Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Isotope separation — where it appears

Sorting the atoms of one element by mass, using a property that differs slightly between isotopes, such as effusion speed or settling in a centrifuge. The differences are tiny, so the work is done in many stages in series, and its energy cost is what the methods compete on.

Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The gas that leaves is not the gas inside. The distribution of molecular speeds inside a container at 300 K and in the beam that escapes through a small hole in it, each normalised to its own peak. They are not the same distribution. A molecule's chance of reaching the hole in a given time is proportional to how fast it is going, so the beam carries one more factor of speed than the gas does — v³ rather than v² times the Boltzmann factor — and the beam is therefore faster and hotter than what it came from. The mean speed inside is 476 m/s and in the beam 561 m/s, a ratio of 1.1781 against the exact 3π/8; and the mean kinetic energy is 1.500 kT inside against 2.000 kT in the beam, which are exactly 3/2 and 2. That difference is not a subtlety. A molecular beam made by effusion has a temperature, in the sense of a mean energy, a third higher than its source; a gas slowly leaking from a container leaves the remainder cooler than it would be if a fair sample had gone; and every calculation of a rate through an aperture that uses the bulk distribution is wrong by this factor.

The gas that leaves is not the gas inside

Put a small hole in a container of gas and what comes out is faster and hotter than what stays behind — its mean kinetic energy is 2kT against the 3/2 kT of the gas it came from. Nothing has heated it. A fast molecule simply reaches the hole more often than a slow one, so the sample that escapes is biased by exactly one factor of speed, and every consequence of effusion is that factor.

thermodynamics · Kinetic theory A gas pressed against the wall of a spinning tube. The density of uranium hexafluoride gas in a rotor spinning at a steady rate, relative to its density on the axis, on a logarithmic scale, against the distance from the axis as a fraction of the radius, for wall speeds of 300, 450 and 600 m/s at 300 K. In the turning frame the gas sits in the centrifugal potential −½mω²r² and settles into the same exponential that thins the atmosphere with height: n ∝ exp(mω²r²/2kT). At 600 m/s the density at the wall is e^25.4 — about 10¹¹ — times that on the axis; at 300 m/s, e^6.4. Almost all the gas lies in a thin layer against the wall, and the middle of the rotor is close to vacuum.

The spin that sorts by a difference of mass

In a spinning tube a gas settles against the wall the way the atmosphere settles towards the ground, with an exponential whose scale is set by the rotor's speed rather than by gravity. Heavier molecules settle more steeply, and the ratio of two isotopes changes from axis to wall by a factor that depends on the difference of their masses, not on the ratio. That one change from a ratio to a difference is why a spinning rotor separates uranium-235 from uranium-238 more than fifty times as strongly per stage as the porous barriers that first did it — and why the history of the machine is a history of how fast a material can turn before it flies apart.

mechanics · Circular motion

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

EffusionBoltzmann distributionCentrifugal forceFluxGrahams lawHoop stressKnudsen numberMaxwell boltzmannMean free pathRotating frameSedimentation equilibriumSeparation factor

All concepts