSpacetime curvatureEquivalence principleImpact parameterProper timeTidal forceAngular momentumBlack holeCoordinate timeEffective potentialEinstein radiusEscape velocity

All concepts