Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Rapidity — where it appears

The quantity that adds when boosts are composed, being the inverse hyperbolic tangent of the speed, so that no finite sum reaches light. A steady push accumulates it at a constant rate for ever, which is why an accelerating rocket has a simple description in it and a saturating one in speed.

Named by 15 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Composing a boost with a speed, and never passing one. The speed one observer measures when a body moving at v is seen from a frame already moving at u, for u = 0.4, 0.6, 0.9, 1 times the speed of light. Every curve ends at one and none crosses it. The straight dashed line is the Galilean answer, u + v, which reaches 1.4c and is wrong. The flat line at the top is light: composing c with anything gives c back.

Speeds that refuse to add, and the quantity that does

Run at half the speed of light, throw something forward at half the speed of light, and the result is not the speed of light. It is four-fifths of it, and there is a variable in which the arithmetic is still simple addition.

relativity · Velocity-addition Which happened first, asked of several observers. Two events on a spacetime diagram: one at the origin and one 3 light-seconds away and 1 second later, so that light leaving the first cannot reach the second. Through the second event runs a family of lines, each one the set of events some observer calls simultaneous with it; an observer moving at a fraction β of the speed of light has such a line of slope β on these axes. Where a line meets the vertical axis is the time that observer assigns to the second event. For a slow observer that meeting point is above the origin and the second event happens later; for a fast one it is below and the second event happens EARLIER. The changeover is at β = 0.3333, which is the time separation divided by the space separation, and it is a legal speed only because the separation is spacelike. So the order of these two events is not a property of the events. What every observer does agree on is that neither could have caused the other, because the two lie outside each other's light cones — drawn here as the diagonals — and that agreement is what causality rests on rather than on any shared notion of before.

Which came first, and who decides

Two events far apart can happen in either order, depending on who is asked, and both answers are correct. That is not a loophole in causality but the reason causality survives at all — because the pairs whose order is negotiable are exactly the pairs neither of which could have caused the other.

relativity · Simultaneity The rotation two boosts leave behind. The angle through which a frame's axes are turned after two boosts of equal size, against the angle between the two boosts, for 4 speeds. Two boosts in the same direction compose to a boost and nothing else, which is the zero at the left; two in different directions do not. What is left over is a rotation, and it is not small at large speeds: at β = 0.3 it peaks at 2.7° when the boosts are 91° apart, at β = 0.6 it peaks at 12.8° when the boosts are 96° apart, at β = 0.85 it peaks at 36.1° when the boosts are 108° apart, at β = 0.95 it peaks at 63.2° when the boosts are 122° apart. Each curve here is computed by multiplying the two boost matrices and pulling the rotation out of the product, not by evaluating a formula; the closed form for perpendicular boosts is used to check the extraction and appears nowhere in the drawing. The consequence is that the Lorentz boosts do not form a group by themselves — compose two and you leave the set — and that an object carried round a closed path in velocity space comes back turned.

The turn that two pushes leave behind

Two boosts in different directions do not compose to a boost. The product carries a rotation, so a frame carried once round a closed path comes back turned — and the size of that turn was the factor of two standing between the calculated and the measured splitting of a spectral line.

relativity · Velocity-addition Pushing one way and going another. The angle between an applied force and the acceleration it produces, against the angle between the force and the body's velocity, at four speeds. At 0° and 90° the two are parallel, because those are the two directions the γ³ and γ divisors do not mix. Everywhere between, they are not: at 0.99c the worst case is 73.9°, reached with the force at 8.0°. A body under a steady sideways-ish push does not travel along it.

The push that does not point where the body goes

Newton's second law survives relativity in the form F = dp/dt and in no other. Written as F = ma it fails outright, and not merely by a factor — at high speed a body pushed at forty-five degrees accelerates at eighty, because the same force is divided by γ³ along the motion and by γ across it.

relativity · Relativistic dynamics A horizon 0.97 light years behind, made by nothing but the motion. Position across and time up, in units where light travels at 45°, for a rocket holding a constant proper acceleration of 1 gravity. The worldline is the hyperbola x² − c²t² = (c²/a)², asymptotic to the light line it never crosses. Three light signals are drawn: one released at x = 0.55 catches up at t = 0.63, one released at x = 0 never arrives, one released at x = -0.6 never arrives. The dividing line is the asymptote itself. Everything at or behind it is permanently out of reach, and for one gravity that boundary sits 0.97 light years behind the rocket's starting point. Nothing is there — no mass, no field, no surface. The horizon is a consequence of never stopping.

