The collection

Every essay — page 17

One idea per essay, ordered so that the earlier ones set up the later ones — but nothing here depends on being read in sequence.

Mechanics

Motion, force, and the quantities that refuse to change.

The deflection is a circle, not a bend. Trajectories integrated from Newton's law in a rotating frame with the Coriolis term and nothing else — no pressure gradient, no friction, no force of any kind. 0.5 m/s at 45°, 0.3 m/s at 30°. Each path closes on itself after one inertial period, checked to a millionth of its own radius, and the radius is the speed divided by the Coriolis parameter: 4.85 km, 4.11 km. The deflection usually described as a curving of the path is a complete circle, traversed clockwise in the northern hemisphere in half a pendulum day, and a body left alone in a rotating frame goes nowhere at all.

The deflection that closes on itself

The Coriolis term is usually described as bending a path to the right. Integrated rather than described, it does not bend the path — it closes it. A body left alone in a rotating frame travels a circle of radius U/f and comes back to where it started in half a pendulum day, having gone nowhere at all, and drifting buoys in every ocean draw exactly that.

6 figures · part 3 on Circular motion

Pushed one way, travelling another. A parcel released from rest under a steady pressure-gradient acceleration of 2.0e-4 metres per second squared pointing east, integrated for 36 hours at 60°, 30°, 10°. Without rotation it would accelerate east indefinitely. With it, the motion is an inertial circle about a mean velocity at right angles to the push, and the mean over a whole number of inertial periods is measured off each path and matches the geostrophic value a/f to two per cent. At high latitude the loops are tight and the drift is almost purely along the isobars; near the equator the parcel travels a long way down the gradient before the rotation has had time to turn it, which is why geostrophic balance is a high-latitude statement and the tropics need a different set of approximations.

The ratio that decides whether the planet is turning

Whether the rotating terms matter is not a question about size. It is one dimensionless ratio, U over fL, and it runs from ten thousand in a teacup to a millionth in the Earth's core. Where it is small the pressure gradient stops accelerating the fluid and starts balancing a force on fluid already moving across it — so the flow runs along the pressure contours instead of down them, and a weather map is a streamline plot.

5 figures · part 4 on Circular motion

Optics

Light, and the small number of rules it obeys.

$A wave with two directions in it. Light at 60° entering silver, 550 nm, whose index is 0.055 + 3.32i. Phase matching along the boundary fixes the transmitted wave's tangential wavenumber and leaves the normal one to the medium, which supplies a complex answer. The real part decides where the phase goes and the imaginary part where the amplitude does, and they are not the same direction: the surfaces of constant amplitude are parallel to the interface, because the decay is entirely into the metal, while the surfaces of constant phase are tilted by 86.5° from the normal. There is therefore no single refracted angle to quote. The familiar picture, in which one set of parallel planes carries both, requires the absorption to be exactly zero.$

The angle that is two angles

Snell's law survives a complex index by giving a complex answer, and a complex angle is not an angle. What the phase-matching argument actually fixes is the tangential wavenumber, and when the medium absorbs, the surfaces of constant phase and the surfaces of constant amplitude stop being parallel. In silver at 550 nanometres the phase fronts run within four degrees of the surface while the amplitude decays straight into it.

6 figures · part 3 on Refraction

Two intersections, and the rule that picks one. The phase-matching construction for light arriving at 40° from a medium of index 1 into one of index -1. The circles are each medium's own relation between wavevector and frequency; the vertical line is the tangential wavenumber, which the boundary conserves. The line crosses the second circle twice, and the construction alone does not say which point is the answer — the rule that does is that energy must travel away from the interface. For a positive index the energy runs along the wavevector and the upper point is taken. For a negative one the energy runs against it, so the lower point is taken, the wavevector points back toward the boundary, and the ray leaves at -40.0° — on the same side of the normal as it arrived. Nothing in the drawing has changed except which intersection is circled.

The ray on the wrong side of the normal

The phase-matching construction draws a circle and a line, and the line crosses the circle twice. Every earlier construction silently took the upper intersection. Which one is physical is decided by where the energy goes rather than by where the wavevector points, and in a medium whose group velocity opposes its phase velocity the answer is the other one — so the refracted ray leaves on the same side of the normal it arrived on, a flat slab focuses, and a lens can beat the diffraction limit until loss stops it.

