Concept

Mean free path — where it appears

The average distance a particle travels between interactions, equal to one over the number density times the cross-section. It is 68 nanometres for air at room conditions and a light-year for a neutrino in lead, and comparing it with the apparatus decides whether a continuum description applies.

Named by 24 essays across 8 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Molecular speeds at 4 temperatures. The distribution of molecular speeds in a gas, with each curve enclosing the same area. Raising the temperature moves the peak right and lowers it: the same molecules, spread over a wider range of speeds.

The speeds in a still room

The air in a quiet room is not still. Every molecule in it is moving at hundreds of metres per second, and temperature is a single number summarising an entire distribution.

thermodynamics · Kinetic theory
A spike, spreading. The solution of the diffusion equation at three times, with a seeded random walk histogrammed behind it. The area under every curve is the same because nothing is lost; only the width changes, and it grows as the square root of the time.

The equation that only runs forwards, and the walk underneath it

A drop of ink spreads and never gathers. The equation describing it is one of the few in physics that is not reversible — and underneath it is nothing but a coin being tossed.

thermodynamics · Diffusion
How much each colour is scattered. Scattering strength against wavelength, as the inverse fourth power, normalised to one at 550 nanometres. Light at 450 nanometres is scattered 4.35 times as strongly as light at 650 nanometres — which is the whole reason the sky is the colour it is.

Why the sky is blue and the sunset is not, from one exponent

Scattering goes as the inverse fourth power of wavelength, and that single number produces a blue sky and a red sun without any second explanation. The two facts look opposite and are the same arithmetic.

optics · Scattering
The isothermal atmosphere against the real one. Pressure as a fraction of its sea-level value, against altitude. The curves are the isothermal barometric formula at 220, 288, 400 kelvin, whose scale heights are 6.4, 8.4, 11.7 kilometres. The points are the measured standard atmosphere. At 20 kilometres the 288 kelvin model is 71 per cent out, because the air up there is not at 288 kelvin.

Why the air thins with height, and why that is the same law as the speeds

The pressure of the atmosphere falls exponentially with altitude, and the distribution of molecular speeds falls exponentially with energy. These are not two results that happen to look alike. They are one statement read on two axes.

thermodynamics · Kinetic theory
The straight line between two plates. A layer of water 10 mm deep with its top plate drawn along at 1 m/s. In the steady state the velocity is a straight line from zero at the fixed surface to the plate's speed at the moving one, and the stress needed to keep it going is μ times that slope: 0.100 Pa. The fluid at each wall is at rest with respect to it, which is an experimental fact rather than a consequence of anything above.

Momentum going sideways

Viscosity is usually described as friction between layers of fluid, which gets the effect right and the mechanism wrong. What is actually happening is that momentum is being conducted across the flow — by the same equation, with the same solutions, as a drop of ink spreading.

fluids · Viscosity
A path through a crowd. A point crossing a field of 90 scatterers, rebounding off each. The mean length of 4000 such segments is 0.2983 box widths, against the textbook form 1/2nr = 0.3086 — a departure of -3.3 per cent, from a measurement that knows nothing of the formula. It does not agree exactly and should not: the closed form is derived for a vanishingly dilute field and these discs cover 9.2 per cent of the plane. Two finite-density effects pull opposite ways — crowding shortens the path, and discs shadowing one another lengthen it — so which side of the formula a given field lands on is not something the formula can tell.

How far a molecule gets

A molecule of air travels about sixty-eight nanometres between collisions — some two hundred times its own size, and a ten-millionth of the width of a room. That ratio is the reason a gas can be treated as a continuous substance at all, and the reason it sometimes cannot.

thermodynamics · Kinetic theory
Which grains the light wins. The radiation force on a spherical grain divided by the gravitational force on it, against the grain's radius, on logarithmic axes. Both forces fall as the inverse square of the distance, so the ratio does not depend on how far away the grain is — only on how big it is. Light acts on the cross-section and gravity on the volume, so the ratio goes as 1/a, and the two are equal at 287 nm for material of density 2000 kg/m³. Anything smaller than that is expelled; anything larger stays.

