Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Mean free path — where it appears

The average distance a particle travels between interactions, equal to one over the number density times the cross-section. It is 68 nanometres for air at room conditions and a light-year for a neutrino in lead, and comparing it with the apparatus decides whether a continuum description applies.

Named by 16 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Molecular speeds at 4 temperatures. The distribution of molecular speeds in a gas, with each curve enclosing the same area. Raising the temperature moves the peak right and lowers it: the same molecules, spread over a wider range of speeds.

The speeds in a still room

The air in a quiet room is not still. Every molecule in it is moving at hundreds of metres per second, and temperature is a single number summarising an entire distribution.

thermodynamics · Kinetic theory A spike, spreading. The solution of the diffusion equation at three times, with a seeded random walk histogrammed behind it. The area under every curve is the same because nothing is lost; only the width changes, and it grows as the square root of the time.

The equation that only runs forwards, and the walk underneath it

A drop of ink spreads and never gathers. The equation describing it is one of the few in physics that is not reversible — and underneath it is nothing but a coin being tossed.

thermodynamics · Diffusion How much each colour is scattered. Scattering strength against wavelength, as the inverse fourth power, normalised to one at 550 nanometres. Light at 450 nanometres is scattered 4.35 times as strongly as light at 650 nanometres — which is the whole reason the sky is the colour it is.

Why the sky is blue and the sunset is not, from one exponent

Scattering goes as the inverse fourth power of wavelength, and that single number produces a blue sky and a red sun without any second explanation. The two facts look opposite and are the same arithmetic.

optics · Scattering The isothermal atmosphere against the real one. Pressure as a fraction of its sea-level value, against altitude. The curves are the isothermal barometric formula at 220, 288, 400 kelvin, whose scale heights are 6.4, 8.4, 11.7 kilometres. The points are the measured standard atmosphere. At 20 kilometres the 288 kelvin model is 71 per cent out, because the air up there is not at 288 kelvin.

Why the air thins with height, and why that is the same law as the speeds

The pressure of the atmosphere falls exponentially with altitude, and the distribution of molecular speeds falls exponentially with energy. These are not two results that happen to look alike. They are one statement read on two axes.

thermodynamics · Kinetic theory The straight line between two plates. A layer of water 10 mm deep with its top plate drawn along at 1 m/s. In the steady state the velocity is a straight line from zero at the fixed surface to the plate's speed at the moving one, and the stress needed to keep it going is μ times that slope: 0.100 Pa. The fluid at each wall is at rest with respect to it, which is an experimental fact rather than a consequence of anything above.

Momentum going sideways

Viscosity is usually described as friction between layers of fluid, which gets the effect right and the mechanism wrong. What is actually happening is that momentum is being conducted across the flow — by the same equation, with the same solutions, as a drop of ink spreading.

fluids · Viscosity A path through a crowd. A point crossing a field of 90 scatterers, rebounding off each. The mean length of 4000 such segments is 0.2983 box widths, against the textbook form 1/2nr = 0.3086 — a departure of -3.3 per cent, from a measurement that knows nothing of the formula. It does not agree exactly and should not: the closed form is derived for a vanishingly dilute field and these discs cover 9.2 per cent of the plane. Two finite-density effects pull opposite ways — crowding shortens the path, and discs shadowing one another lengthen it — so which side of the formula a given field lands on is not something the formula can tell.

How far a molecule gets

A molecule of air travels about sixty-eight nanometres between collisions — some two hundred times its own size, and a ten-millionth of the width of a room. That ratio is the reason a gas can be treated as a continuous substance at all, and the reason it sometimes cannot.

thermodynamics · Kinetic theory Which grains the light wins. The radiation force on a spherical grain divided by the gravitational force on it, against the grain's radius, on logarithmic axes. Both forces fall as the inverse square of the distance, so the ratio does not depend on how far away the grain is — only on how big it is. Light acts on the cross-section and gravity on the volume, so the ratio goes as 1/a, and the two are equal at 287 nm for material of density 2000 kg/m³. Anything smaller than that is expelled; anything larger stays.

Light has a pressure

Sunlight pushes on a square metre with about the weight of a grain of sand, which sounds like a curiosity until the object being pushed is small enough. The demonstration in every school cupboard turns the wrong way, and the reason it does is more interesting than the effect it is supposed to show.

astrophysics · Radiation pressure The same law, across twenty-eight decades. The mean free path 1/nσ against cross-section, for a target density of 6.83·10³⁰ targets per cubic metre — solid lead. It is a straight line of slope minus one, because there is only one thing in the law. At 10⁻²⁸ m² the path is 1.46 mm; at 10⁻⁴⁷ m² the path is 1.55 light-years. Nothing about the physics changes between those ends. Only the area does.

