Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Photon — where it appears

A quantum of light, carrying an energy set by its frequency and a momentum set by its wavelength, and arriving whole rather than in fractions. Its energy is Planck's constant times the frequency, which is why the colour of light and not its brightness decides whether it can eject an electron.

Named by 13 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Photocurrent against applied voltage, at two intensities. Photocurrent against retarding voltage for caesium lit at 12×10¹⁴ hertz, at relative intensities of 1 and 2. Both curves reach zero at the same stopping voltage of 2.82 volts, because the brighter light delivers more photons and not more energetic ones. The saturation currents are in the ratio of the intensities. The slope between the stopping voltage and zero assumes the emitted electrons' energies are spread uniformly below the maximum, which they are not; the crossing point does not depend on that assumption.

Light arrives in lumps, and brightness only changes how many

Shine dim blue light on a metal and electrons come out. Shine intense red light and none do, however long the wait. The frequency decides whether anything happens; the intensity decides only how much.

quantum · Photon The wavelength shift against scattering angle. How much longer a scattered photon's wavelength is, against the angle it scattered through. The shift runs from nothing at 0 degrees to 4.853 picometres straight back, passing through the electron's Compton wavelength of 2.4263 picometres at 90 degrees. Nothing about the incident light or the target material appears anywhere on this axis.

A photon with a momentum, and a collision that proves it

X-rays bouncing off electrons come back with a longer wavelength. How much longer depends on the angle they turned through, and on nothing else — not the incident wavelength, not the target material, not the intensity.

quantum · Photon Hydrogen's emission lines, where they are actually seen. Every transition down to level 1, 2, 3 in hydrogen, drawn at the wavelength it emits, on a logarithmic axis in nanometres. The Lyman series begins at 121.5 nm and crowds toward its limit at 91.1 nm; The Balmer series begins at 656.1 nm and crowds toward its limit at 364.5 nm; The Paschen series begins at 1874.6 nm and crowds toward its limit at 820.1 nm. Only the Balmer series has lines in the visible band, which is why it was the one found first.

The spectrum is a subtraction, not a list of values

An atom emits a handful of sharp wavelengths and nothing in between. They are not the atom's energies — they are the differences between them, which is why the lines come in families that crowd onto a limit.

quantum · Atomic spectra What puts a scale on a tilted axis. A spacetime diagram with a second observer's axes at β = 0.6. The curves are the sets of events at a fixed interval from the origin — c²t² − x² = s², one branch each for s = 0.5, s = 1, s = 1.5 — and the whole point of them is where they cross. A unit of the moving observer's time is wherever the s = 1 curve meets the tilted time axis, and on the page that point is 1.250 times as far from the origin as the stationary observer's own unit. Without the hyperbolae the tilted axes carry no scale at all, and every argument about which of two clocks is behind is unreadable off the diagram. Each drawn crossing reads back as its own interval to 0.0e+0.

The invariant that survives a boost

Energy and momentum are both answers to the question "how fast is it going, and according to whom". One combination of them is not, and that combination is the mass — which is why two photons of 511 keV can be a thing of mass 1.022 MeV or a thing of no mass at all, depending only on the angle between them.

relativity · Mass-energy The correlation, and the best a shared list of answers can do. The coincidence correlation between two polarisation analysers against the angle between them, over two full turns of the correlation — a polariser turned through 180° is the same polariser, so the picture repeats. The singlet gives −cos 2Δ, drawn through −1.00 at 0°, 1.00 at 90°, −1.00 at 180°, 1.00 at 270°. Beside it is the best correlation any shared list of pre-agreed answers can produce: straight lines between the same four extremes, with corners where the cosine is smooth. The two agree exactly at the multiples of 45° and nowhere else, and they are furthest apart — by 0.2105 — at 19.77° and 70.23°, which is ½ arcsin(2/π) from either end of the quarter turn. The difference is not a matter of degree: it is a curve against a shape with a corner in it, and no list can be bent into the curve.

The correlation no instructions can produce

A pair of gloves in two boxes agrees perfectly and needs no physics, because the answers were settled at packing. What no packing can imitate is the shape that appears as the two analysers are turned relative to each other, and the shape is a number — 2.828 where every list of pre-agreed answers is stuck at 2.

quantum · Entanglement The mass of two things that have none. The invariant mass of a pair of photons of equal energy, in units of E/c², against the angle between them. It is computed from the total energy and the vector sum of the two momenta, and agrees with 2E·sin(θ/2) to 1.0e-14. at 0° the pair weighs 0.000 E/c²; at 30° the pair weighs 0.518 E/c²; at 60° the pair weighs 1.000 E/c²; at 90° the pair weighs 1.414 E/c²; at 120° the pair weighs 1.732 E/c²; at 180° the pair weighs 2.000 E/c². Two photons flying in the same direction have no mass between them at all, because their momenta add to exactly the energy over c; anything else and they do. Nothing has been added: the constituents are massless at every angle, and the mass of the system is a property of the arrangement. At 180° the pair weighs 2E/c², which is every joule it contains — the case of a sealed box of light, where the two beams cancel in momentum and the whole energy shows up on the scales.

