Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Skin depth — where it appears

The distance a changing magnetic field penetrates into a conductor before falling by a factor of e. It is the square root of two over the permeability, conductivity and angular frequency — nine millimetres in copper at fifty hertz, two micrometres at a gigahertz, and infinite for a steady field.

Named by 8 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Skin depth against frequency, over eleven decades. The skin depth of copper, stainless steel, seawater, mu-metal against frequency, both axes logarithmic. Every line has the same slope, −½, because the depth goes as the inverse square root of the frequency for all of them; what separates them is conductivity and permeability, which enter the same way. Three points are marked and each is a practical fact. Copper at mains frequency has a skin depth of 9.22 mm, so a busbar of that thickness carries current throughout and a thicker one does not. Copper at a gigahertz has 2.1 µm, so the current in a microwave component runs in a layer thinner than the plating and the surface finish becomes the conductor. Seawater at the frequency navies use to signal submerged submarines has 28.9 m, which is why that link is measured in tens of hertz and carries a few characters a minute. Mu-metal is the outlier and the reason it exists: its conductivity is forty times worse than copper's and its permeability twenty thousand times better, so at low frequency it is the one material on the chart that is thin.

How far a field gets into metal

Every static argument about conductors says the field inside one is zero, and every one assumes the electrons have had time to move. Give them less time and the field gets in — 9.2 millimetres into copper at mains frequency, 2.1 microns at a gigahertz — and the metal box that silences a radio does almost nothing about the cable running past it.

electromagnetism · Conductors The screening that survives to zero frequency. How far a magnetic field gets into copper against how fast it is changing, drawn beside the London depth of a superconductor with a carrier density of 6.0e+28 per cubic metre. The metal's curve falls as one over the square root of the frequency — measured on the drawn curve as -0.5000 against −½ — and it is a straight line on these axes with no bottom: at a hundred hertz the field reaches nine millimetres in, and at zero frequency it reaches all the way through, because a normal metal screens by dissipating and a steady field dissipates nothing. The superconductor's line is flat at 21.7 nanometres. The frequency does not appear in the expression for it, so there is nothing for it to depend on, and the screening is as complete at zero frequency as at any other. The two lines cross at 9.0e+12 hertz, in the far infrared, and above that the ordinary metal is actually the better screen — which is a useful corrective, because a superconductor's advantage is not that it screens harder but that it does not need the field to be changing. What the picture cannot show is where the flat line stops: above the energy gap the pairs break, the superconductor becomes an ordinary metal, and the flat line turns into a sloping one.

The field that is pushed out

A perfect conductor keeps whatever field was inside it when its resistance vanished. A superconductor expels the field either way, and the difference between remembering and expelling is the experiment that showed superconductivity is a state of matter rather than a very good conductor.

electromagnetism · Superconductivity The year, arriving underground at four different times. Temperature against depth in soil of diffusivity 0.5 mm²/s, at four times of year, measured from the annual mean. The surface swings by ±12 K; the swing underground is smaller and later, and both are governed by one length, δ = √(2D/ω) = 2.24 m. The amplitude falls as e^(−z/δ) — the dashed envelope — and the phase lags by z/δ radians, so the curves lean over as they go down and cross the axis at different depths. At 7.0 m the lag is half a year: the ground there is at its coldest in August and its warmest in February, in antiphase with the sky, with a swing of 0.52 K left. That is a cellar, and it is also why a water main below about a metre and a half does not know that it froze last week.

The summer that reaches the cellar in December

Drive the diffusion equation at its boundary instead of releasing something into it and the solution is a decaying, lagging oscillation with a single length in it. That length governs both the shrinking and the delay, which is why the depth at which the ground is coldest in August is fixed by the same number as the depth at which the seasons stop being felt at all.

thermodynamics · Diffusion The ring picks a whole number and pays for the difference. The kinetic energy of the screening current in a superconducting ring, against the flux applied from outside, in units of the flux quantum. Each parabola belongs to one winding number — the number of times the condensate's phase turns round the ring, which has to be an integer because the wavefunction has to come back to itself. The ring cannot hold an arbitrary flux, so it holds the nearest whole number of quanta and drives a current to make up the difference; the energy of that current goes as the square of the mismatch, which is what each parabola is. The lowest curve at each applied flux is the state the ring is in, and the winding number changes at exactly the half-integers — 0.50 and 1.50 and 2.50 here. So the measurable properties of the ring are periodic in the applied flux with a period of one quantum, which is 2.0678 × 10⁻¹⁵ webers and is about the flux the Earth's field puts through a square micrometre.

