Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Inertial frame — where it appears

A frame in which a body free of forces moves in a straight line at constant speed, and in which no fictitious terms are needed. Any frame moving steadily with respect to one is another, which is why there is no experiment that identifies a state of absolute rest.

Named by 3 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

One puck, two frames. A puck slides outward from the centre of a turntable at 1.4 m/s across a table of radius 1 m, which turns through 0.55 of a revolution in the 0.71 seconds the crossing takes. On the left, in the room: a straight line, because no force acts along it. On the right, on the turntable: a spiral, because the coordinates turned underneath it. The two panels are the same numbers with the same clock — the second is the first with the angle rotated by −Ωt — so whatever is bending the path on the right is arithmetic, and it is still worth a name, because on a turning planet the right-hand panel is the one everybody lives in.

The forces that are not there

Writing Newton's law in a frame that is turning produces three extra terms. Nothing was added to the world to make them appear and nothing is removed by calling them fictitious — one of them flattens the planet, one of them turns the weather, and both are computable to four figures.

mechanics · Circular motion How large a box may be before gravity shows in it. The largest freely falling laboratory in which nothing can be detected, against how long the experiment runs, for an instrument resolving 10⁻⁹ m. Free fall removes the field and leaves the gradient: two masses released a distance apart converge across the fall and separate along it, by (GM/r³)Lt²/2, so the box that stays undetectably flat shrinks as the square of the time. At one second the limits are 1.30 mm at the Earth's surface, 5.07 mm at the Sun's surface, 8.61 nm at a white dwarf, 1.86·10⁻¹⁷ m at a neutron star, 3.88·10⁻¹⁷ m at a stellar black hole, 388 mm at a giant black hole. Two things are worth reading off it. The equivalence principle is local in time as much as in space, on the same footing and with a worse exponent — patience is more expensive than room. And the tidal parameter GM/r³ falls with mass at a horizon, so a large enough black hole is one an experimenter could fall through with a metre-sized laboratory and a very good interferometer and detect nothing at all: the curve for the giant lies above the Earth's, not below it.

The term free fall cannot remove

Fall freely and gravity disappears. It disappears only to the extent that the falling laboratory is small — what survives is the gradient, which pulls two released masses together across the fall and apart along it. Given an instrument, the size of the box in which nothing is detectable is computable, and that number is the whole content of the word "locally".

astrophysics · Equivalence principle One expression over 3 decades of area times rate. Sagnac time difference against the product of enclosed area and rotation rate, both logarithmic. The relation Δt = 4AΩ/c² is linear in that product — the fitted slope of the drawn points is 1.0000 — and it contains no refractive index, no shape of the loop and no position of the axis inside it. a 1 km fibre gyroscope on a 10 cm coil: 1.62e-19 s, 3.14e-5 fringes; Sagnac's own ring, 1913: 4.84e-17 s, 0.0666 fringes against a reported 0.07; a laboratory turntable at one revolution a second: 6.99e-17 s, 0.0331 fringes; Michelson and Gale, 1925: 4.50e-16 s, 0.2364 fringes against a reported 0.23. Michelson and Gale's rectangle in Illinois is the one that carries the check: 0.236 fringes predicted from its own dimensions and the vertical component of the Earth's rotation at its latitude, and 0.230 reported.

The ring where the two beams disagree

Send light both ways round a closed loop on a turntable and the two beams come back at different times, by 4AΩ/c² — an expression with no refractive index in it, no shape of the loop and no position of the axis. The same number is what a set of clocks round the rim fails to close by, which is the sharper statement — on a rotating platform there is no global simultaneity to be had.

relativity · Simultaneity

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Rotating frameAngular velocityCentrifugal forceClock synchronisationCoordinate timeCoriolis forceEquivalence principleFalloff exponentFictitious forceFoucault pendulumFree fallGeodesic deviation

All concepts