6 figures · part 4 on Refraction

Electromagnetism

Charge, field, and the lines drawn between them.

Three terms, and one distance. The three terms of an oscillating dipole's electric field against distance, in units of a reciprocal wavenumber, both logarithmic. They fall as 1/u³, 1/u² and 1/u, so they are all equal at u = 1 — a distance of λ/2π, which is a property of the frequency and of nothing about the antenna. The heavy curve is the field the three actually add up to, and it is not their sum: the static and radiation terms are in antiphase and partly cancel, which is why the total dips below every one of them just inside the crossing before settling onto the 1/u the far field is made of.

The distance where a field changes its mind

An oscillating source has three fields around it, falling as the inverse cube, the inverse square and the inverse first power of distance. They are all equal at one radius, and that radius is the wavelength over 2π — a number containing nothing about the source at all. Inside it a source mostly stores energy; outside it, mostly loses it, and the two behaviours are different technologies rather than different strengths.

6 figures · part 2 on Retardation $What a row of sources does that one cannot. The pattern of 8 identical sources in a row, spaced 0.5 wavelengths apart, all driven in phase. Each source alone radiates the same in every direction drawn here; together they radiate almost entirely along one. The sum being performed is the sum over path differences across the row, which is the sum a diffraction grating performs over its slits — the same function with the same first null, at sin θ = 1/Nd, measured here off the curve. What has been exploited is retardation: the contributions arrive at different times, and the pattern is a map of where they arrive in step.$

When the source is not heard all at once

The dipole approximation is not a statement that a source is small. It is a statement that every part of it is heard at the same retarded time, and dropping that assumption turns one source into a sum over a source. The sum is the same one a diffraction grating performs over its slits, with the same first null and the same extra orders — so a phased array and a grating are one piece of arithmetic met twice.

6 figures · part 3 on Retardation

Two solutions, and nothing in the equations to choose between them. A spherical pulse leaving a point and a spherical pulse arriving at one, each drawn at three times 0.35, 0.6, 0.85 in units where the speed is one. Both are exact solutions of the same wave equation, which is checked here by differencing the drawn samples twice in space and twice in time and requiring the residual to vanish for each. The one on the left is what is always used; the one on the right is discarded, and the equations do not do the discarding. The incoming pulse grows as it converges for the same reason the outgoing one decays as it spreads — the same energy through a smaller sphere — and it is as consistent with conservation as its mirror image is.

The solution that is thrown away

Maxwell's equations admit a field that converges on a charge exactly as readily as one that leaves it, and nothing in them prefers either. Retardation is a boundary condition rather than a law. Which boundary condition is right has been argued about for a century, one of the answers makes the arrow of time a property of there being absorbers, and the laboratory version of the question — whether an atom emits at all — has a measured answer that depends on what is listening.

6 figures · part 4 on Retardation

Thermodynamics

Heat, disorder, and the one law with a direction in it.

One temperature, four pawls, and nothing gained. The net rate of a ratchet whose gas and whose pawl are at the same temperature, against the load, for notches 2, 5, 10, 20 times the thermal energy deep. Every curve passes through zero at zero load and is negative everywhere else. The device is not merely unable to lift a weight; under any load at all it turns the wrong way and lets the weight down, converting its potential energy into heat in the gas. Making the notch deeper slows everything down — an exponential in the depth — and does not change the sign anywhere. That is the second law arriving as a mechanism rather than as a prohibition. Nothing was assumed about entropy; the pawl was simply allowed to be as warm as everything else, and its own fluctuations undo exactly the rectification it was there to provide. Any rectifier small enough for thermal noise to matter has this problem, and the rectifier being clever does not help, because the same noise reaches the cleverness.

The engine a fluctuation cannot run

A ratchet lets a shaft turn one way and not the other. Put a paddle in a gas on the same shaft and molecular collisions appear to become a lifted weight — an engine running on one reservoir. It does not work, and following exactly why turns the second law from a prohibition into a mechanism: the pawl is as warm as the gas, and it lifts whenever it is asked to.

