The paraxial approximation — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
What a lens is doing, and why three rays are enough
A lens bends every ray that reaches it. The construction uses three, because three are all that can be drawn without calculation — and any three that meet prove all the rest do.
The mirror that cannot focus, and the shape that can
A perfect sphere does not bring parallel light to a point. The blur is not a manufacturing defect — it is what the shape does, and the shape is used anyway, for a reason worth knowing.
The focus that is a slab, not a plane
A lens images one plane and no other, which would make every photograph and every micrograph almost entirely out of focus. What rescues them is a tolerance — and there are two of them, one from rays and one from waves, which give different answers and stop being interchangeable exactly where microscopes work.
The packet that bends with nothing pushing it
Every wave packet left to itself spreads, and every free particle moves in a straight line. In 1979 Berry and Balazs found a packet that does neither: it keeps its shape for ever, and its peak accelerates sideways along a parabola, in empty space, with no force acting. Nothing in it breaks Newton's laws — the packet's centre of mass stays exactly where it was, and only its bright head runs off, fed by a long dim tail — and the trick turns out to be the rainbow's: the bright lobe is the envelope of a family of straight rays. Thirty years later it was made with light, and then with electrons.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Focal lengthCausticMagnificationReal and virtual imagesAberrationAiry functionApertureAspheric surfaceConic sectionDiffraction limitDispersionEhrenfest theorem