Light has a pressure

Sunlight pushes on a square metre with about the weight of a grain of sand, which sounds like a curiosity until the object being pushed is small enough. The demonstration in every school cupboard turns the wrong way, and the reason it does is more interesting than the effect it is supposed to show.

astrophysics · Radiation pressure
The same law, across twenty-eight decades. The mean free path 1/nσ against cross-section, for a target density of 6.83·10³⁰ targets per cubic metre — solid lead. It is a straight line of slope minus one, because there is only one thing in the law. At 10⁻²⁸ m² the path is 1.46 mm; at 10⁻⁴⁷ m² the path is 1.55 light-years. Nothing about the physics changes between those ends. Only the area does.

How far a neutrino gets

A mean free path is one over the number density times the cross-section, and nothing else. Change only the cross-section — by twenty-eight powers of ten — and the same arithmetic that gives a molecule seventy nanometres in air gives a neutrino a light-year of solid lead.

astrophysics · Kinetic theory
Newton's answer, Laplace's, and the measurement. The speed of sound in 4 gases at 273.15 K. The short bar is Newton's √(RT/M), which assumes the compressions stay at one temperature; the long one is the same multiplied by √γ, which is what they come to if no heat crosses between a compression and the rarefaction beside it; the upright mark is the measured value. Newton's is 15.5% low for air, 22.5% low for helium, 22.5% low for argon, 12.0% low for carbon dioxide, and the corrected one is right to 0.05% for every gas here. Turning it round: γ read off each pair of bars is 1.400 for air, 1.665 for helium, 1.666 for argon, 1.290 for carbon dioxide, which is 1 + 2/f with f = 5.0, 3.0, 3.0, 6.9 ways of holding energy — three for the monatomic gases, five for the diatomic ones, and nearly seven for carbon dioxide, whose bending modes have begun to take a share at this temperature and its stretch has not. A speed measured with a stopwatch counts the ways a molecule can move.

The correction that took a century

Newton derived the speed of sound in 1687 and got 290 metres a second against a measured 340. The arithmetic was right; the assumption was not. Heat cannot cross a wavelength in a period, so the compressions are adiabatic — and the factor that repairs the answer turns out to be a count of the ways a molecule can move.

waves · Wave motion
The viscosity of a gas, over 8 decades of pressure. The viscosity of 3 gases at 300 K against pressure, on a logarithmic pressure axis and a linear viscosity one. The lines are flat, and that is the whole figure. Viscosity is the rate at which momentum is carried across a shear, which is the density of carriers times the distance each one carries it: ⅓ρv̄λ. Doubling the pressure doubles the density and halves the free path, and the two cancel exactly, so the same gas at a hundredth of an atmosphere is exactly as viscous as at one — which is not what anybody expects of a thinner gas and is what is measured. nitrogen comes out at 17.9 μPa·s against a measured 17.9, helium comes out at 19.3 μPa·s against a measured 19.9, argon comes out at 21.7 μPa·s against a measured 22.7. The flatness ends when the free path reaches the apparatus rather than the next layer of gas: at a vessel 10 mm across that is around 0.68 Pa for nitrogen, 1.94 Pa for helium, 0.69 Pa for argon, below which there is no gas-to-gas hand-off left to make.

The viscosity that does not care how much gas there is

Pump most of the air out of a vessel and the air that is left is exactly as viscous as it was. Maxwell derived that in 1860, did not believe it, and spent six years building an apparatus to measure it — which is a better description of how a prediction becomes knowledge than any amount of agreement would have been.

thermodynamics · Kinetic theory
The gas that leaves is not the gas inside. The distribution of molecular speeds inside a container at 300 K and in the beam that escapes through a small hole in it, each normalised to its own peak. They are not the same distribution. A molecule's chance of reaching the hole in a given time is proportional to how fast it is going, so the beam carries one more factor of speed than the gas does — v³ rather than v² times the Boltzmann factor — and the beam is therefore faster and hotter than what it came from. The mean speed inside is 476 m/s and in the beam 561 m/s, a ratio of 1.1781 against the exact 3π/8; and the mean kinetic energy is 1.500 kT inside against 2.000 kT in the beam, which are exactly 3/2 and 2. That difference is not a subtlety. A molecular beam made by effusion has a temperature, in the sense of a mean energy, a third higher than its source; a gas slowly leaking from a container leaves the remainder cooler than it would be if a fair sample had gone; and every calculation of a rate through an aperture that uses the bulk distribution is wrong by this factor.

