Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Resistivity — where it appears

A material's opposition to electric current per unit length and cross-section, the reciprocal of conductivity. In plasmas it is tiny but decisive: it sets how fast field lines can slip through the fluid and where reconnection and magnetic energy dissipation can occur.

Named by 6 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The field near a neutral point. Field lines near a magnetic null, traced by following the local field direction rather than plotted from the closed form. The field is B ∝ (y, k²x) with k = 1, whose lines are the hyperbolae y² − k²x² = constant and whose separatrices are the straight lines y = ±1x. At k = 1 the X is symmetric and the current density is exactly zero: the field is curl-free, and nothing is stored in it beyond the field itself. The four quadrants are four separate flux systems, and which of them a given line belongs to is the quantity a frozen-in field is not allowed to alter.

The knot the field cannot untie

A perfectly conducting fluid cannot change which field line joins which piece of it. So two flux systems pushed together may be squashed indefinitely and can never merge, and the energy of the squashing accumulates with nowhere to go. The release happens only where the perfect conductivity locally fails — in a sheet three metres thick inside a structure ten thousand kilometres across — and the rate that follows is a hundred thousand times too slow for the flares that are observed.

astrophysics · Flux freezing The field a pinch gives up relaxing into. The axial and azimuthal field across a cylinder of conducting plasma in the minimum-energy state at fixed helicity, Bz = J₀(λr) and Bθ = J₁(λr), drawn for λa = 1.5 and λa = 3. Solid lines are the axial field and dashed lines the azimuthal field. Both satisfy ∇×B = λB, checked by finite differences at three radii, so the current runs along the field everywhere and the field exerts no force on the plasma. At λa = 3 the axial field passes through zero at r = 0.802a and is reversed outside it. The reversal needs λa above 2.405, the first zero of J₀, and nothing was imposed at the edge to produce it. λa = 1.5: pinch parameter Θ = 0.75, reversal parameter F = 0.688. λa = 3: pinch parameter Θ = 1.50, reversal parameter F = -1.150.

The twist that outlives the turbulence

A plasma pinch driven hard enough goes violently unstable, and then settles into the same quiet state however it was started — with the field at its edge pointing backwards. The explanation is that turbulence destroys almost every constraint a perfect conductor obeys and spares one. The magnetic helicity, a measure of how twisted and linked the field is, decays far more slowly than the energy, and a field that has shed all the energy it can at fixed helicity has only one shape available to it.

astrophysics · Flux freezing Three shapes of film, one sheet resistance. Three thin films of the same material, of sheet resistance one ohm per square, with four small contacts on each edge labelled A to D in order. For each, the two readings van der Pauw's method takes — the voltage between D and C per unit current from A to B, and between A and D per unit current from B to C — computed by solving for the current flow on a fine grid. For a square, contacts at the corners: 0.221 and 0.221 Ω, giving 1.000 Ω per square; a disc, contacts unevenly spaced: 0.089 and 0.450 Ω, giving 0.999 Ω per square; an irregular lamina: 0.209 and 0.232 Ω, giving 0.999 Ω per square. The readings change with the shape and with where the contacts are; the sheet resistance recovered from them by exp(−πR₁/Rₛ) + exp(−πR₂/Rₛ) = 1 does not.

The sheet resistance that forgets the shape

To measure how well a thin film conducts, the obvious method is to cut it into a neat strip and pass a current along it. In 1958 Leo van der Pauw, an engineer at Philips, showed that the strip is unnecessary. Put four small contacts anywhere on the edge of a film of any shape, take two readings, and one equation returns the film's resistance per square — the shape and the spacing of the contacts drop out entirely. The proof is a single fact about logarithms and the maps that preserve angles, and it fails for exactly one kind of film: one with a hole in it.

electromagnetism · Conductors The ring where an axisymmetric field vanishes. Field lines of the slowest-decaying dipole field of a conducting sphere, drawn in a plane through its axis (the axis is the left edge, the sphere's surface the arc). Each line is a contour of the flux function, which is zero on the axis and at infinity and positive between, so it must have a maximum. Here the maximum is on the equator at 0.873 of the radius: there the lines shrink to a point, which in three dimensions is a ring round the axis on which the meridional field is exactly zero. 7 of the 11 drawn lines leave the sphere and close outside; the other 4 close inside, round the ring. The toroidal current that makes the field is not zero on the ring: it is 89 per cent of its largest value.

The field no symmetric flow can keep

The Earth's core would forget its magnetic field in about forty thousand years, and the field is at least three and a half thousand million years old, so something must be making it again all the time. The obvious candidate is the flow of liquid iron. In 1934 Thomas Cowling proved that the simplest version cannot work: no motion of a conductor, however fast or however arranged, can keep up a field that is symmetric about an axis. The reason is a single ring inside the field where the current it needs cannot be driven.

astrophysics · Flux freezing A ring pushed and pulled, and pushed a little more. Over two cycles of the alternating supply, for a ring whose reactance equals its resistance (ωL/R = 1): the flux through the ring (grey), which also sets the radial field that pushes the ring along the core; the voltage induced round the ring (dashed); the current, which lags that voltage by 45° because of the ring's own inductance (blue); and the force along the axis, current times radial field (red). The force pushes the ring away from the coil for part of each half-cycle and pulls it back for the rest; with the lag, the pushes outweigh the pulls, and the average (dotted) is 0.250 of the peak flux–current product. With no lag the pushes and pulls would cancel exactly. The ring jumps because its current is late.

The ring that jumps because its current is late

Slip an aluminium ring over the iron core of a coil, switch on the alternating current, and the ring leaps off the top. The usual explanation is Lenz's law: the ring's induced current opposes the change, so the ring is repelled. But an alternating field changes both ways every cycle, and an induced current that simply opposed the change would be pushed and pulled equally and stay put. The ring jumps only because its current runs late, held back by its own inductance — which is why a cooled ring jumps far higher and a ring with a saw cut through it does not move.

electromagnetism · Induction The resistance a pan offers the coil. The surface resistance — the square root of πfμρ — of five pan materials against frequency, on logarithmic axes, with the band where induction hobs work, 20 to 100 kHz, shaded. All five rise as the square root of the frequency. At 25 kHz carbon steel offers 9.9·10⁻⁴ Ω and ferritic stainless 0.0024 Ω, while austenitic stainless, which is not magnetic, offers 2.7·10⁻⁴ Ω, aluminium 5.1·10⁻⁵ Ω and copper 4.1·10⁻⁵ Ω. For the same coil current the heating goes as this resistance, so steel heats 19 times as hard as aluminium. Matching steel with aluminium by frequency alone would need 377 times the frequency — 9 MHz, where the hob's own electronics and coil would be the problem.

The pan a better conductor will not heat

An induction hob heats a pan with currents the pan carries itself, driven by a field oscillating twenty-five thousand times a second, and it will heat a cast-iron skillet furiously while an aluminium saucepan, which conducts electricity six times better, barely warms. The better conductor is the worse load. What a pan presents to the coil is a surface resistance that goes as the square root of permeability times resistivity, and on that measure iron beats aluminium twenty times over. The same arithmetic explains why kitchen foil on the same hob can catch fire, and why a steel tip heated this way switches itself off at a fixed temperature.

electromagnetism · Induction

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DissipationFlux freezingConductivityElectromagnetic inductionMagnetic energyMagnetic fluxMagnetic reconnectionPlasmaConformal mapContact resistanceCurie temperatureCurrent sheet

All concepts