Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Threshold — where it appears

A value below which nothing happens at all, distinguishing an instability from a response that is merely proportional to what causes it. Its existence usually signals a competition between two effects with different scalings, and the threshold is where the ratio of the two passes one.

Named by 7 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Photocurrent against applied voltage, at two intensities. Photocurrent against retarding voltage for caesium lit at 12×10¹⁴ hertz, at relative intensities of 1 and 2. Both curves reach zero at the same stopping voltage of 2.82 volts, because the brighter light delivers more photons and not more energetic ones. The saturation currents are in the ratio of the intensities. The slope between the stopping voltage and zero assumes the emitted electrons' energies are spread uniformly below the maximum, which they are not; the crossing point does not depend on that assumption.

Light arrives in lumps, and brightness only changes how many

Shine dim blue light on a metal and electrons come out. Shine intense red light and none do, however long the wait. The frequency decides whether anything happens; the intensity decides only how much.

quantum · Photon Where modulating a system sets it going. The regions of the modulation plane in which an oscillator with a damping ratio of 0.02 will not stay still. The horizontal axis is the modulation frequency in units of the oscillator's own; the vertical is how deeply the stiffness is modulated. Inside a shaded wedge the state of rest is unstable and any disturbance grows exponentially; outside it, nothing happens at all. The wedges sit at modulation frequencies of twice, once and two-thirds of the natural frequency, and the first is much the widest — it opens at a depth of 8.0%, against 40.0% for the second. Each boundary is found by integrating one period of the modulation from two independent starts and asking whether the resulting map has a multiplier outside the unit circle, then bisecting on the depth; none of the shape is drawn by hand. Without damping every wedge would come to a point on the axis and there would be no threshold at all — the flat bottom of each is damping, and it is why a swing has to be pumped hard enough before it does anything.

The swing that is pumped, not pushed

Nobody pushes a swing they are sitting on. They stand up at the bottom and sit down at the ends, which changes the pendulum rather than forcing it — and does so twice per period. The equation that describes it has no forcing term at all, so standing still is always a solution, and what the pumping changes is whether standing still is stable.

waves · Resonance What a collision has to spend, against what it is given. The energy available in a proton–proton collision, against the energy of one beam, on logarithmic axes. Against a stationary target the available energy is √(2mE) and the line has slope one half; head-on it is 2E and the slope is one. Bevatron at 6.2 GeV per beam reaches 3.7 GeV; SPS fixed target at 450 GeV per beam reaches 29.1 GeV; LEP at 104.5 GeV per beam reaches 209.0 GeV; Tevatron at 980 GeV per beam reaches 1960.0 GeV; LHC at 6500 GeV per beam reaches 13000.0 GeV. The gap is the whole architecture of the subject: the LHC's beams give 13000 GeV head-on and would give 110 GeV against a stationary proton, a factor of 118. Reaching the same 13000 GeV in fixed-target mode would need a beam of 90.1 million GeV. What the missing energy has gone into is not lost: it is the kinetic energy of the centre of mass, which every product has to carry away and which no experiment can use.

The collision that wastes most of the energy

The LHC's two beams carry 6,500 GeV each and 13,000 GeV are available. Fire one of those beams at a stationary block of copper instead and 110 GeV are available — the other 12,890 have gone into the motion of the wreckage and cannot be used for anything. The difference is a square root, and every accelerator built since 1970 is a consequence of it.

relativity · Relativistic dynamics An absorption that goes up when the photon gets harder. Mass attenuation coefficients for 4 materials against photon energy, both logarithmic, from tabulated measurements interpolated between. Away from a threshold every curve falls steeply — a harder photon is less easily absorbed, which is what makes X-rays penetrating. At a K edge the curve jumps upward: the photon has become able to eject an innermost electron, a whole new population becomes available, and the absorption multiplies by 4.4 for iodine at 33.17 keV and 4.0 for lead at 88 keV. That is a discontinuity in a material property as a function of frequency, and nothing in the classical description of absorption produces one. It exists because absorption at these energies is a transition of a bound electron rather than a loss in a medium.