The gas that leaves is not the gas inside

Put a small hole in a container of gas and what comes out is faster and hotter than what stays behind — its mean kinetic energy is 2kT against the 3/2 kT of the gas it came from. Nothing has heated it. A fast molecule simply reaches the hole more often than a slow one, so the sample that escapes is biased by exactly one factor of speed, and every consequence of effusion is that factor.

thermodynamics · Kinetic theory
One word, two mechanisms, opposite signs. Viscosity on a logarithmic axis against temperature over the range 280 to 360 kelvin, where gases and liquids can both be measured. The gases rise and the liquids fall, and the two families are separated by three decades of magnitude as well as by sign. The logarithmic slopes at the middle of the range are 0.76 for air, 0.69 for helium, -6.13 for water, -5.41 for ethanol, -23.00 for glycerol, so the steepest liquid responds 30 times more strongly than the gas and in the other direction. Nothing about the word viscosity requires this: what is being measured in both cases is the ratio of a shear stress to a shear rate, and that definition says nothing about what carries the momentum. In a gas it is molecules in free flight, so heating speeds up the carriers; in a liquid the molecules are permanently in contact and what has to happen is one of them getting past its neighbours, so heating removes an obstacle rather than adding a carrier. The obvious question this raises is what a dense gas near its critical point does, where neither picture holds, and the honest answer is that neither formula on this chart applies there at all.

The thickness that goes both ways

Heat a liquid and it thins; heat a gas and it thickens. The two are not a strong effect and a weak one but opposite signs, differing by a factor of thirty in size as well — and the word viscosity names one measurement made on two mechanisms that have almost nothing in common.

fluids · Viscosity
Nine hundred steps and hardly anywhere. On the left, a walk of 900 steps of unit length in uniformly random directions, which is what a photon does inside a star: it goes a mean free path, scatters, and starts again in a direction that has forgotten the last one. After 900 steps it is 7.5 lengths from where it began, against 900 if it had gone straight. On the right, the root-mean-square distance over 240 independent walks against the number of steps, both logarithmic: a straight line of slope 0.4920 against an exact one half. The square root is the whole of the result and it is brutal. Escaping a body of radius R takes not R/λ steps but (R/λ)² of them, so a mean free path a thousand times smaller costs a million times as long. That is the difference between a photon leaving the Sun's core and a neutrino doing it: one takes a hundred thousand years and the other takes two and a third seconds, through the same material, and the only thing that differs is λ. What the picture cannot show is the sense in which the escaping energy is not the photon that started: it is absorbed and re-emitted countless times, at falling temperature, so what leaves is a gamma ray's worth of energy arriving as a great many visible photons.

The light that takes a hundred thousand years to leave

A neutrino made in the Sun's core is at the surface in two and a third seconds. A photon made beside it takes something like a hundred thousand years, through the same material, over the same seven hundred thousand kilometres — and the whole of the difference is one length, entering the answer squared.

astrophysics · Kinetic theory
Light that walks through a cloud. Seven photons entering a slab 8 scattering mean free paths thick from above, straight down, and followed until they leave, with every scattering equally likely to send them in any direction; their paths are projected onto the page. Of 20000 photons followed the same way, 82.5 per cent come back out of the top and 17.5 per cent out of the bottom. Diffusion theory predicts 18.2 per cent through the bottom. Only 10 photons cross without scattering at all, where e⁻⁸ predicts 6.7 — within the counting error of so few: nearly all of what is transmitted has walked, and the direction it arrived from is forgotten on the way.

The cloud light has to walk through

A beam crossing thirty scattering lengths of anything should keep e⁻³⁰ of itself — a ten-millionth of a millionth. A cloud thirty scattering lengths thick lets through nearly a third of the sunlight falling on it. The light has not crossed; it has walked, one scattering at a time, and a walk through a slab obeys a law with the shape of Ohm's rather than of an exponential.

optics · Scattering
The ripple that sits on top of an absorption edge. The Cu K absorption of copper foil, 293 K through its edge and for seven hundred electronvolts above it, with the smooth atomic background it would have if the absorbing atom were alone drawn beneath it. The difference between the two is the fine structure: a modulation reaching 11 per cent, dying away as the photon energy rises, and entirely absent from a free atom. It is there because the ejected electron is a wave that the neighbouring atoms scatter back onto the atom that emitted it, so the absorption depends on whether the returning wave arrives in step with the outgoing one — which depends on the distance to the neighbour and on nothing else about the sample.