The box of light that weighs something

Two photons flying apart have a mass between them, though neither has one. Seal them in a mirrored box and the box is heavier than it was empty, by exactly the energy inside divided by c². Mass is not a property of stuff and it does not add up — it is a property of a system, and 99 per cent of the mass of everything anybody has ever weighed is of this kind.

relativity · Mass-energy Nine hundred steps and hardly anywhere. On the left, a walk of 900 steps of unit length in uniformly random directions, which is what a photon does inside a star: it goes a mean free path, scatters, and starts again in a direction that has forgotten the last one. After 900 steps it is 7.5 lengths from where it began, against 900 if it had gone straight. On the right, the root-mean-square distance over 240 independent walks against the number of steps, both logarithmic: a straight line of slope 0.4920 against an exact one half. The square root is the whole of the result and it is brutal. Escaping a body of radius R takes not R/λ steps but (R/λ)² of them, so a mean free path a thousand times smaller costs a million times as long. That is the difference between a photon leaving the Sun's core and a neutrino doing it: one takes a hundred thousand years and the other takes two and a third seconds, through the same material, and the only thing that differs is λ. What the picture cannot show is the sense in which the escaping energy is not the photon that started: it is absorbed and re-emitted countless times, at falling temperature, so what leaves is a gamma ray's worth of energy arriving as a great many visible photons.

The light that takes a hundred thousand years to leave

A neutrino made in the Sun's core is at the surface in two and a third seconds. A photon made beside it takes something like a hundred thousand years, through the same material, over the same seven hundred thousand kilometres — and the whole of the difference is one length, entering the answer squared.

astrophysics · Kinetic theory Three sources, and the number that separates them. The chance of detecting a second photon a delay τ after a first, divided by the chance if the two were independent, for three kinds of light. At long delay every curve is one, which is what independence means. At zero delay they are 2, 1 and 0, and those three numbers are three different physical situations. Thermal light is bunched: its intensity fluctuates, and a photon is more likely to be found where the intensity happened to be high, so it arrives with company for as long as the fluctuation lasts — 4 nanoseconds here. A laser is flat, because a coherent state has no intensity fluctuation to correlate with. And a single emitter is antibunched: it gives zero, exactly, because after emitting it is in its ground state and cannot emit again until it has been re-excited, which takes 12 nanoseconds. The zero is the important one. Every classical field, of every possible intensity distribution, has g²(0) at least one — the inequality follows from the fact that the mean square of a real positive quantity is at least the square of its mean. A measurement below one is not merely evidence for photons; it is a result no wave theory can produce.

The experiment a wave cannot pass

The photoelectric effect is offered everywhere as the proof that light is quantised, and it is not one — a classical wave falling on quantised matter reproduces every feature of it. The measurement that no wave can pass is a different one: send single photons at a beam splitter and count how often both detectors fire.

quantum · Photon Snell's law with space and time exchanged. Two constructions on the same diagram of frequency against wavenumber, with the light lines of a medium of index 1 and of index 1.5. On the left, a boundary in space: the wave crosses a still surface, the frequency is conserved, and the horizontal line at the incident frequency meets the new medium's line at a wavenumber 1.5 times larger — the familiar shortening of the wavelength. On the right, a boundary in time: the whole medium changes at once, the wavenumber is conserved, and the vertical line at the incident wavenumber meets the new medium's line at a frequency 0.667 times the old one. The vertical line also meets the new line's negative-frequency branch, which is a wave running backwards: a reflection in time. A spatial boundary reflects into the same frequency and a temporal one into the same wavelength.

