Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Length contraction — where it appears

The shortening of a moving object along its motion, which is a consequence of how simultaneity is sliced rather than a squeezing of anything. Measuring a moving length means locating both ends at once, and observers who disagree about at once necessarily disagree about the length.

Named by 15 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A spacetime diagram at β = 0.5. Position across, time up, in units where light travels at 45°. The shaded wedges are the future and past reachable by light; the tilted axes belong to an observer moving at 0.5 of the speed of light.

The length that depends on when, and is not really about length

A moving object is measured shorter. The contraction is real, it is not an illusion of light travel time, and it turns out to be a disagreement about simultaneity wearing a different costume.

relativity · Length contraction The same wire, seen twice at 0.6c. Above: the wire in the laboratory. The lattice is at rest and the electrons drift, so the electrons are the contracted ones — and the wire is neutral, which means their contracted spacing is what the manufacture of a neutral wire produced. Below: the same wire seen by something moving with the electrons at 0.6c. Now the electrons are at rest and the spacing between them stretches by γ = 1.250, while the lattice moves and its spacing contracts by the same factor. The two densities no longer cancel and the wire is charged. Nothing was done to the wire; the only thing that changed is who is looking, and the magnetic force in the first frame is the electric force in the second.

Magnetism is electricity seen sideways

The force on a charge moving beside a current-carrying wire is magnetic in the laboratory and purely electrostatic in the charge's own frame. Both calculations give the same answer, and the drift speed that makes them agree corresponds to a Lorentz factor differing from one in the twenty-sixth decimal place.

relativity · Field transformation Simultaneity at β = 0.866. Two events on the same horizontal line happen at the same time for the stationary observer. The moving observer slices spacetime along the tilted line, and for them one event happens before the other.

The pole that fits and does not fit

A twenty-metre pole is carried through a ten-metre barn at 0.866 of light speed, and both doors shut behind it. In the pole's own frame the barn is five metres long and there is plainly no room. Both accounts are correct, and the doors' closings are 57.8 nanoseconds apart in one of them.

relativity · Length contraction A cube photographed at four speeds. The outline a camera records of a cube passing at β = 0, β = 0.4, β = 0.7, β = 0.9, moving to the right, seen at the moment it passes. The dashed square is what the usual picture shows: the cube flattened along its motion by the Lorentz factor. It is not what the camera gets. Light from the far face left earlier than light from the near face, by the time it needed to cross the extra distance, and the cube moved in that interval — so the far face appears displaced backwards and the side of the cube comes into view. The two effects together are exactly a rotation: at β = 0.4 the cube photographs as one turned 23.6°, at β = 0.7 the cube photographs as one turned 44.4°, at β = 0.9 the cube photographs as one turned 64.2°. The contraction has not gone anywhere — a ruler laid alongside still reads 43.6 per cent of the proper length at the highest speed drawn — but it is a statement about two positions at one time, and a photograph is not that.

The contraction no photograph shows

Every textbook picture of a relativistically moving object drawn between 1905 and 1959 showed it squashed. A camera would have shown it turned. The contraction is entirely real in the measurement that defines it, and a photograph is not that measurement.

relativity · Length contraction Two rockets that keep their distance, and the string that does not. Two rockets 0.5 unit apart in the laboratory, given identical acceleration programmes there, drawn in units where the light speed is one and c²/a is one. Their laboratory separation is constant for ever — the two worldlines are the same curve shifted sideways, and every horizontal line meets them 0.5 apart. The slanted lines are the rockets' own lines of simultaneity, and the distance between the worldlines measured along those is what a string tied between them has to span: at 0.3c it is 0.512, a stretch of 2 per cent; at 0.6c it is 0.557, a stretch of 11 per cent; at 0.8c it is 0.631, a stretch of 26 per cent; at 0.9c it is 0.710, a stretch of 42 per cent. The γL that is always quoted — 0.524, 0.625, 0.833, 1.147 here — is the limit of that measurement for a vanishing gap, and at a gap of 0.5 in these units it overstates the stretch by up to 38.1 per cent; shrinking the gap a hundredfold brings the two within 0.46 per cent. Either way the string is stretched and breaks, while the gap in the laboratory never changes by a millimetre. Length contraction is not something that happens to a rod. It is a statement about which events count as simultaneous, and a rod that is not allowed to contract is a rod that is being pulled apart.

