Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Identical particles — where it appears

Particles of the same kind that no measurement can tell apart, such as two electrons. Their joint quantum state must be unchanged or change sign when two are exchanged, which gives bosons and fermions and the exclusion principle.

Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The hole that holds exactly one particle. How likely a second particle is to be found a distance away from a first, relative to a gas with no correlation at all, for three cases that differ in nothing but the symmetry of the state under swapping the two labels. There is no interaction anywhere in this calculation: no Coulomb term, no potential, no force. Distinguishable particles give a flat line, which is what no interaction ought to give. Identical fermions dig a hole that reaches exactly zero at zero separation and fills back in over about a wavelength. Identical bosons do the opposite and pile up to twice the density. Integrating the fermion hole gives 0.9992 particles missing from around each one — exactly one, and the sum rule holds at any density, because raising the density narrows the hole in exact proportion. That is what makes the effect worth a name of its own. It is often called an exchange force and it is not a force: nothing carries momentum between the particles, and no term in the energy is proportional to a distance. It is a statement about which states exist. What follows from it is most of chemistry — the reason two atoms with filled shells repel, the reason a metal's electrons cost so much less Coulomb energy than a random arrangement would, and the reason matter takes up room.

The force with no force in it

Two identical fermions keep apart and two identical bosons crowd together, and neither is being pushed. The Hamiltonian contains no interaction at all: what produces the hole and the pile is which many-particle states exist, and the hole it digs around each electron holds exactly one particle at any density whatever.

quantum · Exclusion Three identical quarks in one state, and the label that rescues them. The Δ⁺⁺ particle, mass 1,232 MeV and charge +2, drawn as the quark model describes it: three up quarks, all in the lowest orbital state, all with their spins pointing the same way, giving spin 3/2. Left: with nothing else to tell them apart, the state is unchanged by swapping any two quarks — symmetric in where they are, in their spins and in their flavour — which the exclusion principle forbids for identical fermions. Right: give each quark a label that takes three values, and put the three in the one combination of the three values that changes sign under every swap. The whole state is then antisymmetric, as it must be, and the particle is allowed. The label is called colour, and three is the smallest number of values that can do this for three quarks.

The label three identical quarks forced

In 1964 the quark model had one embarrassment it could not explain away. A particle called the Δ⁺⁺, well measured and entirely ordinary, had to be three identical up quarks in the same state with their spins pointing the same way — which the exclusion principle forbids outright. The way out was to give quarks a hidden property that takes three values, so that the three could be different after all. Nobody could see the property, and for years it looked like a bookkeeping trick. Then three independent measurements counted it, and every one came out at three. The exclusion principle, which keeps electrons in shells, had predicted the colour of the strong force.

quantum · Exclusion Fringes that identical nuclei add. The cross-section for two identical spinless nuclei repelling each other, divided by the classical answer — the Rutherford counts for the nucleus hit and the nucleus thrown, added — against the scattering angle in the centre-of-mass frame, for Sommerfeld parameters η = 1, 4 and 16 (η is half the closest approach in units of the wavelength over 2π). Because the detector cannot tell which nucleus it caught, the two amplitudes add before squaring, and the cross term oscillates in angle: at 90° the two paths are mirror images and the rate is exactly twice the classical one at every energy. Between 30° and 90° the curve completes about 2 oscillations for η = 4 and 7 for η = 16 — their number grows in proportion to η, which is to say in proportion to 1/ħ.

The scattering quantum mechanics returns unchanged

Rutherford worked out how alpha particles bounce off a nucleus by treating them as tiny planets on hyperbolic orbits, two years before Bohr's atom and fifteen before quantum mechanics. He had no right to be exactly correct, and he was: the full quantum calculation returns his formula without a single correction, at every energy. Coulomb's force is the one force for which that happens. Make the two nuclei identical, though, and quantum mechanics adds fringes no orbit can produce — doubling the rate at right angles for one kind of particle and halving it for the other.

quantum · Correspondence

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

AntisymmetryBaryonsBosonClassical limitColour chargeCorrespondence principleCoulomb forceCovalent bondCross-sectionExchange holeExchange interactionExclusion principle

All concepts