Spacetime diagram — where it appears
Named by 9 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Two axes, one speed, and a diagram that does the arguing
Put position across and time up, insist that light travels at forty-five degrees for everyone, and nearly every result in special relativity becomes something to read off rather than derive.
Now is a choice of slicing
Two events happening at the same time is not a fact about the events. It is a fact about who is asking, and different observers slice spacetime at different angles.
Speeds that refuse to add, and the quantity that does
Run at half the speed of light, throw something forward at half the speed of light, and the result is not the speed of light. It is four-fifths of it, and there is a variable in which the arithmetic is still simple addition.
The quantity nobody argues about
Relativity takes away the length of a rod and the duration of an event and hands back exactly one thing in their place. Its hyperbolae are what put a scale on the tilted axes of a spacetime diagram — without which the diagram is a picture with no units on it.
The contraction no photograph shows
Every textbook picture of a relativistically moving object drawn between 1905 and 1959 showed it squashed. A camera would have shown it turned. The contraction is entirely real in the measurement that defines it, and a photograph is not that measurement.
The diagram a ruler cannot read
A spacetime diagram is drawn on flat paper, and the geometry it depicts is not flat. The tick marking one second on a moving observer's axis sits further from the origin than the stationary observer's, by an amount that is not the Lorentz factor and means nothing at all.
The rod that is level for only one observer
A metre rod slides at high speed over a metre-wide hole in a thin plate. In the plate's frame the rod is contracted and drops through. In the rod's frame the hole is contracted, the rod is far too long for it, and it drops through anyway — because the instruction 'every point starts to fall now' names a different now for the rod. Its front end starts first, the start runs back along it, and the rod tips into the hole like a spear. Whether a moving thing is level is a question about which events are simultaneous, and so it has an answer only for an observer.
The spot that outruns light and carries nothing
Flick a laser pointer across the face of the Moon and the spot it makes crosses the Moon faster than light. Nothing is wrong with relativity: the spot is not a thing, and no part of it travels from one side to the other. Each lit point is lit by its own light, sent from the hand. What makes the spot worth studying is how strange such a non-thing is allowed to be. It can be born in the middle of the screen as a pair running apart; its speed can be made infinite, or reversed, merely by watching it from a moving frame; and the composition of velocities that caps everything real has nothing to say about it.
The universe one explosion makes in empty space
Throw particles out of a single event at every speed below light's and let them coast. Drawn on a spacetime diagram, nothing curves and nothing expands — it is special relativity in an empty box. Yet the particles, slicing their history by their own clocks, find themselves in a universe that is the same everywhere, expanding, obeying an exact Hubble law with no speed limit, and filling a space of constant negative curvature. Edward Milne built a cosmology on this in 1933, and it shows that 'space expanding' and 'galaxies moving' are two slicings of one set of worldlines.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Light coneThe Lorentz transformationCausalitySimultaneityInvariant intervalLength contractionProper timeVelocity-additionThe Lorentz factorRapidityReference framesRelativistic doppler