Concept

Relativistic beaming — where it appears

The forward sweeping of a fast source's radiation into a narrow cone, produced by aberration rather than by any change in the total power. The cone's half-angle is the reciprocal of the Lorentz factor, so a source at 0.99c concentrates its output into eight degrees.

Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The classical atom, and how long it lasts. An electron in a circular orbit of 5.29·10⁻¹¹ m loses energy at the rate the Larmor formula gives, so its radius obeys r³ = r₀³ − 4k²t/c³ and reaches zero in 1.556·10⁻¹¹ seconds — 16 picoseconds. It completes about 2.04·10⁵ orbits on the way, so the spiral is far too tight to draw. Nothing in this calculation is wrong: the acceleration is right, the radiated power is right, and the conclusion is that matter cannot exist. The curve is the shape of that conclusion.

A charge that turns must glow

An accelerating charge radiates, and a charge going round in a circle is accelerating. Apply that to an electron orbiting a nucleus and classical physics predicts that every atom collapses in sixteen picoseconds — a calculation with nothing wrong in it except its conclusion.

astrophysics · Radiating charge $Three answers where sound has two, and one where it has none. The factor by which an approaching source's frequency is raised, against its speed as a fraction of the wave speed. For sound it matters which of the two is moving: a moving source gives 1/(1 − β) and a moving observer gives 1 + β, and at 0.5 of the wave speed those are 2.000 and 1.500. For light there is one answer, 1.732 — the geometric mean of the other two, exactly — because there is no medium to be moving with respect to. The fourth curve is the transverse shift, which happens at closest approach when the distance is not changing at all: 0.866, and nothing classical predicts it.$

The shift that survives at right angles

For sound it matters which of the two is moving, and the two answers differ. For light there is one answer — their geometric mean — and a term with no classical counterpart at all: a source going past at closest approach, with its distance not changing, is still shifted.

relativity · Doppler

Where the light that was sideways ends up. The direction a photon is seen to travel in the laboratory, against the direction it was emitted in the frame of the source, for a source moving at 0.5c, 0.9c, 0.99c. The straight diagonal is what would happen if a boost only changed frequencies; every curve lies well below it, which is aberration. The number that matters is where the emitted right angle lands, because half of everything emitted is on that side of it: 60.0° at 0.5c, 25.8° at 0.9c, 8.1° at 0.99c. The usual shorthand for that angle is 1/γ, which gives 49.6°, 25.0°, 8.1° — good to a few per cent only once the source is genuinely relativistic, and wrong by 17% at 0.5c. Nothing is emitted differently in any of these cases: the source is radiating exactly as it always did, and it is the map from its angles to ours that has changed.

The sky that crowds into a cone

A boost does not only shift frequencies. It remaps directions, so half of everything a fast traveller can see is squeezed into a forward cone of half-angle about 1/γ — and because brightness carries four powers of the Doppler factor, what lies ahead is overwhelming and what lies behind has effectively gone.

relativity · Doppler

The same source, seen coming and seen going. The observed flux of a moving source, relative to the same source at rest, against the angle between its motion and the line of sight, on a logarithmic scale, at β = 0.5, β = 0.9, β = 0.99. The curves span 8.1e+1, 1.3e+5, 1.6e+9 between the approaching and receding directions, which is ((1+β)/(1−β))⁴ exactly. The fourth power comes from the one quantity every observer agrees about: the specific intensity divided by the cube of the frequency. Three powers of the Doppler factor come from that invariance and the fourth from integrating over frequency. Two consequences are worth reading off. A source seen side-on is fainter than the same source at rest, by γ⁴ — a factor of 2.5e+3 at the fastest speed drawn. And half the light arrives inside a cone of 60.0°, 25.8°, 8.1°, which for a fast source is one over γ.

The brightness that is not the same for everyone

A moving source is not merely shifted in colour. Its light is concentrated forwards, so the same lamp is enormously brighter seen coming than seen going — by the fourth power of one number, which for a jet at ninety-nine per cent of light speed is a factor of a thousand million. The reason is that only one combination of intensity and frequency is the same for every observer, and everything else follows from it.

relativity · Doppler

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Aberration Dipole radiation The Lorentz factor Reference frames Relativistic doppler Synchrotron radiation Transverse doppler Atomic structure Brightness temperature Circular motion Cosmic microwave background Dipole anisotropy

All concepts