Harmonic approximation — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Every minimum is a parabola
A pendulum, a bond between two atoms and a ship rolling in a swell obey the same equation, and the reason is not that they are alike. It is that a function with a minimum has no linear term there, so the first thing every potential well looks like is the same well.
The two pendulums that will not stop swapping
Coupled oscillators joined by a weak spring appear to hand energy back and forth. Nothing is handed anywhere: the system has only a pair of motions that keep their shape, at √(k/m) and √((k+2kc)/m), and the apparent traffic is the beat between them — 51 swings from one handover to the next at a coupling of one part in fifty. Extend the same arithmetic to N masses and it produces a dispersion relation with a hard ceiling, near 7 THz in copper.
Why heating a perfect spring changes nothing
A harmonic solid vibrates harder when heated and does not get any longer. Thermal expansion lives entirely in the term that the harmonic approximation throws away — and so does the fact that a solid conducts heat at a finite rate, which is the same discarded term doing a second job nobody would have connected to the first.
The oscillator that answers at three times the question
Push a spring hard enough that the parabola stops being the whole story, and three things happen that a linear oscillator cannot do: it emits frequencies nobody supplied, its resonance leans over, and its amplitude at one drive frequency depends on where the drive has been.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
AnharmonicitySimple harmonic motionNormal modesPotential wellTaylor expansionAmplitude dependenceApproximationBeatsThe Boltzmann factorBoundary conditionsContinuum limitCurvature