The string that breaks between two rockets

Two rockets a metre apart, given identical acceleration programmes, stay a metre apart in the laboratory for ever. A string tied between them breaks anyway. Nothing pulls on it, nothing in the laboratory moves relative to anything else, and the string is stretched — because the distance it has to span is measured on the rockets' slices of simultaneity and not on the laboratory's.

relativity · Length contraction How far a 1-gravity ship gets, against its own clock. The distance covered by a ship accelerating steadily at 1 gravity for half the trip and braking for the other half, against the time on its own clock, on a logarithmic vertical axis. The curve is a cosine hyperbolic and therefore an exponential once the ship is relativistic, which it is after about a year: Proxima Centauri in 3.5 shipboard years, Sirius in 4.6 shipboard years, the Pleiades in 11.9 shipboard years, the galactic centre in 19.8 shipboard years, Andromeda in 28.6 shipboard years. Nothing about this violates anything. The speed never reaches c — it is the hyperbolic tangent of the rapidity and after 3.5 years it is 0.9495 at turnover — and every one of those journeys takes slightly more than the distance in years as measured from home. What is growing exponentially is not the speed but the length contraction, and the traveller's honest description of the trip is that the distance shrank. The rapidity is what accumulates steadily: it grows by one unit every 0.969 years of shipboard time, for ever, with no ceiling anywhere in the arithmetic. That is the whole reason the numbers come out survivable, and the reason the fuel does not.

The ship that never arrives at c

Accelerate at one gravity and never stop. The speed creeps toward light and never reaches it, and meanwhile the galactic centre is twenty shipboard years away and Andromeda twenty-nine. What makes the journey survivable is that rapidity has no ceiling; what makes it impossible is that the fuel goes as the exponential of the same quantity.

relativity · Accelerated frames A circumference that is more than 2π times the radius. The ratio of a rotating disc's measured circumference to 2π times its measured radius, against the speed of the rim, together with the rate of a clock carried on the rim. Rulers laid round the rim lie along their own direction of motion and are contracted; rulers laid along a radius lie across it and are not. So the circumference takes more of them than a stationary observer counts and the radius takes the same number, and the ratio is γ: 1.091 at β = 0.4, 1.400 at β = 0.7, 2.294 at β = 0.9. The geometry a rotating observer measures is therefore not Euclidean, and it is not Euclidean by an amount that depends on where on the disc the measurement is made. That is the observation Einstein said set him on the road to describing gravity with curved geometry: here is an accelerated frame, and here is a geometry in it that no choice of Cartesian coordinates can flatten. The rim's clock runs slow by the same factor, so a rotating frame has neither a common time nor a flat space.

The disc that cannot be spun

Set a disc turning and measure its circumference with rulers carried on the rim. They lie along their own direction of motion and are contracted, so more of them fit; rulers along a radius lie across the motion and are not. The ratio of circumference to radius is therefore not two pi, in a frame where nothing is happening but rotation — and Einstein said that was what set him looking for gravity in geometry.

relativity · Length contraction Where the second tick actually goes. A spacetime diagram with a second observer's axes at β = 0.6. The hyperbolae are the sets of events one second and one metre from the origin — invariantly, by the interval — and every observer's unit tick is where their own axis crosses them. That is checked here rather than drawn by eye. The moving observer's one-second mark sits 1.458 times further from the origin on the page than the stationary one's, so a ruler laid on this picture reads the two frames on different scales. The picture is not distorted; the page is Euclidean and spacetime is not. The Lorentz factor here is 1.2500.

