Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Scaling — where it appears

How a quantity changes when a system is made larger or smaller, often decided by which power of the size each competing effect carries. Surface effects go as the square and volume effects as the cube, so any competition between them has a size at which the winner changes.

Named by 12 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Surface at fixed volume. Four shapes of identical volume with their surface areas evaluated. The sphere's is the smallest at 4.836; the flattest shape drawn carries 1.91 times as much. Surface tension is an energy per unit area, so a free drop of liquid has an incentive to be the first of these and none at all to be any of the others.

The skin that is not a skin

A drop of water behaves as though it were wrapped in a stretched membrane, and there is no membrane. What there is instead is an energy cost per unit of surface, and almost everything the apparent skin does follows from a liquid trying to have less of one.

fluids · Surface tension The parabola in a pipe, and what it integrates to. Steady flow in a round pipe: the velocity is a parabola, zero at the wall and greatest on the axis, and its average over the cross-section is 0.500 of the peak — exactly a half, by integration. Because the profile scales with r² and the area with r² as well, the flow goes as the fourth power of the radius: widening a pipe from 1 to 2 mm multiplies it by 16.

The fourth power in a pipe

Halve a pipe's radius and the flow through it falls to a sixteenth. The exponent is four rather than two, because narrowing a pipe both removes cross-section and slows what is left — and one law with that exponent in it governs a blood vessel, a hypodermic needle and a water main.

fluids · Viscosity One volume of liquid, several solids. 4 drops of the same 5 µL of liquid, on 4 solids it meets at 20°, 60°, 90°, 140°. Each is the spherical cap that volume and that angle force, so the footprint radius is computed rather than chosen: 20° gives 2.61 mm, 60° gives 1.71 mm, 90° gives 1.34 mm, 140° gives 0.69 mm. At every contact line the three interfacial tensions are drawn to scale, and only their horizontal components balance — γsv = γsl + γlv cos θ. The vertical pull of the liquid surface is taken up by the solid, which is why the angle belongs to three interfaces at once and to no single liquid: change the solid and nothing about the water has changed.

The angle a liquid makes with what it sits on

Everything capillarity does — climbing, beading, wicking, waterproofing — is the sign and size of one cosine, and that cosine belongs to three interfaces at once rather than to the water. Change the solid and nothing about the water has changed, yet the same five microlitres goes from a footprint 2.61 mm across to one of 0.69 mm.

fluids · Capillarity The bigger the hole, the gentler the horizon. The difference in gravitational pull between the two ends of a 1.8 metre body, at the moment it crosses the horizon, against the mass of the hole. Both axes are logarithmic and the line is straight, of slope -2.00: the tidal acceleration at a horizon falls as the square of the mass, because the tide goes as the mass over the cube of the radius and the radius itself is proportional to the mass. At the low end — a hole of a few solar masses — the stretch is 1.9e+7 times Earth's gravity across a person, which pulls them apart long before they arrive. At the high end it is 1.9e-11, which is nothing at all: crossing the horizon of a large enough hole is locally unremarkable, and an observer would notice no boundary being passed. The two meet at 1.0e+4 solar masses, above which the horizon can be crossed intact. That is the sharpest available statement of what a horizon is and is not. It is not a surface, nothing is there, and nothing local marks it — it is the place from which no future path leads out, which is a statement about the whole of the future rather than about anything present.

The horizon that nothing marks

A falling body is torn apart by the difference in gravity between its ends. At the horizon of a black hole that difference goes as the inverse square of the mass, so a large enough hole can be entered intact — and nothing local happens at the crossing to say it has occurred.

astrophysics · Horizons Rough contact grows as W^1.000, and one smooth bump as W^0.667. Real contact area against load, both logarithmic, three ways. Plastic flow of the asperities gives A = W/H, a slope of exactly one, which is the account Bowden and Tabor's argument uses. A single elastic sphere gives Hertz's answer, A ∝ W^(2/3), and a friction coefficient falling as W^(−1/3) — Amontons' law would be false. A rough elastic surface, with many asperities spread exponentially in height and integrated here rather than quoted, gives a slope of 1.0000, because pressing harder mostly recruits new contacts rather than enlarging existing ones. The dotted curve repeats that integration with a Gaussian spread of heights and gives 0.9695 — the upper tail of a Gaussian is nearly exponential, so the answer is nearly and not exactly linear. Amontons' law does not need plasticity. It needs roughness, it is exact for one distribution and good to three per cent for another, and it survives whichever way the individual junctions deform.

