Spacetime diagram — where it appears
Named by 6 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Two axes, one speed, and a diagram that does the arguing
Put position across and time up, insist that light travels at forty-five degrees for everyone, and nearly every result in special relativity becomes something to read off rather than derive.
Now is a choice of slicing
Two events happening at the same time is not a fact about the events. It is a fact about who is asking, and different observers slice spacetime at different angles.
Speeds that refuse to add, and the quantity that does
Run at half the speed of light, throw something forward at half the speed of light, and the result is not the speed of light. It is four-fifths of it, and there is a variable in which the arithmetic is still simple addition.
The quantity nobody argues about
Relativity takes away the length of a rod and the duration of an event and hands back exactly one thing in their place. Its hyperbolae are what put a scale on the tilted axes of a spacetime diagram — without which the diagram is a picture with no units on it.
The contraction no photograph shows
Every textbook picture of a relativistically moving object drawn between 1905 and 1959 showed it squashed. A camera would have shown it turned. The contraction is entirely real in the measurement that defines it, and a photograph is not that measurement.
The diagram a ruler cannot read
A spacetime diagram is drawn on flat paper, and the geometry it depicts is not flat. The tick marking one second on a moving observer's axis sits further from the origin than the stationary observer's, by an amount that is not the Lorentz factor and means nothing at all.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
The Lorentz transformationLight coneCausalityInvariant intervalSimultaneityLength contractionThe Lorentz factorProper timeReference framesAberrationBlock universeClock synchronisation