5 figures · part 4 on Heat engines

The energy that refuses to be shared

Put all the energy of a chain of masses into its longest mode and add a few per cent of nonlinearity, and equipartition says it should spread out among all thirty-two modes and stay there. It does not. It leaks into three or four neighbours and then comes back — almost exactly — and goes on doing so, and the calculation that found this was expected to be a demonstration that it would not happen.

5 figures · part 4 on Equipartition $The temperature a planet ought to be. Each body's measured surface temperature against the temperature at which it would radiate away exactly the sunlight it absorbs — computed from two numbers, the sunlight reaching it and the fraction it reflects, with no other property of the body used. Points on the diagonal are bodies the one-line argument gets right. the Moon: balance 270 K, surface 250 K, −20 K with no atmosphere; Mercury: balance 433 K, surface 340 K, −93 K with no atmosphere; Mars: balance 210 K, surface 210 K, +0 K; Earth: balance 255 K, surface 288 K, +33 K; Venus: balance 227 K, surface 737 K, +510 K. The airless bodies fall below the line rather than on it, and the reason is the fourth power: a surface running from noon heat to night cold radiates like its hottest parts and averages like its coldest, so a mean thermometer reading is lower than the temperature that matches the emitted flux. Mars, whose atmosphere is thin and whose surface is nearly isothermal by comparison, sits on the line. Everything with a substantial atmosphere sits above it, by tens of kelvin on Earth and hundreds on Venus, and always in the same direction. Nothing here explains why. What the figure fixes is the size and the sign of what has to be explained.$

The height a planet is seen from

A body in sunlight settles where it radiates away what it absorbs, and that takes two numbers and one line of arithmetic. It gets the Moon right and Earth wrong by thirty-three kelvin. The correction is not that the atmosphere traps heat but that it moves the level space sees the planet from, and the rest is done by a lapse rate that is not a radiative quantity at all.

5 figures · part 4 on Blackbody

Relativity

Space and time, drawn on the same axes.

$The fringes a flow of water moves. The interference fringe shift against the speed of the water, for two tubes 1.5 m long, an index of 1.333, and light of 526 nm — Fizeau's apparatus. The beam is split, each half goes with the flow in one tube and against it in the other, and the two are recombined; the shift is the difference in transit time counted in wavelengths. Three predictions are drawn and they are not close together. If the water did not affect the light at all the shift would be zero, flat along the bottom. If the water carried the light with it completely the shift would be the steepest line. Fresnel's partial drag is the middle one, and at 7 m/s it gives 0.207 of a fringe — which is what was measured, to the accuracy of an eye reading a fringe pattern in 1851. The experiment therefore did not merely detect an effect; it chose between three quantitative possibilities that differ by factors of two, which is why a fraction of a fringe settled something.$

The drag that was only an addition

Light in moving water is carried along by it, but only partly — by a fraction of the water's speed that depends on the refractive index in a way nobody could account for. Fresnel invented the coefficient to save a theory, Fizeau measured it in 1851, and it sat unexplained for half a century. It is the first term of the relativistic velocity addition and nothing else.

5 figures · part 5 on Velocity addition

The one number the boost leaves alone. The mass of a lambda into a proton and a pion, reconstructed from the two products' laboratory energies and momenta alone, against how fast the parent was moving — for five different rest-frame emission angles. Every curve is the same horizontal line. The lab energies vary by more than a factor of ten across this range and the angles between the products vary from almost 180° to a few degrees; the combination E² − p² of the pair does not vary at all, to 3.2e-15, which the figure requires before drawing anything. The light curves are the energies of the two products, on the same axis and to a different scale, drawn to show how much is moving while the invariant does not. This is the whole method of particle physics. A parent that lives for 10⁻²³ seconds is never detected; what is detected is two tracks, and their invariant mass is computed and histogrammed over millions of events. A parent that exists shows up as a peak at its own mass, at the same place whatever the beam energy, which is what makes the peak believable.

The cone a decay cannot leave

A particle at rest breaks into two and they go opposite ways. Set the parent moving and the whole pattern folds forward — into a cone with a hard edge, beyond which nothing is emitted at any rest-frame angle at all. The energy spectrum that comes out is exactly rectangular, and the one number the boost leaves alone is how the parent is identified at all.

