Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Point-spread function — where it appears

The image an optical system makes of a single point, which is the squared modulus of the Fourier transform of its pupil. Its width is set by the aperture's size and the light it puts far from the centre is set by the aperture's edge and by the flatness of the wavefront.

Named by 6 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The dip that decides it. Two equally bright points seen through a circular aperture, their Airy patterns added, at 0.7, 1, 1.6 times the Rayleigh separation. Below each is the depth of the dip between the peaks, measured off the drawn sum: 0.0%, 26.5%, 91.6%. At exactly the Rayleigh separation the dip is 26.5% — the criterion is a convention about how much of a dip a detector can see, not a threshold anything crosses. Below it the two peaks merge into one and the pair is gone; above it the answer was never in doubt.

How far apart two things have to be

An instrument's ability to tell two things apart is not set by the quality of its glass. It is set by the width of the hole light comes through, by a factor that is the first zero of a Bessel function — and the threshold everyone quotes is a convention laid over a computed dip of 26.5 per cent.

optics · Diffraction The rings belong to the edge, not to the size. The far-field intensity of 3 apertures of the same width, against angle in units of the diffraction limit, on a logarithmic intensity axis spanning ten decades. They differ only in how the transmission falls off toward the rim. With a hard edge the first sidelobe is 13.3 decibels down and the core is 0.89 wide. With a Hann taper the first sidelobe is 31.5 decibels down and the core is 1.44 wide. With a Blackman taper the first sidelobe is 58.1 decibels down and the core is 1.64 wide. The hard edge's rings are not a defect of the optics and are not reduced by making it larger — they are the transform of a discontinuity, and the only way to remove them is to remove the discontinuity. What it costs is the width of the core, which is the resolution.

The rings that belong to the edge

Every account of diffraction so far asks what the size of an aperture does. The rings around a star are not about its size: they are the transform of a discontinuity, they do not shrink relative to the core when the telescope grows, and the only way to remove them is to stop the transmission falling to zero abruptly. Softening the edge buys forty-five decibels of contrast and costs eighty per cent of the resolution.

optics · Diffraction The peak that is lost to a fraction of a wave. The height of the central peak, relative to a perfect pupil of the same size, against the root-mean-square error of the wavefront in waves, for four kinds of error — each computed from the transform and each normalised to the same rms. The dashed curve is the usual approximation, the exponential of minus the square of two pi times the error. What the figure shows is that to a good approximation it does not matter WHAT the error is, only how large it is in the mean square: four quite different shapes of wavefront give nearly the same peak. A fourteenth of a wave leaves 80 per cent of the peak, which is the conventional definition of diffraction-limited, and it corresponds to a quarter of a wave peak-to-valley for a simple defocus — which is where Rayleigh's quarter-wave rule comes from and why it is a convention laid over a computed number rather than a threshold in the physics.

How accurate a mirror has to be

The pupil's amplitude decides the rings; its phase decides the peak. A wavefront error of a fourteenth of a wave root-mean-square leaves eighty per cent of the peak intensity, which is the whole of what 'diffraction-limited' means — a convention laid over a computed number. And the number barely depends on what the error is, only on how large: four quite different aberrations of the same magnitude give nearly the same answer.

optics · Diffraction Too small blurs by diffraction, too large by shadow. The size of the image of a distant point through a pinhole 100 mm from the screen, in 550 nm light, against the hole's diameter, both on logarithmic axes. The dashed lines are the two simple estimates: the hole's own shadow, as wide as the hole, and the diffraction spread, 2.44λf/d. The dots are the diameter holding half the light, computed from the Fresnel diffraction integral. They follow the shadow for large holes and the diffraction for small ones, and are least — 0.207 mm — for a hole 0.336 mm across, where the simple sum of the two estimates puts its minimum at 0.366 mm. At the best hole the Fresnel number d²/4λf is 0.51: the sharpest hole, judged by where half the light lands, lets through about half of the first Fresnel zone.

The hole that makes the sharpest picture

A pinhole camera makes a picture without bending any light: a small hole lets through, from each point of the scene, only the rays that reach one small patch of the screen. A smaller hole makes a sharper picture — until it does not. Below a certain size the hole spreads light by diffraction faster than it narrows the shadow, and the picture blurs again. The best hole balances the two, and at that balance it turns out to pass about half of the first Fresnel zone of the incoming wave: the sharpest pinhole is already beginning to behave like a lens.

optics · Imaging The spikes a star wears are the vanes that hold the mirror. The image of a single star — the squared Fourier transform of the pupil — for a telescope aperture with a central obstruction of 0.3 of its diameter and no vanes, four vanes in a cross, and three vanes at 120°, each vane 2 per cent of the aperture's diameter wide; shown on a logarithmic brightness scale over six decades, each panel spanning ±30 times the angle λ/D. The small pictures are the pupils. With no vanes the star is an Airy core and rings. Each vane adds a streak at right angles to itself, through the core, in both directions: the cross of four vanes, which is two straight bars, gives four spikes, and the three vanes, which are not opposite one another, give six — each vane's two spikes pointing in directions no other vane's do.

The spikes a bright star wears

Photographs of bright stars show them with spikes — four in most telescope pictures, eight in the James Webb Space Telescope's, none at all in some amateur images. The spikes are not in the sky and not in the camera. They are the shadows of whatever holds the telescope's secondary mirror, transformed by diffraction into streaks at right angles to themselves, and they can be counted, predicted and removed by reading a telescope's pupil the way diffraction reads it: as a pattern whose Fourier transform is the star's image.

optics · Diffraction A point of light split by an uncoated roof. The image of a distant point across the direction of the roof edge, behind an Amici roof in glass of index 1.517, for unpolarised light, as a fraction of the peak an undivided pupil would give, against position in units of the diffraction width λ/D: with a phase-coated roof, and with bare glass. The coated roof gives the ordinary diffraction pattern of the full aperture. Bare glass leaves the two halves of the pupil only partly able to interfere, and the image's peak falls to 0.70 of its proper height, its central lobe widening across the edge into a shoulder on each side — a slight doubling of every point, which an observer sees as a loss of crispness and contrast.

The roof that splits a binocular's image

A slim, straight binocular turns its image upright with a roof — two glass faces meeting at a right angle, which reflect every ray twice by total internal reflection and lose no light at all. They lose sharpness instead. Total reflection shifts the phases of the two polarisations of light by different amounts, and the half of the beam on one side of the roof's edge meets the two faces in the opposite order from the other half. The halves leave in different polarisations, interfere only partly at the focus, and every star becomes a slightly doubled smudge — unless a coating a fraction of a micrometre thick makes the glass behave like a mirror.

optics · Total internal reflection

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DiffractionFourier transformStrehl ratioApertureDiffraction limitResolutionAberrationAdaptive opticsAiry discAiry patternAngular resolutionApodisation

All concepts