The wall of silence behind a rocket that never stops

Hold a constant acceleration and the worldline is a hyperbola asymptotic to a light ray — so there is a light ray that never catches it. An observer who never stops accelerating has a horizon a distance c²/a behind, made by nothing but the motion, and at one gravity it sits 0.97 light years back. Nothing is there. No mass, no surface, no field.

relativity · Accelerated frames How far a 1-gravity ship gets, against its own clock. The distance covered by a ship accelerating steadily at 1 gravity for half the trip and braking for the other half, against the time on its own clock, on a logarithmic vertical axis. The curve is a cosine hyperbolic and therefore an exponential once the ship is relativistic, which it is after about a year: Proxima Centauri in 3.5 shipboard years, Sirius in 4.6 shipboard years, the Pleiades in 11.9 shipboard years, the galactic centre in 19.8 shipboard years, Andromeda in 28.6 shipboard years. Nothing about this violates anything. The speed never reaches c — it is the hyperbolic tangent of the rapidity and after 3.5 years it is 0.9495 at turnover — and every one of those journeys takes slightly more than the distance in years as measured from home. What is growing exponentially is not the speed but the length contraction, and the traveller's honest description of the trip is that the distance shrank. The rapidity is what accumulates steadily: it grows by one unit every 0.969 years of shipboard time, for ever, with no ceiling anywhere in the arithmetic. That is the whole reason the numbers come out survivable, and the reason the fuel does not.

The ship that never arrives at c

Accelerate at one gravity and never stop. The speed creeps toward light and never reaches it, and meanwhile the galactic centre is twenty shipboard years away and Andromeda twenty-nine. What makes the journey survivable is that rapidity has no ceiling; what makes it impossible is that the fuel goes as the exponential of the same quantity.

relativity · Accelerated frames The fuel a starship needs, which is most of the universe. The mass of fuel a rocket must start with, divided by the mass it ends with, against the final speed as a fraction of light's — the vertical axis being the number of decades in that ratio, because the numbers do not fit on any other scale. Each solid curve is one exhaust speed, and each dashed one beside it is what Tsiolkovsky's Newtonian formula would have said. Below about a tenth of light speed the two are indistinguishable; above it they part, and the relativistic curve turns upward without limit as the final speed approaches light's, because what adds linearly is the rapidity rather than the velocity. The photon rocket — exhaust at exactly the speed of light, which is the best any engine can do — needs a mass ratio of 1.7321 to reach half light speed, which is √3 exactly, and 4.4 to reach nine tenths. Those are modest numbers and they are the whole of the good news. A chemical exhaust at 4 km/s needs 10^2968 even to reach a tenth of light speed, which is not a difficult engineering problem but an arithmetic impossibility — there are about 10⁵⁰ atoms in the Earth. What the chart cannot show is the other half of the trip: stopping at the far end squares the ratio, and coming home squares it again.

The fuel a starship needs

Tsiolkovsky's logarithm survives relativity with one substitution: what adds is the rapidity rather than the velocity. The result is that a photon rocket reaches half light speed on a mass ratio of the square root of three, and a chemical one reaches a tenth of it on a mass ratio with three thousand digits.

relativity · Mass-energy Every speed there is, on one disc. The whole of velocity space drawn as a disc: the boundary is the speed of light and every possible velocity is a point inside. The rings are equal steps of rapidity — 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 — and they sit at speeds 0.4621, 0.7616, 0.9051, 0.9640, 0.9866 of light. Equal steps of rapidity crowd towards the edge, checked ring by ring, which is the same fact as speeds refusing to add: a boost is a fixed step in rapidity and a shrinking step in speed. The drawing is the Poincaré model, in which angles are true and distances are not — so a shape near the rim is drawn small and is not small, and the boundary is infinitely far away in the geometry although it is a finite circle on the page.

