Cherenkov radiation — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The momentum light carries into glass
A pulse of light in glass has two momenta, nE/c and E/nc, and for a century the argument was about which one is right. Both are measured. A free block that the light crosses must move forward, which only Abraham's value explains; a Cherenkov cone exists at all, which only Minkowski's allows. They answer different questions, and the difference between them is momentum carried by the glass.
Why the glow of a fast charge is blue
A charge moving in a straight line at constant speed does not radiate — in a vacuum. In water, if it moves faster than light does in water, it glows, and the glow is blue. The cone of the light is the familiar half of the story. The other half is a count: Frank and Tamm's formula says each centimetre of water yields about two hundred visible photons, in numbers that rise as the inverse square of the wavelength, which is why a reactor pool shines blue and why the light keeps getting stronger into the ultraviolet until water stops being transparent. The charge never accelerates. What radiates is the water.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
DispersionRefractive indexCentre of massField momentumGroup velocityMomentum conservationNeutrino detectionParticle identificationPolarisation densityPseudomomentumRadiating chargeThreshold