Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Hyperbolic motion — where it appears

Motion at constant proper acceleration, whose worldline is a hyperbola in spacetime rather than a parabola. The traveller never reaches the speed of light, acquires a horizon behind them at a distance c²/a, and ages by a proper time proportional to the rapidity gained.

Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

How far a 1-gravity ship gets, against its own clock. The distance covered by a ship accelerating steadily at 1 gravity for half the trip and braking for the other half, against the time on its own clock, on a logarithmic vertical axis. The curve is a cosine hyperbolic and therefore an exponential once the ship is relativistic, which it is after about a year: Proxima Centauri in 3.5 shipboard years, Sirius in 4.6 shipboard years, the Pleiades in 11.9 shipboard years, the galactic centre in 19.8 shipboard years, Andromeda in 28.6 shipboard years. Nothing about this violates anything. The speed never reaches c — it is the hyperbolic tangent of the rapidity and after 3.5 years it is 0.9495 at turnover — and every one of those journeys takes slightly more than the distance in years as measured from home. What is growing exponentially is not the speed but the length contraction, and the traveller's honest description of the trip is that the distance shrank. The rapidity is what accumulates steadily: it grows by one unit every 0.969 years of shipboard time, for ever, with no ceiling anywhere in the arithmetic. That is the whole reason the numbers come out survivable, and the reason the fuel does not.

The ship that never arrives at c

Accelerate at one gravity and never stop. The speed creeps toward light and never reaches it, and meanwhile the galactic centre is twenty shipboard years away and Andromeda twenty-nine. What makes the journey survivable is that rapidity has no ceiling; what makes it impossible is that the fuel goes as the exponential of the same quantity.

relativity · Accelerated frames The turnaround, made gentler and gentler, and the difference that does not move. A round trip to a star 4 light-years away at 0.6c, with the turnaround done at nine different accelerations from a tenth of a gravity to a thousand. The upper curve is the age difference between the twins and the lower one is how much of that difference the turnaround itself contributes. At 0.1 g the turn accounts for 51 per cent of it; at 1000 g it accounts for 0.00 per cent, and it keeps falling. The total does not follow it down: it tends to 2.67 years, which is what the instantaneous-turnaround cartoon gives. So the acceleration is not what makes the twins differ. It is what makes one twin's path the bent one, and a bent path through spacetime is shorter for the same reason a bent path on a map is longer — but the amount is in the legs, not in the corner, and the corner's contribution can be made as small as anyone likes without the difference going away.

The clock that does not feel the turn

Proper time is the integral of dt over gamma, which presumes that a clock's rate depends on its speed and on nothing else — not on its acceleration, not on how long it has been accelerating. That is an assumption about clocks rather than a theorem about spacetime, and the twin result is empty without it.

relativity · Accelerated frames Radiated while the push holds, paid for when it stops. The power a charge radiates, the power the radiation reaction force takes from its motion, and the rate of change of the Schott term mτ a·v, through a push that rises over the first 20 per cent of its duration, holds steady, and falls away over the last 20, in units of mτa₀² where a₀ is the steady acceleration. Radiated power is a², the reaction force's take is −ȧv, and the Schott rate is found by differencing a·v along the trajectory; at every instant the first equals the sum of the other two. While the push is steady the reaction force is exactly zero and the charge still radiates at the full rate, all of it drawn from the Schott term. When the push stops, ȧ is large and negative while the charge is moving fast, and the reaction force takes 0.775 units, more than the 0.750 radiated over the whole push. The difference is what it handed back while the push was starting: then the charge is still slow, the reaction force points along the rising acceleration, and it does 0.025 units of work on the charge instead of taking any. The totals agree to a part in a hundred thousand.

The bill that arrives when the pushing stops

A charge accelerating steadily radiates at the full Larmor rate while the radiation reaction force on it is exactly zero, so for as long as the push holds, nothing about the charge's motion pays a single watt. The energy is lent by the field that travels with the charge, the loan is called the Schott term, and it is repaid the moment the acceleration changes.

astrophysics · Radiating charge

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Proper accelerationProper timeTime dilationAccelerated framesAccelerationClock hypothesisEnergy conservationExperimental boundIdeal clockLarmor formulaLength contractionLocal lorentz frame

All concepts