Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Surface roughness — where it appears

The departure of a real surface from the shape it was meant to have, quoted as a root-mean-square height. Whether it matters is decided by comparing it with something else — a wavelength for an optic, a lubricant film for a bearing — and never by its own size.

Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The pressure at which an oil becomes a glass. Viscosity against pressure for 4 liquids on a logarithmic axis, from Barus's rule with the pressure coefficient each one actually has. The rule is an exponential, so a gigapascal multiplies an ordinary oil's viscosity by a hundred million or more, and the curves cross the line conventionally taken to mark a glass — a million million pascal-seconds — at 1.37 GPa for a mineral oil, 0.98 GPa for a traction fluid. The vertical line is the peak pressure inside the loaded contact this figure is about, 1.32 gigapascals, computed from the Hertz solution for that geometry and load. Water is drawn for contrast: its pressure coefficient is thirty times smaller, it never approaches a glass over this range, and that is why it is useless as a lubricant in a rolling contact however clean it is. Each curve is drawn solid up to the glass line and dashed above it, because past that point the material is not a liquid and its viscosity is not what decides how it shears — the exponential continues, and the substance it was written for does not.

The oil that is a glass for a quarter of a millisecond

Every other account of viscosity here varies the temperature. Pressure does something larger and in the same direction for every liquid: viscosity rises exponentially, by a factor of ten to the eight or more at the gigapascal inside a loaded gear tooth. That is not a curiosity — it is the only reason there is a film there at all. Remove the pressure dependence from the calculation and the predicted film is five nanometres, under the roughness, and the surfaces touch.

fluids · Viscosity The peak that is lost to a fraction of a wave. The height of the central peak, relative to a perfect pupil of the same size, against the root-mean-square error of the wavefront in waves, for four kinds of error — each computed from the transform and each normalised to the same rms. The dashed curve is the usual approximation, the exponential of minus the square of two pi times the error. What the figure shows is that to a good approximation it does not matter WHAT the error is, only how large it is in the mean square: four quite different shapes of wavefront give nearly the same peak. A fourteenth of a wave leaves 80 per cent of the peak, which is the conventional definition of diffraction-limited, and it corresponds to a quarter of a wave peak-to-valley for a simple defocus — which is where Rayleigh's quarter-wave rule comes from and why it is a convention laid over a computed number rather than a threshold in the physics.

How accurate a mirror has to be

The pupil's amplitude decides the rings; its phase decides the peak. A wavefront error of a fourteenth of a wave root-mean-square leaves eighty per cent of the peak intensity, which is the whole of what 'diffraction-limited' means — a convention laid over a computed number. And the number barely depends on what the error is, only on how large: four quite different aberrations of the same magnitude give nearly the same answer.

optics · Diffraction

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

AberrationAdaptive opticsApproximationContact mechanicsDiffractionElasticityExponentialExtrapolationFourier transformFree volumeFrictionGlass transition

All concepts