Diffraction limit — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
How far apart two things have to be
An instrument's ability to tell two things apart is not set by the quality of its glass. It is set by the width of the hole light comes through, by a factor that is the first zero of a Bessel function — and the threshold everyone quotes is a convention laid over a computed dip of 26.5 per cent.
Two glasses that cancel a derivative
A single lens focuses blue light closer than red, and the difference ruins the image. Cementing a second lens of another glass behind it fixes the fault at two wavelengths and at no others, because the condition sets a slope to zero rather than a value.
The focus that is a slab, not a plane
A lens images one plane and no other, which would make every photograph and every micrograph almost entirely out of focus. What rescues them is a tolerance — and there are two of them, one from rays and one from waves, which give different answers and stop being interchangeable exactly where microscopes work.
The invariant that is a count
Étendue is an area times a solid angle, and ray optics gives it no floor — nothing in a ray has a size. Divide it by the square of the wavelength and it becomes a number of modes, its conservation becomes the conservation of a count, and the count has a least value of one. That is where the ray bound hands over to diffraction, and the handover is the same number written two ways.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Numerical apertureApertureFocal lengthAbbe numberAiry patternAngular resolutionBeam qualityChromatic aberrationCoherenceDe broglie wavelengthDepth of focusDispersion