How far a neutrino gets

A mean free path is one over the number density times the cross-section, and nothing else. Change only the cross-section — by twenty-eight powers of ten — and the same arithmetic that gives a molecule seventy nanometres in air gives a neutrino a light-year of solid lead.

astrophysics · Kinetic theory Newton's answer, Laplace's, and the measurement. The speed of sound in 4 gases at 273.15 K. The short bar is Newton's √(RT/M), which assumes the compressions stay at one temperature; the long one is the same multiplied by √γ, which is what they come to if no heat crosses between a compression and the rarefaction beside it; the upright mark is the measured value. Newton's is 15.5% low for air, 22.5% low for helium, 22.5% low for argon, 12.0% low for carbon dioxide, and the corrected one is right to 0.05% for every gas here. Turning it round: γ read off each pair of bars is 1.400 for air, 1.665 for helium, 1.666 for argon, 1.290 for carbon dioxide, which is 1 + 2/f with f = 5.0, 3.0, 3.0, 6.9 ways of holding energy — three for the monatomic gases, five for the diatomic ones, and nearly seven for carbon dioxide, whose bending modes have begun to take a share at this temperature and its stretch has not. A speed measured with a stopwatch counts the ways a molecule can move.

The correction that took a century

Newton derived the speed of sound in 1687 and got 290 metres a second against a measured 340. The arithmetic was right; the assumption was not. Heat cannot cross a wavelength in a period, so the compressions are adiabatic — and the factor that repairs the answer turns out to be a count of the ways a molecule can move.

waves · Wave motion The viscosity of a gas, over 8 decades of pressure. The viscosity of 3 gases at 300 K against pressure, on a logarithmic pressure axis and a linear viscosity one. The lines are flat, and that is the whole figure. Viscosity is the rate at which momentum is carried across a shear, which is the density of carriers times the distance each one carries it: ⅓ρv̄λ. Doubling the pressure doubles the density and halves the free path, and the two cancel exactly, so the same gas at a hundredth of an atmosphere is exactly as viscous as at one — which is not what anybody expects of a thinner gas and is what is measured. nitrogen comes out at 17.9 μPa·s against a measured 17.9, helium comes out at 19.3 μPa·s against a measured 19.9, argon comes out at 21.7 μPa·s against a measured 22.7. The flatness ends when the free path reaches the apparatus rather than the next layer of gas: at a vessel 10 mm across that is around 0.68 Pa for nitrogen, 1.94 Pa for helium, 0.69 Pa for argon, below which there is no gas-to-gas hand-off left to make.

The viscosity that does not care how much gas there is

Pump most of the air out of a vessel and the air that is left is exactly as viscous as it was. Maxwell derived that in 1860, did not believe it, and spent six years building an apparatus to measure it — which is a better description of how a prediction becomes knowledge than any amount of agreement would have been.

thermodynamics · Kinetic theory The gas that leaves is not the gas inside. The distribution of molecular speeds inside a container at 300 K and in the beam that escapes through a small hole in it, each normalised to its own peak. They are not the same distribution. A molecule's chance of reaching the hole in a given time is proportional to how fast it is going, so the beam carries one more factor of speed than the gas does — v³ rather than v² times the Boltzmann factor — and the beam is therefore faster and hotter than what it came from. The mean speed inside is 476 m/s and in the beam 561 m/s, a ratio of 1.1781 against the exact 3π/8; and the mean kinetic energy is 1.500 kT inside against 2.000 kT in the beam, which are exactly 3/2 and 2. That difference is not a subtlety. A molecular beam made by effusion has a temperature, in the sense of a mean energy, a third higher than its source; a gas slowly leaking from a container leaves the remainder cooler than it would be if a fair sample had gone; and every calculation of a rate through an aperture that uses the bulk distribution is wrong by this factor.

The gas that leaves is not the gas inside

Put a small hole in a container of gas and what comes out is faster and hotter than what stays behind — its mean kinetic energy is 2kT against the 3/2 kT of the gas it came from. Nothing has heated it. A fast molecule simply reaches the hole more often than a slow one, so the sample that escapes is biased by exactly one factor of speed, and every consequence of effusion is that factor.

thermodynamics · Kinetic theory One word, two mechanisms, opposite signs. Viscosity on a logarithmic axis against temperature over the range 280 to 360 kelvin, where gases and liquids can both be measured. The gases rise and the liquids fall, and the two families are separated by three decades of magnitude as well as by sign. The logarithmic slopes at the middle of the range are 0.76 for air, 0.69 for helium, -6.13 for water, -5.41 for ethanol, -23.00 for glycerol, so the steepest liquid responds 30 times more strongly than the gas and in the other direction. Nothing about the word viscosity requires this: what is being measured in both cases is the ratio of a shear stress to a shear rate, and that definition says nothing about what carries the momentum. In a gas it is molecules in free flight, so heating speeds up the carriers; in a liquid the molecules are permanently in contact and what has to happen is one of them getting past its neighbours, so heating removes an obstacle rather than adding a carrier. The obvious question this raises is what a dense gas near its critical point does, where neither picture holds, and the honest answer is that neither formula on this chart applies there at all.

