Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

De broglie wavelength — where it appears

Planck's constant divided by a particle's momentum, the length at which its wave nature becomes visible in interference. It is 10⁻³⁴ metres for a thrown ball and a tenth of a nanometre for a slow electron, which is why one diffracts off a crystal and the other does not.

Named by 7 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The dip that decides it. Two equally bright points seen through a circular aperture, their Airy patterns added, at 0.7, 1, 1.6 times the Rayleigh separation. Below each is the depth of the dip between the peaks, measured off the drawn sum: 0.0%, 26.5%, 91.6%. At exactly the Rayleigh separation the dip is 26.5% — the criterion is a convention about how much of a dip a detector can see, not a threshold anything crosses. Below it the two peaks merge into one and the pair is gone; above it the answer was never in doubt.

How far apart two things have to be

An instrument's ability to tell two things apart is not set by the quality of its glass. It is set by the width of the hole light comes through, by a factor that is the first zero of a Bessel function — and the threshold everyone quotes is a convention laid over a computed dip of 26.5 per cent.

optics · Diffraction Two costs, and the width that balances them. The energy of a particle in a harmonic well against how tightly its wavefunction is squeezed, in units of ħω and of the width that minimises the total. Two terms compete. Squeezing the particle into a smaller region raises its kinetic energy, because the uncertainty relation makes a narrow position spread a wide momentum spread and momentum is squared in the energy; that term rises as the inverse square of the width and goes to infinity as the particle is localised. Letting it spread out raises its potential energy, since the well gets steeper away from the bottom; that term rises as the square of the width. The sum has a minimum at a width of 1.0000 in these units, where the total is 0.5000 ħω and the two terms are equal at a quarter each. That number is exactly the true ground-state energy of a quantum harmonic oscillator, obtained here with nothing but the uncertainty relation and a minimisation. What the figure shows and the formula does not is why there is a floor at all: it is not that the particle happens to keep moving, but that every way of stopping it costs more than it saves.

The motion that cannot be stopped

A particle in a well cannot sit at the bottom of it. Squeezing it into a smaller region costs kinetic energy faster than it saves potential energy, so there is a width that minimises the total — and the minimum is not zero. Helium never freezes because of it.

quantum · Uncertainty 14 decades of fluid, and a floor none of them reaches. The ratio of viscosity to entropy density for 8 substances, in units of the proposed lower bound, on a logarithmic axis. The quantity is a viscosity divided by how much entropy a cubic metre of the substance holds, and it has the dimensions of Planck's constant over Boltzmann's — so a bound on it is a statement with no material properties in it at all. The span here is a factor of 1.6e+14, from pitch at 20 °C at the top to the quark–gluon plasma at the bottom, which sits a factor of 1.6 above the floor. The values marked as computed are worked out from a viscosity and a tabulated entropy; the rest are quoted from the compilations, because a minimum along an isobar is an inference from many measurements rather than a single one.

Whether a fluid can be made arbitrarily thin

Viscosity has no units anybody would call fundamental, and nothing obviously stops it being as small as you like. Divide it by the entropy in a cubic metre and the units become Planck's constant over Boltzmann's — and a conjecture from 2005 says that ratio has a floor. Across fourteen decades of ordinary fluid nothing has been measured below it, the closest thing to it is the hottest matter ever made, and a kinetic-theory argument reaches the same number from the opposite direction.

fluids · Viscosity No beam is narrow enough and wide enough at once. Three lengths at the far end of a Stern-Gerlach magnet 10 centimetres long with a gradient of 1000 tesla a metre, against the width of the beam entering it, for an electron at 100 electronvolts. The spin splitting is a horizontal line at 2.9e-6 metres: it does not depend on the beam's width. The Lorentz blurring rises in proportion to the width, because the field a particle sees depends on where in the beam it is, and the divergence-free condition ties a gradient in one component to a gradient in another. It overtakes the splitting at 1.0e-9 metres. Narrower than that and diffraction has already spread the beam by 3.9e-3 metres, which is larger still. There is no width at which the splitting is the largest of the three, and the magnet's length and gradient cancel out of the comparison entirely — so no magnet helps.

