Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Stress — where it appears

Force per unit area transmitted through a material, with components along a surface as well as across it. The shear components are what separate a solid from a liquid, and their absence is the single assumption from which the whole of hydrostatics follows.

Named by 9 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Solid and liquid are answers about a duration. The relaxation time of seven materials, on a logarithmic axis spanning 39 decades, against the length of one observation. A material behaves as a solid when its relaxation time is longer than the observation and as a liquid when it is shorter, so the vertical line is what decides which — and it is a property of the observer. At 1 s, 4 of these are solids. Move the line six decades to the right and pitch joins the liquids; move it far enough left and water is a glass, which is not a figure of speech but what a picosecond pulse measures.

The liquid that remembers

Pitch shatters like glass under a hammer and flows through a funnel over a decade. Neither behaviour is the true one. What decides which a substance shows is not the substance but the length of the observation, and the ratio between the two has a name and a number.

fluids · Rheology The stress that stops growing with depth. Vertical stress against depth in a silo of radius 0.5 m holding grain of bulk density 1500 kg/m³, with a wall friction coefficient of 0.5 and Janssen's ratio K = 0.5. The straight line is what a liquid of the same density would do — ρgz, with no length in it anywhere. The curve is what grains do: wall friction, mobilised by the sideways stress the grains themselves exert, removes weight from the column at a rate proportional to the stress, so the stress saturates at ρgλ over a screening length λ = R/2μK = 1.00 m. Read off the drawn curve at the 8 m base, the stress is 14.7 kPa against the 117.7 kPa the liquid delivers — 88 per cent of the weight is standing on the walls. Another twenty metres of grain would move the floor's reading by less than a pascal.

The silo that does not weigh what it holds

Pour water into a tall vessel and the pressure at the bottom is the depth times the density times g, whatever the shape above it. Pour grain in and the floor stops learning anything new after the first couple of metres, because the walls have quietly taken the rest — and the length over which they take it contains no property of the grain at all.

fluids · Granular matter Two rockets that keep their distance, and the string that does not. Two rockets 0.5 unit apart in the laboratory, given identical acceleration programmes there, drawn in units where the light speed is one and c²/a is one. Their laboratory separation is constant for ever — the two worldlines are the same curve shifted sideways, and every horizontal line meets them 0.5 apart. The slanted lines are the rockets' own lines of simultaneity, and the distance between the worldlines measured along those is what a string tied between them has to span: at 0.3c it is 0.512, a stretch of 2 per cent; at 0.6c it is 0.557, a stretch of 11 per cent; at 0.8c it is 0.631, a stretch of 26 per cent; at 0.9c it is 0.710, a stretch of 42 per cent. The γL that is always quoted — 0.524, 0.625, 0.833, 1.147 here — is the limit of that measurement for a vanishing gap, and at a gap of 0.5 in these units it overstates the stretch by up to 38.1 per cent; shrinking the gap a hundredfold brings the two within 0.46 per cent. Either way the string is stretched and breaks, while the gap in the laboratory never changes by a millimetre. Length contraction is not something that happens to a rod. It is a statement about which events count as simultaneous, and a rod that is not allowed to contract is a rod that is being pulled apart.

The string that breaks between two rockets

Two rockets a metre apart, given identical acceleration programmes, stay a metre apart in the laboratory for ever. A string tied between them breaks anyway. Nothing pulls on it, nothing in the laboratory moves relative to anything else, and the string is stretched — because the distance it has to span is measured on the rockets' slices of simultaneity and not on the laboratory's.

relativity · Length contraction Rough contact grows as W^1.000, and one smooth bump as W^0.667. Real contact area against load, both logarithmic, three ways. Plastic flow of the asperities gives A = W/H, a slope of exactly one, which is the account Bowden and Tabor's argument uses. A single elastic sphere gives Hertz's answer, A ∝ W^(2/3), and a friction coefficient falling as W^(−1/3) — Amontons' law would be false. A rough elastic surface, with many asperities spread exponentially in height and integrated here rather than quoted, gives a slope of 1.0000, because pressing harder mostly recruits new contacts rather than enlarging existing ones. The dotted curve repeats that integration with a Gaussian spread of heights and gives 0.9695 — the upper tail of a Gaussian is nearly exponential, so the answer is nearly and not exactly linear. Amontons' law does not need plasticity. It needs roughness, it is exact for one distribution and good to three per cent for another, and it survives whichever way the individual junctions deform.

The grip that is not a coefficient

A friction coefficient is independent of load and of area, and the reason is usually given as plastic flow of the asperities. It is not — a rough elastic surface gives the same law, integrated here to a slope of 1.0000, because pressing harder recruits new contacts rather than enlarging old ones. What breaks the law is a contact that is smooth, or a material that dissipates in its bulk — where μ passes one and stops being a coefficient at all.

mechanics · Friction The wedge that proves it. A wedge of water 4 mm on its vertical side, at a depth of 3 m, with the pressure on each of its three faces as an unknown. The two force balances decide them. Horizontally, the sloping face's push has a component that must exactly cancel the vertical face's, and since the sloping face is longer by exactly the factor its slope reduces the component by, the two pressures are equal — the geometry cancels, at every angle, for every size. Vertically the same cancellation happens except for the wedge's own weight, which needs the bottom face to carry 0.0667 per cent more. That excess falls in proportion to the size of the wedge, so at a point it is nothing and the three pressures are one number. Pressure being the same in every direction is the conclusion of that argument, not an assumption in it.