The diagram a ruler cannot read

A spacetime diagram is drawn on flat paper, and the geometry it depicts is not flat. The tick marking one second on a moving observer's axis sits further from the origin than the stationary observer's, by an amount that is not the Lorentz factor and means nothing at all.

relativity · Spacetime diagram Two things that change and one that does not. How a boost treats a piece of charged matter: the charge density rises by the Lorentz factor because the same charges occupy a contracted length, and the length falls by the same factor. At β = 0.6 the density is 1.250 times what it was and the length is 0.800 times, and their product is one to fourteen decimals across the whole range drawn. So the total charge is the same number in every frame, and it is the only quantity in the transformation that is. Charge density is the time component of a four-vector and transforms like an energy; charge itself is a scalar, and nothing about the observer changes it.

The one quantity a boost leaves alone

Energy, momentum, length, duration, density and field strength all change when the observer moves. Electric charge does not, and the whole of the field-transformation argument rests on it — so it is worth asking what the evidence is.

relativity · Field transformation Charge density and current, mixing like time and space. The charge density and the current density of a wire, against the rapidity of the frame they are measured in, starting from cρ = 0 and J = 2. They mix by exactly the transformation that mixes a time and a space coordinate — a hyperbolic rotation — and the combination c²ρ² − J² is unchanged at every rapidity, checked here to nine decimal places. A wire that is neutral in the laboratory is charged in every other frame, at exactly one rapidity out of all of them, and that single fact is the mechanism the first rung of this ladder tells as a story about two contracted lattices. Here it is a coordinate change.

Charge and current are one thing

Ask what a boost leaves alone and the answer is charge. That answer forces the next one: a fixed charge in a contracting volume gives a density that transforms like a time component, and a current that transforms like a space one. So charge density and current density are the four parts of one object — and conservation of charge stops being an extra law and becomes the condition that makes the object exist.

relativity · Field transformation An orbit that flattens without being told to. The path of a classical electron relative to its nucleus, in the laboratory, before and after the nucleus has been accelerated gently — over 200 orbits — from rest to 0.6 of the speed of light along the horizontal, computed from Maxwell's field of a moving charge and the relativistic law of motion alone. Before, the orbit is a circle of radius 1. After, it is an ellipse 0.810 wide along the motion and 1.012 across it, a ratio of 0.8003 against 1/γ = 0.8000, and one turn takes 1.2504 times as long as before, against γ = 1.2500. Nothing in the calculation assumed a contraction or a slowing clock: the forces between the moving charges produced both.

The contraction the forces work out for themselves

Relativity usually introduces length contraction as a consequence of how moving observers disagree about simultaneity, not as something that happens to matter. There is a second way to reach the same number, and it is worth knowing because it is the way the idea was first found. Take an atom, accelerate its nucleus gently, and compute what the electron does using only Maxwell's field of a moving charge and the law of motion. Nobody tells the orbit to contract, and it does, by exactly 1/γ, while each turn takes exactly γ times as long. The forces holding matter together work out the contraction for themselves.

relativity · Length contraction Two factors of γ between a magnet and an X-ray. An electron of 6 GeV (γ = 11742) crossing an undulator, a row of magnets alternating every λᵤ = 3 cm. Top: the laboratory, where the electron wiggles once per period. Middle: the electron's own frame, where the row is contracted by γ to 2.55 μm and rushes past at nearly the speed of light; to the electron it is a wave of that wavelength, and the electron radiates at it, in the infrared. Bottom: that light, emitted forward and seen back in the laboratory, is Doppler-shortened by a further factor of about 2γ, to λᵤ/2γ² = 1.088 Å; the wiggle's own slowing of the electron adds a factor (1 + K²/2), giving 1.632 Å for a deflection parameter K = 1 — hard X-rays from centimetre magnets. The drawing is schematic: the three periods differ by factors of about twelve thousand and a hundred million, and cannot be drawn to one scale.