The experiment that defines spin and cannot be done on it

A Stern–Gerlach magnet separates magnetic moments and is how spin was discovered. It cannot be made to work on a free electron, and the obstruction is not the apparatus: the field gradient that splits the beam also deflects the charge by an amount that varies across it, and the ratio of the splitting to that blurring comes out as the de Broglie wavelength over the beam width — with the magnet's length and gradient cancelling exactly.

quantum · Spin Only a slow grating sends everything one way. The largest fraction of particles, arriving at Bragg's angle, that a standing light wave can put into the first diffracted order, choosing the wave's depth freely, against how long it acts, in units of ħ divided by the two-kick recoil energy, on a logarithmic axis. A brief pulse acts as a thin phase grating and can put at most 33.9 per cent into that order (dashed), the Raman–Nath limit, spreading the rest over the others. A pulse lasting longer than a few units has time to notice that only one exchange conserves energy, and can put nearly all of it there: 99.9 per cent at the longest time drawn. The same distinction between thin and thick gratings decides whether sound in a crystal diffracts light into many orders or one.

The grating made of light

A diffraction grating is ordinarily made of matter and diffracts light. In 1933 Pyotr Kapitza and Paul Dirac proposed the opposite: a standing wave of light, whose bright and dark bands repeat every half wavelength, should diffract a beam of electrons. It took fifty-three years to see the effect with atoms and sixty-eight to see it with electrons, because a free electron barely notices light. The grating works by momentum: it can only change a particle's motion in whole pairs of photon kicks. A brief flash scatters particles into a spread of orders in proportions fixed by Bessel functions; a slow, gentle one sends every particle one way, which is how laser light became the mirrors and beam splitters of atom interferometers.

quantum · Matter waves Three cylinders that focus electrons. An einzel lens: three coaxial tubes of radius R, the outer two at the potential the electrons arrived with and the centre one, 2R long, at 4 times it. Electrons enter from the left parallel to the axis at five heights, from 0.1R to 0.7R, and are traced through the field without approximation. In each gap the equipotentials bulge between the tubes, and an electron crossing them is refracted as at a curved glass surface: pushed towards the axis where the potential is low and away from it where the potential is high. It is slower where it is pushed inward, so it spends longer there, and each gap converges on balance; the electron leaves with the speed it came in with. The rays cross the axis at 4.00R, 3.92R, 3.78R, 3.56R, 3.25R beyond the lens centre: the outer ones are bent too much and cross first, which is spherical aberration.

The voltage that bends an electron like glass

An electron that has fallen through a potential difference V moves at a speed proportional to √V. Crossing a surface of constant potential, it keeps the part of its momentum that runs along the surface and changes the part across it, and the two rules together are Snell's law with √V in place of the refractive index. Every arrangement of charged electrodes is therefore a piece of glass for electrons. Three metal tubes make a lens that focuses whichever way its middle tube is charged — and, by a theorem proved in 1936, no lens built from round electrodes can be free of spherical aberration. That theorem kept electron microscopes some fifty times coarser than their wavelength for sixty years.

electromagnetism · Potential The readings of the moving clocks along one instant: a wave. The cosine of each moving clock's phase, read along a single laboratory instant, against position in light-periods of the clock, for clocks moving at 0.3c, 0.6c, 0.85c. The readings make a wave whose wavelength, measured from the drawing, is 3.18, 1.33, 0.62 light-periods: c²/(γvν₀), shrinking as the clocks move faster. For a clock that ticks at its rest energy over Planck's constant, ν₀ = mc²/h, that is h/γmv — de Broglie's wavelength, h over the momentum. Nothing about waves was assumed: only clocks, synchronised where they rest, read from a frame in which they move.

The wave a row of moving clocks leaves on an instant

Line up identical clocks, synchronise them where they stand, and send the whole row past a laboratory at a steady speed. On any one laboratory instant the clocks do not agree: the ones further ahead read less, by an amount that grows steadily along the row. The readings form a wave laid out in space, its crests are the moving row's instants, and they sweep along faster than light. Give each clock the frequency of its rest energy and the wavelength is exactly h/p. De Broglie's matter wave began, in 1923, as an argument about the relativity of simultaneity.

relativity · Simultaneity

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DiffractionUncertainty principleAiry patternAngular resolutionApertureBeamBohr magnetonBoundBragg conditionComplementarityCompton wavelengthConjecture

All concepts