Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Radiation — where it appears

Energy carried away by a field that has detached from its source and no longer depends on it. The distinguishing mark is the falloff: a field that belongs to a charge dies as the inverse square and one that has been radiated dies as the inverse first power, so its flux through a sphere is constant.

Named by 11 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

How long an orbit has before the waves take it. The time a circular orbit has left before gravitational radiation brings it together, against its separation, for four pairs of masses. Both axes are logarithmic and every curve has the same measured slope, 4.00: the lifetime goes as the fourth power of the separation, so halving an orbit shortens its remaining life by a factor of sixteen. The Earth's orbit is 13 decades above the age of the universe and the neutron-star binary is below it, which is the whole difference between a system that is losing energy and a system that is going to merge.

The orbit that has to shrink

Two masses in orbit radiate gravitational waves and lose energy, so the orbit tightens, so they go faster and radiate harder. The runaway takes 10²³ years for the Earth and the Sun and eight minutes for the last thousand kilometres of a black-hole pair — and the same one-line formula gives both.

astrophysics · Gravitational waves The shell of news, and the kink inside it. A charge that was moving at 0.6c to the right, stopped over a short interval, and has been at rest ever since. Outside the sphere of radius ct nothing has heard: the field there still points at the position the charge would have reached had it carried on, marked ahead of it. Inside, the field is that of a charge at rest. In between is a shell one deceleration-time thick, and across it the field line has to bend, because a field line cannot simply stop in empty space — the two ends are joined here to 8.5e-14 pixels. That bend is transverse to the radius, and it is the radiation. It is not an extra thing the charge emitted; it is the join between two static fields that do not line up, and it travels outward at c because that is where the news front is.

The field that points where the charge is now

The field here was set by what the charge was doing a distance over c ago, so it ought to point at where the charge used to be. For a charge moving steadily it points at where the charge is — not approximately, exactly — and nothing has outrun light. What breaks the arrangement is a change of motion, and the break is the whole of radiation.

electromagnetism · Retardation What a thermal camera reads off a shiny surface. The temperature a camera calibrated for a black body reports, against the emissivity of the surface it is pointed at, for surfaces truly at 323 K, 373 K, 473 K in a room at 293 K. Every curve begins at the true temperature when the emissivity is one and ends at the room's temperature when it is zero, because a surface that emits nothing reflects everything and the camera is then looking at the room. polished aluminium at 0.05 reads 312 K; stainless steel, oxidised at 0.8 reads 451 K; matt black paint at 0.95 reads 468 K; human skin at 0.98 reads 471 K for a surface truly at 473 K. That is not a fault in the instrument. It follows from Kirchhoff's law — a poor emitter is a poor absorber and therefore a good reflector — so the shortfall in a shiny surface's own glow is made up almost exactly by whatever is reflected in it, and no measurement of the light leaving a surface can separate the two without knowing the emissivity in advance.

The glow that says nothing about the surface

A thermal camera pointed at a saucepan of boiling water reads a hundred degrees. Pointed at a polished aluminium block at the same temperature it reads about twenty-five, and the instrument is working perfectly. What it is measuring is emissivity as much as temperature — and a surface's emissivity is forced to equal its absorptivity, at every wavelength and every angle, by an argument with no physics of matter in it at all.

thermodynamics · Blackbody The self-force matters at 6.27 × 10⁻²⁴ s, and nowhere a charge has ever been. The ratio of the radiation reaction to the applied force, which is τ divided by the time the force takes to change, on a logarithmic axis. τ = μ₀q²/6πmc = 6.266e-24 s for an electron, and light crosses 1.879 femtometres in that time — two thirds of the classical electron radius. a 3 GHz accelerating cavity: 1.9e-14; a 500 nm optical field: 3.8e-9; an electron orbiting a proton, ground state: 4.1e-8; an X-ray at 0.1 nm: 1.9e-5; over a classical electron radius: 6.7e-1. The largest of them, "over a classical electron radius", is still 1.5e+0 times too slow. So the correction is never large for any force anybody can apply, and the only regime where it would be is one in which the charge's own structure has already made the whole description meaningless.

The force a charge exerts on itself

Larmor's formula says how much an accelerating charge radiates and says nothing about who pays. Conservation says the charge does, so there is a force on it — and the equation that force produces has a free particle accelerating for ever with nothing pushing it, or else beginning to move before it is pushed. Both solutions are absurd, and the interval over which they are absurd is smaller than the electron the equation was written for.

astrophysics · Radiating charge The cross term, and the fact that it averages to nothing. The intensity of two waves of amplitude 1 and 0.7 added together, against the phase difference between them, in turns. A detector reads the square of the summed amplitude, which is the sum of the two intensities plus a cross term that swings between plus and minus twice the product. At no phase difference the reading is 2.89 and at half a turn it is 0.09; the flat line is what the two would give with no interference, 1.49, and it is exactly the average of the curve over a whole turn. Interference redistributes and does not create — which answers the question of where the energy goes at a dark fringe by saying that it never left.

What adding does to the energy

Waves add their amplitudes and detectors read squares, so two waves together do not deliver the sum of what each delivers. Where the two get dimmer, the natural question is where the energy went — and the answer depends entirely on whether the sources can feel each other.

waves · Superposition The power at stake, which is none. The power an electron radiates by Larmor's formula, against its acceleration, with 5 cases marked. a charge on a table: 9.8e+0 m/s², 5.49e-52 W; a laboratory centrifuge: 1.0e+6 m/s², 5.71e-42 W; a proton at the LHC: 1.9e+16 m/s², 2.06e-21 W; an electron in a linac: 2.0e+19 m/s², 2.28e-15 W; an electron in a hydrogen atom: 9.0e+22 m/s², 4.62e-8 W. The slope is two, measured on the drawn line. A charge held at one gravity radiates 5.49e-52 watts, which over the whole age of the universe comes to 2.39e-34 joules — far less than one photon of any kind. So the question of whether it radiates is not an experimental question about a charge on a table, and never has been. Every number here is a straight line on logarithmic axes with an exponent the figure measures.

