Seebeck effect — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The second experiment that cannot disagree
Heat one end of a wire and a voltage appears across it. Pass a current through the same wire at uniform temperature and it carries heat. Those are two different experiments with two different apparatus, and the coefficient in front is the same number in both — not approximately, and not for some materials. The reason is that the equations of motion underneath look the same run backwards.
An engine with one number in it
A thermoelectric couple has no moving part and no working fluid, and its efficiency is the Carnot value multiplied by a factor containing exactly one dimensionless group of material properties. Sixty years of effort have moved that group from about one to about two, and the reason it is hard is that its three ingredients are not independent: raising the conductivity ruins the coefficient it is squared against, and the only lever that is really free is the heat the lattice carries.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Carnot efficiencyConductivityCross effectDetailed balanceDopingEntropy productionFigure of meritHeat enginesIrreversibilityKelvin relationLinear responseMicroscopic reversibility