The grip that is not a coefficient

A friction coefficient is independent of load and of area, and the reason is usually given as plastic flow of the asperities. It is not — a rough elastic surface gives the same law, integrated here to a slope of 1.0000, because pressing harder recruits new contacts rather than enlarging old ones. What breaks the law is a contact that is smooth, or a material that dissipates in its bulk — where μ passes one and stops being a coefficient at all.

mechanics · Friction The distance that does not know how big the moon is. How close a satellite held together by its own gravity can orbit before the tide pulls it apart, in units of the primary's radius, against how much denser the primary is than the satellite. The curve is the distance at which the tidal stretch across the satellite's own body equals the satellite's surface gravity. Setting those two equal cancels the satellite's radius on both sides, so a boulder and a thousand-kilometre moon of the same material break up at exactly the same distance — the limit is a ratio of densities and nothing else, and it goes as the cube root of that ratio, measured here as 0.3333. For ice around a planet of density 687 kg/m³ the rigid limit is 1.15 radii and the limit for a body that can deform under the tide is 2.23, because a satellite pulled into an egg presents a longer body to the tide and gives way sooner. Saturn's rings end at 2.27 radii, just outside that second number, and its innermost round moon orbits at 3.08 — so the boundary between a ring and a moon falls where this calculation puts it. What this calculation leaves out is strength: a body small enough for its material strength to beat its own gravity ignores the limit entirely, which is why Phobos is well inside Mars's and still in one piece, and why the Shoemaker–Levy fragments were held together by nothing at all.

The distance that forgets the moon

A satellite held together by its own gravity comes apart if it orbits too close, and the distance at which it does contains no reference to its size. Both the tide pulling it apart and the gravity holding it together are proportional to its radius, so the radius cancels twice over and what is left is a ratio of two densities.

astrophysics · Self-gravity How much a wrap holds, against how many turns it is. The ratio of the two tensions a rope can hold across, against the number of turns it is wrapped, for coefficients of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5. The axis is logarithmic because the law is exponential, so each line is straight and its slope is the coefficient. At µ = 0.1 one turn multiplies by 1.9, two turns by 4 and three by 7 — so a person pulling with the strength of one arm holds a load that a small crane would be needed to lift. The practical consequence is the one a sailor states as a rule: turns are cheap and each is worth as much as the one before it, which is a statement about a constant factor rather than a constant force.

The part of the wrap that is actually gripping

The capstan equation gives the largest tension ratio a wrap can hold, and almost nothing spends its life at that limit. Below it the wrap divides in two: an idle arc doing nothing at all and an active arc creeping and carrying the whole exponential — and the division explains a belt's speed loss and its squeal.

mechanics · Friction The current crowding into a contact spot. A meridional section through a circular contact between two solids, with the spot at the centre. The closed curves are equipotentials and the curves running through the spot are current lines, each carrying an equal share. Both are exact: in the coordinates built on the spot's rim the equipotentials are confocal spheroids and the current lines confocal hyperboloids, and in this section they are ellipses and hyperbolas. What the picture shows is that the current has to converge from a region many spot radii across and then spread again, and that the potential falls almost entirely within a few radii of the contact. The equipotential drawn at 12% of the drop sits 5.2 radii away, and everything beyond it contributes that last 12%.

