Clock synchronisation — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Now is a choice of slicing
Two events happening at the same time is not a fact about the events. It is a fact about who is asking, and different observers slice spacetime at different angles.
The clock that is wrong in two directions
A satellite clock loses 7.2 microseconds a day to its speed and gains 45.9 to its height. The two effects have opposite signs, different sizes and different dependence on the orbit, so there is exactly one altitude where they cancel — and 38.6 microseconds a day, left alone, is eleven and a half kilometres of position error.
The ring where the two beams disagree
Send light both ways round a closed loop on a turntable and the two beams come back at different times, by 4AΩ/c² — an expression with no refractive index in it, no shape of the loop and no position of the axis. The same number is what a set of clocks round the rim fails to close by, which is the sharper statement — on a rotating platform there is no global simultaneity to be had.
How big now is
Three earlier arguments have established that a global now is a choice, that part of the choice is convention, and that for a rotating observer no consistent global choice exists at all. What survives is a size. Every observer has a local now, and how local is computable: on the rotating Earth it is 785 kilometres to the nanosecond, and a freely falling frame is inertial over the tolerance times the distance to the centre, divided by two.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Coordinate timeRelativity of simultaneitySimultaneityEquivalence principleProper timeReference frameRotating frameBlock universeCausalityEscape velocityGravitational redshiftGravitational time dilation