Whether a charge on a table glows

The equivalence principle says a charge at rest in a gravitational field is a charge accelerating in empty space, and an accelerating charge radiates. Nothing is supplying the energy. The argument has run for eighty years, and its resolution is that radiation is not something a single observer can define.

astrophysics · Radiating charge Three terms, and one distance. The three terms of an oscillating dipole's electric field against distance, in units of a reciprocal wavenumber, both logarithmic. They fall as 1/u³, 1/u² and 1/u, so they are all equal at u = 1 — a distance of λ/2π, which is a property of the frequency and of nothing about the antenna. The heavy curve is the field the three actually add up to, and it is not their sum: the static and radiation terms are in antiphase and partly cancel, which is why the total dips below every one of them just inside the crossing before settling onto the 1/u the far field is made of.

The distance where a field changes its mind

An oscillating source has three fields around it, falling as the inverse cube, the inverse square and the inverse first power of distance. They are all equal at one radius, and that radius is the wavelength over 2π — a number containing nothing about the source at all. Inside it a source mostly stores energy; outside it, mostly loses it, and the two behaviours are different technologies rather than different strengths.

electromagnetism · Retardation What a row of sources does that one cannot. The pattern of 8 identical sources in a row, spaced 0.5 wavelengths apart, all driven in phase. Each source alone radiates the same in every direction drawn here; together they radiate almost entirely along one. The sum being performed is the sum over path differences across the row, which is the sum a diffraction grating performs over its slits — the same function with the same first null, at sin θ = 1/Nd, measured here off the curve. What has been exploited is retardation: the contributions arrive at different times, and the pattern is a map of where they arrive in step.

When the source is not heard all at once

The dipole approximation is not a statement that a source is small. It is a statement that every part of it is heard at the same retarded time, and dropping that assumption turns one source into a sum over a source. The sum is the same one a diffraction grating performs over its slits, with the same first null and the same extra orders — so a phased array and a grating are one piece of arithmetic met twice.

electromagnetism · Retardation Two solutions, and nothing in the equations to choose between them. A spherical pulse leaving a point and a spherical pulse arriving at one, each drawn at three times 0.35, 0.6, 0.85 in units where the speed is one. Both are exact solutions of the same wave equation, which is checked here by differencing the drawn samples twice in space and twice in time and requiring the residual to vanish for each. The one on the left is what is always used; the one on the right is discarded, and the equations do not do the discarding. The incoming pulse grows as it converges for the same reason the outgoing one decays as it spreads — the same energy through a smaller sphere — and it is as consistent with conservation as its mirror image is.

The solution that is thrown away

Maxwell's equations admit a field that converges on a charge exactly as readily as one that leaves it, and nothing in them prefers either. Retardation is a boundary condition rather than a law. Which boundary condition is right has been argued about for a century, one of the answers makes the arrow of time a property of there being absorbers, and the laboratory version of the question — whether an atom emits at all — has a measured answer that depends on what is listening.

electromagnetism · Retardation All of flat spacetime in a diamond. The whole of flat spacetime with one space dimension, squeezed into a finite diamond by applying arctan separately to the two light-cone coordinates u = t − x and v = t + x. Solid curves are the worldlines of observers at rest at x = −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3; faint curves are the instants t equal to the same values; the dashed lines are the two light rays through the origin, still at 45°, as every light line is — checked to a part in a billion — and the causal order of 4000 sampled pairs is unchanged. Infinity is not one place. Every worldline at rest runs from the bottom corner i⁻ to the top corner i⁺; every instant runs between the side corners i⁰; and light rays begin on the lower edges ℐ⁻ and end on the upper edges ℐ⁺. Each of these limits is checked at ten million units out.

The five places infinity turns out to be

Flat spacetime goes on for ever in every direction, and it can still be drawn whole on a page. Squeeze each family of light rays with a function that keeps their order and the infinite plane becomes a diamond with every light cone still at 45°. The price is distance, which the picture no longer shows. What it shows instead is that infinity is not one place: observers slower than light all end at a single point, instants end at another, and light ends along a whole edge of its own.

relativity · Spacetime diagram The ring does not come back. A ring of freely floating masses at four phases of a passing gravitational wave and once after it has gone. The first four are the familiar picture: stretched one way, then the other, with the area unchanged. The fifth is the one the standard picture does not draw — the ring is permanently deformed, by 25 per cent of the largest deformation the wave itself produced, and nothing brings it back. The masses are not oscillating about a new centre; they are at rest, at new separations. Both the oscillation and the offset are exaggerated enormously: the real strain at 440 megaparsecs is 9.9e-22 and the real permanent offset is 2.5e-22, so the drawing magnifies both by about 2e+20. What is honest in the picture is the ratio between them.

The ring that does not come back

Every picture of a passing gravitational wave shows a ring of free masses stretched, squeezed and let go. The last frame is wrong. The ring ends a different shape — permanently, with the masses at rest at new separations — by about a fifth of the largest distortion the wave itself produced. What sources the offset is the energy the wave carried away, so the wave is remembering itself, and nobody has measured it.

astrophysics · Gravitational waves

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

CausalityDipole radiationRetardationAccelerationLarmor formulaEnergyEnergy conservationGravitational wavesInterferenceThe inverse-square lawMeasurementPoynting vector

All concepts