The resistance that is a length

Two metals touching do not touch over the area they appear to. Current crosses at a few small spots and has to converge into each one, and the resistance of that convergence contains no area and no path length — only the size of the spot, divided into the resistivity.

electromagnetism · Conductors The wedge that proves it. A wedge of water 4 mm on its vertical side, at a depth of 3 m, with the pressure on each of its three faces as an unknown. The two force balances decide them. Horizontally, the sloping face's push has a component that must exactly cancel the vertical face's, and since the sloping face is longer by exactly the factor its slope reduces the component by, the two pressures are equal — the geometry cancels, at every angle, for every size. Vertically the same cancellation happens except for the wedge's own weight, which needs the bottom face to carry 0.0667 per cent more. That excess falls in proportion to the size of the wedge, so at a point it is nothing and the three pressures are one number. Pressure being the same in every direction is the conclusion of that argument, not an assumption in it.

The push that has no direction

That the pressure at a point in a still fluid is the same whichever way the surface faces is not a definition. It is a theorem, and its proof is an argument about how two kinds of force scale with size — which is also the exact statement of when it stops being true.

fluids · Hydrostatics The hourglass that keeps time. Discharge against how much is left above the opening, for grain and for liquid through the same 40 mm hole, each as a fraction of its own rate at a full hopper. The grain rate is a horizontal line: it does not appear in Beverloo's law at all, because the pressure at the outlet does not depend on the head — the walls carry the weight, which is what Janssen's argument establishes, so the grains at the opening are pushed by their immediate neighbours and by nothing else. The liquid falls as the square root of the head and is down to 32 per cent by the time a tenth is left. That is why an hourglass keeps time and a water clock does not, and why the water clocks that worked were built with a float and an overflow to hold the head constant.

The hourglass that keeps time

Grain leaves a hopper at a rate that does not depend on how much is above it, and that goes as the orifice to the five-halves power rather than the one half a liquid gives. Both facts follow from the same thing: the weight is carried by the walls, not by the grains at the opening.

fluids · Granular matter One line decides whether it climbs for ever. The wetting condition for a corner, drawn as a map. The horizontal axis is the corner's half-angle and the vertical axis the liquid's contact angle with the walls; the diagonal is θ + α = 90°. Below it the meniscus in the corner curves into the liquid, the capillary pressure grows without bound as the corner narrows, and the liquid wicks along it indefinitely. Above it the curvature has the other sign and the liquid stays put. The boundary is tested by evaluating the meniscus a millionth of a degree either side of it at seventeen half-angles, and it wicks on one side and not the other every time. water on clean glass, right-angled corner: α = 45°, θ = 5° — wicks; water on glass, a 20° groove: α = 10°, θ = 40° — wicks; water on plastic, right-angled corner: α = 45°, θ = 75° — does not. A right-angled corner needs a contact angle under 45°, which water on clean glass has and water on most plastics does not.

The corner a liquid never stops climbing

A narrow tube lifts a liquid to a definite height because it has a smallest width. A corner has none, so the capillary suction it can develop is unbounded — and whether the liquid takes advantage is decided by a single inequality between the contact angle and the corner's own angle.

fluids · Surface tension Pushed one way, travelling another. A parcel released from rest under a steady pressure-gradient acceleration of 2.0e-4 metres per second squared pointing east, integrated for 36 hours at 60°, 30°, 10°. Without rotation it would accelerate east indefinitely. With it, the motion is an inertial circle about a mean velocity at right angles to the push, and the mean over a whole number of inertial periods is measured off each path and matches the geostrophic value a/f to two per cent. At high latitude the loops are tight and the drift is almost purely along the isobars; near the equator the parcel travels a long way down the gradient before the rotation has had time to turn it, which is why geostrophic balance is a high-latitude statement and the tropics need a different set of approximations.

The ratio that decides whether the planet is turning

Whether the rotating terms matter is not a question about size. It is one dimensionless ratio, U over fL, and it runs from ten thousand in a teacup to a millionth in the Earth's core. Where it is small the pressure gradient stops accelerating the fluid and starts balancing a force on fluid already moving across it — so the flow runs along the pressure contours instead of down them, and a weather map is a streamline plot.

mechanics · Circular motion

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

EquilibriumFrictionContact areaDimensional analysisSurface tensionWettingCapillary lengthCoefficient of frictionContactContact angleFree fallHydrostatics

All concepts