The thickness that goes both ways

Heat a liquid and it thins; heat a gas and it thickens. The two are not a strong effect and a weak one but opposite signs, differing by a factor of thirty in size as well — and the word viscosity names one measurement made on two mechanisms that have almost nothing in common.

fluids · Viscosity Nine hundred steps and hardly anywhere. On the left, a walk of 900 steps of unit length in uniformly random directions, which is what a photon does inside a star: it goes a mean free path, scatters, and starts again in a direction that has forgotten the last one. After 900 steps it is 7.5 lengths from where it began, against 900 if it had gone straight. On the right, the root-mean-square distance over 240 independent walks against the number of steps, both logarithmic: a straight line of slope 0.4920 against an exact one half. The square root is the whole of the result and it is brutal. Escaping a body of radius R takes not R/λ steps but (R/λ)² of them, so a mean free path a thousand times smaller costs a million times as long. That is the difference between a photon leaving the Sun's core and a neutrino doing it: one takes a hundred thousand years and the other takes two and a third seconds, through the same material, and the only thing that differs is λ. What the picture cannot show is the sense in which the escaping energy is not the photon that started: it is absorbed and re-emitted countless times, at falling temperature, so what leaves is a gamma ray's worth of energy arriving as a great many visible photons.

The light that takes a hundred thousand years to leave

A neutrino made in the Sun's core is at the surface in two and a third seconds. A photon made beside it takes something like a hundred thousand years, through the same material, over the same seven hundred thousand kilometres — and the whole of the difference is one length, entering the answer squared.

astrophysics · Kinetic theory Light that walks through a cloud. Seven photons entering a slab 8 scattering mean free paths thick from above, straight down, and followed until they leave, with every scattering equally likely to send them in any direction; their paths are projected onto the page. Of 20000 photons followed the same way, 82.5 per cent come back out of the top and 17.5 per cent out of the bottom. Diffusion theory predicts 18.2 per cent through the bottom. Only 10 photons cross without scattering at all, where e⁻⁸ predicts 6.7 — within the counting error of so few: nearly all of what is transmitted has walked, and the direction it arrived from is forgotten on the way.

The cloud light has to walk through

A beam crossing thirty scattering lengths of anything should keep e⁻³⁰ of itself — a ten-millionth of a millionth. A cloud thirty scattering lengths thick lets through nearly a third of the sunlight falling on it. The light has not crossed; it has walked, one scattering at a time, and a walk through a slab obeys a law with the shape of Ohm's rather than of an exponential.

optics · Scattering The ripple that sits on top of an absorption edge. The Cu K absorption of copper foil, 293 K through its edge and for seven hundred electronvolts above it, with the smooth atomic background it would have if the absorbing atom were alone drawn beneath it. The difference between the two is the fine structure: a modulation reaching 11 per cent, dying away as the photon energy rises, and entirely absent from a free atom. It is there because the ejected electron is a wave that the neighbouring atoms scatter back onto the atom that emitted it, so the absorption depends on whether the returning wave arrives in step with the outgoing one — which depends on the distance to the neighbour and on nothing else about the sample.

The ripple that counts the neighbours

An absorption edge is drawn as a step and it is a step with a ripple on it — a modulation of eleven per cent in copper, five in a zinc site buried in a protein. The ripple is the ejected electron's own wave, scattered back onto the atom that emitted it, so its period is a distance. It is the only way of measuring where an atom's neighbours are that does not need a crystal.

waves · Attenuation 14 decades of fluid, and a floor none of them reaches. The ratio of viscosity to entropy density for 8 substances, in units of the proposed lower bound, on a logarithmic axis. The quantity is a viscosity divided by how much entropy a cubic metre of the substance holds, and it has the dimensions of Planck's constant over Boltzmann's — so a bound on it is a statement with no material properties in it at all. The span here is a factor of 1.6e+14, from pitch at 20 °C at the top to the quark–gluon plasma at the bottom, which sits a factor of 1.6 above the floor. The values marked as computed are worked out from a viscosity and a tabulated entropy; the rest are quoted from the compilations, because a minimum along an isobar is an inference from many measurements rather than a single one.

Whether a fluid can be made arbitrarily thin

Viscosity has no units anybody would call fundamental, and nothing obviously stops it being as small as you like. Divide it by the entropy in a cubic metre and the units become Planck's constant over Boltzmann's — and a conjecture from 2005 says that ratio has a floor. Across fourteen decades of ordinary fluid nothing has been measured below it, the closest thing to it is the hottest matter ever made, and a kinetic-theory argument reaches the same number from the opposite direction.

fluids · Viscosity

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DiffusionKinetic theoryViscosityContinuumCross-sectionMaxwell–Boltzmann distributionRandom walkAttenuationEquipartitionKnudsen numberMomentumMomentum diffusion

All concepts