The steps in an absorption curve

Every absorption law up to this point is smooth — a fixed loss per cycle, a relaxation, a power of frequency. Take the photon energy up to where it can eject an electron from an atom and the curve acquires steps, and they go the wrong way: the material becomes suddenly more opaque to a harder photon. Iodine absorbs four times as strongly at 33.4 keV as at 33.0, and that discontinuity is why it is injected into people.

waves · Attenuation The edge that is a straight line, not a step. The absorption of gallium arsenide near its own band gap of 1.424 electronvolts, on a logarithmic axis, at 4 temperatures. Below the gap the absorption does not stop; it falls exponentially, along a straight line whose slope is an energy, and the straightness holds over several decades. Raising the temperature makes the line shallower — the tail reaches further below the gap — and the slope runs from 5.6 millielectronvolts at 10 kelvin to 7.5 at 300, a factor of 1.33. The lines pivot about a point just above the gap rather than rotating about nothing, which is what makes the slope a single number worth quoting. The band gap's own shift with temperature has been removed here, so that the fan is the tail's doing and not the gap's.

Below the gap, where there is nothing to absorb

A semiconductor is supposed to be transparent below its band gap, and it is not. The absorption falls exponentially instead, over seven decades, along a straight line whose slope is an energy of a few millielectronvolts — and the description that produces that line has no states in the gap at all. What the slope measures is how much the gap itself is moving about.

waves · Attenuation The cone a charge leaves behind in water. A charged particle crossing water at 0.99 of the speed of light in vacuum, which is 1.317 times the speed of light in water, drawn at one instant. From each point it passed, its field set off a spherical wavelet travelling at c/n; the wavelets from earlier points have grown larger. Because the particle outruns them, they all touch one cone with its tip at the particle, at an angle θ = arccos(1/nβ) = 40.6° to the path — the light of Cherenkov radiation, which travels out perpendicular to the cone. No point on the path is special and the particle never accelerates: the radiation is a property of the field moving faster than the medium can carry it, the electromagnetic counterpart of a sonic boom or a boat's wake.

Why the glow of a fast charge is blue

A charge moving in a straight line at constant speed does not radiate — in a vacuum. In water, if it moves faster than light does in water, it glows, and the glow is blue. The cone of the light is the familiar half of the story. The other half is a count: Frank and Tamm's formula says each centimetre of water yields about two hundred visible photons, in numbers that rise as the inverse square of the wavelength, which is why a reactor pool shines blue and why the light keeps getting stronger into the ultraviolet until water stops being transparent. The charge never accelerates. What radiates is the water.

astrophysics · Radiating charge Too little noise, the right amount, too much. The particle's position over 8 cycles of the push (thin grey line, scaled to the wells), with noise of intensity 0.03, 0.085, 0.3 (top to bottom), the barrier being 0.25. With little noise it stays almost always in its starting well and only trembles: 0 hops in eight cycles. With noise 0.085 it hops 30 times, almost always once per half-cycle and almost always while the push is helping — a clean square wave following a push too weak to cause a single hop. With noise 0.3 it hops 285 times, at random, and the push is lost again. There is a best amount of noise, and it is not zero.

The noise that helps a weak signal through

A system that can sit in either of two states, nudged back and forth by a periodic push too weak to switch it, does nothing at all — until noise is added. Then it begins to switch, and with the right amount of noise it switches in step with the push, once each half-cycle, as though the push had been strong enough all along. Too little noise and it never switches; too much and it switches at random. The response peaks at a nonzero noise, which is why the effect is called a resonance, and why crayfish, paddlefish and human fingertips appear to use it.

waves · Resonance

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

AbsorptionAttenuationSpectrumAmplitudeApproximationBand gapBinding energyBistabilityBlackbodyCentre of massCherenkov radiationConservation

All concepts