The reflection that needs no surface

Change the refractive index of a whole medium at one instant and a wave already travelling through it splits in two, one part running on and one running back, though there is no surface anywhere for it to reflect from. A boundary in time is Snell's law with space and time exchanged: the wavelength is kept and the frequency changes, momentum is conserved and energy is not.

optics · Refraction How far the vacuum is from being a nonlinear medium. The size of the vacuum's departure from linearity, as a fraction, against the electric field it is subjected to — thirteen decades of field and twenty-eight of correction, both logarithmic. The scale is the Schwinger field, computed here from the electron's mass and the fundamental constants as 1.32e+18 volts per metre: the field at which a pair gains its own rest energy over a Compton wavelength, and therefore the field at which the vacuum stops being a passive backdrop. The marks are the strongest fields that exist. a laboratory magnet, 10 T is 2.3e-9 of it; a hydrogen atom's own field is 3.9e-7 of it; a 10²² W/cm² laser focus is 2.1e-4 of it; the Schwinger field is 1.0e+0 of it; a magnetar, 10¹¹ T is 2.3e+1 of it. So a laboratory is twenty-eight decades from making the effect large, and a magnetar's field is above the critical one — which is why the only places the vacuum's nonlinearity has been seen are the two where the fields are not human: the ultraperipheral collision of two heavy nuclei, and the surface of a neutron star.

The one medium that was supposed to add exactly

Superposition holds because an equation is linear, and every material stops being linear at some amplitude. Empty space was the exception: Maxwell's equations are linear exactly, and two beams cross with no interaction of any kind. Quantum electrodynamics says otherwise — light scatters light, and a strong field makes the vacuum birefringent — at a field of 1.3 × 10¹⁸ volts per metre, which no laboratory has come within four decades of.

waves · Superposition The count that works for everything with a mass. How many beams a Stern-Gerlach analyser splits a particle into, for four spins, with the photon on the bottom row. For anything with a mass the answer is 2j+1 — go to the particle's rest frame, where its spin can point in any direction, and count the projections along whichever axis the magnet defines. A spin-one particle gives three: up, down, and a middle beam that is not deflected at all. The photon has spin one and gives two. The middle state does not exist, and it is not that it is hard to produce or weakly coupled — there is no such state of the electromagnetic field. A light wave has two polarisations and the third one, in which the field would oscillate along the direction of travel, is not a solution of Maxwell's equations at all.

Two states where the counting says three

A particle of spin one has three states, and the photon has two. The missing one is not rare or weakly coupled — there is no such state of the electromagnetic field. What removes it is that a massless particle has no rest frame, so the rotations that would turn one projection into another are not available; and the state comes back the moment the particle acquires a mass, which is what a photon does in a plasma.

quantum · Spin The light of a diode at room temperature is as bright as a surface thousands of kelvin hot. How many photons occupy each mode of the light, on a logarithmic scale, against photon energy. The lowest curve is the thermal glow of a 1.42 eV semiconductor at 300 K with no voltage across it. The solid curve above it is the same device with 1.3 V across it, emitting only above its gap. The dashed curve is a blackbody at 2571 K, the temperature whose light has the same occupation as the diode's at 1.472 eV, just above the gap. They cross there and nowhere else: the diode's occupation falls a factor e every 25.9 meV, as its lattice's temperature requires, and the blackbody's every 222 meV. No single temperature describes the diode's light. At each photon energy it has a brightness temperature, and that temperature is 300 K multiplied by ε/(ε − qV).

The glow that carries a voltage

Thermal radiation has no chemical potential, because walls make and destroy photons freely. A light-emitting diode is a body that glows at room temperature with a voltage written into its light — Planck's law with the voltage as the photons' chemical potential — which is why its light can be as bright as a surface thousands of kelvin hot, why at low voltage it can put out more light than the power it draws and cool itself doing so, and why a reverse voltage makes a surface look colder than it is.

thermodynamics · Chemical potential Three identical photons in a three-way splitter: some outcomes are forbidden. One photon enters each input of a symmetric three-way splitter, which sends each photon to each output with equal probability. Across: the ten ways three photons can leave, written as how many leave by each output. Bars, for each outcome: photons that can be told apart, identical photons, and identical fermions. Distinguishable photons spread over all ten, as independent coins would. Identical photons never produce 210, 201, 120, 102, 021, 012 — the 6 outcomes whose output labels do not add to a multiple of three — and pile into the rest: 300 with 0.222, 111 with 0.333, 030 with 0.222, 003 with 0.222. Identical fermions leave one per output every time (probability 1.000). Each probability is a sum of amplitudes over the distinct ways to reach the outcome, and each set sums to one.

The outcomes identical photons refuse

Two identical photons meeting at a beam splitter always leave together, and that one fact carries three more. No classical light can empty the coincidence dip more than halfway, so the depth is a test of what light is; the depth measures how identical two photons are, however they differ; and with three photons in a three-way splitter whole classes of outcome become impossible — the first case of a sum over paths that no known algorithm can evaluate quickly as the photons multiply.

quantum · Photon

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Energy conservationE = mc²Momentum conservationPolarisationSpectrumBeam splitterBlackbodyCoincidenceQuantisationSpinSuperpositionSymmetry

All concepts