Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Relativistic doppler — where it appears

The frequency shift of light between a source and a receiver in relative motion, being the classical crowding of crests times the source's time dilation. The second factor survives at right angles, where the classical shift vanishes, and it is what makes the effect a test of relativity rather than of wave motion.

Named by 7 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Wavefronts from a moving source. Circles showing where each crest has reached, centred on where the source was when it emitted them. Ahead of the source the crests are closer together and the frequency heard is higher; behind, they are spread out and it is lower.

The note that changes on approach, and the two ways of getting it

A moving source and a moving listener produce different formulas for the same shift, because the medium is watching. The difference is small, real, and the reason light had to be treated differently.

waves · Doppler A spacetime diagram at β = 0.6. Position across, time up, in units where light travels at 45°. The shaded wedges are the future and past reachable by light; the tilted axes belong to an observer moving at 0.6 of the speed of light.

The twin who comes back younger

If motion slows a clock, and motion is relative, each twin should find the other younger — and yet when they meet, one of them has aged less. The asymmetry is not in the speed and not in the acceleration; it is in which worldline is straight.

relativity · Time dilation Three answers where sound has two, and one where it has none. The factor by which an approaching source's frequency is raised, against its speed as a fraction of the wave speed. For sound it matters which of the two is moving: a moving source gives 1/(1 − β) and a moving observer gives 1 + β, and at 0.5 of the wave speed those are 2.000 and 1.500. For light there is one answer, 1.732 — the geometric mean of the other two, exactly — because there is no medium to be moving with respect to. The fourth curve is the transverse shift, which happens at closest approach when the distance is not changing at all: 0.866, and nothing classical predicts it.

The shift that survives at right angles

For sound it matters which of the two is moving, and the two answers differ. For light there is one answer — their geometric mean — and a term with no classical counterpart at all: a source going past at closest approach, with its distance not changing, is still shifted.

relativity · Doppler What puts a scale on a tilted axis. A spacetime diagram with a second observer's axes at β = 0.6. The curves are the sets of events at a fixed interval from the origin — c²t² − x² = s², one branch each for s = 0.5, s = 1, s = 1.5 — and the whole point of them is where they cross. A unit of the moving observer's time is wherever the s = 1 curve meets the tilted time axis, and on the page that point is 1.250 times as far from the origin as the stationary observer's own unit. Without the hyperbolae the tilted axes carry no scale at all, and every argument about which of two clocks is behind is unreadable off the diagram. Each drawn crossing reads back as its own interval to 0.0e+0.

The invariant that survives a boost

Energy and momentum are both answers to the question "how fast is it going, and according to whom". One combination of them is not, and that combination is the mass — which is why two photons of 511 keV can be a thing of mass 1.022 MeV or a thing of no mass at all, depending only on the angle between them.

relativity · Mass-energy Where the light that was sideways ends up. The direction a photon is seen to travel in the laboratory, against the direction it was emitted in the frame of the source, for a source moving at 0.5c, 0.9c, 0.99c. The straight diagonal is what would happen if a boost only changed frequencies; every curve lies well below it, which is aberration. The number that matters is where the emitted right angle lands, because half of everything emitted is on that side of it: 60.0° at 0.5c, 25.8° at 0.9c, 8.1° at 0.99c. The usual shorthand for that angle is 1/γ, which gives 49.6°, 25.0°, 8.1° — good to a few per cent only once the source is genuinely relativistic, and wrong by 17% at 0.5c. Nothing is emitted differently in any of these cases: the source is radiating exactly as it always did, and it is the map from its angles to ours that has changed.

The sky that crowds into a cone

A boost does not only shift frequencies. It remaps directions, so half of everything a fast traveller can see is squeezed into a forward cone of half-angle about 1/γ — and because brightness carries four powers of the Doppler factor, what lies ahead is overwhelming and what lies behind has effectively gone.

relativity · Doppler A cube photographed at four speeds. The outline a camera records of a cube passing at β = 0, β = 0.4, β = 0.7, β = 0.9, moving to the right, seen at the moment it passes. The dashed square is what the usual picture shows: the cube flattened along its motion by the Lorentz factor. It is not what the camera gets. Light from the far face left earlier than light from the near face, by the time it needed to cross the extra distance, and the cube moved in that interval — so the far face appears displaced backwards and the side of the cube comes into view. The two effects together are exactly a rotation: at β = 0.4 the cube photographs as one turned 23.6°, at β = 0.7 the cube photographs as one turned 44.4°, at β = 0.9 the cube photographs as one turned 64.2°. The contraction has not gone anywhere — a ruler laid alongside still reads 43.6 per cent of the proper length at the highest speed drawn — but it is a statement about two positions at one time, and a photograph is not that.

The contraction no photograph shows

Every textbook picture of a relativistically moving object drawn between 1905 and 1959 showed it squashed. A camera would have shown it turned. The contraction is entirely real in the measurement that defines it, and a photograph is not that measurement.

relativity · Length contraction What a beam's energy buys, three ways. The speed reached against the energy intercepted, measured in the body's own rest energy, for a perfect mirror pushed by a beam, a perfect absorber pushed by the same beam, and a photon rocket that carries the same energy as fuel and throws it out behind. The mirror's curve is γ(1 + β) = 1 + 2E/mc², a rapidity of ln(1 + 2E/mc²); the dots integrate the reflected beam's force, (2P/c)(1 − β)/(1 + β), and agree with it to 10⁻¹⁵. To reach 0.2c the mirror needs 0.1124 of its rest energy, the absorber 0.2500 and the photon rocket 0.2247 — for a 1 g sail, 10.1 terajoules against 20.2. The rocket's rapidity is ln(1 + E/mc²), so the mirror is the rocket with its fuel left at home and each joule used twice, once arriving and once leaving. The absorber does worst, because the energy it keeps becomes rest mass it then has to carry.

The rocket that leaves its fuel at home

A mirror pushed by a beam from the ground carries no propellant, and relativity gives its speed in closed form: its rapidity is ln(1 + 2E/mc²), the photon rocket's equation with the fuel left behind and every joule used twice. What stops it is not the energy, which can be stored for days, but diffraction, which fixes the distance over which the energy can be handed over — and so demands an acceleration of tens of thousands of g.

relativity · Mass-energy

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

The Lorentz factorReference framesAberrationEnergy conservationThe Lorentz transformationE = mc²Momentum conservationRelativistic beamingSimultaneityTime dilationTransverse dopplerCentre of mass

All concepts