Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Electric field — where it appears

The force per unit charge at a point, treated as a property of the space rather than of whatever charge is placed there to feel it. Treating it as real rather than as a bookkeeping device becomes unavoidable once it carries energy and momentum away from its source, which it does the moment anything accelerates.

Named by 21 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The field of a dipole. Field lines traced from a positive charge toward a negative one. Every line does eventually close on the negative charge, but the outer ones loop far outside any frame, so this picture is a crop rather than the whole field.

Field lines are a choice, not a discovery

Nothing in space is arranged in lines. The lines are a drawing convention — and an unusually good one, because three separate facts about the field survive the translation.

electromagnetism · The field concept The same field, sampled as arrows. The field at a grid of points, each arrow pointing the way a positive test charge would be pushed and scaled by the strength there.

The field before the lines were drawn on it

A field is a vector attached to every point of space. Drawing it as arrows on a grid is honest and ugly; drawing it as lines is beautiful and throws information away.

electromagnetism · The field concept A closed surface with the charge inside. Every field line from the enclosed charge crosses the surface exactly once on its way out, so the net flux counts the charge.

Counting what comes out, and never looking inside

Draw any closed surface. The field crossing it depends only on the charge enclosed — not on where that charge sits, not on its shape, not on anything outside.

electromagnetism · Gauss's law Equipotentials, with the field lines that cross them. Contours of constant potential, traced by marching squares, with field lines traced along the gradient of the same potential. The two families meet at right angles everywhere, which is a consequence of the field being the gradient rather than a property of the drawing.

One number for every point, and nothing at all is lost

The electric field is three numbers at every point of space. Replacing it with one number loses nothing — and the reason it loses nothing is the same reason a hill can be drawn as a contour map.

electromagnetism · Potential A conductor in a field, with the surface charge solved for. Field lines approaching an isolated conducting cylinder. The surface charge was found by requiring the conductor to be an equipotential, and the lines then end on that charge, meeting the surface at right angles and leaving the interior empty.

The inside of a conductor, where the field is exactly nothing

Put a metal object in any electric field and the field inside it is zero. Not small — zero, by an argument that takes one sentence, and with consequences that reach from lightning to the most precise test of Coulomb's law ever made.

electromagnetism · Conductors Two plates 0.20 plate-widths apart, with the field traced. The electric field between two oppositely charged plates separated by 0.20 of their own width, traced by following the field of 26 discrete charges on each plate rather than drawn as parallel lines. In the middle the lines are straight and evenly spaced; near the ends they bow outward. The field nine-tenths of the way to the edge is 80 per cent of the field at the centre.

How much charge a shape will hold, before anything is charged

Capacitance is decided by geometry alone. Two pieces of metal have a number attached to them, fixed by their shape and their separation, and it is settled before any charge arrives.

electromagnetism · Conductors The same wire, seen twice at 0.6c. Above: the wire in the laboratory. The lattice is at rest and the electrons drift, so the electrons are the contracted ones — and the wire is neutral, which means their contracted spacing is what the manufacture of a neutral wire produced. Below: the same wire seen by something moving with the electrons at 0.6c. Now the electrons are at rest and the spacing between them stretches by γ = 1.250, while the lattice moves and its spacing contracts by the same factor. The two densities no longer cancel and the wire is charged. Nothing was done to the wire; the only thing that changed is who is looking, and the magnetic force in the first frame is the electric force in the second.

Magnetism is electricity seen sideways

The force on a charge moving beside a current-carrying wire is magnetic in the laboratory and purely electrostatic in the charge's own frame. Both calculations give the same answer, and the drift speed that makes them agree corresponds to a Lorentz factor differing from one in the twenty-sixth decimal place.

relativity · Field transformation The energy of a capacitor, booked as a density. The energy stored by a parallel-plate capacitor of 200 square centimetres — 0.0200 square metres — against the separation of its plates, drawn twice. Held at 15 nC the energy rises in proportion to the separation; held at 169 V it falls as the inverse. Both curves are obtained by integrating the energy density ½ε₀E² over the volume between the plates, and each agrees with ½QV to better than a part in 10¹². The two describe the same capacitor at 2.00 mm, where they cross at 1.27 µJ, and there their slopes are equal and opposite: the attraction between the plates is 635 µN, or 6.353·10⁻⁴ N, whichever quantity is held fixed. That force is Q²/2ε₀A — a property of the field in the gap and of the area it crosses, with no reference to the plates at all.