5 figures · part 5 on Relativistic dynamics

The transformation that never mentions light

Assume space and time are homogeneous, that space is isotropic, that two changes of frame compose into a third, and that the relativity principle holds. Those four leave exactly one free constant — and three possible worlds, one of them Galileo's and one of them Einstein's. Light appears nowhere in the derivation; it enters only when the constant has to be measured.

5 figures · part 4 on Spacetime diagram

Quantum

Where the continuous picture runs out, and what replaces it.

The energy that did not all arrive

A nucleus emitting one particle has no choice about the energy it comes out with — momentum conservation fixes it, and the spectrum is a line. Beta decay gives a continuum instead, from zero to the full available energy, and the shape of that continuum is a count of the ways the energy can be shared. Counting it required a third body nobody had seen, and the way the count approaches its endpoint is still the best place to weigh one.

6 figures · part 3 on Decay

Fluids

Matter that will not hold a shape, and the forces that act in it anyway.

The pressure a charged gel develops. The swelling pressure against the gel's fixed charge density, for several salt concentrations, on logarithmic axes. Each curve has two straight parts with different slopes, and both limits are checked against the solution rather than read off the plot. Where the fixed charge is small compared with the salt the pressure goes as the square of the charge divided by four times the salt: the bath's ions screen the fixed ones, and doubling the salt halves the pressure. Where the fixed charge dominates, every counterion it demands is an extra particle in the gel and the pressure goes as the charge itself. At 15 mM salt, a gel with 200 mM of fixed charge develops 427 kPa; At 50 mM salt, a gel with 200 mM of fixed charge develops 306 kPa; At 150 mM salt, a gel with 200 mM of fixed charge develops 150 kPa; At 500 mM salt, a gel with 200 mM of fixed charge develops 49 kPa. Cartilage carries a fixed charge of a couple of hundred millimolar from the sulphated sugars on its proteoglycans, sits in a bath of about 150 mM, and develops a swelling pressure of an atmosphere and a half — which is what holds a joint apart and carries the load across it.

The swelling a membrane cannot stop

Give the thing a membrane holds back an electric charge and the small ions that can cross are no longer free to distribute themselves. Two conditions — neutrality on each side, and equal chemical potential for the salt — fix where every ion goes, and they leave the charged side with more particles than the other. That excess is what holds a joint apart, and it is why a cell has to spend a third of its energy pumping.

5 figures · part 4 on Osmosis $The colours a draining film runs through, and the end of them. The fraction of light a free soap film reflects, against its thickness, at three wavelengths — 450, 550, 620 nm — computed from the sum over multiple reflections rather than from the two-beam approximation. The three curves peak at different thicknesses, which is why a draining film runs through a sequence of colours as it thins. Below about 11 nm every curve is under a tenth of a per cent and the film looks black. At zero thickness the reflectance is exactly zero, checked before the figure is drawn: the two surfaces reflect equally and half a cycle out of step, so a film much thinner than a wavelength cancels itself. That is the whole of why a black film is black. Nothing is absorbing; the film is there and has simply stopped being able to interfere constructively at any visible wavelength — which means the blackness is a measurement, and a film that has gone black is known to be thinner than about a tenth of a wavelength without anything being measured directly.$

The film that goes black before it bursts

A soap film drains, runs through every interference colour, and then stops reflecting anything at all. The black patch is not a hole and not a film about to break: it is the thinnest and most stable state the arrangement has, held apart by a pressure between its two surfaces that only exists at distances of nanometres.

5 figures · part 8 on Surface tension $A hundred thousand taps, and still not finished. The packing fraction of a column of grains against the number of taps it has been given, on a logarithmic horizontal scale, for several tap intensities. The grains start where pouring leaves them, around 0.55, and climb towards something near 0.64. At an intensity of 1.2 the packing reaches 0.6318 after a hundred thousand taps; At an intensity of 2 the packing reaches 0.6327 after a hundred thousand taps; At an intensity of 3 the packing reaches 0.6338 after a hundred thousand taps, which is still 0.0097 short of the asymptote. The shape is what matters. On a logarithmic axis the curve is close to a straight line over four decades, which means the packing improves by about the same amount for each factor of ten in the number of taps — not for each additional thousand. Going from a hundred taps to a thousand buys as much as going from a thousand to ten thousand. An exponential relaxation is over after a few time constants and this is not one. There is no number of taps after which the column is packed; there is only a number after which the next improvement is too small to measure.$