The ripple that counts the neighbours

An absorption edge is drawn as a step and it is a step with a ripple on it — a modulation of eleven per cent in copper, five in a zinc site buried in a protein. The ripple is the ejected electron's own wave, scattered back onto the atom that emitted it, so its period is a distance. It is the only way of measuring where an atom's neighbours are that does not need a crystal.

waves · Attenuation
14 decades of fluid, and a floor none of them reaches. The ratio of viscosity to entropy density for 8 substances, in units of the proposed lower bound, on a logarithmic axis. The quantity is a viscosity divided by how much entropy a cubic metre of the substance holds, and it has the dimensions of Planck's constant over Boltzmann's — so a bound on it is a statement with no material properties in it at all. The span here is a factor of 1.6e+14, from pitch at 20 °C at the top to the quark–gluon plasma at the bottom, which sits a factor of 1.6 above the floor. The values marked as computed are worked out from a viscosity and a tabulated entropy; the rest are quoted from the compilations, because a minimum along an isobar is an inference from many measurements rather than a single one.

Whether a fluid can be made arbitrarily thin

Viscosity has no units anybody would call fundamental, and nothing obviously stops it being as small as you like. Divide it by the entropy in a cubic metre and the units become Planck's constant over Boltzmann's — and a conjecture from 2005 says that ratio has a floor. Across fourteen decades of ordinary fluid nothing has been measured below it, the closest thing to it is the hottest matter ever made, and a kinetic-theory argument reaches the same number from the opposite direction.

fluids · Viscosity
A gas of grains that lose 51 per cent of their energy per collision, cooling into clumps. 2000 discs in a square box with periodic walls, covering 25 per cent of its area, started with random velocities and left alone. Each collision keeps a fraction e = 0.7 of the relative velocity along the line of centres. The panels are the same gas at three temperatures, where temperature means the mean kinetic energy of a grain: 0.85 T₀, 0.019 T₀, 0.00049 T₀. It starts uniform — the grain counts in a 10 × 10 grid have a variance 0.3 times their mean, more even than scattered points because discs cannot overlap — and ends in dense bands and clumps with empty space between, the variance 17 times the mean. Nothing attracts anything. The clumps form because a dense patch collides more often, cools faster, loses pressure and is squeezed denser by the hotter gas around it.

The gas that cools itself into clumps

Shake a box of grains hard enough and they fly about like the molecules of a gas. Stop shaking and the gas cools, because every collision destroys a little of the motion — and it does not cool evenly. A denser patch collides more often, cools faster, loses pressure, and is squeezed denser by the hotter gas around it. With nothing attracting anything to anything, the gas gathers itself into clumps and bands, and in the limit three grains can collide infinitely many times in a finite time.

fluids · Granular matter
The triangle of collisions that survive. Every collision of a particle ε above a filled Fermi sea with a partner from the sea, at zero temperature: the partner's energy across, one product's energy up, both from the Fermi level, the other product's fixed by energy conservation. Without exclusion every point in the plotted square would be an allowed collision. With it, the partner must come from below the Fermi level, and both products must land above it: the partner no deeper than ε below, the first product above zero, the second product above zero too. What survives is the shaded triangle, whose area is half of ε squared, and the collision rate is proportional to it. Halve the particle's excess energy and the triangle shrinks to a quarter; at the Fermi level itself it vanishes, and a particle there cannot scatter at all.

The collisions the exclusion principle forbids

A copper wire holds one free electron per atom, packed a quarter of a nanometre apart and repelling one another with the full Coulomb force. It seems impossible that an electron could travel any distance through that crowd without colliding. It travels micrometres — thousands of atoms — before another electron deflects it. The collisions are not weak. They are forbidden: to collide, both electrons need empty states to move into, and in a sea filled to the brim almost none exist. The same rule makes cold helium-3 thicken as the square of how cold it gets.