Where the energy of a field actually is

A charged capacitor holds 1.27 µJ, and two entirely different accounts agree on the number: one built from charges and potentials, one built from joules per cubic metre of empty space. They part company at a resistor, where the power arrives sideways through the surface at 1.67 W.

electromagnetism · Field energy Equipotentials, with the field lines that cross them. Contours of constant potential, traced by marching squares, with field lines traced along the gradient of the same potential. The two families meet at right angles everywhere, which is a consequence of the field being the gradient rather than a property of the drawing.

The attraction that needs no charge

Gauss's law says nothing comes out of a neutral molecule, and yet water's field one nanometre away reaches 1.1 × 10⁸ V/m. What survives when the monopole vanishes is a separation, and every step down the tower of falloffs below it is paid for with one more order of cancellation.

electromagnetism · The field concept The plane deleted, and one charge put in its place. A charge of 1 nC held 20 mm above an earthed conducting plane. The lines are traced through the field of the real charge plus an equal and opposite one at the mirror position, and then cut at the plane, because below it there is metal and no field whatever. Nothing in the tracing knows about the surface: each line follows the local field direction and stops where it arrives. That every one of them arrives perpendicular — the worst departure among the 9 drawn is 2.2° away from square — is the boundary condition showing itself rather than a rule imposed on the drawing. The image charge is drawn faint because it is not there: it is a way of writing a function that happens to satisfy the equation and the boundary values, which by the uniqueness theorem makes it the field and not a model of the field.

The charge that has to be somewhere else

Hold a charge above an earthed metal sheet and the field above it is exactly the field of two charges — the real one and an imaginary partner buried at the mirror position. The partner is not an analogy or an approximation. It is a legal guess, and a legal guess is a proof.

electromagnetism · Conductors A loop at rest carrying 2.2e-12 kg m/s. A square loop of area 100 cm² carrying 20 amps, sitting still in a uniform electric field of 1.00 megavolts a metre. The carriers going up the field on one side cross 100 kilovolts on the way, so the ones in the top wire are less energetic than those in the bottom by that much per unit charge. The current is the same all the way round, so the same number of carriers pass per second in each wire — but they carry different energy, and momentum is energy times velocity over c². The two wires therefore contribute unequally, and the difference is 2.23e-12 kilogram metres a second, pointing across both the field and the dipole. Nothing in the picture is moving as a whole. The electromagnetic field round the loop carries exactly that momentum the other way.

The momentum of something that is not moving

A current loop sitting still in an electric field has momentum in the space around it. Nothing is moving, so something must be carrying an equal and opposite amount — and it is the loop, whose carriers on the high-potential side are more energetic than those on the low.

electromagnetism · Field energy Two things that change and one that does not. How a boost treats a piece of charged matter: the charge density rises by the Lorentz factor because the same charges occupy a contracted length, and the length falls by the same factor. At β = 0.6 the density is 1.250 times what it was and the length is 0.800 times, and their product is one to fourteen decimals across the whole range drawn. So the total charge is the same number in every frame, and it is the only quantity in the transformation that is. Charge density is the time component of a four-vector and transforms like an energy; charge itself is a scalar, and nothing about the observer changes it.

The one quantity a boost leaves alone

Energy, momentum, length, duration, density and field strength all change when the observer moves. Electric charge does not, and the whole of the field-transformation argument rests on it — so it is worth asking what the evidence is.

relativity · Field transformation What the plane between them carries. The stress transmitted across the plane halfway between two charges of 10 nC held 1 cm apart, against distance from the axis in units of the half-separation. For two like charges the field on that plane lies entirely in it — checked here rather than assumed — so the plane sees only the pressure across the lines, the stress is negative everywhere, and the two halves are pushed apart. For opposite charges the field on the plane is entirely perpendicular to it, the plane sees only the tension along the lines, the stress is positive, and the halves are pulled together. Faraday's two words for a field line, tension along it and pressure across it, are exactly these two curves; the whole content of the tensor is that they are the same quantity, ε₀E²/2, wearing two signs. The force is what is left after integrating either curve over the plane, and both integrals come to the same magnitude — the Coulomb force — which is the next figure.

The force read off a surface that touches nothing

Draw any closed surface through empty space, measure the field on it, and the sum of one expression over that surface is the total force on everything inside — whatever the contents are, and without knowing anything about them. The expression is Maxwell's stress tensor, and it turns Faraday's guess about tension along a field line into an exact statement.

electromagnetism · Field energy Three charges, three orbits, one drift. Three particles released at rest in crossed fields — 1000 V/m across 0.1 T — with their paths integrated by a scheme that rotates the velocity rather than adding to it, so the magnetic part changes no speeds. The three loops have wildly different sizes and periods: the the electron turns at 2799.25 MHz, the proton turns at 1.52 MHz, the α particle turns at 0.76 MHz. Their guiding centres all creep along the same line at the same rate, measured here from the orbits at -1.000e+4, -1.000e+4 and -1.000e+4 m/s against −E/B = -1.000e+4 m/s, a spread of -0.00 per cent. Neither the charge nor the mass nor the sign appears in the answer. A plasma in crossed fields therefore moves bodily and carries no current from this drift at all, which is the opposite of what an intuition built on ions being heavier than electrons expects.

