Velocity-addition — where it appears
Named by 16 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Speeds that refuse to add, and the quantity that does
Run at half the speed of light, throw something forward at half the speed of light, and the result is not the speed of light. It is four-fifths of it, and there is a variable in which the arithmetic is still simple addition.
The sky that crowds into a cone
A boost does not only shift frequencies. It remaps directions, so half of everything a fast traveller can see is squeezed into a forward cone of half-angle about 1/γ — and because brightness carries four powers of the Doppler factor, what lies ahead is overwhelming and what lies behind has effectively gone.
The turn that two pushes leave behind
Two boosts in different directions do not compose to a boost. The product carries a rotation, so a frame carried once round a closed path comes back turned — and the size of that turn was the factor of two standing between the calculated and the measured splitting of a spectral line.
The push that does not point where the body goes
Newton's second law survives relativity in the form F = dp/dt and in no other. Written as F = ma it fails outright, and not merely by a factor — at high speed a body pushed at forty-five degrees accelerates at eighty, because the same force is divided by γ³ along the motion and by γ across it.
Everything from an exchange of pulses
Send a flash every second and ask how often the far observer receives them. That one measured ratio generates time dilation, the composition of velocities and the twin result, with no coordinate transformation written down anywhere and no convention chosen about what "at the same time" means far away.
The space that speeds live in
Speeds do not add, and the reason is that the set of all possible velocities is not a flat space. It is a hyperbolic plane of curvature minus one in rapidity — and the rotation two boosts leave behind is exactly the area of the triangle they make in it.
The drag that was only an addition
Light in moving water is carried along by it, but only partly — by a fraction of the water's speed that depends on the refractive index in a way nobody could account for. Fresnel invented the coefficient to save a theory, Fizeau measured it in 1851, and it sat unexplained for half a century. It is the first term of the relativistic velocity addition and nothing else.
The transformation that never mentions light
Assume space and time are homogeneous, that space is isotropic, that two changes of frame compose into a third, and that the relativity principle holds. Those four leave exactly one free constant — and three possible worlds, one of them Galileo's and one of them Einstein's. Light appears nowhere in the derivation; it enters only when the constant has to be measured.
The best throw is a tangency
Shot putters release at about 37°, long jumpers take off at about 20°, a ball thrown forward from a moving truck should be aimed steeply and flies flat, and a golf ball's drag alone moves its best angle to 38°. Each is usually explained as an exception to 45°. None of them is. Drawn as a map over launch velocities, range has curves of equal value, a thrower has a set of throws they can make, and the best throw is always where the set first touches a curve.
The river that sound cannot swim up
Sound travels at a fixed speed through the air or water carrying it, so a flowing medium adds its own speed to the sound's: faster downstream, slower upstream. That is the plainest velocity addition there is. Where the flow speeds up past the speed of sound, upstream-going sound is carried backwards, and nothing made beyond that point can be heard before it. The point is a horizon. Sound cones tip over there exactly as light cones do at a black hole, and the rate at which the flow speeds up plays the part of the surface gravity. A kitchen sink under a running tap makes the reverse kind of horizon, a white hole for ripples.
The binary star that would be seen twice
If light thrown forward by a moving source travelled faster, the way a ball thrown from a moving train does, then light from a star swinging towards the Earth in a binary orbit would catch up with light it had sent out earlier. From far enough away the two would arrive together, and the star would be seen in two places at once. Willem de Sitter pointed out in 1913 that nothing of the kind is seen, and that this settles whether the speed of light depends on its source. The argument had a loophole that took half a century to notice — interstellar gas re-emits light at its own speed — and closing it needed X-ray stars.
The rod that is level for only one observer
A metre rod slides at high speed over a metre-wide hole in a thin plate. In the plate's frame the rod is contracted and drops through. In the rod's frame the hole is contracted, the rod is far too long for it, and it drops through anyway — because the instruction 'every point starts to fall now' names a different now for the rod. Its front end starts first, the start runs back along it, and the rod tips into the hole like a spear. Whether a moving thing is level is a question about which events are simultaneous, and so it has an answer only for an observer.
The spot that outruns light and carries nothing
Flick a laser pointer across the face of the Moon and the spot it makes crosses the Moon faster than light. Nothing is wrong with relativity: the spot is not a thing, and no part of it travels from one side to the other. Each lit point is lit by its own light, sent from the hand. What makes the spot worth studying is how strange such a non-thing is allowed to be. It can be born in the middle of the screen as a pair running apart; its speed can be made infinite, or reversed, merely by watching it from a moving frame; and the composition of velocities that caps everything real has nothing to say about it.
The wheel whose top cannot go twice as fast
The top of a rolling wheel moves at twice the speed of its axle, and the bottom is momentarily at rest — two facts every cyclist's spokes show, blurred at the top and sharp at the bottom. Roll the wheel at a large fraction of the speed of light and the second fact survives exactly while the first cannot: the top moves at 2v/(1 + v²/c²), never as fast as light. Caught at one instant of the ground's time the spokes are bent, and over one turn the wheel advances not the circumference measured from its axle but γ times it — the rim's own length, laid down on the ground by a contact point that does not move.
The kick a fast particle can give an electron
A slow proton crossing matter can give any one electron at most a fifth of a per cent of its energy, because an electron struck head-on by something two thousand times heavier rebounds at no more than twice the heavier one's speed. That rule of thumb fails at relativistic speeds, and fails upward: the electron's speed is capped below light, but its energy is not, and the largest kick grows as the square of the projectile's Lorentz factor until, above a teraelectronvolt, one collision can take more than half of everything a proton carries.
The angle a collider counts in logarithms
The two proton beams of the Large Hadron Collider meet head on with equal energies, so the collisions ought to happen at rest in the laboratory. They do not. Each collision is really between two fragments of protons carrying unknown, unequal shares of the momentum, and every one is moving along the beam at a different speed. Particle physicists therefore describe what comes out in a variable that a boost along the beam simply shifts: rapidity, the quantity in which speeds add. A detector cannot measure rapidity directly. It measures an angle, and converts it to a logarithm.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
The Lorentz factorThe Lorentz transformationRapidityLight coneRelativity principleCausalityReference framesSimultaneitySpacetime diagramDoppler effectLength contractionMeasurement