Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Chromatic aberration — where it appears

The failure of an optical element to bring different colours to the same focus, because its focal length depends on wavelength. A glass lens's focal length rises with wavelength and a diffractive element's falls, by about a hundred times as much, which is why one can be used to correct the other.

Named by 5 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Cancelling a derivative, and what is left over. How far the focus of a 500 mm lens moves with wavelength, for a single crown element and for a cemented pair of crown and flint whose powers satisfy the achromatic condition. The singlet's focus runs over 18.1 mm across the visible — a fifth of a per cent of its focal length, and utterly ruinous at any useful aperture. The doublet's runs over 2.268 mm, some 8× less, and — this is the whole content of the figure — it is not flat. The condition sets the rate of change of power with wavelength to zero, so the curve is stationary rather than constant: it returns to the corrected focus at exactly 2 wavelengths — 486 nm and 656 nm, which are the two Fraunhofer lines the condition was written at — and departs from it everywhere else, most at 400 nm. That residual is the secondary spectrum, it has the same sign at both ends of the visible, and no pair of ordinary glasses removes it, because two conditions cannot be met with one free ratio.

Two glasses that cancel a derivative

A single lens focuses blue light closer than red, and the difference ruins the image. Cementing a second lens of another glass behind it fixes the fault at two wavelengths and at no others, because the condition sets a slope to zero rather than a value.

optics · Dispersion Rings whose radii go as the square root of their number. A 20-zone plate for 550 nanometres at 200 millimetres, drawn to scale, beside its zone radii against zone number. The outermost is 1.483 millimetres and the innermost 0.332, and the curve is a square root because the radii come from making each zone's extra path exactly half a wavelength longer than the last. The consequence worth noticing is on the drawing rather than in the formula: every ring has the same area, to 0.003 per cent, so each contributes about equally to what arrives on the axis and the rings get thinner outwards to keep it so. Alternate rings are opaque. Half the light is thrown away and the axis gets brighter, because what is thrown away is the half that would have arrived out of phase with the rest.

The lens that is a set of rings

A lens focuses by delaying the light at its centre until every path takes the same time. A zone plate does the opposite: it changes nothing about the light that gets through, and paints out the light that would have arrived out of step. Half the aperture is thrown away and the axis gets brighter, which sounds like a contradiction and is the whole idea.

optics · Diffraction Stopping down removes one colour error and not the other. The two chromatic errors of a single 50 mm N-BK7 lens with its stop 20 mm in front, at an image point 10° off axis, against the f-number. Axial colour — blue and red focusing at different distances, seen as a coloured blur at the yellow focus — is about 775/N µm across: 387 µm at f/2, 97 at f/8, 35 at f/22. Lateral colour — blue and red images of the point centred at different heights — is 55.0 µm at every f-number, because it is carried by the ray through the centre of the stop. The two are equal near f/14, and past that stopping down leaves only the error it cannot touch.

The colour fringe no aperture can close

A lens bends blue light more than red, and that one fact produces two different faults. One puts the blue focus nearer the lens than the red, and closing the aperture shrinks it. The other puts the blue image of an off-axis point nearer the centre of the frame than the red one, and closing the aperture does nothing at all, because it is carried by the one ray every aperture keeps. It is why photographs have coloured fringes in their corners and not in their middles, and why a lens designer who cannot remove it with glass can sometimes remove it with symmetry, or with a distance.

optics · Imaging A lens with its glass taken out, focusing the same. Two lenses of focal length 200 mm and aperture 100 mm in acrylic (n = 1.49), each with its flat face to a parallel beam and the exact aspheric curve that sends every ray to one focus: solid (top), 12.2 mm thick at the centre, and the same curve cut into 13 rings 1 mm deep with the glass between them removed (bottom), on a backing 0.4 mm thick. Thickness is drawn six times larger than height, and the distance to the focus is not to scale. Every ray leaves each lens at the same angle from the same height, because the angle a ray turns through at a surface depends only on the slope of the surface where it crosses, and every ring keeps the slope it had. What was removed was glass the rays travelled through without turning.

The lens with its glass taken out

Snell's law turns a ray at a surface by an angle set by the slope of the surface where the ray crosses, and the glass behind the surface does not enter it. So a lens can be sliced into rings, the glass between the slopes thrown away, and the rays will not notice. Fresnel did it for lighthouses in 1822. The waves notice — every step cuts a few hundred wavelengths out of them — unless the steps are made exactly one wavelength deep, and then the lens becomes something else: a diffractive element whose colours run backwards, and which can cancel a glass lens's colour with a twentieth of its power.

optics · Refraction How long a lens must hold back its central light. The time by which a lens must delay light passing through its centre relative to light passing its edge, so that every part of a short pulse reaches the focus together, against the lens's radius, for focal lengths of 0.1 mm, 1.0 mm, 10.0 mm (solid), in femtoseconds on logarithmic axes: the extra path from the edge, √(R² + f²) − f, over c. The dashed line is what a flat structure 1 μm thick can supply if its building blocks span a group index of 1: 3.3 fs. A 1 mm focal-length lens reaches it at a radius of 45 μm; a 10 mm one at 141 μm. A glass lens of 10 mm focal length and 5 mm radius holds its centre back by 3937 fs, which it does by being 2.27 mm thicker in the middle. A flat lens has no room for that.

The delay a flat lens has no room for

A glass lens is thick in the middle for a reason that is easy to miss. To focus light of every colour at one point, a lens must do more than bend each colour by the right amount: it must make every part of a light wave arrive at the focus at the same moment, and the light passing the edge has further to go. The glass in the middle is what holds the central light back to wait for it. A lens made flat — a kinoform, a metasurface a micrometre thick — has nowhere to keep that delay. The geometry of the focus sets how much delay is needed, the thickness sets how much is available, and between them they cap how large an achromatic flat lens can be: tens of micrometres, not centimetres.

optics · Refraction

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DispersionAbbe numberFocal lengthKinoformAchromatic lensAmplitude modulationApertureAperture stopChief rayDepth of focusDiffractionDiffraction grating

All concepts