Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Spherical aberration — where it appears

The failure of a spherical surface to bring parallel rays to one point, the defect a parabola does not have and a lens must be figured against. The crossings of rays at different heights trace a caustic rather than a focus, which is the bright cusp visible in a cup of coffee.

Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A sphere does not have a focus. Parallel rays reflected off a spherical mirror. Rays striking further from the axis cross it nearer the mirror, so there is no single point where all of them meet — the blur is spherical aberration, and a perfect sphere has it inherently.

The mirror that cannot focus, and the shape that can

A perfect sphere does not bring parallel light to a point. The blur is not a manufacturing defect — it is what the shape does, and the shape is used anyway, for a reason worth knowing.

optics · Imaging The surface a spin decides. The free surface of a liquid in a dish of radius 0.5 m turning at 10, 20, 40 revolutions a minute. In the rotating frame the surface is a level set of gz − ½ω²r², so it is a paraboloid exactly and not to some approximation, and nothing about the liquid appears in its shape: the same curve is got with mercury, water or oil. The rim stands 14.0 mm, 55.9 mm, 223.6 mm above the centre at those rates. A parabola z = r²/4f has focal length f, so these surfaces are mirrors of focal length g/2ω² — 4.47 m at 10 rpm, 1.12 m at 20 rpm, 0.28 m at 40 rpm. That is checked here on the drawn curves rather than quoted: a vertical ray reflected off the surface at a quarter, a half, three quarters and the whole of the radius crosses the axis at the same height to 0.00%, which is what a mirror with no spherical aberration means. Doubling the spin quarters the focal length, and there is no other adjustment: the dish can only ever look straight up.

The surface a spin decides

Spin a dish of liquid and its surface settles into a paraboloid — exactly, with nothing about the liquid in the shape. A parabola of that form has a focal length of g over twice the spin rate squared, so a bucket of mercury turning at twenty revolutions a minute is a telescope mirror figured by a clock instead of by grinding.

fluids · Hydrostatics Abbe's ratio, measured on the traced rays. The quantity h divided by the sine of the angle at which the ray converges on the focus, in units of the paraxial focal length, against how far up the aperture the ray entered. Abbe's sine condition says that a system already free of spherical aberration images a small region round the axis faithfully only if this ratio is the same for every ray. A horizontal line means the condition is met. The parabola departs by 12.96 per cent across the aperture; The sphere departs by 7.18 per cent across the aperture. The paraboloid is the interesting case, because it is exactly stigmatic on axis — every ray from infinity crosses at one point, which is the definition of the shape — and it still fails this test. Perfection at one point buys nothing at the next one along. What the departure predicts is coma, a blur that grows linearly with the distance off axis and quadratically with the aperture, and the offaxis figure measures exactly that blur on the same surfaces. The condition is not a design rule invented for telescopes: it follows from requiring that the same optical path length join object and image for every route, and any instrument that images a field rather than a point has to meet it.

The condition a lens must meet

A paraboloid brings every parallel ray to exactly one point. Move the source a fifth of a degree off axis and the image is a fan rather than a point, and the reason is a condition Abbe wrote down that has nothing to do with the axis — perfection at one point buys nothing at the next one along.

optics · Imaging The surface that focuses 1 into 1.52 with no error at all. A Cartesian oval: the locus of points for which 1 times the distance from the object plus 1.52 times the distance to the image is a constant. Every ray drawn takes exactly the same optical path, so every one arrives at the image point — not nearly, and not for small angles, but exactly, for rays at any angle the surface reaches. There is no spherical aberration because there is no approximation: this is what Fermat's principle asks for, solved rather than expanded. The surface is not a sphere, not a conic in general, and not anything a grinding machine makes easily, which is most of why lenses are spherical and aberrated instead.

The surface that images one point exactly

Fermat's principle says every ray from an object to its image must take the same time. Written as an equation, that is a curve Descartes found — a surface with no aberration at all, at any angle. It exists, it is easy to compute, and it images exactly one pair of points and nothing else.

optics · Fermat

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Conic sectionAberrationFocal lengthOptical path lengthAplanaticApparent weightAspheric surfaceCausticCentrifugal forceComaEquipotentialFermat's principle

All concepts