The pile that is never finished settling

Tap a jar of grains and it settles. Keep tapping and it goes on settling — logarithmically, so that each factor of ten in the number of taps buys the same small improvement as the last. There is no number of taps after which the column is packed; there is only a number after which the next improvement is too small to measure, and the asymptote everyone quotes is a fitted number rather than a measured one.

5 figures · part 6 on Granular matter

The pattern that stands still while the air goes through it. Streamlines of a steady 20 metre-per-second wind over a bell-shaped ridge 800 metres high and 6.0 kilometres wide, in air whose buoyancy frequency is 1.05e-2 per second. Nothing in the picture is moving: the air crosses it from left to right at 20 metres a second and the waves stay where they are, because standing still is what selects them. The vertical wavelength is 2πU/N = 11.9 kilometres, and the crests lean upstream as they rise — checked here by finding the maximum displacement a quarter of a wavelength up, which sits well upstream of the ridge. That tilt is the signature of energy travelling upward, and it is the feature every hand-drawn version of this picture gets backwards. Cloud forms at the crest of each wave where the air is highest and coldest, which is why the lens-shaped clouds sit stationary in a moving airstream.

The wave that is required to stand still

A stratified fluid supports internal waves at every wavelength there is. Put a steady wind over a ridge and the requirement that the pattern stay put picks exactly one of them — 2πU/N, and nothing about the mountain appears in it. The clouds that mark the crests sit still while the air goes through them at twenty metres a second, and the momentum the wave carries away is delivered thirty kilometres up.

6 figures · part 3 on Stratification

A reflection that keeps the angle to gravity and not to the wall. An internal wave beam of frequency 0.5N reflecting from a slope of 12°, with the wavelength ratio for slopes of 12°, 20°, 28° computed beside it. The frequency fixes the angle the energy makes with the horizontal — 30.0° here — because the restoring force is gravity and gravity is vertical, so the reflected beam must leave at that same angle whatever the wall is doing. Incident and reflected rays are therefore not mirror images, and the wavelength changes on reflection by sin(θ+α)/sin(θ−α). A flat floor gives one, checked exactly. A slope approaching the ray's own angle gives infinity, checked as the limit, and that is where a basin's internal tide is compressed until it breaks.

The reflection that changes the wavelength

An internal wave's frequency fixes the angle its energy makes with gravity, so a sloping wall cannot send it back the way a mirror would. The reflected beam leaves at the same angle to the vertical rather than the same angle to the wall, its wavelength changes by a factor that diverges when the slope matches the ray, and in a closed basin the changes accumulate until every ray in the fluid lies on one line.

6 figures · part 4 on Stratification

Astrophysics

Gravity read as geometry, and the laws carried where no laboratory can follow.

The quantity that went down, and the one that went up. The books for GW150914: two black holes of 36 and 29 solar masses merging into one of 62, with a final spin of 0.67. 3.0 solar masses left as gravitational waves, so the mass fell by 4.6 per cent. The total horizon area rose, from 107417 to 168330 in units of the Sun's gravitational radius squared — an increase of 57 per cent. The two progenitors are taken as non-spinning, which is the assumption that makes the test hardest to pass: a spinning hole of the same mass has a smaller horizon, so any spin they actually had would only widen the gap. Mass is the quantity that behaves the way energy usually does and it is not the one with a direction. Area is, and it is the reason the area has been read as an entropy ever since.

The area that is not allowed to shrink

Two black holes merge and the result weighs less than the sum, because three solar masses left as gravitational waves. The horizon area went up by more than half. Mass is the quantity that behaves like energy and it is not the one with a direction; area is, and the theorem saying so has been tested against a real merger.