quantum · Exclusion
Heat that arrives everywhere at once, and heat that waits. The temperature spread from a point of heat released at time zero, in one dimension, at times 0.5, 2, 8 relaxation times, from the diffusion equation (dashed) and from Cattaneo's telegraph equation (solid) with the same diffusivity, distances in units of the signal speed times the relaxation time. At 0.5, the diffusion equation has put 62 per cent of the heat beyond the reach of any signal; the telegraph equation none, and 78 per cent is still in the two fronts; at 2, the diffusion equation has put 32 per cent of the heat beyond the reach of any signal; the telegraph equation none, and 37 per cent is still in the two fronts; at 8, the diffusion equation has put 5 per cent of the heat beyond the reach of any signal; the telegraph equation none, and 1.8 per cent is still in the two fronts. The fronts, drawn as the vertical marks, carry heat outward at the signal speed and decay; behind them the telegraph solution fills in and, after many relaxation times, becomes the diffusion equation's Gaussian.

The heat that arrives before it could

Release a pulse of heat at one point, and the diffusion equation — the law that has described heat flow since Fourier — says the temperature rises everywhere at once, however far away. A thermometer a kilometre off registers a change the instant the heat is released. That is an infinite signal speed, and relativity forbids it. The flaw is harmless for a kettle and fatal for a relativistic fluid. The repair is a relaxation time: heat flow takes a moment to respond to a temperature gradient. With it the equation carries heat at a finite speed, sends a sharp front ahead of the spreading warmth, and turns short-wavelength heat into a damped wave.

relativity · Relativistic thermodynamics
How well a diamond-like crystal conducts heat, from 1 K to 1000 K. The thermal conductivity of a model crystal with diamond's sound speed and Debye temperature, from kinetic theory applied to its phonons, against temperature on logarithmic axes: natural carbon in a sample 1 mm across, isotopically enriched carbon, and natural carbon in a sample 0.1 mm across; copper's room-temperature 400 W/m K is marked for comparison. The model is calibrated to natural diamond's 2,200 W/m K at room temperature. At low temperature the conductivity rises as the cube of the temperature, limited by the sample's walls; at high temperature it falls as umklapp collisions shorten the phonons' paths. Between, it peaks: 3.7·10⁴ W/m K at 100 K for the natural crystal; 7.8·10⁴ W/m K at 94 K for the enriched crystal; 1.2·10⁴ W/m K at 126 K for the thin natural crystal. The model gets the shape — the rise as the cube of the temperature, a peak near 100 K, the fall — but overestimates the heights, because it leaves out the phonon collisions that conserve momentum and every defect but isotopes; measured enriched diamond peaks near 4 × 10⁴ W/m K. An insulator with no free electrons still conducts heat five times better than copper at room temperature.

The gas of sound that carries a diamond's heat

Diamond has no free electrons and conducts heat five times better than copper. What carries the heat is a gas — not of molecules but of quantised sound waves, phonons — and the kinetic theory that gives the conductivity of air gives the conductivity of a crystal with the same formula: a third of heat capacity times speed times mean free path. The gas is strange in two ways. At low temperature its particles cross the whole crystal without meeting anything, so the conductivity depends on how big the sample is. And at room temperature one atom in a hundred being a neutron heavier is enough to scatter its fastest-oscillating members.

thermodynamics · Kinetic theory
The highest note the air can carry, with height. The frequency at which a sound wave in the air loses its amplitude by a factor e in a single wavelength, in hertz on a logarithmic scale, against height, with the band of human hearing shaded. Because viscosity does not depend on pressure, the collision time grows as the pressure falls, and the ceiling falls with it. It is about 212 MHz at sea level, 0.17 MHz at 50 km and 3 kHz at 80 km. It passes the top of human hearing, 20 kHz, at about 68 km, and the bottom, 20 Hz, at about 110 km; at 100 km it is 92 Hz. Above about a hundred kilometres the air cannot carry anything a person could hear, at any loudness: the molecules are too far apart to pass a compression on before it has dispersed.