The drift that does not care what the charge is

A charge in a uniform magnetic field goes round in a circle and arrives nowhere. Add anything at all — an electric field, gravity, a gradient in the magnetic field itself — and the circle's centre creeps sideways, at right angles to both. One of those drifts is the same for every particle regardless of charge, sign or mass; the others are not, and the difference decides what a plasma does.

electromagnetism · Magnetism Six numbers, one object. The electromagnetic field tensor written out as the four-by-four array it is, for a field with E = (0.4, 1.2, 0) and cB = (0, 0, 0.7), and again after a boost of rapidity 0.9 along the first axis. The array is antisymmetric — checked entry by entry — so of its sixteen slots only six are independent, and those six are the three components of E and the three of cB. The boost does not act on E and B separately; it acts on the array, mixing the top row into the lower block, which is what 'the electric field in one frame is partly magnetic in another' means written down. Its two scalars, E·B = 0.000 and E² − c²B² = 1.110, are unchanged, and they are the only two an antisymmetric rank-two tensor has.

Six numbers, one object

Three components of E and three of B mix into each other under a boost and never into anything else. Six numbers that transform among themselves are the independent entries of a four-by-four antisymmetric array, and writing them that way is not notation — it turns Maxwell's four equations into two, makes the two invariants the only two there could be, and shows that "electric" is a choice of axes rather than a kind of field.

relativity · Field transformation Four places where three charges' fields cancel. Field lines in the plane of three equal positive point charges at the corners of an equilateral triangle, with every point where the field is zero marked. There are four: one at the centre, and three more on the lines from the centre to the middle of each side, 0.164 of a side from the centre. Four is (n − 1)² for three charges, the largest number Maxwell conjectured any three charges could make. Each zero is a saddle: along some directions the field pushes a test charge back and along others away, so none of them can hold anything still.

The zeros a handful of charges can make

Between two equal charges there is a point where their fields cancel. With three there can be two such points, or one, or four. Every such point is a saddle, never a place where a charge could rest. In two dimensions the count is fixed by algebra: n equal line charges make exactly n − 1 zeros, the roots of a polynomial's derivative. In three dimensions nobody knows the answer. In 1873 Maxwell conjectured that n point charges can make at most (n − 1)² zeros. Three charges on a triangle make exactly four, and the conjecture has not been proved even for three charges.

electromagnetism · The field concept The voltage a gas gap can hold, on one curve. The breakdown voltage of a gap in air between flat electrodes against the product of pressure and gap width, on logarithmic scales — Paschen's law, in which pressure and gap enter only as their product because both count how many collisions an electron makes on the way across. Townsend's model, with γ = 0.01 electrons freed per ion at the cathode, has its minimum of 305 V at 1.12 Pa·m — a gap of 11 μm at atmospheric pressure, or 112 Pa across a centimetre. Measured minima in air are about 330 V. To the left the gap is too short, or the gas too thin, for an electron to make enough collisions, and the voltage climbs steeply; below about 0.41 Pa·m there is no gas breakdown at any voltage. To the right, collisions are so frequent that an electron gains too little energy between them, and the voltage rises nearly in proportion to pd. Dashed, the empirical law for air at larger pd: 31.4 kV for a centimetre at one atmosphere, against the model's 35.5.

The spark that needs room to start

Air is an excellent insulator until it is not, and the usual statement of when — three megavolts a metre — is true only for gaps of about a centimetre. A gap breaks down when one electron's avalanche of ionisation sends back enough ions to the cathode to free one more electron, and that condition depends on the pressure and the gap only through their product. The result is a curve with a floor: about 330 volts in air, below which no gap of any width will spark, and above which both a thinner gas and a denser one insulate better.

electromagnetism · Dielectrics A current that grows thirty decades with the field. The current density of electrons tunnelling out of a cold metal against the field at its surface, on a logarithmic scale, from the Fowler–Nordheim law, for work functions of 2.7 eV (lanthanum hexaboride), 4.5 eV (tungsten) and 5.6 eV (a surface barely willing to let electrons go). For tungsten the current is 0.009 A/m² at 2 GV/m, 5·10⁵ at 4 GV/m and 6·10⁹ at 8 GV/m — rising by more than twenty orders of magnitude between 1 and 4 GV/m. The work function sits in the exponent as a three-halves power, so lowering it from 4.5 to 2.7 eV raises the current at 3 GV/m by a factor of 2·10⁵. A current density of a million amperes per square metre, an ordinary working value for a field emitter, needs about 4.2 GV/m on tungsten.