The space that speeds live in

Speeds do not add, and the reason is that the set of all possible velocities is not a flat space. It is a hyperbolic plane of curvature minus one in rapidity — and the rotation two boosts leave behind is exactly the area of the triangle they make in it.

relativity · Velocity-addition Charge density and current, mixing like time and space. The charge density and the current density of a wire, against the rapidity of the frame they are measured in, starting from cρ = 0 and J = 2. They mix by exactly the transformation that mixes a time and a space coordinate — a hyperbolic rotation — and the combination c²ρ² − J² is unchanged at every rapidity, checked here to nine decimal places. A wire that is neutral in the laboratory is charged in every other frame, at exactly one rapidity out of all of them, and that single fact is the mechanism the first rung of this ladder tells as a story about two contracted lattices. Here it is a coordinate change.

Charge and current are one thing

Ask what a boost leaves alone and the answer is charge. That answer forces the next one: a fixed charge in a contracting volume gives a density that transforms like a time component, and a current that transforms like a space one. So charge density and current density are the four parts of one object — and conservation of charge stops being an extra law and becomes the condition that makes the object exist.

relativity · Field transformation Six numbers, one object. The electromagnetic field tensor written out as the four-by-four array it is, for a field with E = (0.4, 1.2, 0) and cB = (0, 0, 0.7), and again after a boost of rapidity 0.9 along the first axis. The array is antisymmetric — checked entry by entry — so of its sixteen slots only six are independent, and those six are the three components of E and the three of cB. The boost does not act on E and B separately; it acts on the array, mixing the top row into the lower block, which is what 'the electric field in one frame is partly magnetic in another' means written down. Its two scalars, E·B = 0.000 and E² − c²B² = 1.110, are unchanged, and they are the only two an antisymmetric rank-two tensor has.

Six numbers, one object

Three components of E and three of B mix into each other under a boost and never into anything else. Six numbers that transform among themselves are the independent entries of a four-by-four antisymmetric array, and writing them that way is not notation — it turns Maxwell's four equations into two, makes the two invariants the only two there could be, and shows that "electric" is a choice of axes rather than a kind of field.

relativity · Field transformation What a beam's energy buys, three ways. The speed reached against the energy intercepted, measured in the body's own rest energy, for a perfect mirror pushed by a beam, a perfect absorber pushed by the same beam, and a photon rocket that carries the same energy as fuel and throws it out behind. The mirror's curve is γ(1 + β) = 1 + 2E/mc², a rapidity of ln(1 + 2E/mc²); the dots integrate the reflected beam's force, (2P/c)(1 − β)/(1 + β), and agree with it to 10⁻¹⁵. To reach 0.2c the mirror needs 0.1124 of its rest energy, the absorber 0.2500 and the photon rocket 0.2247 — for a 1 g sail, 10.1 terajoules against 20.2. The rocket's rapidity is ln(1 + E/mc²), so the mirror is the rocket with its fuel left at home and each joule used twice, once arriving and once leaving. The absorber does worst, because the energy it keeps becomes rest mass it then has to carry.

The rocket that leaves its fuel at home

A mirror pushed by a beam from the ground carries no propellant, and relativity gives its speed in closed form: its rapidity is ln(1 + 2E/mc²), the photon rocket's equation with the fuel left behind and every joule used twice. What stops it is not the energy, which can be stored for days, but diffraction, which fixes the distance over which the energy can be handed over — and so demands an acceleration of tens of thousands of g.

relativity · Mass-energy A delay the Planck scale would write into a burst. The arrival delay, relative to a low-energy photon emitted at the same moment, of photons of each energy from a gamma-ray burst at redshift 0.903, if light slowed in proportion to its energy over an energy scale, on logarithmic axes, for that scale at the Planck energy and at ten times and a tenth of it. At the Planck energy a 31 GeV photon would arrive 1.16 s late. The 31 GeV photon from GRB 090510 arrived 0.83 s after the burst began (marked), so a delay of more than that is excluded, and with it any scale below 1.4 times the Planck energy on this simple reading. Fermi's own analysis, allowing for when in the burst the photon could have been emitted, set the limit at 1.2 times the Planck energy: a speed that depends on energy at first order has been excluded at the scale where it was expected.