The note too high for thin air

Sound in a gas is a compression handed from molecule to molecule by collisions, and it can only be handed on if the molecules collide many times in each period of the wave. At sea level they collide seven thousand million times a second, and the limit is far above anything audible. But a gas's viscosity does not depend on its pressure, so as the air thins with height the time between collisions grows in proportion, and the highest note the air can carry falls with it: two hundred megahertz at the ground, three kilohertz at eighty kilometres, below twenty hertz above a hundred and ten. The upper atmosphere is not silent for want of loudness. It is silent because its molecules are too far apart to pass a sound along.

thermodynamics · Kinetic theory
The voltage a gas gap can hold, on one curve. The breakdown voltage of a gap in air between flat electrodes against the product of pressure and gap width, on logarithmic scales — Paschen's law, in which pressure and gap enter only as their product because both count how many collisions an electron makes on the way across. Townsend's model, with γ = 0.01 electrons freed per ion at the cathode, has its minimum of 305 V at 1.12 Pa·m — a gap of 11 μm at atmospheric pressure, or 112 Pa across a centimetre. Measured minima in air are about 330 V. To the left the gap is too short, or the gas too thin, for an electron to make enough collisions, and the voltage climbs steeply; below about 0.41 Pa·m there is no gas breakdown at any voltage. To the right, collisions are so frequent that an electron gains too little energy between them, and the voltage rises nearly in proportion to pd. Dashed, the empirical law for air at larger pd: 31.4 kV for a centimetre at one atmosphere, against the model's 35.5.

The spark that needs room to start

Air is an excellent insulator until it is not, and the usual statement of when — three megavolts a metre — is true only for gaps of about a centimetre. A gap breaks down when one electron's avalanche of ionisation sends back enough ions to the cathode to free one more electron, and that condition depends on the pressure and the gap only through their product. The result is a curve with a floor: about 330 volts in air, below which no gap of any width will spark, and above which both a thinner gas and a denser one insulate better.

electromagnetism · Dielectrics
The distance at which the air takes over. Evaporation of water at 20 °C into dry air, in kilograms per square metre per second, against the thickness of the layer the vapour must cross before it is carried away, both on logarithmic scales, with the kinetic and diffusive resistances added in series: 1/u + δ/D, where u = √(RT/2πM) is the speed at which the kinetic flux carries vapour off and D the diffusion coefficient. Dashed, the kinetic ceiling. At one atmosphere the two resistances are equal at δ = D/u = 0.17 μm, about two and a half mean free paths of the air; a layer much thinner than that leaves the surface at its ceiling, and a layer much thicker throttles it in proportion to its thickness. At a tenth of an atmosphere diffusion is ten times faster and the crossover moves out to 1.7 μm. Only in vacuum, or across gaps shorter than a mean free path, does the liquid itself set the rate.

The puddle that could dry in a second

A liquid in equilibrium with its vapour loses molecules exactly as fast as the vapour delivers them, and kinetic theory says how fast that is. For water at room temperature it is two and a half kilograms per square metre every second — a puddle two and a half millimetres deep gone in a second. Puddles take hours because almost every molecule that leaves is knocked back by the air within a fraction of a micrometre. The ceiling binds only where the vapour can escape in a single free flight: in vacuum, where water freezes itself, in the smallest droplets, and on the filament of a lamp.

thermodynamics · Kinetic theory
A current that falls every 4.9 volts. The share of electrons reaching the anode of a mercury-vapour tube against the accelerating voltage, from a simulation of 3000 electrons at each voltage: the electrons must arrive at the grid with more than 1.5 eV to climb the last small retarding voltage, and lose 4.886 eV — the energy of mercury's first excited state — whenever they hit an atom with at least that much, after a random further distance averaging 0.03 of the gap. The current rises with voltage, then collapses each time the electrons have gained just enough to excite an atom and too little left to reach the anode: minima at 6.3, 11.2, 16.1, 21.0, 25.8 V, about 4.9 V apart. Energy was being handed to the atoms in lumps of 4.886 eV and in no other amount — the first direct evidence, in 1914, that an atom's internal energy is quantised.

The electrons that pay in fixed amounts

Fire electrons through mercury vapour and raise the voltage that drives them, and the current they carry should simply rise. In 1914 James Franck and Gustav Hertz found it rising, then collapsing, then rising again, over and over, every 4.9 volts. Below that energy an electron bounces off a mercury atom and keeps almost everything; above it, it can hand the atom exactly 4.9 electronvolts and no other amount. The atom will accept energy only in the size of the gap between its levels — shown here by collisions rather than by light, and misread by its discoverers as something else entirely.

quantum · Atomic structure

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DiffusionKinetic theoryViscosityKnudsen numberContinuumCross-sectionMaxwell–Boltzmann distributionRandom walkTemperatureAttenuationContinuum limitDissipation

All concepts