Two lengths, and which one is longer

A superconductor has a depth to which a field leaks in and a distance over which superconductivity itself can be built up. Which of the two is larger decides the sign of the energy of a boundary — and therefore whether the material keeps every field out or fills itself with a lattice of holes.

electromagnetism · Superconductivity A wave with two directions in it. Light at 60° entering silver, 550 nm, whose index is 0.055 + 3.32i. Phase matching along the boundary fixes the transmitted wave's tangential wavenumber and leaves the normal one to the medium, which supplies a complex answer. The real part decides where the phase goes and the imaginary part where the amplitude does, and they are not the same direction: the surfaces of constant amplitude are parallel to the interface, because the decay is entirely into the metal, while the surfaces of constant phase are tilted by 86.5° from the normal. There is therefore no single refracted angle to quote. The familiar picture, in which one set of parallel planes carries both, requires the absorption to be exactly zero.

The angle that is two angles

Snell's law survives a complex index by giving a complex answer, and a complex angle is not an angle. What the phase-matching argument actually fixes is the tangential wavenumber, and when the medium absorbs, the surfaces of constant phase and the surfaces of constant amplitude stop being parallel. In silver at 550 nanometres the phase fronts run within four degrees of the surface while the amplitude decays straight into it.

optics · Refraction The drag peaks and then gives way to lift. The two forces on a magnet moving parallel to a thin conducting sheet, as fractions of the repulsion a perfect mirror image would exert, against the magnet's speed divided by the sheet's characteristic speed w = 2/μ₀σd, on a logarithmic axis. Drag grows in proportion to the speed at first, peaks at 1.27 w with 0.300 of the full repulsion, and then falls as w/v. Lift starts as the square of the speed, equals drag at v = w, where both are 0.293, and approaches the full repulsion at high speed: 0.900 at 10 w. The same eddy currents cause both. What changes with speed is how much of the image they form has time to sink away before the magnet has passed.

The drag that falls as the magnet speeds up

Drop a magnet down a copper pipe and it creeps, because the currents it stirs up in the metal pull back on it in proportion to its speed. Push it faster and the proportion fails: the drag rises to a peak and then falls away, while a second force, pointing straight up, grows to replace it. A magnet moving fast enough over a sheet of aluminium is not braked but held up, with lift thirty times its drag at the speed of a fast train, and the reason is that at high speed the metal has no time to forget the magnet has passed.

electromagnetism · Induction One mode that loses less the faster it is driven. The wall loss, in decibels per kilometre, of three modes in a copper pipe 60 mm across, against frequency on logarithmic axes: TE₁₁, the lowest mode, cut off below 2.93 GHz; TM₀₁, cut off below 3.82 GHz; and TE₀₁, cut off below 6.09 GHz. Each loss is infinite at its cutoff and falls just above it. Then TE₁₁ and TM₀₁ turn and rise with frequency, as the square root, the way every conductor's loss does. TE₀₁ keeps falling: 0.51 dB/km at 60 GHz and 0.20 dB/km at 110 GHz, against 21 dB/km for TE₁₁ at 60 GHz.

The loss that falls as the frequency rises

Every metal conductor loses more at higher frequencies, because the current crowds into a thinner skin and meets more resistance. One wave in a round metal pipe breaks the rule. The TE₀₁ mode's electric field circles the axis and touches the wall nowhere. As the frequency rises it becomes more and more nearly a plane wave running down the middle of the pipe, and it drives less and less current in the metal. Its loss falls with frequency, to about half a decibel per kilometre at 60 GHz in a pipe 60 mm across. In the 1960s it was the best way anyone knew to send a hundred thousand telephone calls across a continent. The catch was that the pipe also carried seven hundred other modes.

waves · Guided waves How fine a grid has to be to polarise. The fraction of the power transmitted by a grid of thin parallel wires, against the ratio of the wire spacing d to the wavelength, on logarithmic axes — for the field along the wires with three wire radii (solid), and for the field across the wires with the thickest (dashed), from the quasi-static theory of strip gratings, valid while the spacing is under about half a wavelength. Across the wires nearly everything passes at every spacing. Along them the leak is about four times the square of (d/λ)·ln(d/2πa): 0.1% of the power at a spacing of a hundredth of a wavelength, 10% at a tenth, 64% at four-tenths, for wires of radius 3% of their spacing. Thicker wires block better because the inductance of the grid falls. The diamond marks Hertz's grid of 1888, 4% leaking along the wires; a visible-light polariser needs the same ratio at a wavelength of half a micrometre, which means wires about 140 nanometres apart.

The grid that stops the light along its wires

A row of parallel wires looks like a fence, and a fence ought to let through a wave that shakes along its slats. A grid of wires does the opposite. A field along the wires drives electrons up and down them, the currents re-radiate, and the wave is reflected; a field across the wires can move charge only through a wire's width, and passes. Heinrich Hertz used such a grid in 1888 to show that his new waves were polarised. The same grid, shrunk two hundred thousand times to wires 140 nanometres apart, polarises visible light in projectors — and every sheet of polarising plastic is the same idea made from chains of iodine.

optics · Polarisation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

AttenuationBoundary conditionComplex wavenumberEddy currentsPhase transitionSuperconductivityAbsorptionBessel functionCirculationCondensateConductivityConductors

All concepts