Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Mutual inductance — where it appears

The magnetic flux through one circuit per unit current in another, the same whichever circuit carries the current. The force between two circuits is the current product times the rate at which their mutual inductance changes with position.

Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Two loops, two calculations, one number. The coupling between a circular loop of radius 10 cm and a rectangle of 5 by 3 cm tilted at 35° and offset sideways, against how far apart they are along the axis. The two loops differ in area by a factor of 21 and in shape entirely. Two quantities are plotted and they lie on top of one another. One is the flux through the rectangle when a current runs in the circle, obtained by integrating the circle's Biot–Savart field over the rectangle's tilted surface. The other is the flux through the circle's disc when the same current runs in the rectangle, integrated over a disc a hundred times the area. Nothing is shared between the two calculations except the positions of the wires, and they agree to 0.075 per cent — a difference which is the quadrature's, not the physics's. This is reciprocity, and it is not obvious: there is no reason from the geometry why a small loop should catch as much of a big one's field as the big one catches of the small one's. It follows from the double line integral the two quantities can both be reduced to, which is symmetric in the two loops — and that reduction is the argument, not this figure, which is the check that the argument is true of the actual fields.

The coupling that is the same both ways

A small loop and a large one catch the same fraction of each other's field. Nothing in the geometry suggests it — one has twenty-one times the area of the other — and the two quantities are computed here by two integrals with nothing in common, over two surfaces of different shapes, agreeing to seven parts in ten thousand.

electromagnetism · Induction Two pieces of current that one law makes push each other unequally. Two short elements of current a unit distance apart: element 1 pointing along the line joining them, element 2 at 45° to it. Left, the forces by the law that follows from Biot and Savart (Grassmann's): element 1 pushes nothing on element 2, because 1 points straight at it, while element 2 pushes on element 1 with a force of 0.71 units at right angles to it; the pair would feel a net 0.71 units. Right, the forces by Ampère's own law of 1826: 0.71 units each, along the line joining the elements, equal and opposite. Both laws give the same force between any two complete circuits, so no experiment on closed circuits can say which is right.

The force between pieces of a current

Ampère spent six years finding the force one short piece of current exerts on another, and the law he found is not the one used today. The modern law, which follows from the Biot–Savart field, disagrees with his for almost every pair of pieces — his obeys Newton's third law and the modern one does not. Both give exactly the same force between any two complete circuits, which is the only thing that has ever been measured. The force between two pieces of current is a quantity with two correct values, because a piece of current on its own does not exist.

electromagnetism · Ampere law

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Ampere lawAmperes force lawAntennaBiot–SavartBiot savart lawCurrent elementFaraday's lawField momentumInductanceLinearityMagnetic fluxNeumann formula

All concepts