Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Faraday's law — where it appears

The statement that a changing magnetic field produces a circulating electric field, one of the four equations rather than a rule about circuits. The field is there whether or not a wire is present, and the circuit version follows from it rather than the other way about.

Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

What a collapse does to a field. A body of radius 700,000 km carrying a field of 0.01 T, collapsing to 10 km. The flux through every comoving loop is fixed, so B goes as 1/R² and the field reaches 4.9·10⁷ T — a compression of 7·10⁴ in radius bought a factor of 4.9·10⁹ in field. The line has slope exactly −2 and that is the only claim being made: what a real object ends up with also depends on how well the flux was held, and on what generated it.

The field that cannot get out

Squeeze a lump of conducting fluid and its magnetic field comes with it, because the flux through any loop that moves with the material cannot change. Halve the radius and the field goes up fourfold; collapse by a factor of seventy thousand and it goes up by five thousand million.

astrophysics · Flux freezing A disc that generates 0.785 V with no changing flux anywhere. The force per unit charge on a carrier in a conducting disc of radius 100 mm spinning at 3000 revolutions a minute in an axial field of 0.5 tesla, against how far out the carrier is. Each carrier is moving through the field at ωr, so v × B pushes it radially with a force per unit charge of ωrB — zero at the axle and largest at the rim. The area under the line is the potential difference between the axle and the rim, which is ½BωR² = 0.7854 volts. Nothing in this calculation mentions a loop, a flux or a rate of change, and the flux through the circuit formed by the disc, the contacts and the external wire does not change at all while the machine runs.

The rule that is two laws wearing one coat

The flux rule folds two entirely different pieces of physics into one number, and they agree exactly, which is why nobody notices there are two. A disc spinning in a steady field generates a voltage with no changing flux anywhere, and the folding comes apart.

electromagnetism · Induction Two loops, two calculations, one number. The coupling between a circular loop of radius 10 cm and a rectangle of 5 by 3 cm tilted at 35° and offset sideways, against how far apart they are along the axis. The two loops differ in area by a factor of 21 and in shape entirely. Two quantities are plotted and they lie on top of one another. One is the flux through the rectangle when a current runs in the circle, obtained by integrating the circle's Biot–Savart field over the rectangle's tilted surface. The other is the flux through the circle's disc when the same current runs in the rectangle, integrated over a disc a hundred times the area. Nothing is shared between the two calculations except the positions of the wires, and they agree to 0.075 per cent — a difference which is the quadrature's, not the physics's. This is reciprocity, and it is not obvious: there is no reason from the geometry why a small loop should catch as much of a big one's field as the big one catches of the small one's. It follows from the double line integral the two quantities can both be reduced to, which is symmetric in the two loops — and that reduction is the argument, not this figure, which is the check that the argument is true of the actual fields.

The coupling that is the same both ways

A small loop and a large one catch the same fraction of each other's field. Nothing in the geometry suggests it — one has twenty-one times the area of the other — and the two quantities are computed here by two integrals with nothing in common, over two surfaces of different shapes, agreeing to seven parts in ten thousand.

electromagnetism · Induction How much of μ₀N²A/ℓ a real coil actually has. The inductance of a 140-turn coil of radius 10 mm, divided by the long-solenoid formula μ₀N²A/ℓ, against how long the coil is compared with its diameter. The inductance is computed as a sum of Maxwell's mutual inductances between every pair of turns plus each turn's own, so the long-coil formula appears nowhere in it. At a length equal to the diameter the real coil has 68% of what the formula promises, and at a quarter of the diameter about a third. The reason is that the formula assumes every turn is threaded by the full interior field, and near the ends of a short coil the field has already begun to spread. The ratio is Nagaoka's coefficient, tabulated since 1909, and the computed points agree with the table.

The circuit that fights its own change

Every circuit is threaded by the field its own current makes, so every circuit resists having that current altered. It is the reason a coil takes time to start and the reason breaking one makes a voltage a thousand times the supply's.

electromagnetism · Induction

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Magnetic fluxLenz's lawElectromagnetic inductionEmfReciprocityAntennaBiot–SavartCircuitConductorsConservation lawsEnergy conservationField energy

All concepts