Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Spherical aberration — where it appears

The failure of a spherical surface to bring parallel rays to one point, the defect a parabola does not have and a lens must be figured against. The crossings of rays at different heights trace a caustic rather than a focus, which is the bright cusp visible in a cup of coffee.

Named by 6 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A sphere does not have a focus. Parallel rays reflected off a spherical mirror. Rays striking further from the axis cross it nearer the mirror, so there is no single point where all of them meet — the blur is spherical aberration, and a perfect sphere has it inherently.

The mirror that cannot focus, and the shape that can

A perfect sphere does not bring parallel light to a point. The blur is not a manufacturing defect — it is what the shape does, and the shape is used anyway, for a reason worth knowing.

optics · Imaging The surface a spin decides. The free surface of a liquid in a dish of radius 0.5 m turning at 10, 20, 40 revolutions a minute. In the rotating frame the surface is a level set of gz − ½ω²r², so it is a paraboloid exactly and not to some approximation, and nothing about the liquid appears in its shape: the same curve is got with mercury, water or oil. The rim stands 14.0 mm, 55.9 mm, 223.6 mm above the centre at those rates. A parabola z = r²/4f has focal length f, so these surfaces are mirrors of focal length g/2ω² — 4.47 m at 10 rpm, 1.12 m at 20 rpm, 0.28 m at 40 rpm. That is checked here on the drawn curves rather than quoted: a vertical ray reflected off the surface at a quarter, a half, three quarters and the whole of the radius crosses the axis at the same height to 0.00%, which is what a mirror with no spherical aberration means. Doubling the spin quarters the focal length, and there is no other adjustment: the dish can only ever look straight up.

The surface a spin decides

Spin a dish of liquid and its surface settles into a paraboloid — exactly, with nothing about the liquid in the shape. A parabola of that form has a focal length of g over twice the spin rate squared, so a bucket of mercury turning at twenty revolutions a minute is a telescope mirror figured by a clock instead of by grinding.

fluids · Hydrostatics Abbe's ratio, measured on the traced rays. The quantity h divided by the sine of the angle at which the ray converges on the focus, in units of the paraxial focal length, against how far up the aperture the ray entered. Abbe's sine condition says that a system already free of spherical aberration images a small region round the axis faithfully only if this ratio is the same for every ray. A horizontal line means the condition is met. The parabola departs by 12.96 per cent across the aperture; The sphere departs by 7.18 per cent across the aperture. The paraboloid is the interesting case, because it is exactly stigmatic on axis — every ray from infinity crosses at one point, which is the definition of the shape — and it still fails this test. Perfection at one point buys nothing at the next one along. What the departure predicts is coma, a blur that grows linearly with the distance off axis and quadratically with the aperture, and the offaxis figure measures exactly that blur on the same surfaces. The condition is not a design rule invented for telescopes: it follows from requiring that the same optical path length join object and image for every route, and any instrument that images a field rather than a point has to meet it.

The condition a lens must meet

A paraboloid brings every parallel ray to exactly one point. Move the source a fifth of a degree off axis and the image is a fan rather than a point, and the reason is a condition Abbe wrote down that has nothing to do with the axis — perfection at one point buys nothing at the next one along.

optics · Imaging The surface that focuses 1 into 1.52 with no error at all. A Cartesian oval: the locus of points for which 1 times the distance from the object plus 1.52 times the distance to the image is a constant. Every ray drawn takes exactly the same optical path, so every one arrives at the image point — not nearly, and not for small angles, but exactly, for rays at any angle the surface reaches. There is no spherical aberration because there is no approximation: this is what Fermat's principle asks for, solved rather than expanded. The surface is not a sphere, not a conic in general, and not anything a grinding machine makes easily, which is most of why lenses are spherical and aberrated instead.

The surface that images one point exactly

Fermat's principle says every ray from an object to its image must take the same time. Written as an equation, that is a curve Descartes found — a surface with no aberration at all, at any angle. It exists, it is easy to compute, and it images exactly one pair of points and nothing else.

optics · Fermat A parallel beam brought to a point on the far side. Parallel rays sent into Luneburg's sphere, whose index falls from the square root of two at the centre to one at the rim, from the left. Each beam is brought to a single point on the rim diametrically opposite the direction it came from; the worst of the 11 rays misses by 2.0e-3 radii. The sphere has no axis — every direction is the same to it — so a beam from any direction is focused as well as any other, and there is no such thing as an off-axis aberration.

The lens with no axis

Every ordinary lens has an axis, and every one of its hardest aberrations is a penalty for looking away from it. A sphere has no axis, so a sphere cannot have off-axis aberrations — but a glass ball has spherical aberration instead, because one index and one curvature are too few to focus every ray. Luneburg's sphere, whose index falls from √2 at the centre to 1 at the rim, keeps the symmetry and removes the aberration: it brings parallel light from every direction to a perfect point on its own surface.

optics · Fermat Three cylinders that focus electrons. An einzel lens: three coaxial tubes of radius R, the outer two at the potential the electrons arrived with and the centre one, 2R long, at 4 times it. Electrons enter from the left parallel to the axis at five heights, from 0.1R to 0.7R, and are traced through the field without approximation. In each gap the equipotentials bulge between the tubes, and an electron crossing them is refracted as at a curved glass surface: pushed towards the axis where the potential is low and away from it where the potential is high. It is slower where it is pushed inward, so it spends longer there, and each gap converges on balance; the electron leaves with the speed it came in with. The rays cross the axis at 4.00R, 3.92R, 3.78R, 3.56R, 3.25R beyond the lens centre: the outer ones are bent too much and cross first, which is spherical aberration.

The voltage that bends an electron like glass

An electron that has fallen through a potential difference V moves at a speed proportional to √V. Crossing a surface of constant potential, it keeps the part of its momentum that runs along the surface and changes the part across it, and the two rules together are Snell's law with √V in place of the refractive index. Every arrangement of charged electrodes is therefore a piece of glass for electrons. Three metal tubes make a lens that focuses whichever way its middle tube is charged — and, by a theorem proved in 1936, no lens built from round electrodes can be free of spherical aberration. That theorem kept electron microscopes some fifty times coarser than their wavelength for sixty years.

electromagnetism · Potential

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Conic sectionFocal lengthAberrationFermat's principleImagingOptical path lengthRefractive indexSnell's lawAntennaAplanaticApparent weightAspheric surface

All concepts