The push that has no direction

That the pressure at a point in a still fluid is the same whichever way the surface faces is not a definition. It is a theorem, and its proof is an argument about how two kinds of force scale with size — which is also the exact statement of when it stops being true.

fluids · Hydrostatics One magnitude, and a direction that turns the wrong way. The force per unit area a magnetic field of 0.01 tesla exerts on a surface, drawn for surface normals at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90° to the field. The short grey arrows are the normals; the long coloured ones are the tractions. Every traction has the same length, 40 pascals, because the magnitude of T·n does not depend on the orientation of n at all — and the direction is the normal reflected in the field rather than carried round with it, so as the surface turns one way the force turns the other. A surface cutting across the field is pushed (the magnetic pressure); a surface cutting along it is pulled (the magnetic tension); and at 45° the traction lies in the surface, which is a shear and is neither.

The same force whichever way the surface faces

A magnetic field's stress is usually described as a pressure across the lines with a tension along them, as though it were two effects. It is one. The force per unit area is B²/2μ₀ on every surface however it is oriented, and only the direction changes — the surface normal reflected in the field, so that turning the surface one way turns the force the other. At 45° neither name applies.

astrophysics · Flux freezing Four stress states in one beam, and only one of them has no tension. Stress across the depth of a 300 by 600 millimetre concrete section at the middle of an eight-metre span, compression to the right, for four conditions. Under the load alone the bottom fibre is in tension at 11.1 MPa, which is four times what concrete can carry, so an ordinary reinforced beam cracks there and relies on steel to hold the crack together. With 1,500 kilonewtons of prestress 120 millimetres below the centroid and the full load applied, the section runs from 9.8 to 3.6 MPa and every fibre of it is in compression. The second case is the one that surprises: with the prestress applied and nothing whatever to oppose it, the top fibre is in tension at 1.7 MPa, because a force below the centroid bends the beam upwards. A prestressed beam is at its most vulnerable when nothing is on it, and what rescues it is its own weight: adding that alone brings the top back to 0.3 MPa of compression. Each stress block is checked by integrating it and recovering the force and the moment that produced it.

A state no load could reach

The free direction a redundant structure leaves open can be driven on purpose. Tighten a tendon through a concrete beam and its whole stress state moves into the half of the range the material is good at; tighten a bolt hard and the load it carries fluctuates by a fifth of what is applied to it. Both put the structure somewhere no arrangement of external loads could.

mechanics · Free-body A squeezed disc between crossed polarisers. The dark fringes seen in a 50 mm disc of polycarbonate, 6 mm thick, squeezed across a vertical diameter by 500 N and viewed between crossed circular polarisers in light of 550 nm: each dark line is a contour on which the principal stresses differ by a whole number of fringe values, from the stress-optic law with a coefficient of 78 Brewsters. At the centre the fringe order is 3.61; it climbs steeply towards the two loading points, where the fringes crowd together and the stress grows without limit, and falls to zero at the free edges level with the centre. The pattern is the exact stress field of an elastic disc under diametral load; every fringe can be counted from a dark point, and the count times the fringe value is the difference of the principal stresses at that place.

The stress that polarised light can see

Squeeze a disc of clear plastic and look at it between two crossed polarising filters, and it fills with dark lines and coloured bands that crowd towards the points where it is pressed. Each line is a contour of stress. Glass, plastic and most transparent solids become doubly refracting when they are loaded, in proportion to the difference between their largest and smallest stresses, and polarised light turns that difference into a pattern that can be counted. David Brewster found it in 1816, the same Brewster whose angle polarises reflected light, and for a century the way to learn the stresses in a bridge or a dam was to cut its shape from plastic, load it and photograph the fringes.

optics · Polarisation One lever, two frames, two different torques. A right-angled lever pivoted at its corner, with arms of length L, held still by a force F at the end of each arm, perpendicular to it. Left, in the lever's own frame: torque FL anticlockwise from the horizontal arm's force, FL clockwise from the vertical arm's, and they cancel. Right, the same lever seen moving to the right at 0.8 of the speed of light: the horizontal arm, along the motion, is contracted to L/γ = 0.60L, and the force on it, which is across the motion, is reduced to F/γ = 0.60F; the vertical arm and its force, along the motion, are unchanged. The torques are now 0.36FL and FL, and the lever is twisted clockwise by 0.64FL — the square of its speed as a fraction of light's. It does not turn.

The lever that is twisted and does not turn

A right-angled lever held still by two equal forces has no net torque on it. Watch the same lever go by at high speed and one arm is shorter, one force is weaker, and the torques no longer cancel — yet the lever goes by without turning. Nothing is wrong with either frame's arithmetic. The forces are doing work on the moving lever, the energy they put in is flowing through its arms, and a flow of energy carries momentum that points across the lever's motion: a body that moves straight with a momentum that does not.

relativity · Mass-energy

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

BuoyancyDissipationElasticityEquilibriumFrictionLength contractionScalingViscosityAccelerationAdhesionAngle of reposeAngular momentum

All concepts