The photons that raced for seven billion years

Nothing on a laboratory bench can reach the Planck scale, but a gamma-ray burst halfway across the universe can amplify a Planck-scale effect until it is a second long. If spacetime has structure at the Planck length, the simplest guess is that light's speed depends slightly on its energy. Then a burst's high-energy photons would arrive measurably later than its low-energy ones, after a race lasting billions of years. In 2009 a 31 GeV photon from a burst 7.5 thousand million light-years away arrived within 0.83 s of the burst's start. That excludes the simplest version of the idea at the Planck energy itself.

astrophysics · Planck scale One spray of particles, seen from two frames. Massless particles sprayed evenly in every direction from a source, as distributions in two variables. Left: against the cosine of the angle from the beam axis, for the source at rest (flat) and the same source moving along the axis at 0.8c (peaked forward), which crowds the particles forward until 81 times as many go straight ahead as straight back. Right: the same two sprays against pseudorapidity, η = −ln tan(θ/2). In η the moving spray is the resting one moved over by 1.099, the rapidity of 0.8c, with its shape — ½ sech² η, a peak of 0.5 and a width of 1.76 at half height — unchanged. A boost along the beam that distorts every distribution in angle or velocity only translates a distribution in rapidity.

The angle a collider counts in logarithms

The two proton beams of the Large Hadron Collider meet head on with equal energies, so the collisions ought to happen at rest in the laboratory. They do not. Each collision is really between two fragments of protons carrying unknown, unequal shares of the momentum, and every one is moving along the beam at a different speed. Particle physicists therefore describe what comes out in a variable that a boost along the beam simply shifts: rapidity, the quantity in which speeds add. A detector cannot measure rapidity directly. It measures an angle, and converts it to a logarithm.

relativity · Velocity-addition A peak at half the mass, made by a sine. The momentum across the beam of the electron from 200,000 simulated W decays, as a probability density per GeV, for a W of mass 80.37 GeV. For a W exactly at rest across the beam, of exactly its mass (dashed), the electron carries M/2 = 40.19 GeV in the W's frame and shows a fraction sin θ of it across the beam, so the distribution climbs to a sharp peak at M/2 and stops: the Jacobian peak, piled up because sin θ hardly changes near θ = 90°. The W's natural width of 2.1 GeV rounds the peak (solid, peak at 39.9 GeV); its motion across the beam, a few GeV on average, smears it further and pushes a tail past M/2 (lighter). The position of the peak measures the mass, and is shifted by anything that moves the W.

The mass weighed without one of its pieces

A W boson decays into an electron and a neutrino, and the neutrino leaves every detector without a trace. Its mass cannot be found the usual way, by adding up the energy and momentum of what it decayed into, because half of what it decayed into is missing. What survives is the part of the motion across the beam, where the neutrino's momentum can be inferred from the imbalance it leaves. There the electron's momentum piles up at half the W's mass, and a quantity built from both particles ends at a sharp edge at the full mass. The world's best measurements of that edge disagree by seventy-five parts in eighty thousand.

relativity · Mass-energy A cloud thrown from one event into empty space. A spacetime diagram, time up, one space dimension across, light at 45° (the edges of the shaded cone). Particles leave one event at the bottom with 13 different speeds, equally spaced in rapidity from −2.10 to 2.10 — from 0.970c one way to the same the other — and coast in straight lines (thin). The curves are the hyperbolas on which every particle's own clock reads 1, 2, 3: the cloud's own instants. Measured along any one of them, the particles are evenly spaced — the cloud is uniform — and the spacing grows in proportion to the clock: it is expanding. Nothing here is curved and nothing is created; it is special relativity in flat spacetime, and every particle, the central one included, sees the same thing.

The universe one explosion makes in empty space

Throw particles out of a single event at every speed below light's and let them coast. Drawn on a spacetime diagram, nothing curves and nothing expands — it is special relativity in an empty box. Yet the particles, slicing their history by their own clocks, find themselves in a universe that is the same everywhere, expanding, obeying an exact Hubble law with no speed limit, and filling a space of constant negative curvature. Edward Milne built a cosmology on this in 1933, and it shows that 'space expanding' and 'galaxies moving' are two slicings of one set of worldlines.

relativity · Spacetime diagram

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

The Lorentz transformationVelocity-additionInvarianceLight coneReference frameCausalityThe Lorentz factorProper accelerationProper timeExhaust velocityField transformationFour-vector

All concepts