The magnet period that comes out as an X-ray

A row of permanent magnets alternating every three centimetres, with a beam of six-gigaelectronvolt electrons sent down the middle, shines X-rays with a wavelength of an ångström and a half — two hundred million times shorter than the spacing of the magnets that made them. The factor is γ squared, and the two γ's come from two different frames. In the electron's frame the row of magnets is contracted by γ and rushes past it as a wave; the electron shakes in step and radiates; and that light, sent forward, comes back to the laboratory shortened by another factor of 2γ. Length contraction is half of every X-ray a modern synchrotron makes.

relativity · Length contraction In the rod's frame: a long rod threads through, front first. The same events seen from the rod's own frame, computed by transforming each point's motion from the hole's frame. Here the rod is its full length and the hole is the contracted one, 0.60 of it, sweeping left at 0.8c — a long rod over a short hole. But the moment each point starts to fall is not one moment in this frame: the front end starts at t′ = −1.07, the rear end at −0.27, and each point then falls at γu = 0.50c. While the start of the fall runs back along it the rod is bent, level behind and sloping in front; once every point is falling it is straight again and tilted, front down, by 21.8°. It threads through the hole front first as the hole slides under it, each part dropping below the plate just before the plate's far edge reaches it. It passes through in both frames; only the order of events along it differs.

The rod that is level for only one observer

A metre rod slides at high speed over a metre-wide hole in a thin plate. In the plate's frame the rod is contracted and drops through. In the rod's frame the hole is contracted, the rod is far too long for it, and it drops through anyway — because the instruction 'every point starts to fall now' names a different now for the rod. Its front end starts first, the start runs back along it, and the rod tips into the hole like a spear. Whether a moving thing is level is a question about which events are simultaneous, and so it has an answer only for an observer.

relativity · Simultaneity How fast each point of a fast wheel moves. The speed through the ground of each point on the rim of a rolling wheel, in units of the speed of light, against the point's angle round the rim measured from the bottom, for axles moving at 0.5c, 0.8c, 0.95c. The dashed curves are the everyday answer, 2v sin(α/2), which puts the top at twice the axle's speed and would carry it past light. Composed relativistically, the bottom is still at rest and the top moves at 2v/(1 + v²/c²): 0.800c, 0.976c, 0.999c, always below c. Every point of the rim stays slower than light, and the fast part of the wheel is flattened into a broad plateau over the top.

The wheel whose top cannot go twice as fast

The top of a rolling wheel moves at twice the speed of its axle, and the bottom is momentarily at rest — two facts every cyclist's spokes show, blurred at the top and sharp at the bottom. Roll the wheel at a large fraction of the speed of light and the second fact survives exactly while the first cannot: the top moves at 2v/(1 + v²/c²), never as fast as light. Caught at one instant of the ground's time the spokes are bent, and over one turn the wheel advances not the circumference measured from its axle but γ times it — the rim's own length, laid down on the ground by a contact point that does not move.

relativity · Velocity-addition One lever, two frames, two different torques. A right-angled lever pivoted at its corner, with arms of length L, held still by a force F at the end of each arm, perpendicular to it. Left, in the lever's own frame: torque FL anticlockwise from the horizontal arm's force, FL clockwise from the vertical arm's, and they cancel. Right, the same lever seen moving to the right at 0.8 of the speed of light: the horizontal arm, along the motion, is contracted to L/γ = 0.60L, and the force on it, which is across the motion, is reduced to F/γ = 0.60F; the vertical arm and its force, along the motion, are unchanged. The torques are now 0.36FL and FL, and the lever is twisted clockwise by 0.64FL — the square of its speed as a fraction of light's. It does not turn.

The lever that is twisted and does not turn

A right-angled lever held still by two equal forces has no net torque on it. Watch the same lever go by at high speed and one arm is shorter, one force is weaker, and the torques no longer cancel — yet the lever goes by without turning. Nothing is wrong with either frame's arithmetic. The forces are doing work on the moving lever, the energy they put in is flowing through its arms, and a flow of energy carries momentum that points across the lever's motion: a body that moves straight with a momentum that does not.

relativity · Mass-energy

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

The Lorentz transformationThe Lorentz factorReference framesSimultaneityCharge densityField transformationInvariant intervalProper lengthRelativity of simultaneitySpacetime diagramTime dilationWorldline

All concepts