The electrons a field pulls from cold metal

A metal holds its electrons behind a step a few electronvolts high, and to get them out the usual way is to heat the metal white-hot until some climb over it. Put a strong enough field outside instead and the step tilts into a triangle a couple of nanometres wide, and electrons leave a cold metal by tunnelling through it. The current grows thirty decades as the field rises tenfold, a sharp needle at a thousand volts reaches the field that a flat plate would need a million volts for, and the electrons that come out all have nearly the same energy — which is why the brightest, sharpest electron microscopes are fed from a single etched tungsten point.

quantum · Tunnelling The field round a thin wire. The electric field against distance from the axis, on a logarithmic axis, for a wire inside a coaxial cylinder of radius 10 cm at 60 kV, for wire radii of 0.2, 1 and 5 mm; the dashed line is 30 kV/cm, the field at which air breaks down across a gap of a few centimetres, and each curve starts at its wire's surface. The field falls as 1/ρ, so it is concentrated at a thin wire: 483 kV/cm at the surface of the 0.2 mm wire, 130 at the 1 mm wire and 40.1 at the 5 mm one. The field exceeds 30 kV/cm only within 3.2 mm of the axis for the thinnest wire, 4.3 mm for the middle one and 6.7 mm for the thickest; across the remaining nine centimetres the air is far below breakdown, so ionisation can start at the wire and has nowhere to go.

The glow a thin wire wears before it sparks

Raise the voltage on a thin wire inside a metal tube and, long before anything sparks across, the wire starts to glow faintly violet and to hiss. The air right next to it is ionising, and the air a millimetre further out is not. The field round a wire falls away so fast that an avalanche of ionisation can start at the surface and find nowhere to go. That partial breakdown, corona, costs power lines energy in the rain, sets the size of the wires they are made from, cleans the smoke from chimneys and counts particles in detectors — and the field it needs is not a property of air but of the wire's radius.

electromagnetism · Dielectrics Charges released on a field line do not stay on it. A positive and a negative charge (left and right) with their field lines (thin), and the paths of a light positive test charge released at rest from four points 0.32 charge-separations from the positive charge, at 20°, 40°, 55°, 70° from the axis (thick), each beside the field line through its own starting point (dashed). Each path sets off exactly along its line — at rest, the acceleration is the only thing with a direction — and then swings wide of it, because the charge carries its velocity round the bend while the line turns. All four miss the negative charge and leave the frame, never to return, although the field line from every starting point ends on it.

The path a charge takes is not its field line

A field line is drawn by stepping along the direction of the force, and it is natural to read it as the route a charge would take. It is not. A field line is the curve whose direction is the force; a charge's path is the curve whose bending is the force, and the two agree only where the charge starts from rest. A charge released beside a dipole sets off along its line and then swings wide of it, carried by the speed it has gained; a charge launched round a point charge circles it on an ellipse that crosses every line. Only two things make a charge keep to its line: enough friction that it never has a speed of its own, or a magnetic field.

electromagnetism · The field concept How much a tiny imbalance of charge would take off a body's weight. The electric repulsion between the parts of any body, as a fraction of their mutual gravity, if every nucleon carried an unbalanced charge δ (in units of the electron's), on logarithmic axes. It is (δ/δc)², with δc = 8.93 × 10⁻¹⁹, for a grain of sand, a planet or a galaxy alike. At the imbalance Lyttleton and Bondi proposed, 2 × 10⁻¹⁸, repulsion would beat gravity 5.0 times over, everywhere — their mechanism for an expanding universe. Experiments with gas let out of tanks had bounded the imbalance near 10⁻²⁰ within a year, where the ratio is 1.3·10⁻⁴, and modern ones near 10⁻²¹, 1.3·10⁻⁶.

The imbalance of charge that would outweigh gravity

Gravity and electricity both fall as the inverse square, so Gauss's law treats them identically: the field of any round body counts what is inside it. If every nucleon in ordinary matter carried a tiny unbalanced charge, the body's charge would follow its mass everywhere, and its electric repulsion would be a fixed fraction of its gravity at every size from a grain of sand to the universe. Below about one part in a billion billion of an electron's charge, gravity always wins; above it, repulsion always does. In 1959 two astronomers proposed that the universe expands because the true imbalance is just above that line.

electromagnetism · Gauss's law

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Field linesField energyThe inverse-square lawElectric potentialEquipotentialGauss's lawMagnetic fieldSuperpositionSurface chargeBoundary conditionsConductorConservation laws

All concepts