5 figures · part 6 on Horizons $The height a clock can see. The fractional difference in rate between two clocks against how far apart in height they are, on logarithmic axes — a straight line of slope one, since the shift is gh/c² and comes to 1.09e-16 per metre near the ground. a caesium fountain, good to 1e-16, resolves 91.6 cm; an optical lattice clock, good to 1e-18, resolves 0.9 cm; the best clocks built, good to 8e-19, resolves 0.7 cm. The caesium fountains that define the second reach about a metre. The optical clocks that will replace them reach a centimetre, and the best of them a few millimetres. That is the whole of why this has stopped being a test of relativity and become a way of measuring the ground. A shift once so small that it took a Mössbauer experiment in a tower to see at all is now large enough to be a nuisance: two clocks in the same building disagree, and the disagreement has to be corrected for before either can be used to keep time.$

The clock that measures a height

A clock a metre higher runs faster by a part in ten thousand million million million. That was once so small it took a tower and a Mössbauer source to see; the best clocks now resolve a centimetre of height, at any distance, without a line of sight. What began as a test of general relativity has become a surveying instrument that measures the quantity surveying actually wants.

5 figures · part 3 on Gravitational redshift

Three centuries of finding nothing. The upper limit on η against the year it was set, on a logarithmic scale. Newton (1687) reached 1e-3; Bessel (1832) reached 2e-5; Eötvös (1922) reached 5e-9; Dicke (1964) reached 1e-11; Braginsky (1972) reached 1e-12; Eöt-Wash (2008) reached 2e-13; MICROSCOPE (2022) reached 1e-15. That is 12 orders of magnitude in 335 years, and every one of those measurements returned zero. A sequence of null results is not a sequence of failures. Each one is a statement that a principle assumed by every theory of gravity holds to a new level, and each new level excludes a class of theories that would have shown a departure there — a long-range force coupling to something other than mass-energy, a scalar partner to the graviton, a violation arising at some energy scale. The measurement is worth making again precisely because it has always come out the same way, which is what makes any departure decisive.

The fall that does not depend on what is falling

Everything falls at the same rate, and the statement has been tested for three hundred years by people looking for the exception. Twelve orders of magnitude have been added to the limit and every measurement has returned zero. The last three orders came not from a better instrument but from finding something bigger to fall towards.

5 figures · part 3 on Equivalence principle

One magnitude, and a direction that turns the wrong way. The force per unit area a magnetic field of 0.01 tesla exerts on a surface, drawn for surface normals at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90° to the field. The short grey arrows are the normals; the long coloured ones are the tractions. Every traction has the same length, 40 pascals, because the magnitude of T·n does not depend on the orientation of n at all — and the direction is the normal reflected in the field rather than carried round with it, so as the surface turns one way the force turns the other. A surface cutting across the field is pushed (the magnetic pressure); a surface cutting along it is pulled (the magnetic tension); and at 45° the traction lies in the surface, which is a shear and is neither.

The same force whichever way the surface faces

A magnetic field's stress is usually described as a pressure across the lines with a tension along them, as though it were two effects. It is one. The force per unit area is B²/2μ₀ on every surface however it is oriented, and only the direction changes — the surface normal reflected in the field, so that turning the surface one way turns the force the other. At 45° neither name applies.

6 figures · part 3 on Flux freezing

Three speeds, drawn against direction. The phase speed of the three magnetohydrodynamic waves against the angle between the wavevector and the field, drawn as a polar diagram with the field horizontal and the sound speed 0.6 times the Alfvén speed. Along the field the two magnetosonic branches take the values of the sound speed and the Alfvén speed themselves and swap which is which as the ratio crosses one; across the field the slow branch vanishes entirely and the fast branch runs at the quadrature sum. The shear branch is the figure-of-eight, v_A cos θ, and it is the only one of the three whose speed contains no thermodynamic quantity — no pressure, no temperature, no sound speed. It does not know what the gas is made of.

The wave that does not know what the gas is made of

Give the magnetic tension of a bent field line an inertia and it becomes a string. The wave that runs along it goes at the same speed at every wavelength, compresses nothing anywhere, and has a speed containing no temperature, no pressure and no sound speed — it is the only wave in classical physics that is indifferent to what the medium is. Its energy travels along the field whatever direction the wave was sent in.

6 figures · part 4 on Flux freezing

Every field · every reading path · every object named · every figure · what is taught wrongly · search